The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Cowboys and Aliens: Steven Spielberg, Daniel Craig, Olivia Wilde, and Harrison Ford

13

Posts

  • Loren MichaelLoren Michael Registered User regular
    Man I just feel weird about this whole thing. Trepidation is right.

    Unrelated: Cantido your avatar makes you my nemesis. Wanna fight to the death?

    a7iea7nzewtq.jpg
  • GodfatherGodfather Registered User regular
    edited July 2011
    I am concerned about this movie.

    Every person i've talked to seems underwhelmed, and it's strictly because of how silly the name is. I've had to watch this trailer more times than I could count thanks to frequent trips to the movies this summer, and everyone from friends, family and the audience are usually dead silent when the trailer rolls. Every now and then i'll hear comments about how ridiculous the name is :? It wouldn't bother me if this reaction didn't happen in Texas of all places, and if you can't sell a western movie down here than it's Bad News Bears.

    Can a bad movie name really pull down ticket sales of a movie? We'll find out.

    I want it to succeed, because Universal is in a real pickle right now ever since Scott Pilgrim bombed royally and they need the money to bounce back up.

    Godfather on
  • Lady EriLady Eri Registered User regular
    Tomorrow night, so excited!

  • Mikey CTSMikey CTS Registered User regular
    I can't imagine any way they could have given this more chance to suceed. A compotent director, strong recognizable talent, and explosions. It's in the hands of the movie gods now. I'll be in line to see it Friday.

    // PSN: wyrd_warrior // MHW Name: Josei //
  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    Anyone who wouldn't see a movie because of a title is pretty much a mouth breather in my opinion.

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • TomantaTomanta Registered User regular
    Preacher wrote:
    Anyone who wouldn't see a movie because of a title is pretty much a mouth breather in my opinion.

    I'm willing to dismiss movies because of their title. But a movie whose title promises you Cowboys and Aliens? Fuck, the title sold me on the film.

  • SammyFSammyF Registered User regular
    Godfather wrote:
    Can a bad movie name really pull down ticket sales of a movie? We'll find out.

    Spielberg's movies have a way of succeeding in spite of making some pretty "duh" mistakes, so I expect this one will still do well. Even in those instances where the story falls apart in his films, he still consistently delivers something visually spectacular that leaves the audience entertained.

  • spool32spool32 Contrary Library Registered User, Transition Team regular
    Preacher wrote:
    Anyone who wouldn't see a movie because of a title is pretty much a mouth breather in my opinion.

    Thing is, mouth breathers have money they spend on movies in a theater. Discerning, sophisticated moviegoers just torrent it.

  • Linespider5Linespider5 ALL HAIL KING KILLMONGER Registered User regular
    I thought this was out already.

  • Fatboy RobertsFatboy Roberts Registered User regular
    edited July 2011
    SammyF wrote:
    Godfather wrote:
    Can a bad movie name really pull down ticket sales of a movie? We'll find out.

    Spielberg's movies have a way of succeeding in spite of making some pretty "duh" mistakes, so I expect this one will still do well. Even in those instances where the story falls apart in his films, he still consistently delivers something visually spectacular that leaves the audience entertained.

    This is a Jon Favreau movie, not a Steven Spielberg film. Spielberg may have a "Producer" credit, but that doesn't make the movie his, anymore than it made Transformers, True Grit, The Lovely Bones, Monster House or Men In Black II his movies.

    But you are right in that story/plotting missteps don't necessarily hurt a film so long as the other components (visuals, emotion, characterization, score) pick up some of that slack.

    That said - I have yet to read a reaction from anyone who saw the press screening/fan preview last night that rates above "shrug"

    Fatboy Roberts on
  • SammyFSammyF Registered User regular
    SammyF wrote:
    Godfather wrote:
    Can a bad movie name really pull down ticket sales of a movie? We'll find out.

    Spielberg's movies have a way of succeeding in spite of making some pretty "duh" mistakes, so I expect this one will still do well. Even in those instances where the story falls apart in his films, he still consistently delivers something visually spectacular that leaves the audience entertained.

    This is a Jon Favreau movie, not a Steven Spielberg film.

    You could just as easily have said "you clearly need another cup of coffee, Sammy," and you still would have been right. To the kitchen!

  • Muse Among MenMuse Among Men Suburban Bunny Princess? Its time for a new shtick Registered User regular
    I was interested as soon as I saw that Daniel Craig was in it. I have faith in him.

  • Lady EriLady Eri Registered User regular
    I was interested as soon as I saw that Daniel Craig was in it. I have faith in him.

    As do I. I am sad there is no more "His Dark Materials" movies.

  • quantumcat42quantumcat42 Registered User regular
    I'm not sure I've ever seen a movie which so precisely fills my expectations of it.

