The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Common misconception on voting

LoggymonsterLoggymonster Registered User regular
edited June 2009 in Debate and/or Discourse
Now let me start off by saying I personally voted for Lookouts BUT I absolutely support the free vote system used that declared Automata the clear winner.

People stating that "Jim Darkmagic stole votes that could have gone to The Lookouts" is a corrupt idea and a very whiny way to say one is a sore loser. If someone voted for Jim Darkmagic it is because they WANTED Jim Darkmagic. They didn't want Lookouts to begin with. Yes, if forced to only choose from two without the third ever being present they may have chosen a more "magical" based comic and not one with a tired idea that has been done before in different ways. BUT taking AWAY the third choice to give another choice a higher chance at success is just wrong.

How does this reflect Penny Arcade and to a greater extent it's creators? Are they just trying to pacify sore fans who didn't get the votes for the comic they wanted? If that is so I don't think this voting system is the way to go about it. Is it an attempt to make the vote swing in the direction of the comic they most wanted to make anyway? If that's the case why have a vote at all? OR is it just a love for "Tournament" style results? If that's the case, wouldn't it have been much better to offer a fourth comic idea even if it was just to even the field?

Loggymonster on
«1

Posts

  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Has the voting already taken place? I didn't even see the poll.

    Ah well, Automata was my favourite anyway, so all is well.

    Richy on
    sig.gif
  • KalTorakKalTorak One way or another, they all end up in the Undercity.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    cex1r.gif

    KalTorak on
  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Richy wrote: »
    Has the voting already taken place? I didn't even see the poll.

    Ah well, Automata was my favourite anyway, so all is well.
    Yeah, but they are issuing a new poll without Jim Darkmagic as an option, because it was crushed and Lookout fans claimed Jim Darkmagic was pulling a Ralph Nader.

    There is a link to the new poll in today's newspost.

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • MalyonsusMalyonsus Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Actually, dropping the lowest ranked choice and doing another round of voting is relatively common and not at all illegitimate. It's typically called a runoff.

    Malyonsus on
  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    should have used instant-runoff ballots

    Bama on
  • tsmvengytsmvengy Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Now let me start off by saying I personally voted for Lookouts BUT I absolutely support the free vote system used that declared Automata the clear winner.

    People stating that "Jim Darkmagic stole votes that could have gone to The Lookouts" is a corrupt idea and a very whiny way to say one is a sore loser. If someone voted for Jim Darkmagic it is because they WANTED Jim Darkmagic. They didn't want Lookouts to begin with. Yes, if forced to only choose from two without the third ever being present they may have chosen a more "magical" based comic and not one with a tired idea that has been done before in different ways. BUT taking AWAY the third choice to give another choice a higher chance at success is just wrong.

    How does this reflect Penny Arcade and to a greater extent it's creators? Are they just trying to pacify sore fans who didn't get the votes for the comic they wanted? If that is so I don't think this voting system is the way to go about it. Is it an attempt to make the vote swing in the direction of the comic they most wanted to make anyway? If that's the case why have a vote at all? OR is it just a love for "Tournament" style results? If that's the case, wouldn't it have been much better to offer a fourth comic idea even if it was just to even the field?

    It's called a runoff. It's used in elections in lots of other countries so people can support a first choice that may not win, and also support a second (or third, fourth, etc.) choice that has a better chance to win.

    It's a better way to get a consensus on which one MOST people would prefer.

    tsmvengy on
    steam_sig.png
  • LoggymonsterLoggymonster Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    I'm just saying the problem is when people get a "runoff" vote when they complain that the first (completely legitimate) vote failed to give them the result they wanted. I hated Bush but Nader deserved the votes he got. They didn't do a runoff vote when people complained about that election.
    If the first vote was supposed to be final then it needed to stay final.

    Loggymonster on
  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    I'm not sure what you think the misconception is.

    Bama on
  • tsmvengytsmvengy Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    I'm just saying the problem is when people get a "runoff" vote when they complain that the first (completely legitimate) vote failed to give them the result they wanted. I hated Bush but Nader deserved the votes he got. They didn't do a runoff vote when people complained about that election.

    That's because our election system doesn't call or allow for that.

