The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Help save my party! [4E D&D]

devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
edited July 2009 in Critical Failures
So here is the long story short, I am running a 4E game with a large group of players (will lay out players below) but my players constantly struggle in the game. Some of them are brand new to paper and pencil RPGing, some are veterans, but I think part of where the issue lies is purely class makeup. I have given them the options of transferring their stats to a new character, new class/race, but I am unsure what else we can do.

I am a D&D insider subscriber, mainly because with such a large group I need to be able to keep track of stuff easier, and using the character creator and encounter creator saves me hours of time. The encounters I have been making are rated 'Too Easy/Easy', and the one today was rated 'Normal' (granted it was against 2 wyrmling dragons) but they struggled through this. I have players using power cards to help out, and figure out what they can/cannot do, since this helps the new players a lot.

Anyways, here is their current class makeup and experience.

Dragonborn Sorc, Playing D&D since AD&D
Drow Cleric, Played D&D on and off since 2nd.
Dwarf Shaman, New to D&D
Eladrin Rogue, New to D&D
Goliath Fighter, New to D&D
Goliath Warden, playing since 3.0
Shifter Druid, playing since 3.5

I myself have been playing on and off since AD&D, but I for the life of me can't figure out what group makeup they should have. The new people want to change their classes (minus the rogue). We are playing in Eberron, and since I have access to the character builder, I have opened up every class/race (with obvious restrictions on special ones (read: Swordmage, Genasi, Kenku, Wilden, etc etc)). Does anyone have suggestions for other classes or really anything else I could/should be using as a DM?

Thanks,
dev|eric

Spoiler here for one of the class changes for sure, spoilered for those that play in my group and read the forums.
Really, you should stop, if you are in my group ASIINA.
No Seriously, stop. I know it's you.
The Goliath Warden will become a Warforged Monk

deveric on

Posts

  • AsiinaAsiina ... WaterlooRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Fine, I won't read it.

    We really need to stop almost dying though.

    Asiina on
  • EshEsh Tending bar. FFXIV. Motorcycles. Portland, ORRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    The makeup looks fine. What specific paths are the classes taking though? Are you short on healing? Maybe it's your DMing? How experienced are you? It's also a pretty giant party. I don't like playing in groups bigger than five.

    Esh on
  • devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I've DM'ed on and off since 3rd edition, did 3.5, DM'ed in Rifts for a while, so I like to think I know what I'm doing, but none of the seasoned players have complained, they said they are enjoying it. This is the first time we have all played 4E, and we haven't played D&D since about 2 or 3 months after the original Eberron release. No one has figured out what paragon paths they want to go, most players have gone defensive in the heroic set though (which is part of the issue). I've played with bigger groups, as a PC, but not DM'ed more than 5 before. We do usually have one or two people absent from the game on a weekly basis though (today there was one gone).

    deveric on
  • ProbadProbad Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Well, you've got 2 of each role except for controller, so it doesn't seem like a ridiculous class imbalance. Even after the changes, it won't be terrible.

    I'm gonna go with my gut reaction and blame Asiina.

    Probad on
  • ProbadProbad Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    deveric wrote: »
    We do usually have one or two people absent from the game on a weekly basis though (today there was one gone).

    Missed this bit. When you're missing players, are all the roles still covered? If you're missing both defenders or leaders, the game could get ugly fast. Also, are you adjusting encounters on the fly to account for actual player numbers?

    Probad on
  • devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Probad wrote: »
    deveric wrote: »
    We do usually have one or two people absent from the game on a weekly basis though (today there was one gone).

    Missed this bit. When you're missing players, are all the roles still covered? If you're missing both defenders or leaders, the game could get ugly fast. Also, are you adjusting encounters on the fly to account for actual player numbers?

    Yeah I realized I forgot to add that in.

    Well, the cleric has always been here, whether physically, or in spirit (IE. someone playing both him and their normal character). Today, for instance, we were only short the druid. Last session, we were short the shaman and druid. And I have been creating the encounters based on a party of 5, so the difficulty should fit that, at least from what it is suggesting on the encounter builder.

    deveric on
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Are players using their second winds/leaders healing on their minor actions? Characters do get bashed in in 4e, it's really par for the course.

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • ProbadProbad Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I take it the party also has all their requisite magic items and such?

    It seems just odd to me that a 6-7 person group would struggle on easy-normal encounters for 5 characters of their level. How do the fights usually go down? Is something obviously lacking?

    Probad on
  • devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Arivia wrote: »
    Are players using their second winds/leaders healing on their minor actions? Characters do get bashed in in 4e, it's really par for the course.

