The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[MISC] IRC Security Complaints

AccalonAccalon Registered User regular
edited May 2009 in PAX Archive
CuZZa wrote: »
All of this stuff seems a bit complex just because we get some dimwit griefer sometimes.

I agree with this 100%. Why does one lame duck have to change our entire channel? The added "security" measures seem a bit much, and it really makes it difficult for new people to stop by and join in the group. They have to spend 10 minutes figuring out how to reg their nick and THEN PM and OP with voice powers, just to say "hi".

I think a better solution would be more OPs or HalfOps who can +M the channel when necessary, but on the whole it should be left open to all. I like to think that PAXers are a little more welcoming than a Moderated channel.

PAX 2007 Omegathon Champeen

*Proud member of the Photoshop Heroes*
Accalon on

Posts

  • BigRedBigRed Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Its not complex to register your nick with nickserv, plus once you setup the perform step you never have to bother with identifying with nickserv again.

    This is making it secure to the forum peeps anyway because we are comparing nicks on there to the forum when they register :)

    Edit:
    The people that did this so far had no issue with it. They followed my directions and PMed me and were added. The directions are as easy as I could make them. I used to make documents for those to perform complex PCB repairs who didn't speak English... so if there is some confusion in the steps let me know and I can fix it.

    also to setup a whole irc network rather than just have people register their nick with nickserv (when they should in the first place to not get it stolen) will be far more complex and confusing

    The other option is to password the channel, but the troll in question does read these forums from time to time

    The channel is open, and I did promote more hops to voice people when necessary. So far nobody has been denied anything, no idea why you would think that.

    BigRed on
    <MoeFwacky> besides, BigRed-Worky is right
  • contrefaitcontrefait Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    CuZZa wrote: »
    All of this stuff seems a bit complex just because we get some dimwit griefer sometimes. Anyone given serious thought to running a private (ie non-network) irc server for all of the PAX/PA needs? We can have more control of it and create a group of channels to mirror what we currently have and expand it like the forums. From what I can tell, the idiot is only griefing us because he's able to get on the network easily, he's not a PAX attendee and not a PA Forums user, so how would he be able to follow us? Especially if the thread announcing it is locked to Forum members only and not public.

    Also these days all IRC clients can run multiple networks, whats another connection?

    So how does this stop him from continuing to grief on the new server? I'm just not following the logic.

    contrefait on
    PAX East 2016 Checklist
    Passes: ▬ Hotel: ▬ Flight: [color=red]☑[/color]
  • MetaverseNomadMetaverseNomad Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    contrefait wrote: »
    CuZZa wrote: »
    All of this stuff seems a bit complex just because we get some dimwit griefer sometimes. Anyone given serious thought to running a private (ie non-network) irc server for all of the PAX/PA needs? We can have more control of it and create a group of channels to mirror what we currently have and expand it like the forums. From what I can tell, the idiot is only griefing us because he's able to get on the network easily, he's not a PAX attendee and not a PA Forums user, so how would he be able to follow us? Especially if the thread announcing it is locked to Forum members only and not public.

    Also these days all IRC clients can run multiple networks, whats another connection?

    So how does this stop him from continuing to grief on the new server? I'm just not following the logic.

    I think it might be easiest just to track this douche down and "take care of him".

    MetaverseNomad on
  • AccalonAccalon Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Pulled this off of someones twitter today...

    "Just tried to get in the PAX IRC channel they've added some lame security measures, after 2 years I'm questioning if its worth inconvenience"

    Accalon on
    PAX 2007 Omegathon Champeen

    *Proud member of the Photoshop Heroes*
  • BigRedBigRed Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    and it figures you would post it in here instead of that person

    passiveagressive go!
    :|

    If they have been in there for two years, why have they not registered their nick by now? Also do they not know how to follow a link?

    BigRed on
    <MoeFwacky> besides, BigRed-Worky is right
  • AccalonAccalon Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Maybe they just like jumping in an IRC channel with paxers every once and awhile and don't like having to jump through unnecessary hoops to do that.

