Quick Legal Question - Good Samaritan Law? Warning about a pedo? Wall o' Text

SheepSheep Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
edited May 2009 in Help / Advice Forum
Run down:

My girlfriend got into a shouting match with her sister. Basically, her sister is a pretty shitty person. They've never gotten along. Her sister had a pretty rough childhood and that affected how sister treated girlfriend when they were younger.

So, they don't really speak. They exchange snipes from time to time, but it never reached boiling point. Until recently. Girlfriend made a comment on her blog that sister misconstrued to be about her. It wasn't. But oh well.

Sister and girlfriend get in shouting match over phone, sister's boyfriend makes physical threats against girlfriend, I told sister's boyfriend that I don't care to get involved with this at all, and that I better not hear of any physical threats being made.

There's a pretty solid reason to believe that sister's boyfriend is sexually abusing sister's two children. There's no absolute proof, but the evidence is pretty strong and is corroborated by several family members that are relatively estranged from the sister. Basically, when a 4 year old girl starts talking about how things hurt and people touching her, well, it's pretty safe to draw conclusions.

Anyway... Girlfriend pretty much tells sister that she wants nothing to do with the sister and that she's a horrible person for letting her boyfriend get away with what he's doing, and some goading of the boyfriend takes place. Phone call ends.

Later that night, sister makes a paranoia fueled Facebook post basically claiming that her estranged family are the ones responsible, and this is all a conspiracy against her. Me included. Even though I've only been in the picture for about 7 months. So, girlfriend makes a retaliatory post on her blog. Things go quiet for about two weeks. Figured it was over. We were told to never call sister again. Even though we never do.

Well, this past Saturday, sister's boyfriend's father starts calling girlfriends mom and making legal threats over the blog post. Why, I dunno. He has no dog in this fight and neither does girlfriend's mom. He starts calling girlfriends phone and leaving voice mails. Cordial. He's not being a dick or anything, but she doesn't want to talk to any of them. She was serious when she said, "I want nothing to do with you or your family." Since leaving voice mails costs us money, I call the guy and tell him to stop calling, that we want nothing to do with it. He tries to tell me how things started, when I was there. I just informed him that things got out of hand after they made the physical threats and after they made the offending blog post. The guy starts getting flustered and starts stuttering and then tells me he'll see me in court. For the record, I was nothing but respectful. Yes sir, no sir, etc. The only thing that could be misconstrued as being out of hand was basically me interrupting taking over the conversation and telling him how things actually happened.

So, the guy hangs up. About 45 minutes later he calls back and asks if my parents own a certain business. I say yes sir and he hangs up. I figured he might try to harass my parents about it, so I call and let them know what's going on. My parents are classy people. Dad just tells me to not bother with him and that they'll just call the police and their lawyer if he shows up.

Another 45 minutes pass and he calls back and asks for my parents number. I tell him I've already informed my parents and that they don't care to speak with him as none of what is going on is any of their business. Guy says he'll go by and speak with them today.




So. Backstory is out of the way. I'm just curious. There is solid reason to believe that the boyfriend is a pedo. Would this be covered under Good Samaritan laws?

I'm not worried in the slightest about a court case. If they hire a lawyer to draft up a cease and desist letter, then maybe we'll pull the blog post. If we do have to appear in court, we'll probably go, make a statement, and have child services there as well.

I just think it's weird. No one that knows these people read the blog. Taking it to court and getting it attention isn't the best way to go about it. But, you know, rednecks.

Sheep on
«1

Posts

  • EggyToastEggyToast Jersey CityRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I'm not sure what you mean -- your question is literally whether Good Samaritan laws cover this dude being abusive towards a child. Do you mean you want to contact the police yet not be involved? If you contact the police you will likely have to draft a statement or something, or make sure someone in your family is willing to. The DA isn't going to make a case against the guy if there's no witnesses or evidence supporting it. The child's word may count but they're notoriously flimsy in court, since children are impressionable.

    EggyToast on
    || Flickr — || PSN: EggyToast
  • Dunadan019Dunadan019 Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    if what you say is true, reporting this to child services would not be out of the question.

    Dunadan019 on
  • SheepSheep Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    EggyToast wrote: »
    I'm not sure what you mean -- your question is literally whether Good Samaritan laws cover this dude being abusive towards a child. Do you mean you want to contact the police yet not be involved? If you contact the police you will likely have to draft a statement or something, or make sure someone in your family is willing to. The DA isn't going to make a case against the guy if there's no witnesses or evidence supporting it. The child's word may count but they're notoriously flimsy in court, since children are impressionable.

