The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
[PATV] Monday, March 4, 2013 - CheckPoint Season 2, Ep. 38: Getting Down to Bidness
Blizzard Prediction: They're going to put everyone that shows up in a pit surrounded by barbed iron spikes and force them to fight to the death. The resulting footage will be sold at a premium under the guise of being D3 PvP. Or maybe I'm just being hopeful. It's probably just SC2 on the next Xbox.
When it comes right down to it, Graham and Kathleen are pretty good with their little goofy endings. I laugh pretty much every time. Also, I read caption of the bunny picture as "Bew Are Rage Beast". Needless to say, I was horribly confused for about 10 seconds
In all seriousness, though, that Uncharted 3 section just made me shake my head (and chuckle, obviously). They're not trying "to see what business models people gravitate to", they're trying to see if anyone will notice what's wrong with that particular picture. It's a very EA-like move, and I was just discussing with my brother last night how hijinks like RR3 are only the beginning if even only a small percentage of people decide such things are "worth the money".
Coincidentally, I have also been recently contemplating the ESRB and parents' general ignorance of it. Those numbers were not encouraging.
The Naughty Dog thing doesn't surprise me - Sony needs to monetize the fuck out of everything if they expect the PS4 to make a profit at some point, seeing as how the PS3 never really got the chance to do so.
As for the "coming up" segment, lolz@ "hey, it may have been crappy, but it was OURS!" Wouldn't that describe pretty much every Canadian exclusive?
As a parent who's a bit older, the fact that so many people don't understand the ESRB ratings is down right confusing to me.
"Rated T for Teen" or "E for Everyone" is too complicated to understand?
Whether you agree or disagree with the ESRB (the ratings it choose or the need for it at all) is one thing, or not knowing of it's existence is another (which to me is just bad parenting) but not understanding what it is? That's amazing to me.
The ESRB rating system is not hard. Anyone reading this that doesn't understand it, should click this: http://www.esrb.org/ratings/ratings_guide.jsp . Everything is explained in perfectly understandable terms there.
The thing to remember is that all the ESRB ratings do is warn you about the kind of game you are looking at. The parents are the ones who have to decide to buy it.
...didn't THQ have the rights to the Stuntman games, since they helped get Stuntman: Ignition out the door?
Where's that license? With the recent trend of 'tough-as-balls' games such as Dark Souls, surely the original 'tough-as-balls' driving game should get its day in the limelight, right?
The ESRB isn't even that different from the movie rating system in the US. An M Game is like an R movie. A T game is like a PG-13 movie. And E game is like a PG or G movie. If anything, it should be easier, because the full names are easy to understand concepts of Mature (M), Teen (T), and Everyone (E), instead of Restricted (R), Parents Strongly Cautioned (PG-13), and Parental Guidance Suggested (PG), and General Audiences (G).
The ESRB isn't even that different from the movie rating system in the US. An M Game is like an R movie. A T game is like a PG-13 movie. And E game is like a PG or G movie. If anything, it should be easier, because the full names are easy to understand concepts of Mature (M), Teen (T), and Everyone (E), instead of Restricted (R), Parents Strongly Cautioned (PG-13), and Parental Guidance Suggested (PG), and General Audiences (G).
Look, parents don't have time to be reading large, isolated letters all god damned day. Give me some pictograms or something. Game publishers should be obliged to incorporate examples of their objectionable content right there on cover. Are there boobs in there? Put some on the box. Violence? Add some explosions. Is there an online interaction component? Just print "SHITCOCK" in big letters across the whole thing. Now I know if my kid can play it.
Of course he can play it, it's just a video game. They probably just put boobs and explosions on everything these days.
ArbitraryDescriptor on
+10
StuntspikeDon Juan De La NoochIn the midstRegistered Userregular
edited March 2013
OMG Arbitrary I damn near spit my coffee all over my screen. With that said, keep up the good work LoadingReadyRun. I sincerely enjoy this show.
Stuntspike on
"Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute, but set him on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
Wait... wasn't the Supreme Commander IP owned by Square Enix now?
I'd hope for a developer to take up the IP and do something with it, but the only company that I can think off that'd do a good job with it is either Uber or GPG, but Uber is busy with Planetary Annihilation and GPG is in some weird tides right now.
Hmm... actually, maybe Paradox. Maybe.
"Obedience and patriotism are men's worst ills. Obedient is the one who doesn't want to think, patriot is the one who doesn't want to question."
- Anonymous Russian Philosopher
Posts
NOOOOO, DOOOOM HAS COME ONTO US. Woe is the PA viewer, for we have been forsaken.
Ohh, look, the Hunger Games is on the TV. later
Alt post:
This episode feels less fulfilling somehow.
STEAM
In all seriousness, though, that Uncharted 3 section just made me shake my head (and chuckle, obviously). They're not trying "to see what business models people gravitate to", they're trying to see if anyone will notice what's wrong with that particular picture. It's a very EA-like move, and I was just discussing with my brother last night how hijinks like RR3 are only the beginning if even only a small percentage of people decide such things are "worth the money".
Coincidentally, I have also been recently contemplating the ESRB and parents' general ignorance of it. Those numbers were not encouraging.
As for the "coming up" segment, lolz@ "hey, it may have been crappy, but it was OURS!" Wouldn't that describe pretty much every Canadian exclusive?
"Rated T for Teen" or "E for Everyone" is too complicated to understand?
Whether you agree or disagree with the ESRB (the ratings it choose or the need for it at all) is one thing, or not knowing of it's existence is another (which to me is just bad parenting) but not understanding what it is? That's amazing to me.
The thing to remember is that all the ESRB ratings do is warn you about the kind of game you are looking at. The parents are the ones who have to decide to buy it.
Where's that license? With the recent trend of 'tough-as-balls' games such as Dark Souls, surely the original 'tough-as-balls' driving game should get its day in the limelight, right?
Look, parents don't have time to be reading large, isolated letters all god damned day. Give me some pictograms or something. Game publishers should be obliged to incorporate examples of their objectionable content right there on cover. Are there boobs in there? Put some on the box. Violence? Add some explosions. Is there an online interaction component? Just print "SHITCOCK" in big letters across the whole thing. Now I know if my kid can play it.
Perfect.
I'd hope for a developer to take up the IP and do something with it, but the only company that I can think off that'd do a good job with it is either Uber or GPG, but Uber is busy with Planetary Annihilation and GPG is in some weird tides right now.
Hmm... actually, maybe Paradox. Maybe.
- Anonymous Russian Philosopher