"I believe that the government sucks at everything and can't do anything right, and if you elect me I will work my hardest to make sure of it!"
Hey laugh all you want but it's a campaign promise they can keep!
The Muffin Man on
0
Options
jungleroomxIt's never too many graves, it's always not enough shovelsRegistered Userregular
edited January 2011
HELP US JEEEEBUS!
(You have to turn your speakers way up and you can hear a lady screaming "NOT OBAMA! NOT OBAMA! HELP US JESUS!" during the part of the constitution that declares who is eligible for president)
I'm waiting for the part afterwards where they get to enjoy their handful of non-buttered popcorn on a paper napkin before settling down for nap time on their carpet squares.
Sir, are you implying that these Republicans are acting like toddlers? Because that's awfully unkind to toddlers.
Oh no no no, you misunderstand entirely; I was implying that John Boehner is acting like a kindergarten teacher in the middle of story time.
And Pelosi participated after Boehner because... she's only a TA?
Deacon, you claim the GOP was doing what they thought was best for the country. You claim they are acting in a good faith opposition to the Dem ideas.
So how do you explain three events:
Their opposition to Pay-Go
The blocking of repeal of an HCR provision that they claim was too onerous, which the Dems eventually agreed on.
Their opposition to HCR, a bill very much like the one they proposed in 94 and nearly identical to one they got in Massachusetts. A bill they helped write from the beginning.
Finally, there was H.R. 96, a bill "to prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from further regulating the Internet." Blackburn had sponsored this bill during the last Congress, too, where it went absolutely nowhere. When she introduced it back in 2009, she suggested it should be called the "Real Stimulus Act of 2009." It contained only a few lines, chief of which was this one: "In General—The Federal Communications Commission shall not propose, promulgate, or issue any regulations regarding the Internet or IP-enabled services." National security issues and wiretapping rules would be exempt from this restriction.
I was going to make one that's more broad based than a stupid publicity stunt. But if Glyph wants to edit the OP and turn it into a general Congress thread, I'm fine with that.
enlightenedbum on
Self-righteousness is incompatible with coalition building.
I was going to make one that's more broad based than a stupid publicity stunt. But if Glyph wants to edit the OP and turn it into a general Congress thread, I'm fine with that.
Man its the GOPs house now, what else are we going to get besides publicity stunts.
I was going to make one that's more broad based than a stupid publicity stunt. But if Glyph wants to edit the OP and turn it into a general Congress thread, I'm fine with that.
Man its the GOPs house now, what else are we going to get besides publicity stunts.
I posted one!
Attempt to kill Net Nutrality!
Burtletoy on
0
Options
GoslingLooking Up Soccer In Mongolia Right Now, ProbablyWatertown, WIRegistered Userregular
edited January 2011
I'm looking at Google News, and Save Us Jesus Lady has taken at least 80% of the air out of this entire endeavor.
Media can't help themselves when something goes off-script.
Gosling on
I have a new soccer blog The Minnow Tank. Reading it psychically kicks Sepp Blatter in the bean bag.
I'm looking at Google News, and Save Us Jesus Lady has taken at least 80% of the air out of this entire endeavor.
Media can't help themselves when something goes off-script.
Funny thing about media stunts. Sometimes they go awry. And sometimes you draw out your dumbass supporters with your dumbass PR tactics and they say stupid stupid shit.
Weird.
Armored Gorilla on
"I'm a mad god. The Mad God, actually. It's a family title. Gets passed down from me to myself every few thousand years."
0
Options
HachfaceNot the Minister Farrakhan you're thinking ofDammit, Shepard!Registered Userregular
edited January 2011
This is already political theater in the most literal sense of the term, so let's up the ridiculousness even further. Let's make this a dramatic reading, with period costumes. I want them to earn this.
This is already political theater in the most literal sense of the term, so let's up the ridiculousness even further. Let's make this a dramatic reading, with period costumes. I want them to earn this.
They're removeing all the messy parts that have been amended since then though.
enlightenedbum on
Self-righteousness is incompatible with coalition building.
This is already political theater in the most literal sense of the term, so let's up the ridiculousness even further. Let's make this a dramatic reading, with period costumes. I want them to earn this.
They're removeing all the messy parts that have been amended since then though.
Then they should have the guys dressed in the colonial-era garb be rudely interrupted by the ones dressed in clothes from the time of the relevant amendment. Let's get into the spirit of this messy, ugly democracy.
This is already political theater in the most literal sense of the term, so let's up the ridiculousness even further. Let's make this a dramatic reading, with period costumes. I want them to earn this.
They're removeing all the messy parts that have been amended since then though.
Which I can kind of understand, due to the fact that they would have no bearing on anything that came out of this congress.
At the same time, when you're dealing with people who want to treat the thing as a religious text, right up to the point of interpreting it for the plebs in the congregation, it's hard to cut them that level of slack.
Hey Deacon, could you please respond to the question I asked you earlier in the thread?
Why bother, he's just gonna use his trite "I have so many people to respond to!" excuse, even though it's only one person actually asking him anything and he isn't responding to ANY of them with anything other than worthless snark.
Armored Gorilla on
"I'm a mad god. The Mad God, actually. It's a family title. Gets passed down from me to myself every few thousand years."
(You have to turn your speakers way up and you can hear a lady screaming "NOT OBAMA! NOT OBAMA! HELP US JESUS!" during the part of the constitution that declares who is eligible for president)
This is already political theater in the most literal sense of the term, so let's up the ridiculousness even further. Let's make this a dramatic reading, with period costumes. I want them to earn this.
They're removeing all the messy parts that have been amended since then though.