    They are, when they remember them. This is why I made power cards for everyone, to help remember they can do more than pounce every round.

    deveric on
  • devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Probad wrote: »
    I take it the party also has all their requisite magic items and such?

    It seems just odd to me that a 6-7 person group would struggle on easy-normal encounters for 5 characters of their level. How do the fights usually go down? Is something obviously lacking?

    It always seems really one sided, if I make a 'Too Easy' encounter, it's over when it starts. If I make an encounter that is considered 'Normal', they almost die.

    Case in point, the fought 4 Vampire spawn fleshrippers at level 3 or so. I toned them down to level 3 from 5. They were one person short. The fleshrippers still had their 1 HP. I nearly killed two of them. I know they hurt, but they just couldn't save each other.

    deveric on
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    That's about normal, and that's where the leader steps in and allows them to hold on for a moment longer.

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • samurai6966samurai6966 Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    The party set up looks good as everyone says. If I was you I would either weaken the monsters a little or give the party a magical boost to help them slay monsters. Weaker monsters would mean that you got to redo some math so I would say that making a storyline that gives them magic weapons/armor/item would be easier.

    samurai6966 on
  • devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Arivia wrote: »
    That's about normal, and that's where the leader steps in and allows them to hold on for a moment longer.

    I've been doing that, not using certain powers (like in the dragon fight today) to their full extent.
    The party set up looks good as everyone says. If I was you I would either weaken the monsters a little or give the party a magical boost to help them slay monsters. Weaker monsters would mean that you got to redo some math so I would say that making a storyline that gives them magic weapons/armor/item would be easier.

    This was part of what I did today, allowing them to slay these dragons allowed them to loot their horde. I guess we will have to see what happens next week with these items, but they are a week or two out from leaving this area they are in now.

    deveric on
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    deveric wrote: »
    Arivia wrote: »
    That's about normal, and that's where the leader steps in and allows them to hold on for a moment longer.

    I've been doing that, not using certain powers (like in the dragon fight today) to their full extent.

    No, no, you don't hold back. The leader (cleric or otherwise) uses their abilities to give other characters temporary hp or let them recover some.

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • samurai6966samurai6966 Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I don't know what to tell you. Ive been playing since 3.5 6 months before 4e and jumped on the 4e bandwagon as soon as I got out of military basic training. Ive never been in a party that was too weak. Ive been in too strong parties before and the DM spit us up into two groups (group 1 in jail trying to escape and group 2 trying to save us before we got executed.) Maybe you should try that.

    samurai6966 on
  • ProbadProbad Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Eric, what are the levels of the characters?

    Probad on
  • devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Probad wrote: »
    Eric, what are the levels of the characters?

    They are all mixed mid-heroic, they are now (after today) running between levels 3-5.

    deveric on
  • ProbadProbad Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    deveric wrote: »
    Probad wrote: »
    Eric, what are the levels of the characters?

    They are all mixed mid-heroic, they are now (after today) running between levels 3-5.

    I'm just wondering what level you're building for and whether that might be an issue given that not all characters are at the top of that range.

    Probad on
  • devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I don't know what to tell you. Ive been playing since 3.5 6 months before 4e and jumped on the 4e bandwagon as soon as I got out of military basic training. Ive never been in a party that was too weak. Ive been in too strong parties before and the DM spit us up into two groups (group 1 in jail trying to escape and group 2 trying to save us before we got executed.) Maybe you should try that.

    Yeah I've done things like that in the past, but with really only one class that can heal (besides the minor shaman healing), I feel like I'd be leaving them out to get LOLSTOMPED.

    deveric on
  • devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Probad wrote: »
    deveric wrote: »
    Probad wrote: »
    Eric, what are the levels of the characters?

    They are all mixed mid-heroic, they are now (after today) running between levels 3-5.

    I'm just wondering what level you're building for and whether that might be an issue given that not all characters are at the top of that range.

    I started out everyone with 1d4x1000 exp (as I had done in previous games), and let them go from there. I've been going for middle of the road (prior to today, 3), so starting for next weekend, I'll be going for 4. I think there are 2 of each level or so currently.

    deveric on
  • samurai6966samurai6966 Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Idk, We had our healer in jail and two rouges, one fighter, and one mage outside of it. And they survived.

    samurai6966 on
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Even out the levels. Having uneven levels in games past 3e is really only a recipe for pain and not-fun on everyone's behalf.

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Arivia wrote: »
    Even out the levels. Having uneven levels in games past 3e is really only a recipe for pain and not-fun on everyone's behalf.

