A dead person is not bothered by me chopping him up into manageable pieces then sinking them in the fjord.
Unless you spoke with them before they died and they indicated they wouldn't be bothered by that, how would you know?
that was before they died
now they are dead
now they don't bother about things anymore
the concept of death isn't hard
Not everyone agrees with your idea of what happens after death. Independent of that, you're being a cockbag in my [chat]. Have you considered making a thread about your question?
I am not going to make a thread about the morality of disposing corpses
are you insane
Abdhyius on
0
Options
Powerpuppiesdrinking coffee in themountain cabinRegistered Userregular
A dead person is not bothered by me chopping him up into manageable pieces then sinking them in the fjord.
Unless you spoke with them before they died and they indicated they wouldn't be bothered by that, how would you know?
that was before they died
now they are dead
now they don't bother about things anymore
the concept of death isn't hard
Not everyone agrees with your idea of what happens after death. Independent of that, you're being a cockbag in my [chat]. Have you considered making a thread about your question?
this chat is your chat
this chat is my chat
it's also that guy's chat
even though he keeps obliquely talking about killing people:whistle:
Your song is amusing and wise. I have no problem with him talking about killing people. Refusing to recognize what Elldren was getting at made me annoyed though.
I saw Black Flag, and some Europunk kept spitting on Henry Rollins. He thought it was some mark of respect or something.
Henry watches, and rocks back and forth, and watches. The Europunk gets closer.
Then Henry punches him in the face, BAM, and the Europunk's nose goes SPLUTCH.
Security haul him away, blood streaming down his face. He's calling 'Henry, vy you hit me? Henry, I luff you Henry!'
Also:
I saw the Henry Rollins Band.
Some girl got crushed in the moshpit. Henry and the bouncers pulled her out, checked she was OK. Turned out it was her birthday. Henry made everyone apologise for crushing her and sing Happy Birthday. He then sat her on the stage for the rest of the show, making her day/week/year.
Point I guess I'm trying to make, cartoon punk comedy slamdancing is lame, and Henry Rollins is God.
Henry Rollins is an awesome dude, Get In The Van is pretty cool to listen to because I guess the audiobook cuts out a lot of bullshit and just includes the cool stuff
Like getting hit in the head with a guitar and the pegs cutting his forehead and bleeding all over it so they tried to wash it off with Coke and it came out all fucked up and then he punched a guy out
Fuck yeah Rollins
Although I've always been partial to Bill Stevenson going "Fuck Black Flag I wrote these songs" and then ALL covers some stuff
Also, I bet you ten bucks to get some junkie to think this idea is totally awesome and that I should totally do it if he ODs
that doesn't make it more or less right
basically my position is I'm not hurting anyone (If we disregard the people that might actually care more than I thought they would) so therefore it's okay
Also, I bet you ten bucks to get some junkie to think this idea is totally awesome and that I should totally do it if he ODs
that doesn't make it more or less right
basically my position is I'm not hurting anyone (If we disregard the people that might actually care more than I thought they would) so therefore it's okay
But I'm not crazy enough to chop up people anyway
Ever think about that next of kin you might not know about? Family even if they are estranged or something like that. A body is something to connect to, dumping doesn't help. Just a thought. Also don't dump, find a pig farm.
Not everyone agrees with your idea of what happens after death. Independent of that, you're being a cockbag in my [chat]. Have you considered making a thread about your question?
To be fair, Abdhiyus is kind of a cockbag in general.
Say a decent argument instead of saying "you annoy me by thinking something stupid"
Should we go ahead and completely excise the concept of a last will then?
I mean, this is what you are arguing against.
technically that concerns the deceased's property more often than the deceased
possessions can have value after their poessessor is dead
corpses rarely have value on the open market, except maybe for extremely broad-minded fertilizer/animal feed salesmen
If I do not own my own body then I don't know what.
The value or lack thereof has nothing to do with it. People leave pieces of otherwise worthless sentimental junk in their wills all the time. This has no bearing on the legal concept and its underlying cultural base.