    Since when is being frustrated considered passive agressive? Just giving you examples of others who agree that this +m garbage is dumb.

    Accalon on
    PAX 2007 Omegathon Champeen

    *Proud member of the Photoshop Heroes*
  • BigRedBigRed Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Not reading topic, not PMing anybody and asking, not posting about it on the irc thread in the forums where people learn about the topic in the first place, then going to bitch about it elsewhere which solves nothing = passive agressive imo

    You arent helping your agruement much anyway. If I have to take flak from 1% of people on irc when nobody else is complaining, and espically the 14+ new people that joined irc since this and had no issues or complaints, then so be it.

    I wont be discussing this further on the forums, thread is cluttered enough with this bs anyway. I ask that you do the same.

    Im not going to let the vocal minority bother me for the greater good of everyone else :P
    (I work at MS, already get enough of that on the internets in general, heh)

    This thread is for helping people with the unofficial irc chat for pax.

    BigRed on
    <MoeFwacky> besides, BigRed-Worky is right
  • ashridahashridah Registered User regular
    edited May 2009

    I think it might be easiest just to track this douche down and "take care of him".

    If only :S.
    I've been through this situation before on other channels. The only IRC network i know of where they had admins that would actually do things like try and call the originator to discuss things over the phone, etc, was freenode, and that was before the founder died. He would ruthelessly stamp out open proxies, etc.

    While our troll is annoying, i'm surprised we've bothered with +m but i support it nevetheless. I've been in channels where the attacks have been significantly worse, with part/join floods, etc. As far as I'm concerned, +m is an acceptible, low-cost, solution.

    ashridah on
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited May 2009
    People have been wondering why we don't keep -m until something happens. Since nickserv is down, we've been running -m, and this has happened several times just today:
    [00:12] --> higuys has joined this channel (~rofl@cloak-AFF6C7FD.hsd1.in.comcast.net).
    [00:12] <HotSake> and compensates perfectly
    [00:12] <higuys> higuyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguys
    [00:12] <higuys> higuyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguys
    [00:12] <higuys> higuyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguys
    [00:12] <HotSake> Or so my Star Trek Tech guide said
    [00:12] <Azazel> I hear nothing
    [00:12] <higuys> higuyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguyshiguys
    [00:12] <MeeOk> .. ohfun
    [00:12] <-- higuys has left this server (Excess Flood).
    [00:12] <Moe_Fwacky> !redalert
    [00:12] <Azazel> NOThING

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • WormdundeeWormdundee Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Not to mention the nickbeep spam and that it's impossible to ban him. I'm not sure if he has a lot of spare time or what, but it is unfortunate that there are people like this.

    Wormdundee on
  • BigRedBigRed Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Wormdundee wrote: »
    Not to mention the nickbeep spam and that it's impossible to ban him. I'm not sure if he has a lot of spare time or what, but it is unfortunate that there are people like this.

    The Ban list fills up before he even comes close to running out of proxies :( +m is the only solution to this.

    BigRed on
    <MoeFwacky> besides, BigRed-Worky is right
  • AutumnWindzAutumnWindz Registered User new member
    edited May 2009
    As someone who's going to PAX for the first time this fall, and as someone who is relatively familiar with IRC and such, I'm of the opinion that, while it is unfortunate and perhaps inevitable that +m is needed, it still is really a lot of trouble for people who want to just join and chat with others. I mean, yes, it stems the spamming, but at the cost of potentially driving away new people to the community. It makes the whole operation seem 'elitist' to an extent.

    At first, when I saw that one had to register a nick and get on the access list, I assumed that it was another case of an exclusive chat-room where only certain people are welcome. That's not the case, obviously, but it put me off - not because I had to register, because that's easy - but because I had no reason to think otherwise. If there was a clear explanation right up front about why the +m and related measures are needed.... then that would be different. Additionally, nickserv wasn't working the last two times I tried to register.

