it looks like a guy trying a submission on another guy in an mma match
I can't tell if you're joking or serious.
I thought you picked the sig because it looks ridiculously gay.
i'm totally serious
i picked the sig because it's one of my favorite MMA moments ever, and i think it's remarkably good framing while staying 80 pixels tall
i guess his expression is vaguely sexual but i don't think it's a 'gay looking' picture unless you are being kind of weird and aggressive about your perspective
I dearly love glass houses. Totally impractical, but really pretty. There's not altogether that many of them, but when they're built they almost always become famous.
I dearly love glass houses. Totally impractical, but really pretty. There's not altogether that many of them, but when they're built they almost always become famous.
I want to be able to throw stones in my own house.
Feral on
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
If you drink one liter of water that's, say, 17 degrees, you're going to burn 20 calories heating that up
woop woooop
When calories are measured in food they are really kilocalories. So the energy you use heating that water is 20/1000 of 1 "calorie" as listed on a food label.
edit: woops, I hadn't refreshed my browser in a while. so beat'd
If you drink one liter of water that's, say, 17 degrees, you're going to burn 20 calories heating that up
woop woooop
When calories are measured in food they are really kilocalories. So the energy you use heating that water is 20/1000 of 1 "calorie" as listed on a food label.
edit: woops, I hadn't refreshed my browser in a while. so beat'd
you know, i almost put a disclaimer on there about how it wasn't the exact same position, what with the switch of a leg for an arm, no explicit tit smooshing and the distinct lack of a classic orgasm face (freaks aside), but i thought it was unnecessary to post anything so obvious.
oh. and the hair grabbing. I feel like it all kinda balances out. if someone wanted to crop that, i'll put it as a sig. for science.
Posts
Unless you chose to dance or rap.
maybe we see what we love
but a dude smooshing his tits up against another man's foot won't
life's unfair
I want to be able to throw stones in my own house.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
When calories are measured in food they are really kilocalories. So the energy you use heating that water is 20/1000 of 1 "calorie" as listed on a food label.
edit: woops, I hadn't refreshed my browser in a while. so beat'd
you regularly assault gay men and drag them behind your vehicle
you can't even throw stones from one
yeah but sexually
And by "stones" I mean "breathmints."
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
Lots of flesh tones and shadows and skin folds and creases. It looks like sex if you're not staring straight at it, and even a little if you are.
And it is two dudes. And one of the dudes is coming.
yeah I thought about this
but then I forgot
then I remembered
1000 grams hurrr
coming to punch you in the face for your filthy, base accusations
get it together
Because Chu is posting a lot so his signature keeps on coming up.
I feel like I should bold a couple words in this post.
just follow the road
lets see
yeah! equality experiment!
why, because it isn't straight
homophobe
Nope.
but i wouldn't infract for that
(plus mine has a glove it's obvs a fight)
sex and fight do not preclude eachother
I have video evidence
Well, I wouldn't infract you for a "gay-looking" sig. But I think you're getting ragged on for a reason.
Me? That sig just makes me kind hard.
you know, i almost put a disclaimer on there about how it wasn't the exact same position, what with the switch of a leg for an arm, no explicit tit smooshing and the distinct lack of a classic orgasm face (freaks aside), but i thought it was unnecessary to post anything so obvious.
oh. and the hair grabbing. I feel like it all kinda balances out. if someone wanted to crop that, i'll put it as a sig. for science.
Ultimate Surrender's a great website, isn't it?
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
Casual Eddy really knows how to "sell" gay.