The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Getting rid of the pouch...

cmsamocmsamo Registered User regular
edited December 2006 in Help / Advice Forum
So, I am working away from home, and have been on and off for 3 or 4 months. I get all my food and living expenses paid for. Naturally I have eaten well. Before starting the travelling, I went to my gym every day, kept in shape, and managed to maintain a steady weight at about 185 pounds.

Fast forward to now, and I got on the scales in the hotel gym and I am now 215 pounds. When I get out of the shower I can notice the dreaded forming of a pouch (or beer gut as we call them in the UK!) Now - I am doing the first step - returning to a balanced controlled diet and eating the right things (low fats etc)

I go to the gym and do cardio workouts and lift weights but I don't seem to be shifting the pouch. My question is this - should I be choosing the fat burn program on the bike / treadmill / cross trainer ? Or should I be sticking to the cardio programs I normally choose. The trainers both here and at home say do cardio. My fitness is good, but I can't shift the weight.

Any ideas?


Short version: I am eating the right stuff after putting on 25 pounds, but exercise does not get rid of the gut, how can I solve it?

steam_sig.png
cmsamo on

Posts

  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Go for a calorie diet. All this fat and carb stuff gets messy. Just focus on calories and try to make all of them count. Also much easier to adjust and plan for since so much workout equipment counts calories.

    For the gut: My understanding is that using your stomach muscles is the key to killing it. Sit ups and the like.

    For activities, do something you can actually enjoy. My understanding is that relatively quick walking is the best overall fat-burning way to beat feet. Swimming is damned good, as well.

    The main thing is that you need to make this a lifestyle, and not just a "diet."

    This has to become part of who you are, not just something you do to lose weight.

    Incenjucar on
  • ZsetrekZsetrek Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    "Paunch"

    I came into the thread expecting a kangaroo infestation.

    Zsetrek on
  • blincolnblincoln Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Incenjucar wrote:
    For the gut: My understanding is that using your stomach muscles is the key to killing it. Sit ups and the like.

    That just tones the muscle underneath, it doesn't help burn the fat in that area any faster.

    From what I've read, most guys tend to build up fat in their stomach area first, and lose it there last as they burn fat off of their body as a whole - it's our equivalent of how womens' hips are.

    blincoln on
    Legacy of Kain: The Lost Worlds
    http://www.thelostworlds.net/
  • AndorienAndorien Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    blincoln wrote:
    Incenjucar wrote:
    For the gut: My understanding is that using your stomach muscles is the key to killing it. Sit ups and the like.

    That just tones the muscle underneath, it doesn't help burn the fat in that area any faster.

    Spot reduction is a myth, your body will burn fat from where ever it feels like.

    Personally, I don't feel weight lifting at the moment will do you much good. I would focus on exercising and getting a good calorie deficit (since in the end, that's how you lose fat. Your body needs energy and its only choice is to burn the fat reserves).

    Also, bikes and ellipticals for the win, as they're better for your knees.

    Andorien on
  • Mad JazzMad Jazz gotta go fast AustinRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    blincoln wrote:
    From what I've read, most guys tend to build up fat in their stomach area first, and lose it there last as they burn fat off of their body as a whole - it's our equivalent of how womens' hips are.

    True. Testosterone inhibits fat deposits around the hips and buttocks and facilitates deposits around the waist. Vice versa for estrogens, incidentally.


    Best way to lose the fat (from any area, really) is to keep on with the cardio type stuff...the gut is the hardest thing to lose for a guy, but keep at it.

    Mad Jazz on
    camo_sig2.png
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    If you drink beer or soda regularly, you could probably simply cut that out of your diet and eat like you do now, and you'd lose the weight (albeit pretty slowly).

    Usually, the "fat-burning" setting on a cardio machine puts it into a mode for HIIT, otherwise known as "High-Intensity Interval Training." This is where you have a relatively short, easy cardio period, which is punctuated by very brief, very intense cardio periods. It is supposed to be a good way to lose weight quickly. Experts disagree on whether it's better than simply a long, fairly light cardio period, or a shorter, more intense cardio period.

