In the show, can Sylar tell whether people have powers or not? I mean, would it make sense to guess that the Sylar in this phalla has a Seering ability?
Also, we really need to find out how the Guardian role(s?) are going to work. Forming a network depends on that.
In the show, can Sylar tell whether people have powers or not? I mean, would it make sense to guess that the Sylar in this phalla has a Seering ability?
Also, we really need to find out how the Guardian role(s?) are going to work. Forming a network depends on that.
You should def. watch some Heroes on tv-links. I think they have episodes of it there.
EDIT: www.tv-links.co.uk, a site that hosts a bunch of tv shows in various formats. I think they have Heroes, but if so I'd suggest hurrying. St. and I watched almost all of the first two seasons of Venture Bros. on it, but then they took them all down.
EDIT: www.tv-links.co.uk, a site that hosts a bunch of tv shows in various formats. I think they have Heroes, but if so I'd suggest hurrying. St. and I watched almost all of the first two seasons of Venture Bros. on it, but then they took them all down.
You can watch alle the Venture Bros. episodes on youtube.
I did and it was awesome.
PotU on
0
Options
Tossrocktoo weird to livetoo rare to dieRegistered Userregular
edited July 2007
Does no one remember the lessons of last time? The sad tale of Quetzi the poor reader of PMs? I don't see why it's a fucking crime to go through the thread before checking my PMs, I saw it posted and wanted to go through it, and didn't even realize I'd gotten a role PM yet cause I turned notifications off back when I was the Amyrlin and was annoyed by popups every time I changed pages.
I realize this bandwagon is probably unstoppable at this point, but it's retarded. Drez is seriously reaching, and I'd say relying on the trust he built up from last game to try and push a point of view. Whether that's "evil" or not I can't say, but !vote Drez because what the hell man.
Tossrock on
0
Options
StraightziHere we may reign secure, and in my choice,To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered Userregular
edited July 2007
Haha, Tossrock, I'll retract my vote for you because of that little namedrop. Well also because it's a solid goddamned point.
I !retract my vote for Tossrock
Straightzi on
0
Options
Tossrocktoo weird to livetoo rare to dieRegistered Userregular
edited July 2007
Oh and yes wook, I have indeed never lived past day 2 yet. Next time I should just post retarded fluff comments every day instead of actually trying to accomplish something.
Posting might be light today because people thought that this game would originally start today and end tomorrow, but it got moved forward. Also, it's Sunday so cut people some slack, Jack.
Bogey on
Fitocracy: Join us in the SE++ group!
XBox LIVE: Bogestrom | Destiny
PSN: Bogestrom
Posting might be light today because people thought that this game would originally start today and end tomorrow, but it got moved forward. Also, it's Sunday so cut people some slack, Jack.
Agreed, it's a bit early to be doing this, but maybe that's just me.
Does no one remember the lessons of last time? The sad tale of Quetzi the poor reader of PMs? I don't see why it's a fucking crime to go through the thread before checking my PMs, I saw it posted and wanted to go through it, and didn't even realize I'd gotten a role PM yet cause I turned notifications off back when I was the Amyrlin and was annoyed by popups every time I changed pages.
I realize this bandwagon is probably unstoppable at this point, but it's retarded. Drez is seriously reaching, and I'd say relying on the trust he built up from last game to try and push a point of view. Whether that's "evil" or not I can't say, but !vote Drez because what the hell man.
1) No, it's not a crime to check the thread before checking your IM. It is, however, extremely suspicious to post a QUESTION before even checking to see what your role is. Role PMs are one of the fundamental, common elements to a Phalla. If you want to see my reasoning, I just PMed it to someone who asked, but I'll go ahead and post it here, too:
1) I hate grudge voting. It's usually wasteful.
2) There's not much to go on on the first day.
3) I really do believe that Tossrock is too smart to post in the thread with the question he had without checking PMs first, so I think he didn't take into account that Hylianbunny posted win conditions in good guy PMs (rather than publicly), because normally win conditions are posted publicly, so I think the quick "I didn't check my PMs yet" reply in-thread was an excuse. It could have been an honest mistake, but I haven't seen anything else suspicious yet, and I prefer to vote for someone even slightly suspicious than randomly throwing my vote away. Honestly, though, I'm surprised people just started following my lead. There's a damn good chance I'm wrong.
2) I didn't expect people to blindly follow my vote for you. I simply pointed out that what you were doing was inconsistent with good guy behavior considering the information good guys have. And what lesson are we to have learned from the last Phalla? The lesson I learned is to not engage people in pointless debate, so I won't do that again. The lesson wasn't "vote randomly instead of for people acting suspiciously." Sorry, Tossrock, maybe it was just an honest mistake on your part but it is literally the only suspicious thing that has happened in this thread so far, by my observation. Others can disagree, and they should go vote with their instincts. I'm not calling for your death or trying to drum up a bandwagon against you, and I certainly wasn't the first person to point out the glaring error in your post. I may very well be wrong, and people should assess the situation for themselves. I may be very wrong about you, but I'm not going to vote blindly when I have someone saying something even minutely suspicious in front of me. My votes will always go toward my hunches above randomness. Anyway, I hope the above quote accounts for my reasoning.
Posting might be light today because people thought that this game would originally start today and end tomorrow, but it got moved forward. Also, it's Sunday so cut people some slack, Jack.
True. Sunday activity is always very low. Let's worry about low-activity posters tomorrow after rush hour.
Tossrocktoo weird to livetoo rare to dieRegistered Userregular
edited July 2007
I'd never actually voted before and just assumed it was green.
Tossrock on
0
Options
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
Posting might be light today because people thought that this game would originally start today and end tomorrow, but it got moved forward. Also, it's Sunday so cut people some slack, Jack.