    The blog post is basically the guys picture with "KEEP YOUR CHILDREN AWAY". Since there's a good reason to believe this to be true, would this be covered under Good Samaritan laws?

    Sheep on
  • SheepSheep Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    Dunadan019 wrote: »
    if what you say is true, reporting this to child services would not be out of the question.

    The sister has already been investigated once. Part of her bad childhood was being molested by her father, who she routinely left her daughters with. There wasn't enough evidence to file charges.

    Sheep on
  • bowenbowen How you doin'? Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Sheep wrote: »
    Dunadan019 wrote: »
    if what you say is true, reporting this to child services would not be out of the question.

    The sister has already been investigated once. Part of her bad childhood was being molested by her father, who she routinely left her daughters with. There wasn't enough evidence to file charges.

    Report it again, tell them about how the kid is complaining about how someone is hurting her parts.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • WillethWilleth Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Sheep wrote: »
    EggyToast wrote: »
    I'm not sure what you mean -- your question is literally whether Good Samaritan laws cover this dude being abusive towards a child. Do you mean you want to contact the police yet not be involved? If you contact the police you will likely have to draft a statement or something, or make sure someone in your family is willing to. The DA isn't going to make a case against the guy if there's no witnesses or evidence supporting it. The child's word may count but they're notoriously flimsy in court, since children are impressionable.

    The blog post is basically the guys picture with "KEEP YOUR CHILDREN AWAY". Since there's a good reason to believe this to be true, would this be covered under Good Samaritan laws?

    I think Child Protection Services may have more power than you think. If you are worried about the safety of the child then I would look in to what they are able to do, especially if you have as strong evidence as you say.

    The fact that your fiancée posted that without undeniable proof is worrisome. IANAL of course, but this seems like defamation of character to me without proof, even if you think all signs point to it.

    Willeth on
    @vgreminders - Don't miss out on timed events in gaming!
    @gamefacts - Totally and utterly true gaming facts on the regular!
  • SheepSheep Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    That's what my main worry is. At most, slander and defamation of character.

    I just really don't want to have to pay for any court costs. Making this thread was just a feeler out for information. My normal legal consul often goes to Oscar Zeta Acosta type of excess and I'm not surprised whenever he disappears for a week or so.

    Sheep on
  • SentrySentry Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Sheep wrote: »
    EggyToast wrote: »
    I'm not sure what you mean -- your question is literally whether Good Samaritan laws cover this dude being abusive towards a child. Do you mean you want to contact the police yet not be involved? If you contact the police you will likely have to draft a statement or something, or make sure someone in your family is willing to. The DA isn't going to make a case against the guy if there's no witnesses or evidence supporting it. The child's word may count but they're notoriously flimsy in court, since children are impressionable.

    The blog post is basically the guys picture with "KEEP YOUR CHILDREN AWAY". Since there's a good reason to believe this to be true, would this be covered under Good Samaritan laws?

    Being a Good Samaritan would involve informing Child Protective services and the police if you feel actual physical abuse is taking place. You say the sister was investigated, but you said nothing about whether or not the boyfriend was. Without taking any actual steps to protect these kids, it seems to me you and your girlfriend are simply trying to attack them, then claim some dubious high ground you don't deserve.

    Sentry on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    wrote:
    When I was a little kid, I always pretended I was the hero,' Skip said.
    'Fuck yeah, me too. What little kid ever pretended to be part of the lynch-mob?'
  • bowenbowen How you doin'? Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I operated under the notion that court costs were held entirely by the person doing the suing. Otherwise you could just sue people to bankrupt them. Or whatever.

    The facebook thing? I mean sure it's slander/libel, but no more so than saying it at a party or event. The problem comes in when it affects their day to day lives or getting a job. If you said something so damaging (that was a lie) that the person couldn't go shopping or the likes, they could probably effectively sue you. Saying "You're a pedo" to someone on a website probably isn't much of anything.

    You'd probably be protected just from that. But sic child services on them hard this time, really hard. Have multiple family members report the issue.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • starmanbrandstarmanbrand Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Man, you all need to grow the hell up. Take down whatever posts you've made, apologize, and then just never speak to them again.

    You all are not trying to "THINK OF THE CHILDREN" when you're posting petty, possibly false, shit on the internet. If you were really looking out for them you would be getting child services to go after the boyfriend to try to get some proof that what you THINK is going on is actually going on.

