The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I may be over thinking this, but the following problem is giving me a headache, I'm not trying to get anyone to do this for me, but hints in the right direction would be greatly appreciated....Maybe I'm overlooking some simple law/rule that will make this easy...
"Find a function such that f(a+b) = f(a)f(b) Why does your function satisfy this condition?"
I've toyed around with a variety of functions and methods and can't seem to get anything that will cause these to equal each other. Thanks in advance for any help.
There are two, they're both very very simple. I dunno about a good hint, but think about functions and are they distributive or associative or any of that stuff?
enlightenedbum on
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
Unfortunately, this question isn't terribly "hintable" (just giving you the answer wouldn't help you on a future test or such). Try to think of rules you may know for breaking up a sum. For example, the distributive property says that 2 * (3 + 5) = 2 * 3 + 2*5. That's not what you're looking for, since that turns into addition instead of multiplication.
Do you know any other similar rules for other operations?
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
You're doing quite a good job of finding the pathological (by which I mean fun) examples. I suspect the person who wrote the problem has a specific type of answer in mind (namely, a non-constant function) which requires more math but isn't as cool.
You're doing quite a good job of finding the pathological (by which I mean fun) examples. I suspect the person who wrote the problem has a specific type of answer in mind which requires more math but isn't as cool.
Edit: you too, Virum.
The complicated answers make me think of group theory and I don't want to think about that, so I say aim him towards the fun ones.
enlightenedbum on
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
You're doing quite a good job of finding the pathological (by which I mean fun) examples. I suspect the person who wrote the problem has a specific type of answer in mind which requires more math but isn't as cool.
Edit: you too, Virum.
Well now I'm all excited.
One thing about maths is I find the idea of it usually pretty cool, I just suffer at the execution.
That's why I'm trying out data mining programs. All the fun, none of the programming of equations
I'm looking forward to what this thread ends up with!
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
You're doing quite a good job of finding the pathological (by which I mean fun) examples. I suspect the person who wrote the problem has a specific type of answer in mind which requires more math but isn't as cool.
Edit: you too, Virum.
The complicated answers make me think of group theory and I don't want to think about that, so I say aim him towards the fun ones.
In this case, group theory is ridiculous overkill. So's calculus, complex analysis, and anything else that's beyond pre-calc. Sheesh.
You're doing quite a good job of finding the pathological (by which I mean fun) examples. I suspect the person who wrote the problem has a specific type of answer in mind which requires more math but isn't as cool.
Edit: you too, Virum.
The complicated answers make me think of group theory and I don't want to think about that, so I say aim him towards the fun ones.
In this case, group theory is ridiculous overkill. So's calculus, complex analysis, and anything else that's beyond pre-calc. Sheesh.
I've been restudying for the GRE math lately. Group theory comes up a lot.
enlightenedbum on
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
0
SmasherStarting to get dizzyRegistered Userregular
edited January 2009
You're looking for a function where adding a small value to the input results in a multiplicative increase in the output. Also, f(a+0) = f(a)f(0) which means f(0) = 1. What class of functions fits those criteria?
Edit: Guess I should have refreshed before posting. In any case it should work for any base (other than 0), not just e.
Posts
f(x) = x/x
That's my guess anyway.
Do you know any other similar rules for other operations?
Second one of those functions isn't defined at 0.
Rats :x
You're doing quite a good job of finding the pathological (by which I mean fun) examples. I suspect the person who wrote the problem has a specific type of answer in mind (namely, a non-constant function) which requires more math but isn't as cool.
Edit: you too, Virum.
The complicated answers make me think of group theory and I don't want to think about that, so I say aim him towards the fun ones.
Well now I'm all excited.
One thing about maths is I find the idea of it usually pretty cool, I just suffer at the execution.
That's why I'm trying out data mining programs. All the fun, none of the programming of equations
I'm looking forward to what this thread ends up with!
Shush, he didn't want an answer.
In this case, group theory is ridiculous overkill. So's calculus, complex analysis, and anything else that's beyond pre-calc. Sheesh.
I've been restudying for the GRE math lately. Group theory comes up a lot.
This would result in the first side (a+b) equaling e^(a+b) and the second side being (e^a)(e^b) which by the rules of exponents should be equal.
Am I thinking about this correctly? All the help is appreciated.
Edit: Guess I should have refreshed before posting. In any case it should work for any base (other than 0), not just e.
e^x is much more elegant and nontrivial though.