Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

Acrimony 101

1565758596062»

Posts

  • vermiculturevermiculture Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    I had the same thought as this quote:
    “We have been trying to work within the regulations, but it’s almost impossible,” Duke said. “If we were going with the letter of the law, every film would have performers in latex gloves and goggles.”

    but I know some people would probably love porn like that.

    steam id: vermiculture
  • Drew-BDrew-B Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
  • Grey GhostGrey Ghost Okay... This looks bad.Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Scientist porn awwwwwwwwwww jeah

    zw3k8eu.gif
  • JoeUserJoeUser Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Grey Ghost wrote: »
    Scientist porn awwwwwwwwwww jeah

    20090623sexyscientist78.jpg

    PSN: JoeUser80 Steam
  • NotASenatorNotASenator Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Usagi signal lit

  • NotASenatorNotASenator Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    This is a fantastic thing from a British defamation case:
    http://www.5rb.co.uk/case/Bridle--Anor-v-Williams--Anor

    just for the opening line of the comment from the court on the ruling:
    It is rare to find a case failing on so many grounds.

  • PiptheFairPiptheFair Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    There's also something about privacy laws being such that you can't be compelled to disclose the results of a test for HIV, so the entire system is on shaky legal ground.

    except hiv/aids is monitored by the health department

    STEAM
    Spoiler:
  • TamTam I hate art I love artRegistered User regular
    edited March 2010
    pip have you ever seen dead like me?

  • Grid SystemGrid System Registered User
    edited March 2010
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    There's also something about privacy laws being such that you can't be compelled to disclose the results of a test for HIV, so the entire system is on shaky legal ground.

    except hiv/aids is monitored by the health department
    I should have specified in an employment (i.e. private) context.

  • PiptheFairPiptheFair Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Tam wrote: »
    pip have you ever seen dead like me?

    that show ruled

    STEAM
    Spoiler:
  • TamTam I hate art I love artRegistered User regular
    edited March 2010
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    Tam wrote: »
    pip have you ever seen dead like me?

    that show ruled

    did you notice that one of the episodes used the Chronopolis theme as background music?

  • PiptheFairPiptheFair Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Tam wrote: »
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    Tam wrote: »
    pip have you ever seen dead like me?

    that show ruled

    did you notice that one of the episodes used the Chronopolis theme as background music?

    woah seriously?

    that's awesome

    STEAM
    Spoiler:
  • PiptheFairPiptheFair Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Raneados wrote: »
    don't porn stars get monthly screenings for HIV and other STDs

    i could have sworn i saw a documentary about pron several times
    What does your clean test from three weeks ago says about your current situation if you've had unprotected sex with multiple partners in the intervening time?

    To say nothing of HIV's dormancy potential.

    this isn't the 80's

    the detection ability of tests is much better, regardless of dormancy

    also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_Industry_Medical_Health_Care_Foundation

    and technically the actors/actresses cannot legally be compelled to submit to the tests, but good luck getting work after it

    STEAM
    Spoiler:
  • CalliusCallius Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    we talkin' 'bout doin' it up ins?

    tonksigblack.png
  • TamTam I hate art I love artRegistered User regular
    edited March 2010
    yeah, in the one where George makes a friend at the college where her dad teaches

  • JoeUserJoeUser Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Dems ducking Obama's reform calls
    If anyone sets up a Do Not Call Registry to block phone solicitations from the White House, Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Tex.) wants in.

    Cuellar, a fiscally and socially moderate Hispanic Democrat from Laredo, tells reporters that he’s strongly leaning toward backing heath care reform – but that he’s been ducking calls from President Obama’s staff because he doesn’t want to enter the wind tunnel of presidential persuasion.

    PSN: JoeUser80 Steam
  • AneurhythmiaAneurhythmia Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    Raneados wrote: »
    don't porn stars get monthly screenings for HIV and other STDs

    i could have sworn i saw a documentary about pron several times
    What does your clean test from three weeks ago says about your current situation if you've had unprotected sex with multiple partners in the intervening time?

