Some people here didn't like the movie because they had a hard time watching it with their noses stuck up in the air.
seriously people who completely could not enjoy this movie are dumb
and need to get their heads out of their asses
hard to see a movie with your innards blocking your view
My head was neither up my ass nor my nose in the air and I did not like this movie.
I wanted to LOVE this movie, but it felt disjointed and dragged to hell and back. The pacing was bad and the needless gore and sex was just that, needless. The battles were the same thing we have been seeing in almost every superhero movie for the last decade at least.
There are somethings that work as a comic, but not as a movie. This movie did not work because it relied too much on things that worked in the book.
And people are going to say that it is "a companion to the book" bollocks on that. It is a major motion picture that should be able to stand on its own. It should not have to be a companion to anything.
It was not very good at all.
with every post your head just shoves itself even further into that chasm
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
Some people here didn't like the movie because they had a hard time watching it with their noses stuck up in the air.
seriously people who completely could not enjoy this movie are dumb
and need to get their heads out of their asses
hard to see a movie with your innards blocking your view
My head was neither up my ass nor my nose in the air and I did not like this movie.
I wanted to LOVE this movie, but it felt disjointed and dragged to hell and back. The pacing was bad and the needless gore and sex was just that, needless. The battles were the same thing we have been seeing in almost every superhero movie for the last decade at least.
There are somethings that work as a comic, but not as a movie. This movie did not work because it relied too much on things that worked in the book.
And people are going to say that it is "a companion to the book" bollocks on that. It is a major motion picture that should be able to stand on its own. It should not have to be a companion to anything.
It was not very good at all.
See I think your opinions are wrong here.
And I already called the movie a 'companion to the book' so now you're just parroting me and being wrong in the process.
Munkus Beaver on
Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
Some people here didn't like the movie because they had a hard time watching it with their noses stuck up in the air.
seriously people who completely could not enjoy this movie are dumb
and need to get their heads out of their asses
hard to see a movie with your innards blocking your view
My head was neither up my ass nor my nose in the air and I did not like this movie.
I wanted to LOVE this movie, but it felt disjointed and dragged to hell and back. The pacing was bad and the needless gore and sex was just that, needless. The battles were the same thing we have been seeing in almost every superhero movie for the last decade at least.
There are somethings that work as a comic, but not as a movie. This movie did not work because it relied too much on things that worked in the book.
And people are going to say that it is "a companion to the book" bollocks on that. It is a major motion picture that should be able to stand on its own. It should not have to be a companion to anything.
It was not very good at all.
with every post your head just shoves itself even further into that chasm
astounding
Vann Diras, I know nothing about you, but I feel safe in saying that you're a moron. Or at least an asshole. Or both. I'm not entirely sure.
Some people here didn't like the movie because they had a hard time watching it with their noses stuck up in the air.
seriously people who completely could not enjoy this movie are dumb
and need to get their heads out of their asses
hard to see a movie with your innards blocking your view
My head was neither up my ass nor my nose in the air and I did not like this movie.
I wanted to LOVE this movie, but it felt disjointed and dragged to hell and back. The pacing was bad and the needless gore and sex was just that, needless. The battles were the same thing we have been seeing in almost every superhero movie for the last decade at least.
There are somethings that work as a comic, but not as a movie. This movie did not work because it relied too much on things that worked in the book.
And people are going to say that it is "a companion to the book" bollocks on that. It is a major motion picture that should be able to stand on its own. It should not have to be a companion to anything.
It was not very good at all.
with every post your head just shoves itself even further into that chasm
astounding
I'm sorry we have a difference of opinion here. But I don't understand how anything I have said was jamming my head up my ass. It is just my opinion, you can have yours. But to say "anyone who didn't like this movie...blah blah blah" is stupid and myopic.
I wasn't looking for art, I was looking to be entertained, I was looking for a good movie, I did not find one here.
I'm sorry we have a difference of opinion here. But I don't understand how anything I have said was jamming my head up my ass. It is just my opinion, you can have yours. But to say "anyone who didn't like this movie...blah blah blah" is stupid and myopic.
I wasn't looking for art, I was looking to be entertained, I was looking for a good movie, I did not find one here.
Read your Koran, 42, people that don't like movies with more than two explosions are less than dogs.
I mean, I personally don't agree with this, but I understand the argument.
Some people here didn't like the movie because they had a hard time watching it with their noses stuck up in the air.
seriously people who completely could not enjoy this movie are dumb
and need to get their heads out of their asses
hard to see a movie with your innards blocking your view
My head was neither up my ass nor my nose in the air and I did not like this movie.
I wanted to LOVE this movie, but it felt disjointed and dragged to hell and back. The pacing was bad and the needless gore and sex was just that, needless. The battles were the same thing we have been seeing in almost every superhero movie for the last decade at least.
There are somethings that work as a comic, but not as a movie. This movie did not work because it relied too much on things that worked in the book.
And people are going to say that it is "a companion to the book" bollocks on that. It is a major motion picture that should be able to stand on its own. It should not have to be a companion to anything.
It was not very good at all.
See I think your opinions are wrong here.
And I already called the movie a 'companion to the book' so now you're just parroting me and being wrong in the process.
But why should it have to be a "companion" to anything? Why does it need that excuse to be good. You yourself said judging it as a movie alone it is not a good movie.
But it should be judged on its own. I mean the ads don't say: "Hey to really get this you really need to read these fifteen year-old comic books because if you don't this is kind of crappy and you might not enjoy yourself."