    Lastly, has it not occured to anyone that doing things like +m and requiring everyone else to register and get voice might be playing into the troll's hands? People like these generally don't care for anything other than attention... such drastic measures also invariably confirm such attention to the troll's actions.

    AutumnWindz on
  • proXimityproXimity Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Truths

    HMMMM would you look at that

    proXimity on
    camo_sig2.png
  • NeelixNeelix Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    AutumnWindz, if you think that the PAX group (and to some extent, the Penny Arcade community as a whole) is a little bit elitist, then you would be correct.

    I don't believe that the majority of the group are, obviously, but some of the folks near the top of the food chain definitely have a "What you like and think is cool are actually STUPID and you are a FAG!" attitude. They set the tone for the whole group, so even though most of us are carebears who would love to have more friends, they drive people away.

    I don't understand the attitude, but I do know that it's bad for Penny Arcade, PAX, and Enforcers to have such people be involved with the organization. They might be smart, they might be organized, they might have work ethics, but they have shitty public relations skills, and Penny Arcade needs to wise up to this fact.

    The attitude of those up top over this IRC stuff is just one of many things proving their ignorance of positive public relations. The fact that they ignore the arguments against the behavior is proof of their elitism. And the fact that they're still involved with representing Penny Arcade is proof that Penny Arcade as a company has no fucking clue how their brand is really being represented in the community on a day to day basis.

    Neelix on
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited May 2009
    That's a pretty fallacious argument. Nobody's being elitist, we're trying to prevent spammer attacks. I'm sorry that we're utilizing the tools provided for us by the IRC server to make it happen. Switching to another IRC network doesn't guarantee we get away from spammer attacks unless we host our own, which nobody is currently willing to do. If you don't like some of the people in IRC, that's a personal problem and has no bearing on the Penny Arcade brand. Not everybody can get along with everybody.

    Additionally, we're not an official channel, we don't represent PA or purport to represent them. We're just some people from the forum who like to chat in real time over IRC.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • DaNerdDaNerd Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I am a new person to the PA forums, the IRC channel, and PAX in general, but I don't get any elitist vibes at all. I don't really understand where you're coming from at all. Everyone has been nice, and I thoroughly enjoy chatting with everyone on the channel. Right now +m seems to be the best solution to the troll problem, but I'm sure that they would be open to other suggestions.

    DaNerd on
    Buy a small corporation and use it to manufacture love. Then give the love to her at a bulk discount
  • NeelixNeelix Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    That's a pretty fallacious argument. Nobody's being elitist, we're trying to prevent spammer attacks. I'm sorry that we're utilizing the tools provided for us by the IRC server to make it happen. Switching to another IRC network doesn't guarantee we get away from spammer attacks unless we host our own, which nobody is currently willing to do. If you don't like some of the people in IRC, that's a personal problem and has no bearing on the Penny Arcade brand. Not everybody can get along with everybody.

    Additionally, we're not an official channel, we don't represent PA or purport to represent them. We're just some people from the forum who like to chat in real time over IRC.
    Moe_Fwacky, Straw Man, heard of it?

    I wasn't saying that trying to prevent spammer attacks was elitist. How you guys have responded to the public's comments about it, that is.

    Also, implicit in my post is that there are other things that contribute to an elitist tone for the Penny Arcade community, and that this IRC thing was just one instance of the attitude.

    I'm not one to publicly make criticisms like this, but I've been discussing this exact topic with some other folks for four or five months now, and we've all come to the conclusion that Penny Arcade has really, really, really shitty community management and public relations. This IRC bullshit does not help.

    In summation, I am against the draconian IRC restrictions as I feel that they severely limit the ability of new community members to become an active part of the community, and I feel that the management's reactions to criticism of the IRC restrictions are an indicator of problems with the representation of Penny Arcade and the PAX community.