    To say nothing of HIV's dormancy potential.

    this isn't the 80's

    the detection ability of tests is much better, regardless of dormancy

    also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_Industry_Medical_Health_Care_Foundation

    and technically the actors/actresses cannot legally be compelled to submit to the tests, but good luck getting work after it

    I thought the average detection was still a few months out. That article just seems to point to earliest possible detection. I dunno, though.

    1LRdqui.png
  • Grid SystemGrid System Registered User
    edited March 2010
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    ...

    and technically the actors/actresses cannot legally be compelled to submit to the tests, but good luck getting work after it
    That's true, but I don't like the idea that pornographers can just ignore the law because it's inconvenient and their workforce is uninformed.

  • AneurhythmiaAneurhythmia Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    JoeUser wrote: »
    Dems ducking Obama's reform calls
    If anyone sets up a Do Not Call Registry to block phone solicitations from the White House, Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Tex.) wants in.

    Cuellar, a fiscally and socially moderate Hispanic Democrat from Laredo, tells reporters that he’s strongly leaning toward backing heath care reform – but that he’s been ducking calls from President Obama’s staff because he doesn’t want to enter the wind tunnel of presidential persuasion.

    This sounds like a political dodge for a guy who wants to vote for the bill but not be associated with the general backlash when it comes election day.

    1LRdqui.png
  • PiptheFairPiptheFair Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    Raneados wrote: »
    don't porn stars get monthly screenings for HIV and other STDs

    i could have sworn i saw a documentary about pron several times
    What does your clean test from three weeks ago says about your current situation if you've had unprotected sex with multiple partners in the intervening time?

    To say nothing of HIV's dormancy potential.

    this isn't the 80's

    the detection ability of tests is much better, regardless of dormancy

    also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_Industry_Medical_Health_Care_Foundation

    and technically the actors/actresses cannot legally be compelled to submit to the tests, but good luck getting work after it

    I thought the average detection was still a few months out. That article just seems to point to earliest possible detection. I dunno, though.

    14 days

    STEAM
    Spoiler:
  • ArtreusArtreus Hamlet Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    ...

    and technically the actors/actresses cannot legally be compelled to submit to the tests, but good luck getting work after it
    That's true, but I don't like the idea that pornographers can just ignore the law because it's inconvenient and their workforce is uninformed.

    The entire point of his post was that they won't get any work if they refuse the tests

    http://atlanticus.tumblr.com/ PSN: Atlanticus 3DS: 1590-4692-3954 Steam: Artreus
  • PiptheFairPiptheFair Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    ...

    and technically the actors/actresses cannot legally be compelled to submit to the tests, but good luck getting work after it
    That's true, but I don't like the idea that pornographers can just ignore the law because it's inconvenient and their workforce is uninformed.

    it's a matter of public safety and the findings are still technically kept private

    STEAM
    Spoiler:
  • CalliusCallius Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    oh, yeah, adult industry workers should be required to take a battery of STD tests every week or so.

    The end.

    tonksigblack.png
  • Grid SystemGrid System Registered User
    edited March 2010
    Artreus wrote: »
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    ...

    and technically the actors/actresses cannot legally be compelled to submit to the tests, but good luck getting work after it
    That's true, but I don't like the idea that pornographers can just ignore the law because it's inconvenient and their workforce is uninformed.

    The entire point of his post was that they won't get any work if they refuse the tests
    I'm trying to figure out why you think I didn't get that.

  • Grid SystemGrid System Registered User
    edited March 2010
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    ...

    and technically the actors/actresses cannot legally be compelled to submit to the tests, but good luck getting work after it
    That's true, but I don't like the idea that pornographers can just ignore the law because it's inconvenient and their workforce is uninformed.

    it's a matter of public safety and the findings are still technically kept private
    If it's a matter of public safety then it should be dealt with by a public body, and I don't know what kind of definition of "private" you're using.

