The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.

New Rimfire Rifle for a Plinking Good Time

Durandal InfinityDurandal Infinity Registered User regular
edited July 2009 in Help / Advice Forum
Get Ready kids

So Im getting ready to purchase a new .22LR rifle and I have a few questions about exactly which one I should get. I've looked around extensively and I honestly wish to purchase a rifle that is under 400 TOTAL (new hammers barrels etc) and be a good rifle for plinking targets, cans, and potentially rabbits and woodland squirrel.

I have narrowed my selection down to the:

Ruger 10/22 (which the upgrades category would fall into)
Remington 597 (Great out of the box now, used to be trash)
Remington 552 Speedmaster (Classic design and beautiful blue & walnut, but a bitch to take apart)
OR if I can find it for a good price
Browning BL22 (Lever action cowboy god)

Im essentially looking for input on rifles of the sort, Id like to keep them on the cheaper side but with Obama in office all gun prices have skyrocketed. Any pros or cons with any of the rifles I've mentioned would be appreciated or other brands that I've looked past. In general Im looking for autoloaders with an exception for lever action, they are just classy.

Durandal Infinity on

Posts

  • ShadowfireShadowfire Vermont, in the middle of nowhereRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    If you like the idea of lever action rifles (which you fucking should), I've been heavily leaning toward Marlin and Henry rifles. I see places online with Henry .22s at around $250 for the base models, and they're well-liked firearms.

    Hit your local gun store and see what they've got. However, if you can wait a bit, you may want to. Once people stop being crazy fucks, we should see a pretty good second-hand gun market in a year (or a little less).

    Shadowfire on
  • dispatch.odispatch.o Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I can't add much other than I had a Ruger 10/.22 when I was growing up and loved it. It belonged to my grandfather before me and I owned it for 19 years. The police eventually confiscated it when we called them to our home on a break in. Nothing was missing, but they saw the gun and pulled the "is it registered?" bit. By the time I dug up the purchase and registration information three days later it had been destroyed. California gun laws are crazy bullshit.

    I always found the task of loading my Rugers clip very satisfying. Don't know why.

    dispatch.o on
  • Steel AngelSteel Angel Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Get Ready kids

    So Im getting ready to purchase a new .22LR rifle and I have a few questions about exactly which one I should get. I've looked around extensively and I honestly wish to purchase a rifle that is under 400 TOTAL (new hammers barrels etc) and be a good rifle for plinking targets, cans, and potentially rabbits and woodland squirrel.

    I have narrowed my selection down to the:

    Ruger 10/22 (which the upgrades category would fall into)
    Remington 597 (Great out of the box now, used to be trash)
    Remington 552 Speedmaster (Classic design and beautiful blue & walnut, but a bitch to take apart)
    OR if I can find it for a good price
    Browning BL22 (Lever action cowboy god)

    Im essentially looking for input on rifles of the sort, Id like to keep them on the cheaper side but with Obama in office all gun prices have skyrocketed. Any pros or cons with any of the rifles I've mentioned would be appreciated or other brands that I've looked past. In general Im looking for autoloaders with an exception for lever action, they are just classy.

    The 597 can be finicky with some ammo by all accounts. The Ruger feeds more reliably. Plus parts and accessories are much more common.

    Ruger and Marlin dominate the autoloading .22 LR rifle market for good reason. Plus you have a better chance of finding a 10/22 used and saving some cash that way.

    Steel Angel on
    Big Dookie wrote: »
    I found that tilting it doesn't work very well, and once I started jerking it, I got much better results.

    Steam Profile
    3DS: 3454-0268-5595 Battle.net: SteelAngel#1772
  • underdonkunderdonk __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2009
    Love love love the Ruger. You will not be unhappy with this rifle.

    underdonk on
    Back in the day, bucko, we just had an A and a B button... and we liked it.
  • The Black HunterThe Black Hunter The key is a minimum of compromise, and a simple, unimpeachable reason to existRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Dad got a BRNO

    Fucking excellent rifle

    The Black Hunter on
  • Durandal InfinityDurandal Infinity Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Im thinking 10/22 I may splurge on one with a walnut stock as my local gun store has a few of them new and they generally are nice enough to toss me a brick of CCI mini mags for buying a new gun from them, especially something that isnt an AR-15 that seem to sell like hotcakes. Ill get a BL22 or Henry Goldenboy in the future, or maybe a Winchester Lever .30-30 if they open another outdoor range near me.