    Thanatos on
  • TalTal Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Cardio is going to be your best plan of attack, but I wouldn't skip out on the weights either (as long as you *want* to make that part of your schedule). Your goal here isn't to see a lower number on the scale, it's to reduce the beginnings of your beer belly and overall body fat percentage. Any muscle you're building at this point is going to help burn fat in the long run.

    As for the intensity you train at, you've got a decision to make. The common belief is that you're burning fat if you sustain an intensity level at 60% of your maximum heartrate, and while true, it's also misleading. The respiratory quotient (RQ) measures the relative amounts of fats, carbs, and proteins being burned for energy.

    RQ = volume of CO2 expired / volume of O2 utilized

    For carbs, the RQ is 1.0 and for fats the RQ is 0.7. This means more fat burning takes place at a slightly lower intensity due to the fact that fat metabolization requires more oxygen. When you begin to exercise closer to 100% of your V02 max (max oxygen uptake), your energy is drawn more and more from carbohydrates because beta oxidation (breaking down fatty acids for energy) can't keep up.

    So now you're thinking well, as long as I stay around 60% of my VO2 max then I'll be burning more fat! Here's the thing - physical conditioning lowers the RQ, so the better shape you're in, the more fatty acids you'll be breaking down for energy. In a study done between trained and untrained individuals, during exercise the average RQ of the untrained was 0.95 while the RQ of the trained was 0.9.

    So then, my advice is to primarily do cardio - bike, run, elliptical, your choice - working up to 30-45 minute sessions. Once you get there, or if you're already there, start increasing the intensity. Add incline to the treadmill, resistance to the bike, and increase the speed. Track your progress so that you're advancing a little bit each week, small steps just so long as you're able to keep moving forward.

    And then depending how many times a week you're planning on working out, try to get in 1-2 days of weights. Do a full body routine with focus on the large muscle groups of the body. Chest, back, legs, and core. Shoot for 3 sets of 8-12 reps with as close to about a minute rest in between sets as possible. As with any weight program, keeping proper form is much more important than the amount of weight you're lifting.

    And just to throw this out there about the diet, make sure you're eating smaller meals often to keep the blood glucose level as constant as possible. That'll keep the body in a better state for burning fat.

    But MOST IMPORTANTLY, make sure you're having fun with whatever you choose to do. :)

    Tal on
  • aettaett NorCalRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    I don't mean to hijack the thread, but I have an on-topic question. I'm not a fan of running, especially in winter weather, and I don't like dealing with crowds at the gym. I was thinking about getting a stationary bike for my apartment, so that I can bike often and do it while playing DS, watching TV, or whatever. So, I have to ask, which would be better: cycling at a pleasant pace for longer periods of time, or just doing more intense 20-30 minute sessions once or twice a day?

    aett on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    aett wrote:
    I don't mean to hijack the thread, but I have an on-topic question. I'm not a fan of running, especially in winter weather, and I don't like dealing with crowds at the gym. I was thinking about getting a stationary bike for my apartment, so that I can bike often and do it while playing DS, watching TV, or whatever. So, I have to ask, which would be better: cycling at a pleasant pace for longer periods of time, or just doing more intense 20-30 minute sessions once or twice a day?
    It depends on who you want to listen to. Some people would say a 30-45 minute light session, others would say a 20-30 minute intense session, yet others would say a 15-20 minute light session punctuated by 1-minute very intense sessions at even intervals.

    Thanatos on
  • aettaett NorCalRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Thanatos wrote:
    It depends on who you want to listen to. Some people would say a 30-45 minute light session, others would say a 20-30 minute intense session, yet others would say a 15-20 minute light session punctuated by 1-minute very intense sessions at even intervals.

    This is probably a stupid question, but would there be any downside to just cycling at a casual pace for longer periods of time than that? Like, anywhere between the length of a movie or even a longer gaming session. I would imagine that any activity would be better than just sitting there, which I would be doing anyway. Of course, I would still do 20-30 minute intense sessions about 3-5 times a week.

    aett on
  • LondonBridgeLondonBridge __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2006
    I found lifting weights with low cardio helped me lose the most fat around my belly.