    Neelix on
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited May 2009
    IRC IS NOT OFFICIAL OR ASSOCIATED WITH PENNY ARCADE IN ANY WAY

    I'm not going to say it again.

    It take 30 seconds to register a nick with nickserv and pm one of us to get added to the access list. Nobody gets denied access, except our friendly neighborhood spammer troll. You seem to be the only person who has a problem with this community. I seriously don't understand where your complaints are based.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • MissDizzyBeeMissDizzyBee Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    As annoying as it can be to register the first time, I think the current measured are definitely necessary.

    I've been in the chan while mockturtle and/or autokick for him flooded the channel for an hour or more, on more than one occasion. It really ruins the whole idea of "we're here to chat together" if you can't get a sentence seen.

    MissDizzyBee on
  • AutumnWindzAutumnWindz Registered User new member
    edited May 2009
    Personally, upon first entering the PAX channel on IRC, I was basically told that if I wasn't registered on the boards, I wouldn't be trusted on IRC. That's part of what gives me an elitist vibe about the whole thing.

    Also, since the channel is actually called 'paforums_PAX', there's no way some people can claim that you have no affiliation with the actual PAX. It may not be officially sanctioned or anything, but the fact that you're using the name means that you are still a direct representation of PAX as a whole. As far as affiliations are concerned, 'PAX' is trademarked and the channel is using that trademark.

    Another thing, and perhaps off-topic, why does the PAX forum see necessary to categorize everything like it is? For new people that have no idea what these are about, it's daunting, to say the least, to even try to make sense of the forums, much less post stuff and get involved.

    One last note, why isn't my question of whether +m is just feeding the troll a legitimate complaint? Honestly, I've been in plenty of channels with troll problems, and banning them, +m, etc, have never done anything other than make the troll more determined to come back. Ultimately, I feel that these measures and attitudes, while they may (or may not) prevent future trollings, are potentially driving away plenty of new people. Moe Fwacky, the other guy isn't the only one with a problem, I have questions and problems too. Sure, there are new people who successfully get into the community, but I for one have been disappointed.

    AutumnWindz on
  • contrefaitcontrefait Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    so what do you suggest would be done instead of +M? He uses a bunch of proxies to join so we can't ban him. You fill the ban list before that is possible. He has been doing it consistently for years. I don't think you can really do anything other than mitigating his effect on the channel.

    contrefait on
    PAX East 2016 Checklist
    Passes: ▬ Hotel: ▬ Flight: [color=red]☑[/color]
  • AutumnWindzAutumnWindz Registered User new member
    edited May 2009
    To be honest, I don't know of an effective alternative. As a newb here, I guess I'm just voicing my opinions that things like this really suck. Plus, I wasn't exactly treated pleasantly either. There isn't really anywhere to voice complaints around here. It all adds up, to an extent.

    more on-topic: seems that nickserv isn't taking registrations this weekend -
    [22:35:59] -Global- [Logon News - May 09 2009] IRC Services are currently in a read-only state--no new nickname or channel registrations will be processed and changes to settings or access lists will not be saved. This is only effective for this weekend.

    AutumnWindz on
  • proXimityproXimity Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I believe the best solution would be this-

    Keep the channel -m as much of the time as possible, while increasing the amount of HOps/people who can initiate +m. Having people who can do this on at almost all times is crucial, yet very doable. This would not be a change of !redalert, it'd be more of a replacement than anything. Registration and being added to the autovoice list should be strongly encouraged, but not required, as it generally is now. I don't know if there's anything to make non-registrants automatically de-voice if +m or something was engaged, but that may be incentive (while not making it mandatory) to register your nick.

    As AutumnWindz has so clearly pointed out, requiring you to register and get setup with such is both draconian to longtime users and hostile to newcomers.

    It is totally not necessary to have +m active at all times, only to have people around to activate it when it's actually needed. The current roster of Ops/HOps is insufficient to provide for the flexibility that would be ideal, yet obtainable.