    Cowboys? Check.
    Aliens? Check.
    Explosions? Check.
    Han Solo/James Bond/13? Check, check, and check.

    The general criticism seems to be that it doesn't really go beyond the premise... if you're ok with that, it's a solidly enjoyable flick.

  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited July 2011
    I saw the movie last night and enjoyed it!

    There is no real plot to be had. Just cowboys and aliens.

    But...isn't that what you should have been expecting?


    Best line in the movie
    Harrison: What do they want?

    Someone: Gold.

    Harrison: That's ridiculous! What're they gonna do, buy something?

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • Angry BoidAngry Boid Registered User regular
    The best thing about this movie was pretty much the title unfortunately.

    They could have done a lot more with this concept. Fuck.

  • DiannaoChongDiannaoChong Registered User regular
    Yeah just got back from it. It was fun to sit through I guess. They just didn't do much with it. big plot spoiler for a large chunk of the movie:
    Alot of the movie is riding, losing tracks of a bleeding alien, deus ex'ing back on the trail, repeat, deus ex'ing aliens to attack your enemies, rinse and repeat

    I got spoilered from a review synopsis on rotten tomatoes which really pissed me off, but it turned out that it didnt really matter except to plot the movie through to the end.

    All the stars do great jobs, I really enjoyed them all in their roles. I think this movie was very different at some point (Theres alot of religious undertones, and hell if you are a cowboy and you see a space ship, how do you correlate that), and someone picked it up and said "Shoot this movie, but fuck the words, its gonna be aliens and cowboys shooting at each other."

    Also noone mentions it, but Sam Rockwell is in the movie and is pretty awesome as always. I saw his name in credits, but couldnt tell what character he was until about halfway through.

    steam_sig.png
  • Linespider5Linespider5 ALL HAIL KING KILLMONGER Registered User regular
    So, what's anyone's guess? 40 million this weekend?

  • Hi I'm Vee!Hi I'm Vee! Formerly VH; She/Her; Is an E X P E R I E N C E Registered User regular
    TehSpectre wrote:
    Best line in the movie
    Harrison: What do they want?

    Someone: Gold.

    Harrison: That's ridiculous! What're they gonna do, buy something?

    I'm not gonna argue with you on that, but the best part of the movie was:
    "Gimme your hand, I can get us outta here"

    *crack of douchey son's hand breaking as Craig slides it out of the manacles*

    vRyue2p.png
  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    So, what's anyone's guess? 40 million this weekend?

    I'd hope for at least that much, but I dunno it has a fairly major ad campaign with major names behind it, but with HP and Captain America there might be some kind of big movie exhaustion.

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • Atlas in ChainsAtlas in Chains Registered User regular
    The movie was good enough for me to recommend. I am still upset that the trailer sold me a nude scene and failed to produce. Otherwise I got exactly what I expected when I walked in.

    The problem, however, is my nerd brain. I guess I'm still looking for the next Star Wars, some enormous galaxy full of wonder and new ideas. District 9 is closer to what I want these days rather than the Thing.

  • DiannaoChongDiannaoChong Registered User regular
    edited July 2011
    But you guys, how about that bangin' trailer for Battleship:the game: The movie? Staring Liam Nieson? huh? huh? $5 he says "GIVE ME BACK MY DAUGHTER" in it.

    (Actually seeing the setup makes me hopeful for space invaders being an alright popcorn movie)

    DiannaoChong on
    steam_sig.png
  • TomantaTomanta Registered User regular
    I'm not gonna argue with you on that, but the best part of the movie was:
    "Gimme your hand, I can get us outta here"

    *crack of douchey son's hand breaking as Craig slides it out of the manacles*

    I want to thank you for this.

    I just got back from seeing the film. The "regular" (non-deluxe*) theater was too small and, therefore, crowded forcing me to sit near the front. But the bad thing was the audio problems. Half the trailers were missing some of the dialogue for some reason. The film itself did not seem to have that problem, except for a couple of gunshots and the line you quoted.

    Anyway, poor theater experience aside I highly enjoyed the film. Not cinematic excellence by any stretch but it adequately delivered on the expectations I had.

    * Carmike is apparently doing a "Deluxe" screen thing with really nice seats and a floor-to-ceiling screen. Didn't want to pay another $2 for that.... but may some other time.

  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    But you guys, how about that bangin' trailer for Battleship:the game: The movie? Staring Liam Nieson? huh? huh? $5 he says "You sunk my battleship!" in it.

    (Actually seeing the setup makes me hopeful for space invaders being an alright popcorn movie)

    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    Saw this over the weekend.

    A very surprising waste of talent and concept. Very James Cameron-lite, i.e., a talented cast spouting a bunch of tropes and cliches dressed up to do little other than exactly what it says on the box.