    LondonBridge on
  • JonisJonis Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Weight lifting is always good, for anything, especially for fat loss. It's essentially a cardio workout in itself if you take it seriously and don't take 10 minute breaks in between sets. It also causes muscle mass increase, that muscle that you gain it one of the primary calorie burners around.

    Jonis on
  • DiscGraceDiscGrace Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Thanatos wrote:
    aett wrote:
    I don't mean to hijack the thread, but I have an on-topic question. I'm not a fan of running, especially in winter weather, and I don't like dealing with crowds at the gym. I was thinking about getting a stationary bike for my apartment, so that I can bike often and do it while playing DS, watching TV, or whatever. So, I have to ask, which would be better: cycling at a pleasant pace for longer periods of time, or just doing more intense 20-30 minute sessions once or twice a day?
    It depends on who you want to listen to. Some people would say a 30-45 minute light session, others would say a 20-30 minute intense session, yet others would say a 15-20 minute light session punctuated by 1-minute very intense sessions at even intervals.

    If you can find a bike with a "random hill" setting, those are also pretty good for a 30-45 minute session, with random brief peaks of higher intensity. I find those challenging but more doable than a really hard 15 minute session.

    Also, have you ever considered an elliptical? Those are nice and low-impact like a stationary bike is, and you can read or watch TV while on it, but it has the added benefit of making you stand up while you're exercising. Having to support your whole body weight is a more challenging (and thus more calorie-burning) activity.

    DiscGrace on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • cmsamocmsamo Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Thanks for all the replies guys. Some interesting stuff in there.

    I already have a good regime for weights etc, 3 sets of 10 reps at whatever weight group I am doing.

    The main thing was whether to do the fat burning program or the cardio program on the machines.

    Reason being, if I do the cardio - I am often tired and sweaty at the end of it (good thing). It actually feels like I've done some work. If I do the fat burn, I don't tend to feel as it if is taking much effort at all, and I'm not at my limit at the end of the program like the cardio.

    As a guide (this may not mean anything to some people depending on the machines you have at your gym of choice) - I can comfortably run at 8.0 mph on the treadmill, and often ramp it up to 10, and then 12 for short bursts of time, with an incline of 1.0. The bike - I normally put it on "round the world - random hillclimb" on level 14 for 15 mins. Cross trainer, again I will do 15mins at level 14.

    Based on Tal's post, I'll just stick to cardio, increasing from 45mins to an hour per session, and swap out the few beers and sodas I drink for cranberry or something!

    As for having fun - ipod video banging out a few good tunes while I work out :)

    cmsamo on
    steam_sig.png
  • IcemopperIcemopper Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    aett wrote:
    Thanatos wrote:
    It depends on who you want to listen to. Some people would say a 30-45 minute light session, others would say a 20-30 minute intense session, yet others would say a 15-20 minute light session punctuated by 1-minute very intense sessions at even intervals.

    This is probably a stupid question, but would there be any downside to just cycling at a casual pace for longer periods of time than that? Like, anywhere between the length of a movie or even a longer gaming session. I would imagine that any activity would be better than just sitting there, which I would be doing anyway. Of course, I would still do 20-30 minute intense sessions about 3-5 times a week.

    Maybe even try riding during a movie, and when you're done riding, get off the bike and finish watching the movie? You don't have to ride the entire time, unless you're watching the Tour De France through a biker's eyes or something.

    Icemopper on
  • MuridenMuriden Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    The person who could ride the entire length of the Dune Sci-Fi mini series without stopping would win a box of cookies.

    I'm talking Frank Herbert's Dune and Frank Herbert's Children of Dune.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dune_%28TV_miniseries%29
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children_of_Dune_%28TV_miniseries%29

    Muriden on
    MrGulio.332 - Lover of fine Cheeses. Replays
    301787-1.png
  • stixs4321stixs4321 Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Weight lifting burns calories and so does cardio. This makes them both perfect for helping with weight loss. Maybe you burn more in the cardio session but weight lifting is good for maintaining muscle mass while in a caloric deficit. I would also keep the days seperate doing each 3 times a week(lift weights mon,wed,fri)(cardio tues,thurs,sat).

