The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
That is impossible. Individual atoms are so small that no form of light could possibly bounce off of one in any meaningful way.
That's why they're imaged using things other than light.
Edit 3: I can't rule out the possibility that metamaterials could be used to image one with visible-light waves, because they *can* be used theoretically to make a lens that can resolve details smaller than the wavelength of the light being sensed, but I don't know what the limits on that are. It's definitely something that can't be done today.
That is impossible. Individual atoms are so small that no form of light could possibly bounce off of one in any meaningful way.
Supposedly someone just created a material with a negative refractive index. I am not going to pretend I understand how it works, but (according to the article) this means someone could theoretically build an optical microscope able to magnify things smaller than the wavelength of light. So maybe it's not impossible. o.O
That is impossible. Individual atoms are so small that no form of light could possibly bounce off of one in any meaningful way.
Supposedly someone just created a material with a negative refractive index. I am not going to pretend I understand how it works, but (according to the article) this means someone could theoretically build an optical microscope able to magnify things smaller than the wavelength of light. So maybe it's not impossible. o.O
Not that that helps the OP...
My God, the implications of this, could be... profound.
You also have to understand the quantum mechanical difficulties with imaging an atom. One understanding of an electron is that it exists as a proability pattern in the shape of a sphere around the nucleus; it's not strictly a flying particle until you observe it, at which point it collapses into a point.
Posts
http://www.ornl.gov/info/press_releases/get_press_release.cfm?ReleaseNumber=mr20040917-00
But it's not that exciting visually. I have trouble believing there are any right now that look better, though. Imaging something that small is hard.
Edit: what Thanatos posted is the kind of thing I went looking for. That's the best resolution of one I can imagine getting in this era.
Edit 2:
That's why they're imaged using things other than light.
Edit 3: I can't rule out the possibility that metamaterials could be used to image one with visible-light waves, because they *can* be used theoretically to make a lens that can resolve details smaller than the wavelength of the light being sensed, but I don't know what the limits on that are. It's definitely something that can't be done today.
http://www.thelostworlds.net/
The letters IBM, spelled out on a metal surface using single atoms, under a scanning tunneling microscope, from 1990.
Not that that helps the OP...
My God, the implications of this, could be... profound.
I want a picture of a tennis ball, but my only photography tool is a sheet of metal and an old fashioned cannon.
I will never ever get a good picture of that tennis ball, no matter how many times I shoot my cannon at that tennis ball.
I really, really like this analogy.
The shape of the electron orbitals can get pretty interesting.
http://www.thelostworlds.net/