    Very disappointing.

  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    Saw it this morning very well put together mash up, would have been interesting with just a straight western with the cast.

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • pyromaniac221pyromaniac221 this just might be an interestin YTRegistered User regular
    Yeah I was pretty disappointed in this movie.

    Chief among it's transgressions was the casting of Noah Ringer.

    psn tooaware, friend code SW-4760-0062-3248 it me
  • CantidoCantido Registered User regular
    The movie was good enough for me to recommend. I am still upset that the trailer sold me a nude scene and failed to produce. Otherwise I got exactly what I expected when I walked in.

    The problem, however, is my nerd brain. I guess I'm still looking for the next Star Wars, some enormous galaxy full of wonder and new ideas. District 9 is closer to what I want these days rather than the Thing.

    Olivia Wilde's back was hot, wtf are you talking about.

    3DS Friendcode 5413-1311-3767
  • Lady EriLady Eri Registered User regular
    Saw this over the weekend.

    A very surprising waste of talent and concept. Very James Cameron-lite, i.e., a talented cast spouting a bunch of tropes and cliches dressed up to do little other than exactly what it says on the box.


    Very disappointing.

    Disappointing in the sense you thought it would transgress the advertisement?

  • Linespider5Linespider5 ALL HAIL KING KILLMONGER Registered User regular
    Lady Eri wrote:
    Saw this over the weekend.

    A very surprising waste of talent and concept. Very James Cameron-lite, i.e., a talented cast spouting a bunch of tropes and cliches dressed up to do little other than exactly what it says on the box.


    Very disappointing.

    Disappointing in the sense you thought it would transgress the advertisement?

    I seem to recall claims from the cast that the title was a starting point and that the actual movie took you in its own direction altogether...

  • GodfatherGodfather Registered User regular
    Oh wow, this movie got crushed by critics. They really threw money into this one as well :/

    This kind of reminds me of what happened to Your Highness

  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    edited August 2011
    Saw this over the weekend.

    A very surprising waste of talent and concept. Very James Cameron-lite, i.e., a talented cast spouting a bunch of tropes and cliches dressed up to do little other than exactly what it says on the box.


    Very disappointing.

    I second this.

    My biggest problem with the movie was... well... Olivia Wilde's character.

    The title of the movie is Cowboys & Aliens, not
    Friendly Alien and Some Cowboys vs. Mean Aliens

    The movie tries to shoehorn in an explanation for the aliens' behavior that makes no sense. I kind of felt like my intelligence was insulted. Don't get me wrong, I like a stupid action movie. This one was a little too stupid.

    To those who say "what were you expecting? it's a movie called Cowboys & Aliens, you get exactly what is shown in the trailers."

    Yeah... I guess. Sort of.
    My biggest fear for this movie from the trailers is that they were going to overuse Daniel Craig's bracelet blaster gun. In a movie like this, I want to see some roughnecks take down an enemy significantly more advanced than they, using some lever-action rifles and six-shooters. To the movie's credit, I got a lot of that. The shootout scene at the end was pretty great, especially them using dynamite to blow up the alien hangar.

    But during the second half of the movie, I felt like none of it would have happened without Olivia Wilde's character, who might as well have been billed in the credits as "Miss Exposition." The friendly alien drives the action at that point, putting the humans in the back seat. It felt as though the studio figured that movie audiences wouldn't accept a truly alien horror - they had to humanize it, by making their motivation one that we can understand. Well, by helping us understand it, they actually made it less interesting. The explanation was pretty dumb, anyway. The movie would have been better had they left it out.

    Remember Predator? The humans had to figure out the alien on their own. Alien and Aliens? Ditto. The audience is right there along with them, feeling their confusion and fear. These are also very simple movies; they play on our basic instincts. Humans have to survive against a creature higher on the food chain - it doesn't matter why they're here, we just have to kill them or escape.

    I kind of resented the presence of the Friendly Alien. It felt a little bit to me like a reverse Avatar or Dances With Wolves. The savages can't hope to defeat the technologically advanced invaders without one of the invaders becoming a turncoat* and leading the savages to victory.

    Yes, I understand that Olivia Wilde was a different species of alien. Ultimately, it doesn't matter. The message to the audience is simple - without an alien's help, the humans are screwed.

    I started to cringe every time she appeared on-screen. The climactic moment, where she hugs the wristband and smiles, was just a little too over the top to me. It just made me roll my eyes.

    There were other moments I disliked, too, but I could have overlooked them had I felt like the general story structure were better. A few that really stuck out at me:
    The part where the Apache dude crouched down over alien tracks and said, basically, "They went that way."

    The Mexican dude fumbling with the matches.