I think calling it a companion is just making excuses for the movie that failed in its execution for various reasons that have been outlined by many people here.
Vann is trolling some old-timers pretty hard, and I appreciate his efforts.
nah I just think it's dumb when people can't sit down and enjoy a perfectly entertaining movie without applying some arbitrary checklist to make sure its up to some film-major standards
apparently I'm an asshole for thinking that!
unless that is now considered trolling gosh this gets confusing quick
Vann is trolling some old-timers pretty hard, and I appreciate his efforts.
nah I just think it's dumb when people can't sit down and enjoy a perfectly entertaining movie without applying some arbitrary checklist to make sure its up to some film-major standards
apparently I'm an asshole for thinking that!
Having a movie not drag is not "film-major" standards.
I don't understand how anyone can say they weren't at least entertained. I mean, it's a fucking superhero movie with explosions and fights and tits.
Wanted was terrible.
It had those things.
iusehappymod on
Hamlet will be Hamlet An ineffable tragedy of the human spirit that still resonates, even today.
0
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
edited March 2009
If you don't think that a companion piece can be good on its own accord then I clearly don't want to be having this discussion with you.
Munkus Beaver on
Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
0
SheriResident FlufferMy Living RoomRegistered Userregular
Vann is trolling some old-timers pretty hard, and I appreciate his efforts.
nah I just think it's dumb when people can't sit down and enjoy a perfectly entertaining movie without applying some arbitrary checklist to make sure its up to some film-major standards
apparently I'm an asshole for thinking that!
unless that is now considered trolling gosh this gets confusing quick
So, for the record, you're going to check "Idiot" instead of "Asshole?"
I have to get this down officially. For tax purposes, you know?
If you don't think that a companion piece can be good on its own accord then I clearly don't want to be having this discussion with you.
A companion piece can be good on its own. But this one was not, in my opinion, and the excuse of "its a companion piece" should not let it off the hook for being sub par.
Posts
with every post your head just shoves itself even further into that chasm
astounding
See I think your opinions are wrong here.
And I already called the movie a 'companion to the book' so now you're just parroting me and being wrong in the process.
In the first scene with the Comedian, I was prepared to be really annoyed by the slow-mo
I didn't even notice it the next time it came around, or for the rest of the movie
Well it's hard to appreciate a man getting his head lopped off when you can't see the blood slowly spill forth from what used to be his neck.
I saw it opening day in IMAX
I will see it again ummm soon
Sheri Baldwin Photography | Facebook | Twitter | Etsy Shop | BUY ME STUFF (updated for 2014!)
Snyder has definitley honed his slo-mo skills.
I'm sorry we have a difference of opinion here. But I don't understand how anything I have said was jamming my head up my ass. It is just my opinion, you can have yours. But to say "anyone who didn't like this movie...blah blah blah" is stupid and myopic.
I wasn't looking for art, I was looking to be entertained, I was looking for a good movie, I did not find one here.
Fortytwo's blog about fatherhood, life, and everything.
Holy shit it was so awesome
I mean, I personally don't agree with this, but I understand the argument.
But why should it have to be a "companion" to anything? Why does it need that excuse to be good. You yourself said judging it as a movie alone it is not a good movie.
But it should be judged on its own. I mean the ads don't say: "Hey to really get this you really need to read these fifteen year-old comic books because if you don't this is kind of crappy and you might not enjoy yourself."
I think calling it a companion is just making excuses for the movie that failed in its execution for various reasons that have been outlined by many people here.
Fortytwo's blog about fatherhood, life, and everything.
They shouldn't have cut her cigarette smoking out, that would've been hot
Man what
Haha, I'm actually the other way around.
I preferred 300's though because it was supposed to be over the top action.
This, I don't think suited the movie and I rolled my eyes more than once in this.
I mean sawing the hands off I just saw as silly.
Satans..... hints.....
I'm kind of glad about that. A woman smoking just turns me off so quickly.
nah I just think it's dumb when people can't sit down and enjoy a perfectly entertaining movie without applying some arbitrary checklist to make sure its up to some film-major standards
apparently I'm an asshole for thinking that!
unless that is now considered trolling gosh this gets confusing quick
I haven't seen Watchmen yet
It was missing a car chase.
And it would have been so easily doable, seeing as Manhattan can transform into a car.
Sounds to me like you are a huge faggot
I can't tell
I am suffering from severe fanboyism and I'm not afraid to admit it.
Sheri Baldwin Photography | Facebook | Twitter | Etsy Shop | BUY ME STUFF (updated for 2014!)
what is this
i don't even
Having a movie not drag is not "film-major" standards.
Fortytwo's blog about fatherhood, life, and everything.
I thought that was people who enjoyed seeing others smoking a fag?
Wanted was terrible.
It had those things.
Hamlet will be Hamlet
An ineffable tragedy of the human spirit that still resonates, even today.
Sheri Baldwin Photography | Facebook | Twitter | Etsy Shop | BUY ME STUFF (updated for 2014!)
I have to get this down officially. For tax purposes, you know?
Dude, you know I love ya, but this isn't what he said at all
He said a companion piece SHOULD be good on its own accord, and he doesn't think this one is
Sheri Baldwin Photography | Facebook | Twitter | Etsy Shop | BUY ME STUFF (updated for 2014!)
A companion piece can be good on its own. But this one was not, in my opinion, and the excuse of "its a companion piece" should not let it off the hook for being sub par.
Fortytwo's blog about fatherhood, life, and everything.