The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

A wireless router so that I may game, not a branded Gaming Wireless Router

Lady EriLady Eri Registered User regular
edited March 2009 in Games and Technology
I am getting a wireless router for a roommate's needs, and I need one that won't make a fuss for any online gaming I would like to do. I would like to run my ethernet cable to the router direct. Does anyone have any suggestions for me? One that is easy to manipulate ports should that be an issue, or better yet, just comes default with everything open?

Lady Eri on

Posts

  • randombattlerandombattle Registered User regular
    edited March 2009
    Lady Eri wrote: »
    I am getting a wireless router for a roommate's needs, and I need one that won't make a fuss for any online gaming I would like to do. I would like to run my ethernet cable to the router direct. Does anyone have any suggestions for me? One that is easy to manipulate ports should that be an issue, or better yet, just comes default with everything open?
    Just buy a normal router. Anything touted as a "gaming" product is over priced and not worth it.

    randombattle on
    itsstupidbutidontcare2.gif
    I never asked for this!
  • Funguy McAidsFunguy McAids Registered User regular
    edited March 2009
    There's no noticeable difference in lag between a direct connection and a wireless connection.

    'Gaming router'? That's a joke

    Funguy McAids on
  • WoggleWoggle OheoRegistered User regular
    edited March 2009
    There's no noticeable difference in lag between a direct connection and a wireless connection.

    'Gaming router'? That's a joke

    Actually unless you're sitting inside an EMR-sealed room, a wired connection is superior because of interference on the spectrum wifi uses. No wireless connection can ever have a perfect 100% accuracy like a correctly shielded and twisted cable will.

    Every time a wireless packet is received incorrectly, it has to use more bandwidth resending it, which takes more time to successfully send the same data than wired connection would.

    Woggle on
  • Funguy McAidsFunguy McAids Registered User regular
    edited March 2009
    Woggle wrote: »
    There's no noticeable difference in lag between a direct connection and a wireless connection.

    'Gaming router'? That's a joke

    Actually unless you're sitting inside an EMR-sealed room, a wired connection is superior because of interference on the spectrum wifi uses. No wireless connection can ever have a perfect 100% accuracy like a correctly shielded and twisted cable will.

    I said no noticeable difference.

    no⋅tice⋅a⋅ble
       /ˈnoʊtɪsəbəl/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [noh-ti-suh-buhl] Show IPA
    –adjective
    1. attracting notice or attention; capable of being noticed: a noticeable lack of interest.
    2. worthy or deserving of notice or attention; noteworthy: a book that is noticeable for its vivid historical background.
    Origin:
    1790–1800; notice + -able

    Related forms:
    no⋅tice⋅a⋅bil⋅i⋅ty, noun
    no⋅tice⋅a⋅bly, adverb

    Synonyms:
    1. conspicuous, prominent 2. notable.

    Antonyms:
    1. inconspicuous.

    Funguy McAids on
  • WoggleWoggle OheoRegistered User regular
    edited March 2009
    It very much depends on the environment around him whether or not it'll be noticeable. Your connection might have 99% accuracy, but his could have 50% or worse because of interference, and the difference between those two is rather noticeable.

    It's not guaranteed that wireless is always going to be as good as wired for gaming, especially if there's a few walls between the router's location and the computer.

    Wired is guaranteed to create no additional problems, wireless always has the chance of something changing, like someone turning on a borked microwave.

    Woggle on
  • scootchscootch Registered User regular
    edited March 2009
    on the other hand cutting the wire can cause problems too.

    scootch on
    TF2 stats
    PSN: super_emu
    Xbox360 Gamertag: Emuchop
  • WoggleWoggle OheoRegistered User regular
    edited March 2009
    Well yea, that's assuming your cable isn't bad. Fixing wired is easier too, since swapping out the bad cable for one that works is probably a lot easier than tracking down interference on a wireless connection.

    Woggle on
  • scootchscootch Registered User regular
    edited March 2009
    true, but most users probably won't encounter any of the problems we've been listing...