    Mockturtle honestly IS NOT A BIG DEAL, and there has been some incredible overreactions to what should be a relatively minor problem.

    proXimity on
    camo_sig2.png
  • BigRedBigRed Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    There's no other alternative that keeps the trolls out

    Yeah it may suck for some of the new people
    So does the endless spam

    Nobody is turned away from the unofficial irc channel, nobody is elitist, the channel is about as exclusive as the forum (ohnoes registration). Everyone is welcome to both.

    The vocal minority (standard internet fare) is making a huge stink about something they don't like, but the rest of the channel is fine with to keep the trolls out. Everyone else sees there's no better option except for a few people.
    What I dont understand is why those few people are making everyone in the channel look like complete assholes :/ The same people in the channel are the same that are on the forum

    BigRed on
    <MoeFwacky> besides, BigRed-Worky is right
  • Atlus ParkerAtlus Parker Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Jesus christ BigRed, when are you going to learn? You can't just keep us, the "vocal minority" down, without us putting up some kind of a fight. Our revolutions will leave your streets red with blood!

    Hark! The archangels cry!

    BigRed! BigRed! We cometh for you!

    Atlus Parker on
  • BigRedBigRed Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    since the flamewar appears to be over...
    edit: me and atlus win at sametime posting

    IRC services are fully restored after last weeks hicup. nickserv registration is reopened.

    BigRed on
    <MoeFwacky> besides, BigRed-Worky is right
  • BigRedBigRed Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Atlus:
    Go drink some more

    BigRed on
    <MoeFwacky> besides, BigRed-Worky is right
  • edited May 2009
    BigRed wrote: »
    Atlus:
    Go drink some more

    he will start to hit us if he does

    Richard M. Nixon on
    chevy.jpgsteve.jpgmartin.jpg
  • AccalonAccalon Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    BigRed wrote: »
    The vocal minority (standard internet fare) is making a huge stink about something they don't like, but the rest of the channel is fine with to keep the trolls out. Everyone else sees there's no better option except for a few people.
    What I dont understand is why those few people are making everyone in the channel look like complete assholes :/ The same people in the channel are the same that are on the forum

    Just because we're the "vocal minority", does that automatically make our concerns worthless? I've never felt so belittled for having a contrary view in my life. So far there are obviously more than just a couple people that are expression concerns, and on top of that, some are new to the community.
    MoeFwacky wrote:
    IRC IS NOT OFFICIAL OR ASSOCIATED WITH PENNY ARCADE IN ANY WAY
    Also, since the channel is actually called 'paforums_PAX', there's no way some people can claim that you have no affiliation with the actual PAX. It may not be officially sanctioned or anything, but the fact that you're using the name means that you are still a direct representation of PAX as a whole. As far as affiliations are concerned, 'PAX' is trademarked and the channel is using that trademark.

    That argument didn't work so well when I started my PAX Singles website. As must as I posted Unofficial all over it, I was asked to not use PAX or Penny Arcade because it's a use of a trademark. If this IRC channel is going to be run by OFFICIAL PA moderators and OFFICIAL PA Enforcers, then I feel if it's going to hold the Penny Arcade branding it should damn well be representing them well...

    Right now it is NOT
    proXimity wrote:
    Keep the channel -m as much of the time as possible, while increasing the amount of HOps/people who can initiate +m.

    I have suggested this as well, but was quickly told that I was an idiot and only 100% +M is the way to handle it. I don't see how 2 seconds of spam and then one of the many possible HO's turning on +M is inconvenient. AutumnWindz is right in saying that we're letting mockturtle win and encouraging him to continue this these unnecessary measures.
    Ultimately, I feel that these measures and attitudes, while they may (or may not) prevent future trollings, are potentially driving away plenty of new people. Moe Fwacky, the other guy isn't the only one with a problem, I have questions and problems too. Sure, there are new people who successfully get into the community, but I for one have been disappointed.