Then they should have the guys dressed in the colonial-era garb be rudely interrupted by the ones dressed in clothes from the time of the relevant amendment. Let's get into the spirit of this messy, ugly democracy.
Period Dress from the Civil War onward is just wearing a suit whose lapels are of varying width. It's actually one of the reasons why there are more Civil War movies than Colonial/Revolutionary ones. It's more relateable when the dudes aren't wearing tights.
This is already political theater in the most literal sense of the term, so let's up the ridiculousness even further. Let's make this a dramatic reading, with period costumes. I want them to earn this.
They're removeing all the messy parts that have been amended since then though.
Then they should have the guys dressed in the colonial-era garb be rudely interrupted by the ones dressed in clothes from the time of the relevant amendment. Let's get into the spirit of this messy, ugly democracy.
Period Dress from the Civil War onward is just wearing a suit whose lapels are of varying width. It's actually one of the reasons why there are more Civil War movies than Colonial/Revolutionary ones. It's more relateable when the dudes aren't wearing tights.
This is already political theater in the most literal sense of the term, so let's up the ridiculousness even further. Let's make this a dramatic reading, with period costumes. I want them to earn this.
They're removeing all the messy parts that have been amended since then though.
Then they should have the guys dressed in the colonial-era garb be rudely interrupted by the ones dressed in clothes from the time of the relevant amendment. Let's get into the spirit of this messy, ugly democracy.
Period Dress from the Civil War onward is just wearing a suit whose lapels are of varying width. It's actually one of the reasons why there are more Civil War movies than Colonial/Revolutionary ones. It's more relateable when the dudes aren't wearing tights.
There is some artistic license here: The 26th Amendment was passed in 1971, so we need to put that one in a leisure suit. Also we shouldn't neglect the diverse possibilities presented to us by the history of facial hair.
jungleroomxIt's never too many graves, it's always not enough shovelsRegistered Userregular
edited January 2011
20 some odd pieces of legislation with the word "repeal" in it.
jungleroomx on
0
Options
KalTorakOne way or another, they all end up inthe Undercity.Registered Userregular
edited January 2011
Why is there all this hoopla about repealing the healthcare bill? Even if it cleared the House there's no way the Senate would look at that. Is this anything other than dick-waving?
Why is there all this hoopla about repealing the healthcare bill? Even if it cleared the House there's no way the Senate would look at that. Is this anything other than dick-waving?
No. They were elected to repeal Obamacare, but everyone loves the individual mandates.
It's kinda like abortion, where they make all kinds of noise about doing something about it, but they never even touch it. 6 months from now, we'll not hear from it again until the election race.
Posts
Hey laugh all you want but it's a campaign promise they can keep!
(You have to turn your speakers way up and you can hear a lady screaming "NOT OBAMA! NOT OBAMA! HELP US JESUS!" during the part of the constitution that declares who is eligible for president)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yexT53Gm5o&feature=player_embedded
And Pelosi participated after Boehner because... she's only a TA?
This analogy is so great guys!
The other is at 90 pages so if there is an established alternative its not a bad idea.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/01/net-neutrality-fight-gop-wields-garlic-against-fcc-vampires.ars
Man its the GOPs house now, what else are we going to get besides publicity stunts.
I posted one!
Attempt to kill Net Nutrality!
Media can't help themselves when something goes off-script.
They tried to bury us. They didn't know that we were seeds. 2018 Midterms. Get your shit together.
Funny thing about media stunts. Sometimes they go awry. And sometimes you draw out your dumbass supporters with your dumbass PR tactics and they say stupid stupid shit.
Weird.
They're removeing all the messy parts that have been amended since then though.
Then they should have the guys dressed in the colonial-era garb be rudely interrupted by the ones dressed in clothes from the time of the relevant amendment. Let's get into the spirit of this messy, ugly democracy.
At the same time, when you're dealing with people who want to treat the thing as a religious text, right up to the point of interpreting it for the plebs in the congregation, it's hard to cut them that level of slack.
They tried to bury us. They didn't know that we were seeds. 2018 Midterms. Get your shit together.
No. Or perhaps he can, but he has no intention of doing so. Or at least, not without a heaping cup of bullshit.
Why bother, he's just gonna use his trite "I have so many people to respond to!" excuse, even though it's only one person actually asking him anything and he isn't responding to ANY of them with anything other than worthless snark.
GAVEL
GAVEL
GAVEL
It's Deacon's version of "Noun, verb, 9/11".
Period Dress from the Civil War onward is just wearing a suit whose lapels are of varying width. It's actually one of the reasons why there are more Civil War movies than Colonial/Revolutionary ones. It's more relateable when the dudes aren't wearing tights.
They tried to bury us. They didn't know that we were seeds. 2018 Midterms. Get your shit together.
There is some artistic license here: The 26th Amendment was passed in 1971, so we need to put that one in a leisure suit. Also we shouldn't neglect the diverse possibilities presented to us by the history of facial hair.
I hope Save US Jesus Lady becomes the new Don't Touch My Junk Guy.
If only we had Dems with spines who would call his bluff on it.
Our only hope at this point is that the Republicans' corporate masters stop them from playing chicken with the debt ceiling.
http://nation.foxnews.com/us-constitution/2011/01/06/rep-jesse-jackson-jr-presses-gop-read-slavery-language-constitution
No. They were elected to repeal Obamacare, but everyone loves the individual mandates.
It's kinda like abortion, where they make all kinds of noise about doing something about it, but they never even touch it. 6 months from now, we'll not hear from it again until the election race.
A killing spree would actually create jobs and reduce unemployment.