The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

A god damned discussion about right of way

VeeveeVeevee WisconsinRegistered User regular
edited April 2014 in Debate and/or Discourse
Moved from the carpool discussion, this is about right of way at a 4-way intersection. Who goes first? Is safe and legal the same? Will this get locked for being another god damned pointless thread? Lets find out!
syndalis wrote: »
ni7goe12l7ts.jpg
This is why there are rules.

#3 jumping ahead of queue is putting themselves in #2's blind spot when they get their right of way to turn.

@syndalis‌ If 2 and 3 arrived at the intersection at the same time though, 3 has right of way from being on 2's right, which means they do get to go first.

Veevee on
«13456713

Posts

  • _J__J_ Pedant Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    In countries with right hand traffic the person to the right has the right of way. so if 2 and 3 arrived at the same time 3 would have the right of way.

  • SkeithSkeith Registered User regular
    The way I was taught was this:

    -Did the person directly across arrive at the same time and signal for a left turn? They wait. If I'm turning left, I wait. One of us wants to go right, the other left, righty waits.

    -Person on your left arrives at the same time? They go first. Person on the right arrives at the same time? They wait.

    I was told that the person to your left had right of way, and that seems to be the case out here in general (except in zipper lanes, but fuck zipper lanes and everyone in them). Was I doing it wrong? Haven't driven in years.

    aTBDrQE.jpg
  • syndalissyndalis Getting Classy On the WallRegistered User, Loves Apple Products, Transition Team regular
    In countries with right hand traffic the person to the right has the right of way. so if 2 and 3 arrived at the same time 3 would have the right of way.

    When an intersection is full, traffic flows counter clockwise. It has nothing to do with who came there first, assume 1 just being the start of the pattern.

    SW-4158-3990-6116
    Let's play Mario Kart or something...
  • HakkekageHakkekage Space Whore Academy summa cum laudeRegistered User regular
    Whoever has the biggest wheels and the most ferocious glare has the right of way

    Next

    3DS: 2165 - 6538 - 3417
    NNID: Hakkekage
  • edited April 2014
    This content has been removed.

  • edited April 2014
    This content has been removed.

  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    that experience suggests a need for more rigorous driver's ed to substitute local norms of politeness

    aRkpc.gif
  • ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User, Moderator mod
    This is why America needs god damn roundabouts.

    Seriously. It's a circle of concrete, and everything about it makes traffic flow safer and quicker.

    we have a few here and, well

    it's not better

    i mean, it should be

    but i don't think the type of traffic pattern is the problem

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    This is why America needs god damn roundabouts.

    Seriously. It's a circle of concrete, and everything about it makes traffic flow safer and quicker.

    Annapolis has roundabouts.

    They put multiple traffic lights up inside the circle.

  • edited April 2014
    This content has been removed.

  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    or for that matter, norms of canadian driving

    aRkpc.gif
  • ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User, Moderator mod
    ronya wrote: »
    that experience suggests a need for more rigorous driver's ed to substitute local norms of politeness

    it's FAR too easy to obtain and keep a driver's license in the states

    but also it's far too difficult to lead a productive life that includes things like employment if you don't own a car and don't live in a major-major metropolitan area

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • iTunesIsEviliTunesIsEvil Cornfield? Cornfield.Registered User regular
    This is why America needs god damn roundabouts.

    Seriously. It's a circle of concrete, and everything about it makes traffic flow safer and quicker.

    They really do help, but if you live in a community where people are really fucking stupid (hi suburbs of Indianapolis, IN) then they're nearly goddamn death-traps. I had someone STOP in front of me the other day while we were IN the roundabout so they could let someone enter the roundabout. Multi-lane roundabouts are apparently really really confusing to the point where I've started flipping people off and forcing them to either 1) go the way they didn't want to by "herding" them with my car or 2) hit the fucking concrete forming the outer-surrounding of the roundabout. Seriously the idea that "the left/inner lane is used to make what is basically a left-hand turn while the right/outer lane is for making a right-turn or going straight through" is completely mind-boggling to people around here. And the roundabouts are well-labeled/signed. GAAAAH!

