The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Loren's Ongoing Calculus Confusion

Loren MichaelLoren Michael Registered User regular
edited April 2009 in Help / Advice Forum
Okay, this is based paritally on this one that I posted previously.

Basically, I get to ln y and then... shit, how do I integrate ln y? What's next? Is it 1/y? The answer I'm supposed to get is that the primitive function of ln y is ln y again, but I'm under the impression that that's wrong.

What's up with that?

Next, could someone please walk me through the integration of (9-y^2)^(1/2)? Originally, I got [(9-y^2)^(3/2)]/[-3y] but I am now under the impression that I am wrong, given that [(9-y^2)^(3/2)]/[-3y] doesn't differentiate back to (9-y^2)^(1/2). What's up with that? Where am I going wrong?

Finally, similar problem with (6-y)^(1/2). My integration is weak. :x

a7iea7nzewtq.jpg
Loren Michael on

Posts

  • ClipseClipse Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Okay, this is based paritally on this one that I posted previously.

    Basically, I get to ln y and then... shit, how do I integrate ln y? What's next? Is it 1/y? The answer I'm supposed to get is that the primitive function of ln y is ln y again, but I'm under the impression that that's wrong.

    What's up with that?

    Next, could someone please walk me through the integration of (9-y^2)^(1/2)? Originally, I got [(9-y^2)^(3/2)]/[-3y] but I am now under the impression that I am wrong, given that [(9-y^2)^(3/2)]/[-3y] doesn't differentiate back to (9-y^2)^(1/2). What's up with that? Where am I going wrong?

    Finally, similar problem with (6-y)^(1/2). My integration is weak. :x

    The integral of ln(y) dy is a little tricky. Assuming you know integration by parts, we take one part to be ln(y) and the other part to be 1 dy. Then Integral(ln(y) dy) = y*ln(y) - Integral(1/y * y dy) = y*ln(y) - Integral(1 dy) = y*ln(y) - y.

    As for (9-y^2)^(1/2): The best way to approach this is trigonometric substitution. We take y = 3*sin(t), then dy = 3*cos(t) dt, so we get:
    Integral( (9 - 9*sin^2(t))^1/2) * 3*cos(t) dt)
    = Integral( (9*cos^2(t))^1/2) * 3*cos(t) dt)
    = Integral( 3*cos(t) * 3*cos(t) dt)
    = 9 * Integral(cos^2(t) dt)

    If you know the integral of cos^2 it's fairly simple now, otherwise you have to follow something like this to complete the problem.

    Clipse on
  • Dunadan019Dunadan019 Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    the way i found easiest to figure out the integral of LN(x) is to do some reverse derivatives.

    what derivative gives you LN(x) as an answer.

    well derivative of LN(x) is 1/x... derivative of xLn(x) with the chain rule gives you ln(x) + 1. so the question is "the derivative of what is -1" and the answer is -x. so from all that you get integral Ln(x) = x*Ln(x) - x

    Dunadan019 on
  • Loren MichaelLoren Michael Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Wait, I'm not familiar with trig substitution (yet). Why is that the best approach?

    Loren Michael on
    a7iea7nzewtq.jpg
  • IrohIroh Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Wait, I'm not familiar with trig substitution (yet). Why is that the best approach?
    There are a lot of known trigonometric identities you can use to manipulate the equation if you perform that substitution.

    Iroh on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ClipseClipse Registered User regular
    edited April 2009
    Wait, I'm not familiar with trig substitution (yet). Why is that the best approach?

    If you're familiar with regular substitution -- "u substitution", as it is frequently called in intro calc classes -- you can pick up trigonometric substitution quickly. Basically trigonometric substitution is the opposite of regular substitution. With regular substitution, we define u = f(x); with trigonometric substitution we define x = f(t), where f is typically a simple trigonometric substitution. Then you just do simple algebraic substitution, replacing every instance of x with f(t), and replacing dx with f'(t) dt.

    As Iroh said, the reason it's the best approach for this particular problem is because of trig identities. In particular, you have 9 - x^2; if you take x = 3*cos(t) or x = 3*sin(t), you can use the old sin^2(t) + cos^2(t) = 1 to simplify the portion of your integrand which is inside the square root, which will in turn greatly simplify the whole problem.

    Clipse on
Sign In or Register to comment.