    Grow up, take lame internet stuff down, cut them from your life completely. If you really want to help the kids, call child services some more.

    starmanbrand on
    camo_sig2.png
  • TopweaselTopweasel Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    To sum this up.

    The post isn't necessary and isn't protected under any Samaritan laws. I could be construed as slander and therefore could go either way in any legal battle. I would get rid of it, you never know they may not have printed it out yet.

    If you want to be a good Samaritan call social services on them and recommend to anyone whom has had the similar interactions with him or the kids to do the same.

    Topweasel on
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Take the shit off the internet. He's certainly not going to take you to court over it, though (who wants a court record showing that they were exonerated of being a child rapist?). It's just the fastest way to cut this douchebag out of your life.

    Doc on
  • EggyToastEggyToast Jersey CityRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Yeah, what Sentry said. Good Samaritan laws are to protect people who would otherwise not get involved in a situation. You're not getting involved, you're making a blog post. If you're seriously concerned for the children, contact your state services, not The Internet.

    Who are you trying to communicate to with your blog post? Police? Friends? Or just be kind of a dick because you don't like the guy or you think he's an asshole? I mean, your approach is kind of like trying to get in a fight with a dude behind a bar, instead of going to an authority figure.

    EggyToast on
    || Flickr — || PSN: EggyToast
  • KyouguKyougu Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Sheep wrote: »
    EggyToast wrote: »
    I'm not sure what you mean -- your question is literally whether Good Samaritan laws cover this dude being abusive towards a child. Do you mean you want to contact the police yet not be involved? If you contact the police you will likely have to draft a statement or something, or make sure someone in your family is willing to. The DA isn't going to make a case against the guy if there's no witnesses or evidence supporting it. The child's word may count but they're notoriously flimsy in court, since children are impressionable.

    The blog post is basically the guys picture with "KEEP YOUR CHILDREN AWAY". Since there's a good reason to believe this to be true, would this be covered under Good Samaritan laws?

    No it's not.

    It's pretty close to libel actually, as you have no hard evidence, since the guy has neverbeen investigaged and no proof has been show up.

    Someone needs to grow up and take down the post. If you're truly concerned for the children call Child Protective services.

    Kyougu on
  • GrisloGrislo Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    If you're sure enough about this to post it on facebook, or whatever, you should damn well be sure enough to take it further than that.

    If you're not sure enough to report him, take that rubbish of facebook.

    I can't know what your definition of "pretty solid reason" is, but I'd not use that wording unless I was at a stage where I would think about maybe taking it further than the great tribunal of facebook.

    Grislo on
    This post was sponsored by Tom Cruise.
  • JohnnyCacheJohnnyCache Starting Defense Place at the tableRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    No, libeling someone who is in the opposite side of a family dispute with you is CERTAINLY not a "good Samaritan" or bystander law situation.

    Basically, if it didin't start with "I was walking by and I saw a stranger..." it's going to be a reach.

    Also, 4 year olds are terrible witnesses. I know a four year old who was just a few days ago telling me Iron Man was sick, and another that thinks "space" is where you ice skate, and another one that thinks I'm black because I'm big, and he's heard the phrase "big black guy" over and over from his redneck mother.

    That's just fantasy, divorced of their desire to explore and/or please - if you ask a kid a question in an even slightly leading way, you can produce a desired answer. That's why there are entire fields of study in properly deposing kids for legal purposes.

    Also, if I was dating a girl, and she got in some bonkers-ass girlfight with her sister, and her sister's boyfriend posted I was a pedophile on facebook, I'd be almost literally fit to murder you. If you look at it from how pissed the guy should be if he's innocent, he's acting pretty mildly. You don't get to post something up for a guy's friends and neighbors calling him a pedophile and then go "that's it, that's the last word, I'm not picking up the phone"

    That's a fucked up thing to do, actually.

    JohnnyCache on
  • TL DRTL DR Not at all confident in his reflexive opinions of thingsRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Kyougu wrote: »
    Sheep wrote: »
    EggyToast wrote: »
    I'm not sure what you mean -- your question is literally whether Good Samaritan laws cover this dude being abusive towards a child. Do you mean you want to contact the police yet not be involved? If you contact the police you will likely have to draft a statement or something, or make sure someone in your family is willing to. The DA isn't going to make a case against the guy if there's no witnesses or evidence supporting it. The child's word may count but they're notoriously flimsy in court, since children are impressionable.

    The blog post is basically the guys picture with "KEEP YOUR CHILDREN AWAY". Since there's a good reason to believe this to be true, would this be covered under Good Samaritan laws?