    I could seriously bitch for daaaaaaaaaaays about the drivers in the area I moved to about a year ago. They're the worst I've seen. 5 under EVERY speed-limit. They will pull out in front of you like they're in a fucking NASCAR race, and then act like they forgot where the accelerator is. Turn without signaling. Won't make rights on red. Etc etc etc.

    brb, depressed now... :cry:

  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    Chanus wrote: »
    ronya wrote: »
    that experience suggests a need for more rigorous driver's ed to substitute local norms of politeness

    it's FAR too easy to obtain and keep a driver's license in the states

    but also it's far too difficult to lead a productive life that includes things like employment if you don't own a car and don't live in a major-major metropolitan area

    My mother's new license is good for the next thirty years or something crazy.

    She's sixty nine.

  • ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User, Moderator mod
    Quid wrote: »
    Chanus wrote: »
    ronya wrote: »
    that experience suggests a need for more rigorous driver's ed to substitute local norms of politeness

    it's FAR too easy to obtain and keep a driver's license in the states

    but also it's far too difficult to lead a productive life that includes things like employment if you don't own a car and don't live in a major-major metropolitan area

    My mother's new license is good for the next thirty years or something crazy.

    She's sixty nine.

    sounds legit totes no problem

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    the uk appears to favour hideously complicated rules that may, in fact, generate situations where there is no answer at all save "slow down and wing it"

    singapore, australia, and new zealand also enforce priority to vehicles coming from the right, despite not driving on the right

    aRkpc.gif
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    oh oh and singapore has "priority to the right... and also vehicles coming from the left that are going straight. But the latter doesn't apply when you are turning left".

    fun times

    aRkpc.gif
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    roundabouts are overrated, particularly in areas where traffic is high, because areas where intersection traffic is high also tend to have foot traffic, and if you're adding traffic lights for pedestrians then there's no goddamn point to the roundabout

    aRkpc.gif
  • ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User, Moderator mod
    yeah, we had to cross at a roundabout in reykjavik and the traffic just didn't ever stop, so it took forever

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User, Moderator mod
    i wonder what the cost of building and maintaining a pedestrian bridge would be compared to a stoplight in place of a roundabout

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    all grade separations are pretty costly

    pedestrian bridges are relatively cheap because humans are pretty light, but even so you still need a lot of space for the on-ramps

    aRkpc.gif
  • This content has been removed.

  • KroenenKroenen Registered User regular
    edited April 2014
    Ahaha. Sorry that my weird stopping rant necessitated a thread split, I was trying to get back to the topic at hand. It is something people are crazy about it seems. :smile:
    syndalis wrote: »
    ni7goe12l7ts.jpg
    This is why there are rules.

    #3 jumping ahead of queue is putting themselves in #2's blind spot when they get their right of way to turn.

    @syndalis‌ If 2 and 3 arrived at the intersection at the same time though, 3 has right of way from being on 2's right, which means they do get to go first.

    My scenario was all 4 stopped there at the same time. That picture is assuming #3 isn't paying full attention and takes more than a second to respond to #1 moving, and starts moving when he's more than halfway through the intersection. That is definitely not a safe time to go. In that situation, if I'm #3, I'm usually moving before #1 gets halfway through his crosswalk section. This maneuver isn't a #1 goes, #3 goes, #2 turns, #4 turns. It's #1 & #3 go, #2 turns, #4 turns. Hell, I'd even say #4 could do the quick right before #2 as well, but that'd be bit of a dick move.

    Kroenen on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited April 2014
    Speaking of right of way.

    If you are on a multi-lane highway, and you are not passing somebody, stay the fuck out of the leftmost lane. (People in countries that drive on the incorrect side of the road may reverse the directions here.)

    Like, I'm not going to get into a debate on whether cruising in the center lane is okay or not when you're on a three-lane road and there's all these people merging, or whatever. I'm not a zealot, I get it. The left lane is for passing. If you are in the left lane and you are not moving substantially faster than the people to your right, you are a bad person.

    Daedalus on
  • SummaryJudgmentSummaryJudgment Grab the hottest iron you can find, stride in the Tower’s front door Registered User regular
    This is why America needs god damn roundabouts.

    Seriously. It's a circle of concrete, and everything about it makes traffic flow safer and quicker.

    Fuckkkkkkkkkkkk roundabouts. Seriously, I needed the extra K's to try and express my dislike for them.

    It's not so much the pulling into the roundabout that's the issue, it's the fact that once you're in the roundabout there will inevitably be some guy ahead of you, who is attempting to enter it, who thinks that he has the right-of-way over cars already in the roundabout.