  • AneurhythmiaAneurhythmia Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    Raneados wrote: »
    don't porn stars get monthly screenings for HIV and other STDs

    i could have sworn i saw a documentary about pron several times
    What does your clean test from three weeks ago says about your current situation if you've had unprotected sex with multiple partners in the intervening time?

    To say nothing of HIV's dormancy potential.

    this isn't the 80's

    the detection ability of tests is much better, regardless of dormancy

    also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_Industry_Medical_Health_Care_Foundation

    and technically the actors/actresses cannot legally be compelled to submit to the tests, but good luck getting work after it

    I thought the average detection was still a few months out. That article just seems to point to earliest possible detection. I dunno, though.

    14 days

    "as early as"

    1LRdqui.png
  • CalliusCallius Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    How would all that apply with porn stars who have sex with the same people; such as amateur porn?

    If a husband-wife duo create and distribute pornography, would they be required to wear condoms? That's a bit ridiculous.

    tonksigblack.png
  • PiptheFairPiptheFair Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    Raneados wrote: »
    don't porn stars get monthly screenings for HIV and other STDs

    i could have sworn i saw a documentary about pron several times
    What does your clean test from three weeks ago says about your current situation if you've had unprotected sex with multiple partners in the intervening time?

    To say nothing of HIV's dormancy potential.

    this isn't the 80's

    the detection ability of tests is much better, regardless of dormancy

    also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_Industry_Medical_Health_Care_Foundation

    and technically the actors/actresses cannot legally be compelled to submit to the tests, but good luck getting work after it

    I thought the average detection was still a few months out. That article just seems to point to earliest possible detection. I dunno, though.

    14 days

    "as early as"

    "get in my butt"

    STEAM
    Spoiler:
  • AneurhythmiaAneurhythmia Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    Raneados wrote: »
    don't porn stars get monthly screenings for HIV and other STDs

    i could have sworn i saw a documentary about pron several times
    What does your clean test from three weeks ago says about your current situation if you've had unprotected sex with multiple partners in the intervening time?

    To say nothing of HIV's dormancy potential.

    this isn't the 80's

    the detection ability of tests is much better, regardless of dormancy

    also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_Industry_Medical_Health_Care_Foundation

    and technically the actors/actresses cannot legally be compelled to submit to the tests, but good luck getting work after it

    I thought the average detection was still a few months out. That article just seems to point to earliest possible detection. I dunno, though.

    14 days

    "as early as"

    "get in my butt"

    sr201003masked003.jpg

    1LRdqui.png
  • Grid SystemGrid System Registered User
    edited March 2010
    Callius wrote: »
    How would all that apply with porn stars who have sex with the same people; such as amateur porn?

    If a husband-wife duo create and distribute pornography, would they be required to wear condoms? That's a bit ridiculous.

    There are two things to say here. First, that doesn't look like something that would fall under workplace health and safety legislation. Second, even if it did, enforcement is generally based on a complaint-initiated model, so if barebacking works for both people nobody will even know to get involved.

  • Grey GhostGrey Ghost Okay... This looks bad.Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    sr201003masked003.jpg

    This is some Silent Hill shit

    zw3k8eu.gif
  • AntimatterAntimatter if you want to talk to me look elsewhere.Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
  • RaneadosRaneados Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Antimatter wrote: »
    Grey Ghost wrote: »

    but somehow arousing

    not even a little bit

    Dubh wrote: »
    Rane is the future of ancient greek tradition
  • DarmakDarmak Godking of the Snerkywizards Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    My pants are already off and I can't even see the image.

    PIZTDhW.jpg
  • Grey GhostGrey Ghost Okay... This looks bad.Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    No, it really isn't

    zw3k8eu.gif
  • FirmSkaterFirmSkater Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    Someone start a new thread so we can talk about the shit going down in gaza

    sig2.jpg
  • RaneadosRaneados Registered User regular
    edited March 2010
    go ahead

    Dubh wrote: »
    Rane is the future of ancient greek tradition
This discussion has been closed.