    Is there a problem with trying a system that has a better chance at figuring out the comic that MOST PEOPLE would like to see?

    They are both legitimate. I don't understand how you think one is more legit than the other.

    tsmvengy on
    steam_sig.png
  • redxredx I(x)=2(x)+1 whole numbersRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    If the first vote was supposed to be final then it needed to stay final.

    It's a webcomic run on a website by people who make money by their consumers clicking on ads. Why does it need to stay final?

    redx on
    They moistly come out at night, moistly.
  • tsmvengytsmvengy Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Election Fraud Scandal in Penny Arcade Webcomic Voting!

    More at 11.

    Where's the :rolleyes: when you need it?

    tsmvengy on
    steam_sig.png
  • LoggymonsterLoggymonster Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Well at least I'm thankful for some of the intelligent responses. I will concede (before this becomes a flame war) that this system will allow people who may have also wanted Lookouts to vote for it and maybe I'll get my comic i wanted in the first place. I am less motivated to move on the fact that, unless this runoff vote was intentional, this reflects badly on the integrity of Penny Arcade. Being a comic that prides itself on calling out other companies for their lack of integrity i would hope they aren't becoming hypocrites.

    Loggymonster on
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    See, this is the problem facing anyone who wants to overhaul and fix the flaws inherent in simple majority vote systems. Too many people have internalised the idea of a simple majority vote and begin to regard runoff voting as illegitimate.

    ... dude, it's just a runoff vote. O_o

    ronya on
    aRkpc.gif
  • Joshua368Joshua368 Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    you know all three comics will be made eventually, right?

    no need to go crying onto the forums because there's a chance your favorite might not win

    Joshua368 on
    58.png
  • kildykildy Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    tsmvengy wrote: »
    Election Fraud Scandal in Penny Arcade Webcomic Voting!

    More at 11.

    Where's the :rolleyes: when you need it?

    We've picked Blue as our color of freedom, and the forums support us.

    kildy on
  • KalTorakKalTorak One way or another, they all end up in the Undercity.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Jesus christ. It's a silly little webcomic vote. And it's just to determine which storyline they're doing first! They're going to do all of them eventually.

    If you're going to get your panties in a twist about their "integrity" for running a second round of voting on a webcomic popularity internet poll, then I think you have some wild misconceptions about what "integrity" is.

    KalTorak on
  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Joshua368 wrote: »
    you know all three comics will be made eventually, right?

    no need to go crying onto the forums because there's a chance your favorite might not win
    To be fair, he specifically said that his pick was Lookouts.

    Bama on
  • runaway_pancakerunaway_pancake Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Having a runoff better accomplishes the ultimate goal of making as many voters as possible as happy as possible. Getting in a huff over it because they didn't plan it from the beginning is pretty dumb, and this is coming from someone who voted for Automata both times.

    runaway_pancake on
  • DrakeDrake Edgelord Trash Below the ecliptic plane.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Well at least I'm thankful for some of the intelligent responses. I will concede (before this becomes a flame war) that this system will allow people who may have also wanted Lookouts to vote for it and maybe I'll get my comic i wanted in the first place. I am less motivated to move on the fact that, unless this runoff vote was intentional, this reflects badly on the integrity of Penny Arcade. Being a comic that prides itself on calling out other companies for their lack of integrity i would hope they aren't becoming hypocrites.

    Are you fucking serious?

    Drake on
  • LoggymonsterLoggymonster Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Drake wrote: »
    Well at least I'm thankful for some of the intelligent responses. I will concede (before this becomes a flame war) that this system will allow people who may have also wanted Lookouts to vote for it and maybe I'll get my comic i wanted in the first place. I am less motivated to move on the fact that, unless this runoff vote was intentional, this reflects badly on the integrity of Penny Arcade. Being a comic that prides itself on calling out other companies for their lack of integrity i would hope they aren't becoming hypocrites.

    Are you fucking serious?

    yes I'm fucking serious. You wanna do something about it, bitch? (see what I did there? I responded in a way your caveman like brain can understand.)

    I'm out, seems like most of you missed the point but there are some good arguments and my mind has been changed in some ways. Thanks for the responses!