    I don't see a good reason why the person shouldn't try wireless.. wireless routers ARE wired routers also.

    scootch on
    TF2 stats
    PSN: super_emu
    Xbox360 Gamertag: Emuchop
  • Hahnsoo1Hahnsoo1 Make Ready. We Hunt.Registered User, Moderator, Administrator admin
    edited March 2009
    I'll second the fact that wireless signals for online gaming can be compromised due to environment, and it does cause a noticeable difference in some circumstances. It highly depends on the amount of wireless devices and the amount of wiring in your walls (which can lead to a Faraday Cage effect). More and more people are using wireless devices (not just routers), and they all occupy a similar spectrum. Problems are uncommon, but not rare.

    There are also security issues (as even using common wireless encryption protocols do not guarantee security), but the average household really doesn't need to worry about that.

    Hahnsoo1 on
    8i1dt37buh2m.png
  • ArkanArkan Registered User regular
    edited March 2009
    I've been using some generic wireless router for a few years now, it's worked fine for me other than the occasional hiccup that requires I reboot it.

    Arkan on
    Big, honkin' pile of WoW characters
    I think it's hard for someone not to rage at mario kart, while shouting "Fuck you Donkey Kong. Whose dick did you suck to get all those red shells?"
  • BartholamueBartholamue Registered User regular
    edited March 2009
    I've been using the D-Link WBR-2310 for a few years now and I chose that one because it supported the wii and DS online. It's a great router once you get it working.

    Bartholamue on
    Steam- SteveBartz Xbox Live- SteveBartz PSN Name- SteveBartz
  • Lady EriLady Eri Registered User regular
    edited March 2009
    scootch wrote: »
    true, but most users probably won't encounter any of the problems we've been listing...

    I don't see a good reason why the person shouldn't try wireless.. wireless routers ARE wired routers also.

    I don't have a wireless card and/or I am too stupid to figure out how to find my wireless connection with my new Vista computer.

    Lady Eri on
  • acidlacedpenguinacidlacedpenguin Institutionalized Safe in jail.Registered User regular
    edited March 2009
    anything from the WRTxx(x) series is great, especially if you use tomato or dd-wrt on it.

    specifically I have WRT350N with dd on it.

    keep in mind that as long as you're playing online your router's wireless transmission speed is generally going to be about 5 times the speed of your internet connection, so as long as it drops less than 5 packets for every 1 packet sent you won't really see slowdown. . . If you're talking about LAN play though wireless is balls slow compared to the pretty much now-standard gigabit per second and it's really annoying if you have to transfer files or whatever. . .

    acidlacedpenguin on
    GT: Acidboogie PSNid: AcidLacedPenguiN
  • TheCrumblyCrackerTheCrumblyCracker Registered User regular
    edited March 2009
    I've been using the D-Link WBR-2310 for a few years now and I chose that one because it supported the wii and DS online. It's a great router once you get it working.

    I have had so many issues with mine, I second the get it working part.

    TheCrumblyCracker on
  • scootchscootch Registered User regular
    edited March 2009
    Lady Eri wrote: »
    scootch wrote: »
    true, but most users probably won't encounter any of the problems we've been listing...

    I don't see a good reason why the person shouldn't try wireless.. wireless routers ARE wired routers also.

    I don't have a wireless card and/or I am too stupid to figure out how to find my wireless connection with my new Vista computer.


    press the start button, in the search bar: type "network"
    should automatically populate with search results.
    click on "network and sharing center"
    on the left hand side of the new window, click on "manage network connections."
    this new window will list all your available network options.
    it's represented by neat little graphics so you shouldn't have any problem telling what you have available.


    fyi, "X" mark means you're not connected. it does not mean you don't have that option on your computer.

    scootch on
    TF2 stats
    PSN: super_emu
    Xbox360 Gamertag: Emuchop
  • jestjest Registered User regular
    edited March 2009
    anything from the WRTxx(x) series is great, especially if you use tomato or dd-wrt on it.

    specifically I have WRT350N with dd on it.

    I second this notion. I have a WRT54G or some variation thereof running DD-WRT. Although, I freely admit that I don't really take advantage of that custom firmware because I'm not tech savvy enough to really customize it. So the base Linksys firmware may be enough to do what you want (and what I want). I really don't know though because I installed DD-WRT from the get go.

    jest on
Sign In or Register to comment.