    I say screw using the special settings on the fancy bikes and just go at your own pace on them if you find it more effective. The fat burn setting on the bike might be low pace cardio because your body uses more fat for energy when its going at a slow pace. Thats fat like the fat you eat not the fat on your body. In the end it comes down to how intense you worked out and for how long because you wanna burn as many calories as possible, not worrying about how much fats or carbs you burns during the workout.

    stixs4321 on
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    When I go to my gym, I usually do a 30 minute session on a stationary bike, then immediately go do weights for another half hour or so. It does a great job of keeping your heart rate up the full time, as long as you don't slack off.

    Doc on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    stixs4321 wrote:
    Weight lifting burns calories and so does cardio. This makes them both perfect for helping with weight loss. Maybe you burn more in the cardio session but weight lifting is good for maintaining muscle mass while in a caloric deficit. I would also keep the days seperate doing each 3 times a week(lift weights mon,wed,fri)(cardio tues,thurs,sat).

    I say screw using the special settings on the fancy bikes and just go at your own pace on them if you find it more effective. The fat burn setting on the bike might be low pace cardio because your body uses more fat for energy when its going at a slow pace. Thats fat like the fat you eat not the fat on your body. In the end it comes down to how intense you worked out and for how long because you wanna burn as many calories as possible, not worrying about how much fats or carbs you burns during the workout.
    I've been told that if you work out for longer than half an hour or so, your body starts burning muscle. I don't know how accurate that is, though.

    Thanatos on
  • kaliyamakaliyama Left to find less-moderated fora Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    I've been consistently pudgier than I should be from working on thesis instead of going outside last year. 30-min gy mworkouts on ellipticals or bikes didn't do me much good.
    I dropped to about 1200 calories/day (i'm like 6'2) and began light training for a marathon, meaning I've been jogging/running 35 miles a wk. i went from 220 or 225 to 195 lbs in two months. I HATED jogging to begin with because i wasn't used to it and it is harder (as well as harder on your knees) than gym exercises. on the other hand, it's a much more intense workout.

    kaliyama on
    fwKS7.png?1
  • SentrySentry Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Thanatos wrote:
    stixs4321 wrote:
    Weight lifting burns calories and so does cardio. This makes them both perfect for helping with weight loss. Maybe you burn more in the cardio session but weight lifting is good for maintaining muscle mass while in a caloric deficit. I would also keep the days seperate doing each 3 times a week(lift weights mon,wed,fri)(cardio tues,thurs,sat).

    I say screw using the special settings on the fancy bikes and just go at your own pace on them if you find it more effective. The fat burn setting on the bike might be low pace cardio because your body uses more fat for energy when its going at a slow pace. Thats fat like the fat you eat not the fat on your body. In the end it comes down to how intense you worked out and for how long because you wanna burn as many calories as possible, not worrying about how much fats or carbs you burns during the workout.
    I've been told that if you work out for longer than half an hour or so, your body starts burning muscle. I don't know how accurate that is, though.

    Your body almost always burns fat and muscle together, which is why lifting is important to weight loss... muscle burns more calories at rest then fat does, so when you diet and cut calories, the body tries to burn muscle first (which is why you should lift and consume enough protein). If you don't lift, you'll still lose weight, but about half of it will likely be muscle, not fat.

    My biggest problem is motivation. I have none.

    Sentry on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    wrote:
    When I was a little kid, I always pretended I was the hero,' Skip said.
    'Fuck yeah, me too. What little kid ever pretended to be part of the lynch-mob?'
  • cmsamocmsamo Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    thankfully, I do.

    The hotel I am staying in has a wall sized mirror opposite the shower. So when you step out every morning, you can see the spare tyre starting to form. And it AINT good! :p

    cmsamo on
    steam_sig.png
Sign In or Register to comment.