    Quick question for you guys, do any of you kids buy into "barrel break in?" I plan on disassembling and cleaning the gun as soon as I get it, and every time I leave the range. Is it necessary to do the (1 shot CLEAN x20) then (10 clean x10) then (20 clean x5 ) or is that just an old time myth? Sort of sounds like a waste of ammo IMHO

    Keep in mind I will mainly be firing copper jacketed or "plated" as I alternate between indoor and outdoor range depending on weather. (Indoor doesnt like exposed lead, health hazard)

    Durandal Infinity on
  • Nova_CNova_C I have the need The need for speedRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I'm pretty sure Gale McMillan (Yes, THAT McMillan) says barrel break-in is a load of crap and he's one of the most respected custom rifle makers in the world. I'm good with that.

    Either way, a .22 isn't going to really need a break-in.

    I have a Ruger 10/22 that was customized to the tune of $1K. The out-of-the-box performance was very good on it, but the sheer amount of customization out there makes this rifle very attractive.

    One thing, though. A stock CZ .22 will hold it's own against my custom Ruger 10/22. Food for thought.

    Nova_C on
  • Steel AngelSteel Angel Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Quick question for you guys, do any of you kids buy into "barrel break in?" I plan on disassembling and cleaning the gun as soon as I get it, and every time I leave the range. Is it necessary to do the (1 shot CLEAN x20) then (10 clean x10) then (20 clean x5 ) or is that just an old time myth? Sort of sounds like a waste of ammo IMHO

    Shooters far more experienced than me only do that for long range competition rifles. It's nothing that won't occur over time, not all barrels benefit from it (ie, if they're already smoothed out), and not something you'd need to do for a plinker in any case.

    Actually, many expert shooters seem to go the opposite way with rimfires and advise not cleaning the barrel. This would be idiotic on a more powerful centerfire rifle but the little powder that builds up in a rimfire and stays there doesn't warrant the wear to the barrel and muzzle cleaning results in. Something like the excess gunk just not being able to stay inside the rifle when fired IIRC. Apparently a lot of competition shooters go this route and I haven't heard of a rimfire going kaboom at a competition. But do clean the non-barrel parts, pretty sure this does not apply to the action etc.
    Nova_C wrote: »
    One thing, though. A stock CZ .22 will hold it's own against my custom Ruger 10/22. Food for thought.

    Yeah, but now we're comparing a bolt action to a semi-auto and the OP wanted to stick to the latter.

    Steel Angel on
    Big Dookie wrote: »
    I found that tilting it doesn't work very well, and once I started jerking it, I got much better results.

    Steam Profile
    3DS: 3454-0268-5595 Battle.net: SteelAngel#1772
  • desdinovadesdinova Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    The 10/22 is a great firearm, the aftermarket is huge, it's reliable and easy to care for. The MkII pistols are great, too!

    desdinova on
    wat
  • Nova_CNova_C I have the need The need for speedRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Nova_C wrote: »
    One thing, though. A stock CZ .22 will hold it's own against my custom Ruger 10/22. Food for thought.

    Yeah, but now we're comparing a bolt action to a semi-auto and the OP wanted to stick to the latter.

    Ah. Then yeah, can't go wrong with a 10/22.

    Nova_C on
  • TokyoRaverTokyoRaver Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    How are Savage Arms guns? I bought a Mark II not that long ago...

    TokyoRaver on
    logo_phpBB.gif
  • Steel AngelSteel Angel Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    TokyoRaver wrote: »
    How are Savage Arms guns? I bought a Mark II not that long ago...

    Very good. The Mark II is to bolt actions what the 10/22 is to semi-autos. Only downside on older ones were the triggers, which were heavier than what many want in a rimfire bolt action. They solved that with the accu-trigger system.

    Savage also has a good reputation in the centerfire market. Remington is better known but both Remington and Savage are usually recommended when people are looking for a first centerfire bolt action.

    Steel Angel on
    Big Dookie wrote: »
    I found that tilting it doesn't work very well, and once I started jerking it, I got much better results.

    Steam Profile
    3DS: 3454-0268-5595 Battle.net: SteelAngel#1772
  • KistraKistra Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Quick question for you guys, do any of you kids buy into "barrel break in?" I plan on disassembling and cleaning the gun as soon as I get it, and every time I leave the range. Is it necessary to do the (1 shot CLEAN x20) then (10 clean x10) then (20 clean x5 ) or is that just an old time myth? Sort of sounds like a waste of ammo IMHO

    Shooters far more experienced than me only do that for long range competition rifles. It's nothing that won't occur over time, not all barrels benefit from it (ie, if they're already smoothed out), and not something you'd need to do for a plinker in any case.