    Loggymonster on
  • KalTorakKalTorak One way or another, they all end up in the Undercity.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Drake wrote: »
    Well at least I'm thankful for some of the intelligent responses. I will concede (before this becomes a flame war) that this system will allow people who may have also wanted Lookouts to vote for it and maybe I'll get my comic i wanted in the first place. I am less motivated to move on the fact that, unless this runoff vote was intentional, this reflects badly on the integrity of Penny Arcade. Being a comic that prides itself on calling out other companies for their lack of integrity i would hope they aren't becoming hypocrites.

    Are you fucking serious?

    After this voting fiasco how are we supposed to believe that they aren't taking all the Child's Play money and stuffing it down their pants in front of sick kids?!?!!!

    I will trust no more, forever.

    KalTorak on
  • KyouguKyougu Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    KalTorak wrote: »
    Drake wrote: »
    Well at least I'm thankful for some of the intelligent responses. I will concede (before this becomes a flame war) that this system will allow people who may have also wanted Lookouts to vote for it and maybe I'll get my comic i wanted in the first place. I am less motivated to move on the fact that, unless this runoff vote was intentional, this reflects badly on the integrity of Penny Arcade. Being a comic that prides itself on calling out other companies for their lack of integrity i would hope they aren't becoming hypocrites.

    Are you fucking serious?

    After this voting fiasco how are we supposed to believe that they aren't taking all the Child's Play money and stuffing it down their pants in front of sick kids?!?!!!

    I will trust no more, forever.

    I'm becoming a lawyer!

    Kyougu on
  • DeebaserDeebaser on my way to work in a suit and a tie Ahhhh...come on fucking guyRegistered User regular
    edited June 2009
    I mistakenly thought this thread was more important based on the subject text of the thread.

    Deebaser on
  • DrakeDrake Edgelord Trash Below the ecliptic plane.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Drake wrote: »
    Well at least I'm thankful for some of the intelligent responses. I will concede (before this becomes a flame war) that this system will allow people who may have also wanted Lookouts to vote for it and maybe I'll get my comic i wanted in the first place. I am less motivated to move on the fact that, unless this runoff vote was intentional, this reflects badly on the integrity of Penny Arcade. Being a comic that prides itself on calling out other companies for their lack of integrity i would hope they aren't becoming hypocrites.

    Are you fucking serious?

    yes I'm fucking serious. You wanna do something about it, bitch? (see what I did there? I responded in a way your caveman like brain can understand.)

    I'm out, seems like most of you missed the point but there are some good arguments and my mind has been changed in some ways. Thanks for the responses!

    What makes Mike and Jerry think they can run this vote how they want? Fucking sellouts. How dare they, after all these years of providing us with free fun. Fucking hypocrites.

    Drake on
  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Deebaser wrote: »
    I mistakenly thought this thread was more important based on the subject text of the thread.
    it's a common misconception

    Bama on
  • KalTorakKalTorak One way or another, they all end up in the Undercity.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Kyougu wrote: »
    KalTorak wrote: »
    Drake wrote: »
    Well at least I'm thankful for some of the intelligent responses. I will concede (before this becomes a flame war) that this system will allow people who may have also wanted Lookouts to vote for it and maybe I'll get my comic i wanted in the first place. I am less motivated to move on the fact that, unless this runoff vote was intentional, this reflects badly on the integrity of Penny Arcade. Being a comic that prides itself on calling out other companies for their lack of integrity i would hope they aren't becoming hypocrites.

    Are you fucking serious?

    After this voting fiasco how are we supposed to believe that they aren't taking all the Child's Play money and stuffing it down their pants in front of sick kids?!?!!!

    I will trust no more, forever.

    I'm becoming a lawyer!

    20080411.jpg

    KalTorak on
  • DarkewolfeDarkewolfe Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    I was most amused that the runoff argument boiled down to a sci-fi fan vs. fantasy fan argument. Additionally, I'm willing to lay down some money that they actually wanted to draw Lookouts more than they wanted to work on Automata right now.

    (And I think they really wanted to do Jim Darkmagic the most. However, the initial comic was just unfunny, and that's definitely what turned me off.)