    Ok, This should be an easy enough suggestion. I'll complete this this week, lots of dings for everyone.

    deveric on
  • PygmalionPygmalion Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Summary:
    1. Even up the levels.
    2. Make sure everybody has the right amount of magic items, including a healing potion.
    3. Remind them gently to use their healing.
    4. Remember it's supposed to be fun!

    Pygmalion on
  • AsiinaAsiina ... WaterlooRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    deveric wrote: »
    Arivia wrote: »
    Even out the levels. Having uneven levels in games past 3e is really only a recipe for pain and not-fun on everyone's behalf.

    Ok, This should be an easy enough suggestion. I'll complete this this week, lots of dings for everyone.

    Man I was so proud to level up today too, and now you're just handing out the levels.

    Asiina on
  • TerrendosTerrendos Decorative Monocle Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    It might behoove you to have everyone start back at level 1 for a while. I know it'll kind of suck for players to lose powers and such, but level 1 exists for a reason. It's a chance for players to get used to the way things work for their character before you start adding too many new things at once. The Cleric gets to realize he has 2 encounter heals, the Druid learns the basics of Controllering, etc. Then progress them to level 2-4 at an accelerated rate if you want, maybe 1/2 a level per session.

    Also, it is vitally important in 4E that you give the right number of magic items. With so many players, you should expect to be giving someone a magic item just about every encounter. If they're starting at level 3, then they should already have 2 magic items, and if they're level 5, they should have about 4. This is, again, why I'm suggesting you revert back to level 1.

    How're your players/NPCs rolling? A string of bad rolls can turn a standard encounter into a near PK.

    Terrendos on
  • devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Yeah I probably need to up the magic items they have, I haven't been that generous, as I didn't want this to turn into too easy of a game, but maybe that might be the good thing to do. On the positive side, after this encounter today I left them with enough gold to buy everything they should ever (well for a period of time) need.

    Yeah, everyone seems to have a rut that they get into for rolling, including myself, which hindens things. But it's not something I would base entirely on bad rolls.

    deveric on
  • Super NamicchiSuper Namicchi Orange County, CARegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    how did you generate their stats?

    if you rolled them up... bad idea. this can make for some pretty skewed parties.

    if you used point buy... i dunno what to tell you. do your players understand that they should at least have a 16 in their primary attribute, if not an 18?

    Super Namicchi on
  • devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    how did you generate their stats?

    if you rolled them up... bad idea. this can make for some pretty skewed parties.

    if you used point buy... i dunno what to tell you. do your players understand that they should at least have a 16 in their primary attribute, if not an 18?

    I had that do the 4d6, pick highest three, but no one has bad stats. Their stats are all better than the point buying methods.

    deveric on
  • ForarForar #432 Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    deveric wrote: »
    I started out everyone with 1d4x1000 exp (as I had done in previous games), and let them go from there.

    I know you've already said that you were going to even out the exp, but this really caught my eye. To other dm's; don't do this. There is a fine balance on what characters can do at each level, especially the early ones, where people are still getting their initial dailies, utility powers, and whatnot.

    A 1-2 level discrepancy between the party (again, especially early on) can mean that things that challenge the low end get smoked by the characters on the higher end, and those that challenge the high end risk eating the lower leveled characters alive. I'm sure it's less of an issue later on, but despite characters being rather badass right out of the box in 4th edition, a level 2 character in an encounter meant to challenge the level 4 characters (as an example) is likely going to struggle significantly.

    I do suspect that having everyone on the same footing will help matters considerably.

    Also, while slogging through the starter levels can seem like a chore, with roughly half your group new to D&D, it might not've been a bad idea to start them all at level 1 and run through something (perhaps a slightly modified Kolbold Keep) to get them to level 2, and let them all get a feel for their characters, roles and the system. Starting them between level 2-4 might have even been counterproductive to this.

    Edit: I'm also a huge fan of using the Point Buy system. Rather than using lucky rolls, people get to pick where they are strong and where they are weak, without anyone having a vastly better stat pool than anyone else, but if it works for your group, then fair enough.
    deveric wrote: »
    Yeah I probably need to up the magic items they have, I haven't been that generous, as I didn't want this to turn into too easy of a game, but maybe that might be the good thing to do. On the positive side, after this encounter today I left them with enough gold to buy everything they should ever (well for a period of time) need.

    Just how much gold are we talking? By the character creation guidelines in the DMG, a level 4 (for example) character should start with a level 5, 4, and 3 item, and gold enough to buy another level 3 item. While this is a considerable amount of wealth compared to the old days where you might've been picking pocket change from kobolds still at this point, stumbling into too vast a sum too quickly or easily might seem to take away a sense of accomplishment (tied in with your comments where you felt that you weren't challenging them, I'm left wondering if the encounters they faced will make them feel this was an earned reward, for example).