    The PAX forums are here expressly for the purpose of welcoming in new people to our wonderful community. PAX is about finding and making friends who share our passions of games and nerdiness. It should be warm and friendly and as easy as possible to get involved.

    Lately, those in charge are portraying an attitude of "We've been here a long time, this community is established. If you want in you'd better do everything our way, the first time, or else."

    That's not what this community needs. There are ways, as suggested above, to quell the troll problem without surrounding our community with steel walls and barbed wire. Who wants to join that?

    Accalon on
    PAX 2007 Omegathon Champeen

    *Proud member of the Photoshop Heroes*
  • The DIMDThe DIMD Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I can see both sides of this truthfully, but as a newbie I'll just give my thoughts.

    I personally found it really easy to join the IRC. Red was really helpful and I was set up almost instantaneously. It may be a little confusing, but after being there when the trolls came a knockin', I can honestly see the need for those measures.

    I don't really get the whole elitist thing honestly. I found this group both on IRC and on the forums to be nothing but inviting and friendly. I also found it to be a really great way to keep in touch with the people I've recently become acquainted with. I suppose I just don't see what difficulty lies in registering. I mean, if people can't do it I understand... but to me it's no different than why an unregistered user can post on these forums.

    Just my two cents though. :)

    The DIMD on
    <+ACC3SS> 4chan doesn't make me cringe as much as you do, The_DIMD.
  • AccalonAccalon Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    BigRed wrote: »
    Accalon wrote: »
    That argument didn't work so well when I started my PAX Singles website.

    Is that what this is about?

    Are you serious BigRed? You think I'm holding this position out of spite? I am not so pathetic as to try and drag others down just cause I had a hiccup with a fun site I started.

    No, this is about trying to keep PAX Forums and the chat channel that is accompanied with it the open welcoming place it should be.

    Maybe your intentions are misguided if you feel that is my argument.

    Accalon on
    PAX 2007 Omegathon Champeen

    *Proud member of the Photoshop Heroes*
  • kazuokazuo Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Neelix wrote: »
    In summation, I am against the draconian IRC restrictions as I feel that they severely limit the ability of new community members to become an active part of the community, and I feel that the management's reactions to criticism of the IRC restrictions are an indicator of problems with the representation of Penny Arcade and the PAX community.

    In summation, your argument is dumb

    "Draconian?" Hardly. Might as well call them Nazi's if you want to start using inaccurate labels. I don't get why people are crying about a very simple registration process that allows the channel to avoid being spammed by some loser with too much time on his hands.

    You have to register to use AIM
    You have to register to use gmail and googlechat
    and MSN, and ICQ and whatever else bullshit chat you want to use

    Cry more guys, seriously

    kazuo on
  • proXimityproXimity Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Isn't the fact that this whole issue is causing so much shit in the first place a pretty good indicator that it's far from an ideal solution? And don't go spouting off about it being a vocal minority disliking it, because really, it's just as small of a minority that is really supporting it.

    proXimity on
    camo_sig2.png
  • BigRedBigRed Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Accalon wrote: »
    Just because we're the "vocal minority", does that automatically make our concerns worthless? I've never felt so belittled for having a contrary view in my life. So far there are obviously more than just a couple people that are expression concerns, and on top of that, some are new to the community.

    No it doesnt, but there are still only a few people that have an issue with this. Everyone is trying to be as helpful as possible when people are signing up on irc. Ive talked countless people through the register process and to get them setup, how is that being uninviting?

    Accalon wrote: »
    That argument didn't work so well when I started my PAX Singles website. As must as I posted Unofficial all over it, I was asked to not use PAX or Penny Arcade because it's a use of a trademark. If this IRC channel is going to be run by OFFICIAL PA moderators and OFFICIAL PA Enforcers, then I feel if it's going to hold the Penny Arcade branding it should damn well be representing them well...

    Right now it is NOT

    How is the unofficial channel not representing them well?
    Becuase it changed to requiring registration?
    Just like the pax forum that requires registration?

    Should the forum not require registration?