    Anything that limits my defensive driving options and forces me to hope the other guy knows what he's doing is no bueno. And I'm from a pretty provincial, suburban part of town - they don't know what they're doing.

    God help you if it's a two lane roundabout, and people need to take into consideration what lane they're allowed to enter, or that they need to remain within their lane within the roundabout (at least here it's a solid white line between lanes)

  • DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice Blackguard Registered User regular
    This is why America needs god damn roundabouts.

    Seriously. It's a circle of concrete, and everything about it makes traffic flow safer and quicker.

    Meh. They're not viable as a replacement for four-way stops, because four-way stops are generally only found in residential areas, and a traffic circle would take up way too much space.

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    This is why America needs god damn roundabouts.

    Seriously. It's a circle of concrete, and everything about it makes traffic flow safer and quicker.

    Meh. They're not viable as a replacement for four-way stops, because four-way stops are generally only found in residential areas, and a traffic circle would take up way too much space.

    Not really true, though.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    This is why America needs god damn roundabouts.

    Seriously. It's a circle of concrete, and everything about it makes traffic flow safer and quicker.

    Fuckkkkkkkkkkkk roundabouts. Seriously, I needed the extra K's to try and express my dislike for them.

    It's not so much the pulling into the roundabout that's the issue, it's the fact that once you're in the roundabout there will inevitably be some guy ahead of you, who is attempting to enter it, who thinks that he has the right-of-way over cars already in the roundabout.

    Anything that limits my defensive driving options and forces me to hope the other guy knows what he's doing is no bueno. And I'm from a pretty provincial, suburban part of town - they don't know what they're doing.

    God help you if it's a two lane roundabout, and people need to take into consideration what lane they're allowed to enter, or that they need to remain within their lane within the roundabout (at least here it's a solid white line between lanes)

    I puzzle over the psychology of somebody who wouldn't run a stop sign but would muscle his way into a roundabout.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    ronya wrote: »
    roundabouts are overrated, particularly in areas where traffic is high, because areas where intersection traffic is high also tend to have foot traffic, and if you're adding traffic lights for pedestrians then there's no goddamn point to the roundabout

    Roundabouts are best as a calming measure for very low-traffic areas.

    The reason you want a roundabout over a stop sign is because in a very low-traffic area, a stop sign is pointless. You're stopping for no reason.

    If it's just one stop sign, that's fine. When it's multiple stop signs in a row, it's pretty infuriating.

    start stop start stop there's nobody on this road start stop start stop doot doot doo start stop start stop...

    Eventually you just develop a habit of rolling through them which isn't a good habit to have.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    Quid wrote: »
    This is why America needs god damn roundabouts.

    Seriously. It's a circle of concrete, and everything about it makes traffic flow safer and quicker.

    Annapolis has roundabouts.

    They put multiple traffic lights up inside the circle.

    What the goddamn fuck?

  • DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice Blackguard Registered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    This is why America needs god damn roundabouts.

    Seriously. It's a circle of concrete, and everything about it makes traffic flow safer and quicker.

    Meh. They're not viable as a replacement for four-way stops, because four-way stops are generally only found in residential areas, and a traffic circle would take up way too much space.

    Not really true, though.

    Round these parts, it pretty much is.

    Just about every residential area is littered with four-way stops. There are nearly no unregulated intersections, and any intersection with a moderate disparity in traffic volume would rate a two-way stop instead. Circles have a comparatively gigantic footprint compared to an intersection so there's no way I can picture them on every corner like the four-ways are now.

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    ronya wrote: »
    roundabouts are overrated, particularly in areas where traffic is high, because areas where intersection traffic is high also tend to have foot traffic, and if you're adding traffic lights for pedestrians then there's no goddamn point to the roundabout

    Roundabouts are best as a calming measure for very low-traffic areas.

    The reason you want a roundabout over a stop sign is because in a very low-traffic area, a stop sign is pointless. You're stopping for no reason.

    If it's just one stop sign, that's fine. When it's multiple stop signs in a row, it's pretty infuriating.

    start stop start stop there's nobody on this road start stop start stop doot doot doo start stop start stop...

    Eventually you just develop a habit of rolling through them which isn't a good habit to have.