    No it's not.

    It's pretty close to libel actually, as you have no hard evidence, since the guy has neverbeen investigaged and no proof has been show up.

    Someone needs to grow up and take down the post. If you're truly concerned for the children call Child Protective services.

    TL DR on
  • underdonkunderdonk __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    Why would you not keep reporting this to the authorities until someone was done about it?

    underdonk on
    Back in the day, bucko, we just had an A and a B button... and we liked it.
  • ShawnaseeShawnasee Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I try not to be harsh to people for asking for advice but you and your GF need to contact the authorities.

    That kid is SAYING SOMEONE IS TOUCHING HER!!! AND YOU'RE WORRIED ABOUT A FUCKING BLOG??

    Pull your collective head out and get in touch with child services so they can talk to the kid. Worrying about being sued for libel while a child is potentially being molested is fucking sad. Seriously, this makes me sad.

    Shawnasee on
  • RikushixRikushix VancouverRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Yeah, man...that blog post is actually pretty vindictive. Your sister's family is whacked out, it seems, but posting this guys picture is DEFINITELY not covered under the Good Samaritan law. It sounds like you're trying to justify your actions.

    Rikushix on
    StKbT.jpg
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    So, if I understand this correctly, you made a blog post about how a family member you don't like is a pedophile? But you didn't call CPS, or the police, or anything like that, you just put it up on the internet?

    How in the world would that make you a good samaritan? It just makes you an asshole, because either you don't actually think this guy is a pedophile and you're making shit up, or you do actually think this guy is a pedophile and all you're doing about it is posting on the internet.

    Take down the libelous blog post (because it is absolutely libel), and either report him to CPS or just stop talking to him entirely.

    Thanatos on
  • ShawnaseeShawnasee Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Stop talking to him AND about him, and start talking to CPS.

    DO

    THAT

    NOW

    Shawnasee on
  • JobastionJobastion Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Sheep wrote: »
    Later that night, sister makes a paranoia fueled Facebook post basically claiming that her estranged family are the ones responsible, and this is all a conspiracy against her. Me included. Even though I've only been in the picture for about 7 months. So, girlfriend makes a retaliatory post on her blog. Things go quiet for about two weeks. Figured it was over. We were told to never call sister again. Even though we never do.

    Just cause I'm a nice guy, I'd like to point out that Sheep didn't post the pic of girlfriend's sister's boyfriend the alleged pedo on face book. Sheep's GF did. Still wrong. Still should come down. Still should get in touch with CPS if you really do believe it to be the truth.

    Jobastion on
    Recommended reading - Worm (Superhero Genre) & Pact (Modern Fantasy Thriller) |
    Backlog Wars - Sonic Generations | Steam!
    Viewing the forums through rose colored glasses... or Suriko's Ye Old Style and The PostCount/TimeStamp Restoral Device
  • LadyMLadyM Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Do you really think he's abusing the four year old? If so, call Child Protective Services.

    If not, it seems to me you're adding fuel to the fire by being bitchy and petty towards this guy and trying to cover your ass with Good Samaritan laws which, by the way, would not cover defaming someone in a blog post.

    LadyM on
  • KyouguKyougu Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    BTW, I just want to add that I hope you guys really do feel that he's abusing children and not just letting the situation cloud your guy's judgement.

    Cause getting CPS called on you for no reason can not be fun, and if you're doing it to be vindictive can be grounds for a civil suit.

    Kyougu on
  • SheepSheep Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    She's calling them today.

    I spoke with her about taking it down, and she said she wouldn't. I can't force her, so I'm gonna do what it takes to support her in whatever way I can.

    Sheep on
  • The Crowing OneThe Crowing One Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Sheep wrote: »
    She's calling them today.

    I spoke with her about taking it down, and she said she wouldn't. I can't force her, so I'm gonna do what it takes to support her in whatever way I can.

    I'd highly suggest getting visibly and audibly involved with the "take it down" crowd. CYA and all.

    Of course it's more complex than that. You can work out the details if you don't want to be involved in the nastiness.

    The Crowing One on
    3rddocbottom.jpg
  • underdonkunderdonk __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    I'd highly suggest getting visibly and audibly involved with the "take it down" crowd. CYA and all.

    This. When this thing goes to court, this is only going to hurt your GF.

    IANAL, BTW.

    underdonk on
    Back in the day, bucko, we just had an A and a B button... and we liked it.
  • SammyFSammyF Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Sheep wrote: »
    I can't force her, so I'm gonna do what it takes to support her in whatever way I can.