    I wonder how long that would fly.

    This channel has existed for 4 years now and has always been unofficial. Why is this coming up now?
    How is this about your dating site? is that what is making you suddenly angry about all this?
    Accalon wrote: »
    I have suggested this as well, but was quickly told that I was an idiot and only 100% +M is the way to handle it. I don't see how 2 seconds of spam and then one of the many possible HO's turning on +M is inconvenient. AutumnWindz is right in saying that we're letting mockturtle win and encouraging him to continue this these unnecessary measures.

    We tried that for weeks, hence the scripts i put in place to deal with this (+m the channel and voice people). I granted access of the script to many people, and we promoted a few more people to hops to manually voice people. In that two seconds there can be 3 screens full of text. We would +m then turn it off like 15min later, and the troll would just come back.
    How is not allowing the trolls to bother the channel anymore winning? Id call that a victory for us, personally, we dont have to put up with them anymore.
    Accalon wrote: »
    Ultimately, I feel that these measures and attitudes, while they may (or may not) prevent future trollings, are potentially driving away plenty of new people. Moe Fwacky, the other guy isn't the only one with a problem, I have questions and problems too. Sure, there are new people who successfully get into the community, but I for one have been disappointed.

    The PAX forums are here expressly for the purpose of welcoming in new people to our wonderful community. PAX is about finding and making friends who share our passions of games and nerdiness. It should be warm and friendly and as easy as possible to get involved.

    Lately, those in charge are portraying an attitude of "We've been here a long time, this community is established. If you want in you'd better do everything our way, the first time, or else."

    That's not what this community needs. There are ways, as suggested above, to quell the troll problem without surrounding our community with steel walls and barbed wire. Who wants to join that?

    Ever since +m was left on... When new people join the channel, I have been welcoming them via PM and walking them through registering their nick via chanserv (and manually voicing them in the process). I have also asked (since I dont run things, moe does) any other hops/ops to do the same. Is this not welcoming new poeple?

    We already tried the above sugguestions to minimize trolling of the channel but it was not effective. Whenever the channel was -m'ed the troll would just return. If anything it angered the trolls further, since hes aware of the script i made and one of his spam messages is its trigger phrase.

    Why are you being unreasonable? Its not like we havent tried these other methods before.

    Yeah +m sucks for some, but you are acting like we are just leaving it on and not even helping new people along when they join.
    Ever since it has been left on to solve the troll problem I have been devoting my personal time to PMing new people who join (im on irc at home and work at least 12h a day) and assisting them with irc (can you say the same thing about forum registration?).
    Yeah im not on at all hours, but there have been a few who PMed me overnight (when I was sleeping) and said they followed the instructions on the main page and asked to be added to the access list whenever I got back at the computer. They were not upset over it and just said to get to it when I could. So far its only the one new guy in this thread who had issues with it all, but understand theres no other way to avoid the trolls.
    Nobody has been turned away from the channel, its about as exclusive as the forum is, which isnt at all since anybody can signup.

    BigRed on
    <MoeFwacky> besides, BigRed-Worky is right
  • proXimityproXimity Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Honestly, most of my frustrations come from several times being on, and somebody new comes on who can't talk because there's no ops or hops around. This is usually later at night, when they're generally in bed/asleep/whatever.

    A compromising solution would be to add more hops who are around at the more... odd times of the day than the current roster contains.

    proXimity on
    camo_sig2.png
  • BigRedBigRed Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    proXimity wrote: »
    A compromising solution would be to add more hops who are around at the more... odd times of the day than the current roster contains.

    Finally a productive sugguestion.

    Further discussion about the above will be on irc.

    BigRed on
    <MoeFwacky> besides, BigRed-Worky is right
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited May 2009
    Since you guys saw fit to fill up the IRC thread with this flamewar, I'm moving it to another thread and locking it. Alternative suggestions to the security measures are still welcome in the IRC thread as long as they are constructive and not abusive.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

This discussion has been closed.