The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent
vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums
here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules
document is now in effect.
[Dead Space 3] - EA shuts down Visceral Games... Add another EA victim to the list.
Posts
I mean, they're stuck making CoD games now, but CoD WW2 looks to be the best one in years and they're pouring their Dead Space expertise into the zombies mode.
Yeah. I would have really loved to get a AAA single player focused game, especially a sci-fi RPG, and I worry about how different that the focus group feedback will change this product. The direction of games has been shifting away from the things I like and how I like to play for some time... so eh.
"Fucking wanking shits."
And
"EA is the serial killer of the video game industry. It's like Dexter, except Dexter had a code of honor. EA just has code which it focus tests and forces devs to re-write, before killing them. Like a serial killer."
Hell most don't make it pass their first title.
What a waste of talent. Fucking hell.
I really liked the franchise, and I'm sad to see it and Visceral be over.
Make us whole, EA.
Steam ID XBL: JohnnyChopsocky PSN:Stud_Beefpile WiiU:JohnnyChopsocky
The only surprise here is that Visceral got to make so much Dead Space stuff instead of getting canned after the first game didn't sell however many several millions of copies EA wanted.
Don't get me wrong, EA is the Devil, but I am pretty sure any company would have shuttered Visceral at this point.
The real complaint you can level at EA is not letting Visceral do their thing and effectively doing all in their power to sink the ship.
But from the outside, Dead Space 1 and 2 feel fairly meddle-free. Those are easily the two "purest" games in their catalog.
Dante's Inferno was a fun game. Having played it, it felt rushed to me, and it felt like EA had a hand in pushing it out the door to get a few sales. The earliest rings of hell were the most interesting and best developed, and by the time you got to the inner rings and the finale, it felt very rushed and underdeveloped. So I'd say that Dante was probably 50% Visceral at best. That's being generous. I still liked it, but it feels like a game with vast untapped potential.
Dead Space 3 has "EA Corporate Bullshit" written all over it, and it is prime example of what corporate meddling does to wonderful things.
Battlefield Hardline was very obviously shoved on them as an unwanted project that EA corporately mandated be made because they need a new Battlefield every year to keep up with Call of Duty, so instead of letting studios do what they do best, they just parcel out side projects so to try to keep up with the CoD machine.
Honestly, I don't see much more from Respawn Entertainment either. Mark my words, it will not be long before the brains and talent abandon that studio and Respawn starts receiving hand-me-down projects as well. To be quite honest, after the whole Infinity Ward / Activision debacle that happened, I was shocked that they were so quick to jump in bed with the actual devil from hell. But that's a bit off topic.
pleasepaypreacher.net
Eh. I agree about the MP component, but not the other two. Sometimes sequels make huge departures because that's what the creators want to do instead of the same thing over again. Alien -> Aliens, Star Control -> Star Control II. I think having Isaac talk in DSII was far better choice than trying to make a second silent protagonist game. The first time in any game someone says something like "Strong, silent type, eh?" to a silent protagonist I just want to burn it all down.
EDIT: Granted, Alien was Scott and Aliens was Cameron, but I wouldn't characterize it as corporate meddling.
I take it you didn't track any previews and/or interviews about Hardline. Far from being an "unwanted project," Hardline was born from Visceral (well, technically, equal parts Visceral and DICE).
From their PC Gamer interview (September 2015, Issue 256, page 48):
That, plus loot boxes/microtransactions. The end of the quote, where it references a shifting marketplace, makes me think that they were frustrated that the game's design potentially didn't contain a secondary monetization system like so many of their other titles. They like to charge for cheap/easy DLC (an extra level here, some extra weapons there). If the game didn't lend itself to a season pass or loot box system, I could see them souring on it.
I didn't say it was bad. But it definitely was different from DS1.
It's almost as if the first game had a huge glaring flaw and they fixed it in the sequel.
This news and the disappointing Mirrors Edge sequel really means that era is over and gone. Not to mention the bad taste from Battlefront "1" and Andromeda... they are slipping back to Activision status of dickery. Oh, and they buried Titanfall 2 in favor of Battlefield "1".
Ugh. The original Dead Space is one of my favorite games of all time, very few games have ever scared me and been fun to play. Silent Hill is scary as hell but plays like ass. Resident Evil has the opposite problem. Everything from the lore, to the sound design, down to weaponry and puzzles, felt very carefuly made.
Dunno what EA is thinking. After Battlefront I'm skeptical of their ability to deliver a good Star Wars game. I would have bought a Dead Space 4 in half a heartbeat, this other game not so much.
I swear the game industry always feels like a bunch of folks all chasing the same trend at times.
*Comes back to thread half a year later... Heroins up whisky*
Leaked emails suggested that the studio didn't want to make it, the publisher made them make it, and they swallowed the bitter pill telling themselves it was SS3. Speaking of publisher fuckery, I wanted the original Human Head Prey 2, it looked really interesting and fun.
Nah, silent protagonist is best protagonist
If i was a pessimist... (And I'm not, but that can't last)...I might come up with a vast theory that EA is trying to make the game industry as generic and easy to produce as possible so they can half-ass themselves a bunch of money every year by making minimal changes to the previous years game and slapping a higher number on it. So whenever an original idea, or a high effort, high quality product comes out, they set out to crush the competition by buying it and running it into the ground.
This is what I was afraid was going to happen to Blizzard when they got bought by Activision. Luckily in that case it seems that Blizzard was smart enough to hold enough of the reins to keep from going into that pit. Other companies that were big enough to fend off EA, unfortunately have discovered they do better not making new games at all (Valve).
Prey is actually a pretty good System Shock equivilent in a lot of ways. But it did not hold my interest and I LOVE the SS series...why? I'm not really sure to be honest...but I thought it had some flaws in the gameplay, movement and combat kinda felt like I was moving through molasses and it drug down the fun factor. I keep telling myself I will go back and finish it, but i keep getting distracted by other new games.
It's basically System Shock 3, but also with a Nerf gun.
If this isn't back-of-the-box quote material I don't know what is.
Disagree, disagree so hard for a game that's about a single player narrative. Like dead space was about telling a story, having issac not be vocal in the first game hurt the narrative. You're telling me this dude is seeing all this crazy shit and he's quiet? Yeah no.
pleasepaypreacher.net
I will say, back on topic with the whole Visceral games thing, the thing that hurts the most for me about the Dead Space loss is simply that I love the setting. Sci-Fi is my first love, and the original Alien is one of my favorite movies. I love the claustrophobic feeling of being trapped on a spaceship, with literally nowhere to run, with monsters hunting you. Dead Space 1, while mechanically inferior to DS2, was my favorite in series. DS2 delivered a much better gameplay experience, but the bigger environments and overall change in location made the game less scary to me.
I like Dead Space better than Resident Evil, just because I love Sci-Fi so much.
Side note - I really wish Fantasy wasn't quite so popular these days. Don't get me wrong. I love Fantasy games too. And Fantasy movies. But Sci-Fi is my first love, that other than the dearly departed Mass Effect universe, there isn't much else in terms of top tier Sci-Fi.