    Nonetheless, I think we should begin tweeting about this oppressive system and the thrown election. Clearly Automata was the will of the people.

    Darkewolfe on
    What is this I don't even.
  • SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited June 2009
    Voted for Automata...this must be how supporters of Mousavi feel.

    Szechuanosaurus on
  • KalTorakKalTorak One way or another, they all end up in the Undercity.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Voted for Automata...this must be how supporters of Mousavi feel.

    Just like the GOP, mirite?

    (sorry, cross-reference from the GOP thread)

    KalTorak on
  • MagicPrimeMagicPrime FiresideWizard Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    So Loggy -- is this "Common Misconception" thing going to be your schtick? If so -- I'll tell you right now -- it's not going to win you any friends.

    MagicPrime on
    BNet • magicprime#1430 | PSN/Steam • MagicPrime | Origin • FireSideWizard
    Critical Failures - Havenhold CampaignAugust St. Cloud (Human Ranger)
  • DrakeDrake Edgelord Trash Below the ecliptic plane.Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Voted for Automata...this must be how supporters of Mousavi feel.

    Nice Hoekstra, there.

    Drake on
  • evilintentevilintent Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    What the fuck? Darkmagic was removed because it had much, much, much fewer votes than the rest, and it was highly unlikely that it would ever catch up.

    What the fuck is your damage?

    evilintent on
    6a00d83451c45669e2011571303907970b-.jpg
  • SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited June 2009
    evilintent wrote: »
    What the fuck is your damage?

    That was very...uh..eighties of you.

    Szechuanosaurus on
  • MagicPrimeMagicPrime FiresideWizard Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Don't you... forget about me...

    MagicPrime on
    BNet • magicprime#1430 | PSN/Steam • MagicPrime | Origin • FireSideWizard
    Critical Failures - Havenhold CampaignAugust St. Cloud (Human Ranger)
  • DelzhandDelzhand Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited June 2009
    I ran... Iran's so far awayyyyy

    Delzhand on
  • CampyCampy Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Didn't Mike say he had difficulty with drawing Automata, as it's so different from his usual style? He's gonna love everyone for doubling his work hours.

    Also, I think that the runoff votes are freaking awesome. In countries such as the England it would allow people to vote for who they actually wanted rather than being coerced to voting for one of the big two (maybe three) by scare tactics of "Woooooh, vote for us or the other even worse guy will get in, wooooooh".

    Campy on
  • KyouguKyougu Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    Campy wrote: »
    Didn't Mike say he had difficulty with drawing Automata, as it's so different from his usual style? He's gonna love everyone for doubling his work hours.

    Also, I think that the runoff votes are freaking awesome. In countries such as the England it would allow people to vote for who they actually wanted rather than being coerced to voting for one of the big two (maybe three) by scare tactics of "Woooooh, vote for us or the other even worse guy will get in, wooooooh".

    That's why I voited for it actually. The art was so different from what's he has normally done, while Lookout, although neat in concept, still looked too familiar.

    Kyougu on
  • YodaTunaYodaTuna Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    I'm on the side of the OP, to me it seems like they had this runoff vote just because they're hoping they don't have to do Automata. If that's the case, why even hold a poll? Just do whatever one you want. Runoff's are legitimate, sure, but as you're all saying "It's just a webcomic" if it's not that important, why have a runoff?

    YodaTuna on
  • The Lord of HatsThe Lord of Hats Registered User regular
    edited June 2009
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    I'm on the side of the OP, to me it seems like they had this runoff vote just because they're hoping they don't have to do Automata. If that's the case, why even hold a poll? Just do whatever one you want. Runoff's are legitimate, sure, but as you're all saying "It's just a webcomic" if it's not that important, why have a runoff?

    Except that they said that they do, in fact, want to do all of these. And they're going to be doing them all eventually.

    All we're determining is the order in which they do them.

    The Lord of Hats on
  • SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited June 2009
    I think they're are just using this run-off to buy time to organise strikes against dissidents using their PAX Enforcer goons. I'm voting by-proxy just in case so they can't find me. I mean, via a proxy.


    fakeedit: via lots of proxies actually

    Szechuanosaurus on
This discussion has been closed.