    I mean no disrespect, but the suggestion to start over at level 1 might be a good one. Clean slate, mistakes of the past left behind, people can stick with their characters or pick new ones, and go from there. Walk before you run, y'know?

    Forar on
    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
  • samurai6966samurai6966 Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Im a fan of standard array now. I use to roll stats but Ive had characters that where too weak compared to my friends that got 18,16,16,15,13,11 type rolls (random numbers were used there but you get the picture.) Start at level 1 and let them get xp together. I really hated my very first D&D 3.5 game where we started at level 12. I, a newbie, was so lost making the character that I was happy when I got killed. With newbies in your group going back to level 1 and giving them an easy to normal difficulty encounter will help them learn their class more and they will want to stay in the game.

    samurai6966 on
  • PygmalionPygmalion Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Addition to summary:
    (Optional, but helpful) 6. Attributes - 16,14,13,12,11,10

    Pygmalion on
  • devericdeveric MinneapolisRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I'm probably going to opt of restarting characters for people, since we have been going for a while now. As far as leveling players out, that part is easy enough, and I have my more experienced players in the group volunteering to help out with the newer players. I've laid out a few more rules for the group as far as how things will hash out, on player attendance (always planning for the max, having some people play characters if someone is absent), and magic equipment. I've gotten some other advice from others around, so we will see how things work out, but it's starting to look better.

    deveric on
  • TerrendosTerrendos Decorative Monocle Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Restarting from level 1 will really help. I don't suppose your adventure happened to start in media res? Then you could have a flashback to the characters first meeting at level 1 and find out the trail that led them to the current point in the plot.

    Terrendos on
  • CleonicusCleonicus Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I agree that starting at level 1 will help. The group I play with have all played various RPGs for at least 10 years, and we still started out at level 1 just to learn all the basic mechanics and powers of 4e. The first few fights of a new system always take twice as long.

    In addition, my DM has stopped using exp and started keeping a loose total so he knows when we should level. That way we are all the same level and he doesn't have to worry about tuning encounters for our group. Plus, he doesn't have to hear the whining and begging about being 100 exp short of the next level. Our group doesn't seem to mind not getting experience points and we, the players and DM, have a good idea about when we are nearing the next level. Plus our DM can adjust when to level our group to be more meaningful, like right after downing the big boss, instead of at random times, like slaying your 132 kobold.

    Cleonicus on
    Debate 'n' DeHockey team: Astronauts
  • AsiinaAsiina ... WaterlooRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I don't think any of us really want to go back to level 1. A couple people need to have an out of game refresher on what they can do and how to do it, but I found at least this last session that the power cards helped immensely in figuring out a strategy. Having my options laid out in front of me really made a difference.

    There's stupid things we forget all the time cause many of us are new. Like I had a regen I should have started much earlier than I did, but I wasn't thinking clearly. I also tend to forget to do my saving throws. Those small bits of damage add up.

    Honestly, I think making us all the same level will help immensely. It's hard to soak up damage when you're a level or two lower than the thing you're fighting. I know for me the frustration was always with needing to be healed. Bringing us all up to be the same should solve that problem, which was the major one from my point of view.

    Bringing us all up to the same level and ensuring that all characters are played each week whether the people are there or not is going to make a big difference I think in how the game goes. I'm looking forward to it.

    Asiina on
  • PygmalionPygmalion Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I don't like when people play more than one character. It annoys me.

    Pygmalion on
  • ForarForar #432 Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Being down one isn't so bad, and probably wouldn't be too brutal as long as you have a Leader and Defender on hand, and everyone is back to the same level (which apparently they will be, so that's covered).

    My party levelled from 1 to 3 and change as a 4 member group across Kobold Keep and most of a friend's campaign. However, the DM was controlling one of the strikers/controllers, and we had a balanced party in terms of roles being covered. We've recently let the DM stop having to play a character, and snagged 2 more players, putting us at a proper Party of Five.

    A group of 7 should have, if I'm not mistaken, even better survivability in the face of being a man or woman down for the night. Maybe even 2, but I do imagine that encounters might need a little tweaking, lest an average or challenging encounter prove to be impossible.

    Now, if people don't want the hassle of running multiple characters, perhaps you could just keep everyone at the same exp level. Yes, it means people end up earning levels without participating in encounters, but it prevents them from falling behind again, leaving you with the same issues you have now. And if they're away enough, the loss of gold and magic items that I assume they'd miss out on should be penalty enough. But if the need arises, dropping a few extra items to catch someone up into a chest is easy enough.

    Forar on
    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
Sign In or Register to comment.