    Actually, many expert shooters seem to go the opposite way with rimfires and advise not cleaning the barrel. This would be idiotic on a more powerful centerfire rifle but the little powder that builds up in a rimfire and stays there doesn't warrant the wear to the barrel and muzzle cleaning results in. Something like the excess gunk just not being able to stay inside the rifle when fired IIRC. Apparently a lot of competition shooters go this route and I haven't heard of a rimfire going kaboom at a competition. But do clean the non-barrel parts, pretty sure this does not apply to the action etc.
    Nova_C wrote: »
    One thing, though. A stock CZ .22 will hold it's own against my custom Ruger 10/22. Food for thought.

    Yeah, but now we're comparing a bolt action to a semi-auto and the OP wanted to stick to the latter.

    I've never bothered doing anything like that for a .22.

    For the record, every competition shooter I know does clean their rifle on a semi-regular basis. Collegiate shooters go through several thousand rounds a week, barrels get nasty if you put that many rounds through them and don't clean them regularly. It is just that most .22 rifles have a sweet spot that isn't at squeaky clean. So you clean the rifle and then put 200 - 1000 rounds (depending on your particular rifle) down range before a big match.

    I do clean my .22 anytime it isn't going to be fired for a while (more than 2-3 weeks).

    Kistra on
    Animal Crossing: City Folk Lissa in Filmore 3179-9580-0076
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2009
    I have a newer 597 and I love it. But really, you can't go wrong with a 10/22.

    Doc on
  • Durandal InfinityDurandal Infinity Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    My friend went to dicks and got a 597 Scoped for I think $225 which sounds like a great deal especially for something mounted with a scope, apparently the scope that dicks affixed (it was not the remington model that came stock with a scope) came with the wrong size rings and required another tiny investment just to mount it properly. The gun itself worked flawlessly save the painful thumbs I had.

    I dunno, its from an older school of thought but not cleaning everytime just irks me the wrong way, but I understand the barrel wear. Ill just wont brush the barrel every time just run a hoppes patch, dry patches and a quick lube patch on it

    Durandal Infinity on
  • underdonkunderdonk __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2009
    I dunno, its from an older school of thought but not cleaning everytime just irks me the wrong way, but I understand the barrel wear. Ill just wont brush the barrel every time just run a hoppes patch, dry patches and a quick lube patch on it

    It really depends what you use it for. Most of the hunters I know 'round there parts clean their rifle, sight it in, hunt for the season, and clean it before putting it up for the year. The theory is, and I'm sure you know this, is that cleaning it will affect the accuracy. If you're hunting with it, trying to make kill shots, you want it to be as accurate as possible. If you just plan on killing paper with it, I personally would clean it after every third to fifth time to the range. Honestly, with the materials being used in the construction of both firearms and ammunition these days, you don't need to clean your gear after every trip to the range (assuming a normal shooting schedule).

    The only firearm of mine that I've never cleaned, beyond first pulling it out of the box, is my Yugo AK-47 under-folder. I figure if the day ever comes in which that thing doesn't cycle, I'll leave it sit outside in the rain with the action open for a couple of hours and that will take care of it.

    underdonk on
    Back in the day, bucko, we just had an A and a B button... and we liked it.
  • KistraKistra Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    underdonk wrote: »
    I dunno, its from an older school of thought but not cleaning everytime just irks me the wrong way, but I understand the barrel wear. Ill just wont brush the barrel every time just run a hoppes patch, dry patches and a quick lube patch on it

    It really depends what you use it for. Most of the hunters I know 'round there parts clean their rifle, sight it in, hunt for the season, and clean it before putting it up for the year. The theory is, and I'm sure you know this, is that cleaning it will affect the accuracy. If you're hunting with it, trying to make kill shots, you want it to be as accurate as possible. If you just plan on killing paper with it, I personally would clean it after every third to fifth time to the range. Honestly, with the materials being used in the construction of both firearms and ammunition these days, you don't need to clean your gear after every trip to the range (assuming a normal shooting schedule).

    The only firearm of mine that I've never cleaned, beyond first pulling it out of the box, is my Yugo AK-47 under-folder. I figure if the day ever comes in which that thing doesn't cycle, I'll leave it sit outside in the rain with the action open for a couple of hours and that will take care of it.

    Yeah, I've never put a brush through my competition .22LR. When I said clean I mean put through patches with solvent until they come out clean and then dry patches until they come out clean. And don't use a rod either. The cleaning systems that use what looks like fishing line prevent damage to the barrel.

    Kistra on
    Animal Crossing: City Folk Lissa in Filmore 3179-9580-0076
  • Nova_CNova_C I have the need The need for speedRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Speaking of cleaning, if you're okay with paying the premium, get a stainless barrel. I will never buy a rifle without one.

    The old .22 repeater my dad gave me as a kid takes some scrubbing to clean, but the 10/22 with the stainless match grade barrel and my new Tikka .204 with a stainless barrel clean so bloody fast and easy. And I'm pretty sure corrosion is pretty much no concern at all with a stainless barrel.