    So I gather you're going to be paying for her attorney? :eyeroll:

    SammyF on
  • SheepSheep Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    So you suggest I hack her account or something?

    Sheep on
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Kyougu wrote: »
    Sheep wrote: »
    EggyToast wrote: »
    I'm not sure what you mean -- your question is literally whether Good Samaritan laws cover this dude being abusive towards a child. Do you mean you want to contact the police yet not be involved? If you contact the police you will likely have to draft a statement or something, or make sure someone in your family is willing to. The DA isn't going to make a case against the guy if there's no witnesses or evidence supporting it. The child's word may count but they're notoriously flimsy in court, since children are impressionable.

    The blog post is basically the guys picture with "KEEP YOUR CHILDREN AWAY". Since there's a good reason to believe this to be true, would this be covered under Good Samaritan laws?

    No it's not.

    It's pretty close to libel actually, as you have no hard evidence, since the guy has neverbeen investigaged and no proof has been show up.

    Someone needs to grow up and take down the post. If you're truly concerned for the children call Child Protective services.

    Yeah, okay, so this.

    Follow the advice in the post I'm quoting, it's the best advice you're going to get on the topic. Also, distance yourself from this legally where ever it comes up. Get used to repeating this line: "I didn't post it and the post in question does not represent my opinion".

    There's a good disincentive against the other party actually going to court, but at the same time, you don't want to be standing too closely by if summons start getting served.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Sheep wrote: »
    So you suggest I hack her account or something?

    Don't be stupid.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • SheepSheep Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    Pheezer wrote: »
    Sheep wrote: »
    So you suggest I hack her account or something?

    Don't be stupid.

    It was sarcasm.

    Sheep on
  • BloodySlothBloodySloth Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    This is one of the weirdest H/A threads pretty much ever. You feel that actual sexual abuse might be going on between your sister's boyfriend and a four year old girl, but your question to all of us is whether or not your shit is safe because you made a pissy blog post?

    this all feels spectacularly backwards. First off, if you think you might get in some legal trouble because of some needless libel on the internet, it's probably time to take that fucker down. What purpose does it even serve, other than to spark an argument?

    Secondly, if this pedophilia shit is serious, there is something hideously wrong with letting it slide. You need to fucking get to the bottom of that.

    BloodySloth on
  • SheepSheep Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2009
    It's not being overlooked. DHS will be contacted. In the mean time, I'm was also worried about potential court costs/issues on my end.

    Sheep on
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    ...DHS?

    If you are tied to that blog posting and he sues for libel, you might get held responsible by the judge and forced to pay up. Even if you are not judged to be responsible for libel, you will still very likely accrue substantial legal fees. That's where your risk lies.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • DodgeBlanDodgeBlan PSN: dodgeblanRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    *joins chorus*

    What the hell? Seriously? You think posting unsubstantiated claims on a blog could possibly be legally protected? Are you crazy?

    DodgeBlan on
    Read my blog about AMERICA and THE BAY AREA

    https://medium.com/@alascii
  • Mr. PokeylopeMr. Pokeylope Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Sheep wrote: »
    She's calling them today.

    I spoke with her about taking it down, and she said she wouldn't. I can't force her, so I'm gonna do what it takes to support her in whatever way I can.

    Tell her that the blog post may make it harder to help her sister's kids. And that's what's important right? Not winning the arguement with her sister.

    Right now the sister's boyfriend could just point out that any call to CPS as being part of a vindictive family fight. Which could cause CPS to ignore any future allegations.

    Mr. Pokeylope on
  • splashsplash Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I was scared and confused when the first 10 replies had so little to do with bringing up the fact that you think an innocent child is being sexually abused and possibly scarred for life and the main topic isn't about how to investigate it and stop it immediately. But then everybody started posting about the true important subject here. So I want to reiterate that.

    splash on
  • SentrySentry Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    splash wrote: »
    I was scared and confused when the first 10 replies had so little to do with bringing up the fact that you think an innocent child is being sexually abused and possibly scarred for life and the main topic isn't about how to investigate it and stop it immediately. But then everybody started posting about the true important subject here. So I want to reiterate that.

    Then you need to learn to read, because almost every post from the very beginning mentioned calling Child Protective Services.

    Sentry on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    wrote:
    When I was a little kid, I always pretended I was the hero,' Skip said.
    'Fuck yeah, me too. What little kid ever pretended to be part of the lynch-mob?'
Sign In or Register to comment.