And I'm about to go help put up some crown molding up at my parent's house.
And, unfortunately, the only solid lead I see right now is either A: Tossrock for the shenanigans or B: Drez for stirring up the bandwagon juices so fast.
Munkus Beaver on
Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
*Hylian signs on to the PA forums to go check the game*
*19 new messages*
O_o
I'll get answering those questions in a moment. :P
Hylianbunny on
0
Options
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
I think I'm more interested in the people who were posting a lot last game but not so much this game.
Unfortunately that will be me, because I'm leaving tomorrow morning and I'll only have time to vote in the evening.
Well the fact that you let us know about it before hand excuses you quite a bit, honestly.
Last game I was considered suspicious by the good guys for not posting a whole bunch after I repeatidly explained that I had been at the doctor's office and was dealing with the ramifications of the diagnosis.
People don't pay that much attention always.
Munkus Beaver on
Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
I think I'm more interested in the people who were posting a lot last game but not so much this game.
Unfortunately that will be me, because I'm leaving tomorrow morning and I'll only have time to vote in the evening.
Well the fact that you let us know about it before hand excuses you quite a bit, honestly.
Last game I was considered suspicious by the good guys for not posting a whole bunch after I repeatidly explained that I had been at the doctor's office and was dealing with the ramifications of the diagnosis.
People don't pay that much attention always.
I swung the mobvote to kill PotU while he was out drinking because I knew he couldn't stop me.
Posts
off to work
@Bryceforvice on Twitter Facebook
Ok, I just read that. Thanks. Going back to continue my reading of each page.
Steam
Also, we really need to find out how the Guardian role(s?) are going to work. Forming a network depends on that.
You should def. watch some Heroes on tv-links. I think they have episodes of it there.
scarlet ave. is scarlet st.'s fatter twin brother
Hahaha
I wish
EDIT: www.tv-links.co.uk, a site that hosts a bunch of tv shows in various formats. I think they have Heroes, but if so I'd suggest hurrying. St. and I watched almost all of the first two seasons of Venture Bros. on it, but then they took them all down.
You can watch alle the Venture Bros. episodes on youtube.
I did and it was awesome.
I realize this bandwagon is probably unstoppable at this point, but it's retarded. Drez is seriously reaching, and I'd say relying on the trust he built up from last game to try and push a point of view. Whether that's "evil" or not I can't say, but !vote Drez because what the hell man.
I !retract my vote for Tossrock
seriously man, if my biding cat goes, how can i possibly bide my time?
PARKER, YOU'RE FIRED! <-- My comic book podcast! Satan look here!
i know there's no inactivity deaths this round, but we should keep track of who's laying low
!retract vote for Tossrock
There's probably some dude who doesn't think this starts until Tuesday.
And he's probably like the one who has the win-the-game-power.
Unfortunately that will be me, because I'm leaving tomorrow morning and I'll only have time to vote in the evening.
Well the fact that you let us know about it before hand excuses you quite a bit, honestly.
the wook 17
Seriously 12
Six 11
Hylianbunny 10
Green 10
Nogs 8
Shenanigans 8
Qorzm 7
Zoolander 7
Tossrock 6
PotU 6
Quetzi 5
JohnHam 5
Carl with a K 5
Dislexic 4
TheKovakistani 4
AkimboLegs 4
Fizban 4
Osvik 3
DasHanselHM 3
Monkeybomb 3
scarlet ave. 3
Darkseid 2
real_pochacco 2
Dogbone33 2
Raneados 2
Javen 2
bsjezz 2
Nucsh 2
vagabondmonk 2
Mr. Embarkation 2
scarlet st. 1
SeafoodSoup 1
Bogey 1
not counting Hylianbunny 34 people have posted. So 16 players haven't made a single post in this thread.
XBox LIVE: Bogestrom | Destiny
PSN: Bogestrom
Agreed, it's a bit early to be doing this, but maybe that's just me.
1) No, it's not a crime to check the thread before checking your IM. It is, however, extremely suspicious to post a QUESTION before even checking to see what your role is. Role PMs are one of the fundamental, common elements to a Phalla. If you want to see my reasoning, I just PMed it to someone who asked, but I'll go ahead and post it here, too:
2) I didn't expect people to blindly follow my vote for you. I simply pointed out that what you were doing was inconsistent with good guy behavior considering the information good guys have. And what lesson are we to have learned from the last Phalla? The lesson I learned is to not engage people in pointless debate, so I won't do that again. The lesson wasn't "vote randomly instead of for people acting suspiciously." Sorry, Tossrock, maybe it was just an honest mistake on your part but it is literally the only suspicious thing that has happened in this thread so far, by my observation. Others can disagree, and they should go vote with their instincts. I'm not calling for your death or trying to drum up a bandwagon against you, and I certainly wasn't the first person to point out the glaring error in your post. I may very well be wrong, and people should assess the situation for themselves. I may be very wrong about you, but I'm not going to vote blindly when I have someone saying something even minutely suspicious in front of me. My votes will always go toward my hunches above randomness. Anyway, I hope the above quote accounts for my reasoning.
3) You used the wrong color to vote for me.
True. Sunday activity is always very low. Let's worry about low-activity posters tomorrow after rush hour.
I !vote for Tossrock.
And I'm about to go help put up some crown molding up at my parent's house.
And, unfortunately, the only solid lead I see right now is either A: Tossrock for the shenanigans or B: Drez for stirring up the bandwagon juices so fast.
*19 new messages*
O_o
I'll get answering those questions in a moment. :P
Last game I was considered suspicious by the good guys for not posting a whole bunch after I repeatidly explained that I had been at the doctor's office and was dealing with the ramifications of the diagnosis.
People don't pay that much attention always.
I swung the mobvote to kill PotU while he was out drinking because I knew he couldn't stop me.