There was a holiday resort in the Drakensberg with a restaurant overlooking a lake, that had a "pet" otter that would come in. People could pet it etc.
Be careful when wearing baggy shorts as he likes to climb up the pants leg. Then he gets stuck, and panics.
So i watched The Dark Knight Rises today, after skipping it in theaters.
That movie was really crappy. What the fuck was up with Bane's voice? As if Bale's Batman voice isn't bad enough.
God. I feel like that film's narrative goal was to bore me to death punctuated by occasional kicks to the groin.
yeah it really wasn't very good, was it?
like, walking out i didn't think it was that bad an experience
but in hindsight it was kind of terrible
The single worst thing about the movie, and there was a lot to dislike about, was the fact that the not-so-surprising surprise villain plot twist at the very end read so much like an islamic terrorist that I felt guilty for hating it, despite the fact that it was a very loathsome villain who deserved no sympathy.
By playing into such a hot button racial stereotype pastiche, the movie deprived me of even the simple joy of really rooting for the villain to take a bullet to the brain.
So i watched The Dark Knight Rises today, after skipping it in theaters.
That movie was really crappy. What the fuck was up with Bane's voice? As if Bale's Batman voice isn't bad enough.
God. I feel like that film's narrative goal was to bore me to death punctuated by occasional kicks to the groin.
It definitely felt like a 'a camel is a horse designed by committee' kind of thing. So many plot holes make me think the script was rewritten a dozen times by a dozen different people.
0
Options
simonwolfi can feel a differencetoday, a differenceRegistered Userregular
Dark Knight Rises wasn't the best movie I've seen, but I don't feel like I wasted my money by seeing it in theatres
Of course, such moderate opinions can't be tolerated here
give me a few minutes to get really riled about how adequate I found it
Dark Knight Rises wasn't the best movie I've seen, but I don't feel like I wasted my money by seeing it in theatres
Of course, such moderate opinions can't be tolerated here
give me a few minutes to get really riled about how adequate I found it
Pretty much my opinion. I found it to be easilly the weakest of the 3 in the new serie but it's also easilly superior to the Batman movies that came out before it.
"You won't destroy us, You won't destroy our democracy. We are a small but proud nation. No one can bomb us to silence. No one can scare us from being Norway. This evening and tonight, we'll take care of each other. That's what we do best when attacked'' - Jens Stoltenberg
Teaser for a film that probably won't happen does not redeem a long painful crappy movie.
I like JGL, I like Tom Hardy, I like Morgan Freeman, I like Michael Caine, I like Anne Hathaway, I like Gary Oldman.
That doesn't mean I don't have to pretend that wasn't a really crappy film.
Because it really was. I'm not saying it's Plan Nine From Outer Space or The Room, but for all the money and talent they had to throw around, they have no excuse for the film sucking as much as it did.
Do we know anything about Cyberpunk 2077's gameplay?
Because the trailer for Dead Island with the girl reversing through the window was an amazing trailer that apparently signified nothing about the game at all. So as cool as the Cyberpunk trailer is, it could have nothing to do with the game itself.
Well, I mean, yeah. There is no such thing as an airtight defense against a company that's willing to spend tens of thousands of dollars on a fancy cinematic trailer to convince you their game is something it's not.
But ideally the trailer, even sans gameplay, shows something about the tone and the aesthetic they're going for. And this one is nice because it is comes off as fresh and modern but demonstrates a certain level of understanding of the source material, which is heartening when you have a group of Poles making a game of a beloved but hoary twenty-five-year-old tabletop gaming property.
0
Options
Irond WillWARNING: NO HURTFUL COMMENTS, PLEASE!!!!!Cambridge. MAModeratormod
Teaser for a film that probably won't happen does not redeem a long painful crappy movie.
I like JGL, I like Tom Hardy, I like Morgan Freeman, I like Michael Caine, I like Anne Hathaway, I like Gary Oldman.
That doesn't mean I don't have to pretend that wasn't a really crappy film.
Because it really was. I'm not saying it's Plan Nine From Outer Space or The Room, but for all the money and talent they had to throw around, they have no excuse for the film sucking as much as it did.
oh you can hate it all you want
I just have a hard time getting that worked up about it
it was like someone filmed the idea of an adequate but not great batman movie
Dark Knight Rises wasn't the best movie I've seen, but I don't feel like I wasted my money by seeing it in theatres
Of course, such moderate opinions can't be tolerated here
give me a few minutes to get really riled about how adequate I found it
Pretty much my opinion. I found it to be easilly the weakest of the 3 in the new serie but it's also easilly superior to the Batman movies that came out before it.