Also, I bet you ten bucks to get some junkie to think this idea is totally awesome and that I should totally do it if he ODs
that doesn't make it more or less right
basically my position is I'm not hurting anyone (If we disregard the people that might actually care more than I thought they would) so therefore it's okay
But I'm not crazy enough to chop up people anyway
Ever think about that next of kin you might not know about? Family even if they are estranged or something like that. A body is something to connect to, dumping doesn't help. Just a thought. Also don't dump, find a pig farm.
uh
I did
I said if we disregard those people
I'm not hurting anyone
If we don't, then yes
I don't own pigs, but I do own or have access to heavy-duty garbage bags, a saw, a boat, and a fjord that's hundreds of meters deep
Say a decent argument instead of saying "you annoy me by thinking something stupid"
Should we go ahead and completely excise the concept of a last will then?
I mean, this is what you are arguing against.
technically that concerns the deceased's property more often than the deceased
possessions can have value after their poessessor is dead
corpses rarely have value on the open market, except maybe for extremely broad-minded fertilizer/animal feed salesmen
If I do not own my own body then I don't know what.
The value or lack thereof has nothing to do with it. People leave pieces of otherwise worthless sentimental junk in their wills all the time. This has no bearing on the legal concept and its underlying cultural base.
look i'm not even trying to argue with you i just wanted to make that post cuz i am in a posting mood
Say a decent argument instead of saying "you annoy me by thinking something stupid"
Should we go ahead and completely excise the concept of a last will then?
I mean, this is what you are arguing against.
technically that concerns the deceased's property more often than the deceased
possessions can have value after their poessessor is dead
corpses rarely have value on the open market, except maybe for extremely broad-minded fertilizer/animal feed salesmen
If I do not own my own body then I don't know what.
The value or lack thereof has nothing to do with it. People leave pieces of otherwise worthless sentimental junk in their wills all the time. This has no bearing on the legal concept and its underlying cultural base.
You don't own it after your death, dead person cannot own property. We inherit automatically, or the state takes it, because it has to go somewhere as there is no owner anymore.
Say a decent argument instead of saying "you annoy me by thinking something stupid"
Should we go ahead and completely excise the concept of a last will then?
I mean, this is what you are arguing against.
This wasn't at you, it was at the other guy who think it is totally stupid for us to disagree
but anyway, no, but a will only matters to whoever wrote it for as long as they are alive, after that it concerns only the ones who are alive
basically what I'm saying is that dead people are dead and the only ones you can hurt are the living
but we've been saying the same things at each other over and over, we're not going anywhere, so I'll change the subject if you want to
I have no problem with you disagreeing, but repeating your postulate as if it were a fact makes the argument uninteresting and tedious. You were begging the question is all.
Powerpuppies on
0
Options
SarksusATTACK AND DETHRONE GODRegistered Userregular
Say a decent argument instead of saying "you annoy me by thinking something stupid"
Should we go ahead and completely excise the concept of a last will then?
I mean, this is what you are arguing against.
technically that concerns the deceased's property more often than the deceased
possessions can have value after their poessessor is dead
corpses rarely have value on the open market, except maybe for extremely broad-minded fertilizer/animal feed salesmen
No, it concerns the wishes of the deceased.
If the wishes of a dead person were unimportant then we wouldn't have wills to decide how their property would be divided up, we would just take whatever we can get.
Say a decent argument instead of saying "you annoy me by thinking something stupid"
Should we go ahead and completely excise the concept of a last will then?
I mean, this is what you are arguing against.
technically that concerns the deceased's property more often than the deceased
possessions can have value after their poessessor is dead
corpses rarely have value on the open market, except maybe for extremely broad-minded fertilizer/animal feed salesmen
If I do not own my own body then I don't know what.
The value or lack thereof has nothing to do with it. People leave pieces of otherwise worthless sentimental junk in their wills all the time. This has no bearing on the legal concept and its underlying cultural base.
You don't own it after your death, dead person cannot own property. We inherit automatically, or the state takes it, because it has to go somewhere as there is no owner anymore.
This is false. The estates of dead people often exist long after they do.
Say a decent argument instead of saying "you annoy me by thinking something stupid"
Should we go ahead and completely excise the concept of a last will then?
I mean, this is what you are arguing against.
technically that concerns the deceased's property more often than the deceased
possessions can have value after their poessessor is dead
corpses rarely have value on the open market, except maybe for extremely broad-minded fertilizer/animal feed salesmen
No, it concerns the wishes of the deceased.
If the wishes of a dead person were unimportant then we wouldn't have wills to decide how their property would be divided up, we would just take whatever we can get.