    I understand that they're using old Western movie tropes, but when those tropes involve racial stereotypes, maybe they'd be better advised to leave them out.

    The Colonel's knife was introduced, obviously as a Chekov's Gun, and then fumbled (literally) and reintroduced again. This was awkward and anticlimactic. They should have left the kid without a weapon during his first alien encounter, introduced the knife in the following scene, and went from there.

    The aliens wasted too much time roaring and scowling. If they're that intelligent, why do they act like dumb beasts?

    Not enough denouement. They defeat the aliens and then all of a sudden everybody in the town is getting along famously. The Colonel and the sheriff like each other, the Colonel's deadbeat son is offered a position in his company. I would have at least liked a few lines of apology between the Colonel and the sheriff or between the Colonel's son and the Colonel. Something to make the transition.

    Feral on
    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    Feral wrote:
    The aliens wasted too much time roaring and scowling. If they're that intelligent, why do they act like dumb beasts?

    This was hit on in another review I read, and they called it "Jjabramsitis," where your macguffin is literally everything the script needs it to be at each and every moment. Likewise with the wrist-gun; why would a wrist shackle also offer the powers of x-ray vision, projectile firing, and large-scale detonation?

    Not surprisingly, Damon Lindeloff, Roberto Orci, and Alex Kurtzman were all involved in this film. It smacks largely of their developing wheelhouse of high-concept, under-written sci-fi tropes.

  • DacDac Registered User regular
    Those aliens got Ewok'd so hard. Selective vulnerability to rocks and sticks.

    Also someone please tell me the evolutionary imperative of having your heart exposed at any point ever.

    Steam: catseye543
    PSN: ShogunGunshow
    Origin: ShogunGunshow
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    Feral wrote:
    The aliens wasted too much time roaring and scowling. If they're that intelligent, why do they act like dumb beasts?

    This was hit on in another review I read, and they called it "Jjabramsitis," where your macguffin is literally everything the script needs it to be at each and every moment.

    The deus ex machinas were a little too much.

    Any time one human threatened another human and it looked hopeless, I knew the aliens would appear out of nowhere to scare off the bad humans.

    Any time an alien threatened a human and it looked hopeless, I knew that the alien's head would explode and the camera would pan to show a secondary character holding a smoking gun.

    Somebody should have said to the screenwriters, "You get to use each of these tricks one time. That's it. Use them wisely."

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • Styrofoam SammichStyrofoam Sammich WANT. normal (not weird)Registered User regular
    There were cowboys. And aliens.

    And explosions and Olivia Wilde.

    The movie delivered on what it promised.

    wq09t4opzrlc.jpg
  • Linespider5Linespider5 ALL HAIL KING KILLMONGER Registered User regular
    Feral wrote:
    My biggest problem with the movie was... well... Olivia Wilde's character.

    The title of the movie is Cowboys & Aliens, not
    Friendly Alien and Some Cowboys vs. Mean Aliens

    oh man

    That spoiler basically destroyed the movie for me. Not in a 'I wish I hadn't seen that spoiler' way, but in a 'I really, really wish they could've come up with something, anything else for that character to do.'
    There's something very bothersome to me that the female lead in the movie couldn't be a normal human character. I'd assumed from the trailer that Wilde's character got the same amnesia thing going on as Craig's, but had a month ahead on him or something, but recognized that whatever happened to her happened to him too. Silly crap like this leads me to wonder if the screenwriters were intimidated at writing a believable female character, or what.

  • Centipede DamascusCentipede Damascus Ho! Ho! Ho! Drink Coke!Registered User regular
    Feral wrote:
    The aliens wasted too much time roaring and scowling. If they're that intelligent, why do they act like dumb beasts?

    This was hit on in another review I read, and they called it "Jjabramsitis," where your macguffin is literally everything the script needs it to be at each and every moment. Likewise with the wrist-gun; why would a wrist shackle also offer the powers of x-ray vision, projectile firing, and large-scale detonation?

    Not surprisingly, Damon Lindeloff, Roberto Orci, and Alex Kurtzman were all involved in this film. It smacks largely of their developing wheelhouse of high-concept, under-written sci-fi tropes.

    Except it wasn't a shackle, it was an alien weapon he accidentally stole from them. The detonation wasn't really a "power", unless you consider the ability to make a gun misfire a "power".

  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    edited August 2011
    Except it wasn't a shackle, it was an alien weapon he accidentally stole from them. The detonation wasn't really a "power", unless you consider the ability to make a gun misfire a "power".
    Yeah it was a gun, the xray thing was like advanced sighting, and she clearly overloaded it and tossed it into the reactor which caused the ship to explode.

    Preacher on
    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
Sign In or Register to comment.