    I find with my Ruger 10/22 it takes about 100 rounds after a cleaning to hit it's sweet spot. Once there I can do a 1/2" at 50 yards (10 shot group) with it.
    NewScopeRings.jpg

    Custom1.jpg

    The accuracy there holds until around 500 rounds have been fired, then the group opens back up. So I clean based on rounds fired, not how often I go shooting. I'm doing the same thing with my Tikka, although I just got it, so I don't yet know it's sweet spot.

    Nova_C on
  • JohnnyCacheJohnnyCache Starting Defense Place at the tableRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I bought a level action henry .22 (fires LR or shorts) for USD260 brand spankin' new and I love it. I want to take it out behind the middle school and get it pregnant.

    JohnnyCache on
  • EliteLamerEliteLamer __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2009
    The Ruger 10/22 is about the best .22 you can get. You can customize a ton of parts for it and make it a sniper if you want or leave it as is.

    EliteLamer on
    SEGA
    p561852.jpg
  • Durandal InfinityDurandal Infinity Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Kistra wrote: »
    underdonk wrote: »
    I dunno, its from an older school of thought but not cleaning everytime just irks me the wrong way, but I understand the barrel wear. Ill just wont brush the barrel every time just run a hoppes patch, dry patches and a quick lube patch on it

    It really depends what you use it for. Most of the hunters I know 'round there parts clean their rifle, sight it in, hunt for the season, and clean it before putting it up for the year. The theory is, and I'm sure you know this, is that cleaning it will affect the accuracy. If you're hunting with it, trying to make kill shots, you want it to be as accurate as possible. If you just plan on killing paper with it, I personally would clean it after every third to fifth time to the range. Honestly, with the materials being used in the construction of both firearms and ammunition these days, you don't need to clean your gear after every trip to the range (assuming a normal shooting schedule).

    The only firearm of mine that I've never cleaned, beyond first pulling it out of the box, is my Yugo AK-47 under-folder. I figure if the day ever comes in which that thing doesn't cycle, I'll leave it sit outside in the rain with the action open for a couple of hours and that will take care of it.

    Yeah, I've never put a brush through my competition .22LR. When I said clean I mean put through patches with solvent until they come out clean and then dry patches until they come out clean. And don't use a rod either. The cleaning systems that use what looks like fishing line prevent damage to the barrel.

    I have a Ruger mini and my dad a Rock River M4 so I have a couple carbon fiber cleaning rods and 22 attachments and the sort. Id only use a brush on the inside of the receiver if it really starts to gum up due to the fact that .22LR is pretty dirty, though Ill save that for when I need to.

    [edit] given the attachments that I have would it almost be ok to only use a boresnake with some solvent and lube to clean the inside of the barrel every 500rds or so?

    Durandal Infinity on
  • A Dabble Of TheloniusA Dabble Of Thelonius It has been a doozy of a dayRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    My two cents. I've had nothing but trouble with Marlins. They always seem to be rather low quality compared other makers.

    A Dabble Of Thelonius on
  • NorthGuardNorthGuard Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Not like you needed it, but yes, the 10/22 is the way to go. One thing I'd recommend though, is upgrading to a match barrel - the stock barrel heats up a little too quickly for my tastes. If you prefer a heavier gun or are monkey armed like me, I'd suggest a musket-style stock.

    NorthGuard on
  • GafotoGafoto Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I have a Savage .22. God knows what model it is. It's dirt cheap and works pretty well at killing groundhogs. People who are more interested in target practice seem to gravitate towards the ruger due to the customization available. You can put together a pretty sweet 10/22 depending on how much money you're willing to spend.

    Gafoto on
    sierracrest.jpg
  • Durandal InfinityDurandal Infinity Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    NorthGuard wrote: »
    Not like you needed it, but yes, the 10/22 is the way to go. One thing I'd recommend though, is upgrading to a match barrel - the stock barrel heats up a little too quickly for my tastes. If you prefer a heavier gun or are monkey armed like me, I'd suggest a musket-style stock.

    the problem I have with most match style stocks is that Im a big fan of iron sighting and most aftermarket bull barrels ive seen are sightless

    Durandal Infinity on
  • Lia ParkerLia Parker __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2009
    Thanks for your kind information.

    Lia Parker on
  • Durandal InfinityDurandal Infinity Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Actually does anyone know a good bull barrel that is sited, i wouldn't mind grabbing one and a hogue stock

    Durandal Infinity on
  • Durandal InfinityDurandal Infinity Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Ive heard that the Stainless Steel 10/22s chip and peel on the inside of the receiver. any truth to this?

    Durandal Infinity on
Sign In or Register to comment.