The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Picture of an atom

XenoXeno Registered User regular
edited December 2006 in Help / Advice Forum
Yeah, I have been looking on the net and have not come up with anything.

Is there a picture of an atom? Like, a REAL picture, and not a drawing.

It would be great for my project if such a thing exists.

Thanks guys.

Xeno on

Posts

  • For the FutureFor the Future ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    That is impossible. Individual atoms are so small that no form of light could possibly bounce off of one in any meaningful way.

    For the Future on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    This is probably about the best thing you can find.

    Thanatos on
  • blincolnblincoln Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Here's an image of a bunch of them in a lattice:

    http://www.ornl.gov/info/press_releases/get_press_release.cfm?ReleaseNumber=mr20040917-00

    But it's not that exciting visually. I have trouble believing there are any right now that look better, though. Imaging something that small is hard.

    Edit: what Thanatos posted is the kind of thing I went looking for. That's the best resolution of one I can imagine getting in this era.

    Edit 2:
    That is impossible. Individual atoms are so small that no form of light could possibly bounce off of one in any meaningful way.

    That's why they're imaged using things other than light.

    Edit 3: I can't rule out the possibility that metamaterials could be used to image one with visible-light waves, because they *can* be used theoretically to make a lens that can resolve details smaller than the wavelength of the light being sensed, but I don't know what the limits on that are. It's definitely something that can't be done today.

    blincoln on
    Legacy of Kain: The Lost Worlds
    http://www.thelostworlds.net/
  • matt has a problemmatt has a problem Points to 'off' Points to 'on'Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/vintage/vintage_4506VV1003.html

    The letters IBM, spelled out on a metal surface using single atoms, under a scanning tunneling microscope, from 1990.

    matt has a problem on
    nibXTE7.png
  • ffordefforde Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    That is impossible. Individual atoms are so small that no form of light could possibly bounce off of one in any meaningful way.
    Supposedly someone just created a material with a negative refractive index. I am not going to pretend I understand how it works, but (according to the article) this means someone could theoretically build an optical microscope able to magnify things smaller than the wavelength of light. So maybe it's not impossible. o.O

    Not that that helps the OP...

    fforde on
  • For the FutureFor the Future ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    fforde wrote:
    That is impossible. Individual atoms are so small that no form of light could possibly bounce off of one in any meaningful way.
    Supposedly someone just created a material with a negative refractive index. I am not going to pretend I understand how it works, but (according to the article) this means someone could theoretically build an optical microscope able to magnify things smaller than the wavelength of light. So maybe it's not impossible. o.O

    Not that that helps the OP...


    My God, the implications of this, could be... profound.

    For the Future on
  • DrFrylockDrFrylock Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    You also have to understand the quantum mechanical difficulties with imaging an atom. One understanding of an electron is that it exists as a proability pattern in the shape of a sphere around the nucleus; it's not strictly a flying particle until you observe it, at which point it collapses into a point.

    DrFrylock on
  • Captain VashCaptain Vash Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    I always imagined it like this.

    I want a picture of a tennis ball, but my only photography tool is a sheet of metal and an old fashioned cannon.


    I will never ever get a good picture of that tennis ball, no matter how many times I shoot my cannon at that tennis ball.

    Captain Vash on
    twitterforweb.Stuckens.1,1,500,f4f4f4,0,c4c4c4,000000.png
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2006
    It's not like atoms would look particularly (heh) interesting anyway. They would be fuzzy dots.

    Doc on
  • Mad JazzMad Jazz gotta go fast AustinRegistered User regular
    edited December 2006
    I always imagined it like this.

    I want a picture of a tennis ball, but my only photography tool is a sheet of metal and an old fashioned cannon.


    I will never ever get a good picture of that tennis ball, no matter how many times I shoot my cannon at that tennis ball.

    I really, really like this analogy.

    Mad Jazz on
    camo_sig2.png
  • blincolnblincoln Registered User regular
    edited December 2006
    Doc wrote:
    It's not like atoms would look particularly (heh) interesting anyway. They would be fuzzy dots.

    The shape of the electron orbitals can get pretty interesting.

    blincoln on
    Legacy of Kain: The Lost Worlds
    http://www.thelostworlds.net/
Sign In or Register to comment.