If the wishes of a dead person were unimportant then we wouldn't have wills to decide how their property would be divided up, we would just take whatever we can get.
people lined up outside sickrooms like on Black Friday
Posts
This clip
I'm also not a huge fan of aimless G20/WTO/Globalisation protesters.
I am conflicted.
I am not going to make a thread about the morality of disposing corpses
are you insane
Your song is amusing and wise. I have no problem with him talking about killing people. Refusing to recognize what Elldren was getting at made me annoyed though.
in this day and age anyone who can be bothered to protest about anything without being a horde of toothless racists is praiseworthy
A knife is useless against those MASSIVE CLAWS!
I'm not
I'm a huge fan of watching police beat the shit out of protesters
police wins
Henry Rollins is an awesome dude, Get In The Van is pretty cool to listen to because I guess the audiobook cuts out a lot of bullshit and just includes the cool stuff
Like getting hit in the head with a guitar and the pegs cutting his forehead and bleeding all over it so they tried to wash it off with Coke and it came out all fucked up and then he punched a guy out
Fuck yeah Rollins
Although I've always been partial to Bill Stevenson going "Fuck Black Flag I wrote these songs" and then ALL covers some stuff
I think both are stupid equally and move on from there.
Every band of note originating in Scotland has played there. I'm 5'10" and I have to stoop to avoid cracking my head on the beams.
It is not an environment conducive to moshhing, but people do it.
I will side with the police on this one because at least they're doing something constructive.
Accept that it is bastards beating up retards and move on with your life.
Should we go ahead and completely excise the concept of a last will then?
I mean, this is what you are arguing against.
Completely forgetting about the whole respect for the dead and their last wishes.
technically that concerns the deceased's property more often than the deceased
possessions can have value after their poessessor is dead
corpses rarely have value on the open market, except maybe for extremely broad-minded fertilizer/animal feed salesmen
that doesn't make it more or less right
basically my position is I'm not hurting anyone (If we disregard the people that might actually care more than I thought they would) so therefore it's okay
But I'm not crazy enough to chop up people anyway
Ever think about that next of kin you might not know about? Family even if they are estranged or something like that. A body is something to connect to, dumping doesn't help. Just a thought. Also don't dump, find a pig farm.
Oh man, this is something I really want to do, and I'm in the second best location in the UK to do it.
I just need to figure out where and when these things are going to happen in advance.
This wasn't at you, it was at the other guy who think it is totally stupid for us to disagree
but anyway, no, but a will only matters to whoever wrote it for as long as they are alive, after that it concerns only the ones who are alive
basically what I'm saying is that dead people are dead and the only ones you can hurt are the living
but we've been saying the same things at each other over and over, we're not going anywhere, so I'll change the subject if you want to
To be fair, Abdhiyus is kind of a cockbag in general.
The problem with Neo-Nazis is I just want to punch them in the neck, but they're really big and tough.
If I do not own my own body then I don't know what.
The value or lack thereof has nothing to do with it. People leave pieces of otherwise worthless sentimental junk in their wills all the time. This has no bearing on the legal concept and its underlying cultural base.
The tough thing about the one going on today is that the Nazis have been refusing to say where it's being held at. They're sneaky little buggers.
uh
I did
I said if we disregard those people
I'm not hurting anyone
If we don't, then yes
I don't own pigs, but I do own or have access to heavy-duty garbage bags, a saw, a boat, and a fjord that's hundreds of meters deep
look i'm not even trying to argue with you i just wanted to make that post cuz i am in a posting mood
posting machine on the video screen
posting like you ain't never seen
You don't own it after your death, dead person cannot own property. We inherit automatically, or the state takes it, because it has to go somewhere as there is no owner anymore.
of course not, why is that even a question
it's rarely worth being rational to people at the best of times, let alone if they have a completely opposition-defined antagonistic ideology
Huh.
I have no problem with you disagreeing, but repeating your postulate as if it were a fact makes the argument uninteresting and tedious. You were begging the question is all.
No, it concerns the wishes of the deceased.
If the wishes of a dead person were unimportant then we wouldn't have wills to decide how their property would be divided up, we would just take whatever we can get.
This is false. The estates of dead people often exist long after they do.
At least in common-law countries.
Wait what?
Shit, I have been doing it wrong.
people lined up outside sickrooms like on Black Friday
waiting to rush in and grab the best deals