I find it remarkably inferior to the two Michael Keaton Batman films.
Comparing it favorably to the Val Kilmer/George Clooney films does not seem like much of a compliment.
Posts
So i watched The Dark Knight Rises today, after skipping it in theaters.
That movie was really crappy. What the fuck was up with Bane's voice? As if Bale's Batman voice isn't bad enough.
God. I feel like that film's narrative goal was to bore me to death punctuated by occasional kicks to the groin.
I wanna go to this so hard but I'm going on a biggole trip around then
$
"hey guys, do you want a recording of an album that I made on my phone from 40 ft away?"
yeah it really wasn't very good, was it?
like, walking out i didn't think it was that bad an experience
but in hindsight it was kind of terrible
There was a holiday resort in the Drakensberg with a restaurant overlooking a lake, that had a "pet" otter that would come in. People could pet it etc.
I never petted that otter.
It’s not a very important country most of the time
http://steamcommunity.com/id/mortious
for only twenny dollers?
Gasp...
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
The single worst thing about the movie, and there was a lot to dislike about, was the fact that the not-so-surprising surprise villain plot twist at the very end read so much like an islamic terrorist that I felt guilty for hating it, despite the fact that it was a very loathsome villain who deserved no sympathy.
By playing into such a hot button racial stereotype pastiche, the movie deprived me of even the simple joy of really rooting for the villain to take a bullet to the brain.
Fuck that movie.
It definitely felt like a 'a camel is a horse designed by committee' kind of thing. So many plot holes make me think the script was rewritten a dozen times by a dozen different people.
Of course, such moderate opinions can't be tolerated here
give me a few minutes to get really riled about how adequate I found it
It wouldn't have bothered me if he hadn't had more screen time monologuing than any other character in the film.
But as much as I had to listen to that fruity voice? It should have been a lot less stupid.
especially those last few seconds
But it allowed for that town crier scene which was probably where the fruity voice came from in the first place.
it has some really bad pacing issues
I thought I raised a street-wise hercules
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
Pretty much my opinion.
Teaser for a film that probably won't happen does not redeem a long painful crappy movie.
I like JGL, I like Tom Hardy, I like Morgan Freeman, I like Michael Caine, I like Anne Hathaway, I like Gary Oldman.
That doesn't mean I don't have to pretend that wasn't a really crappy film.
Because it really was. I'm not saying it's Plan Nine From Outer Space or The Room, but for all the money and talent they had to throw around, they have no excuse for the film sucking as much as it did.
Well, I mean, yeah. There is no such thing as an airtight defense against a company that's willing to spend tens of thousands of dollars on a fancy cinematic trailer to convince you their game is something it's not.
But ideally the trailer, even sans gameplay, shows something about the tone and the aesthetic they're going for. And this one is nice because it is comes off as fresh and modern but demonstrates a certain level of understanding of the source material, which is heartening when you have a group of Poles making a game of a beloved but hoary twenty-five-year-old tabletop gaming property.
yeah probably. calc 2 is pretty much the meat of calc
calc 3 isn't so bad if you survive the gauntlet
oh you can hate it all you want
I just have a hard time getting that worked up about it
it was like someone filmed the idea of an adequate but not great batman movie
I find it remarkably inferior to the two Michael Keaton Batman films.
Comparing it favorably to the Val Kilmer/George Clooney films does not seem like much of a compliment.
Dat first minigame...
he was probably the high point of the movie
also i guess anne hathaway did a good job even though her character was completely pointless to the story
It's like 90% memorizing shit and 10% figuring out what it means later.
My god ... 0:45 ...
If you go down that road you have to start asking why they didn't just
12 Monkeys is so great
my roll: 1, 1, 8, 1, 2
headdesk.jpb
to fiiiiight the riiiising odds
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
i still feel like batman begins was the best one even though katie holmes looks like she is having a stroke
heath ledger was brilliant in tdk, but really the whole harvey dent side of the plot dragged everything down
To be fair, some of these seem rigged or due to gross incompetence.
Because Bane didn't think severe injuries could be cured with a rope&bullshit.