    Yeah, roundabouts aren't really useful for arterials in an urban setting (unless it is a fully grade separated junction/interchange or you have pedestrian access points that clearly ensure right of way) but they are far superior to stop signs within the third tier local streets and possibly also for second tier roads that are ~halfway between the arterials within the grid. Though you will want to combine them with chicanes or neckdowns in order to reduce the risk of people speeding through since speed bumps/humps generally suck in a variety of ways. Infinitely so if you get snow. Though raised sidewalk speed humps are at least somewhat defensible, even in plow ridden climes, compared to just randomly raising the street bed mid-block.

  • KrieghundKrieghund Registered User regular
    Daedalus wrote: »
    Speaking of right of way.

    If you are on a multi-lane highway, and you are not passing somebody, stay the fuck out of the leftmost lane. (People in countries that drive on the incorrect side of the road may reverse the directions here.)

    Like, I'm not going to get into a debate on whether cruising in the center lane is okay or not when you're on a three-lane road and there's all these people merging, or whatever. I'm not a zealot, I get it. The left lane is for passing. If you are in the left lane and you are not moving substantially faster than the people to your right, you are a bad person.

    To expand on this since I hear a lot of people ask about the "Slower Traffic Keep Right" stuff. It doesn't matter how fast you are going in the right lane. If someone is coming up behind you, you are the slower traffic now. Move over. Unless you are the cops, it isn't your business to police the right lane. If you think that going the speed limit is perfectly fine in all lanes of traffic, get off the road, you are now the hazard.

  • ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User, Moderator mod
    there is sort if a fake single lane roundabout here that doesn't take up more room than a four way stop. it only really works with slow traffic though, but it would definitely be smoother moving than constant four way stops

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    This is why America needs god damn roundabouts.

    Seriously. It's a circle of concrete, and everything about it makes traffic flow safer and quicker.

    Spoken like a man who has never seen Americans try and drive in a roundabout.

    We have a couple around here and I hate them solely because of how other people drive on them.

    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    This is why America needs god damn roundabouts.

    Seriously. It's a circle of concrete, and everything about it makes traffic flow safer and quicker.

    Meh. They're not viable as a replacement for four-way stops, because four-way stops are generally only found in residential areas, and a traffic circle would take up way too much space.

    Not really true, though.

    Round these parts, it pretty much is.

    Just about every residential area is littered with four-way stops. There are nearly no unregulated intersections, and any intersection with a moderate disparity in traffic volume would rate a two-way stop instead. Circles have a comparatively gigantic footprint compared to an intersection so there's no way I can picture them on every corner like the four-ways are now.

    Nope. (pdf)

    I mean, it can be. You can also ~double the road width at four junction stop signs/signalized intersections through the use of turn lanes. Even more if you make the right hand turn go through a channel. That doesn't mean it is always the case.

  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    This is why America needs god damn roundabouts.

    Seriously. It's a circle of concrete, and everything about it makes traffic flow safer and quicker.

    They really do help, but if you live in a community where people are really fucking stupid (hi suburbs of Indianapolis, IN) then they're nearly goddamn death-traps. I had someone STOP in front of me the other day while we were IN the roundabout so they could let someone enter the roundabout. Multi-lane roundabouts are apparently really really confusing to the point where I've started flipping people off and forcing them to either 1) go the way they didn't want to by "herding" them with my car or 2) hit the fucking concrete forming the outer-surrounding of the roundabout. Seriously the idea that "the left/inner lane is used to make what is basically a left-hand turn while the right/outer lane is for making a right-turn or going straight through" is completely mind-boggling to people around here. And the roundabouts are well-labeled/signed. GAAAAH!

    I could seriously bitch for daaaaaaaaaaays about the drivers in the area I moved to about a year ago. They're the worst I've seen. 5 under EVERY speed-limit. They will pull out in front of you like they're in a fucking NASCAR race, and then act like they forgot where the accelerator is. Turn without signaling. Won't make rights on red. Etc etc etc.

    brb, depressed now... :cry:

    Indiana is Chicago's New Jersey; only Jersey drivers are considerate and pleasant by comparison.

  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    ronya wrote: »
    roundabouts are overrated, particularly in areas where traffic is high, because areas where intersection traffic is high also tend to have foot traffic, and if you're adding traffic lights for pedestrians then there's no goddamn point to the roundabout

    Roundabouts are best as a calming measure for very low-traffic areas.

    The reason you want a roundabout over a stop sign is because in a very low-traffic area, a stop sign is pointless. You're stopping for no reason.

    If it's just one stop sign, that's fine. When it's multiple stop signs in a row, it's pretty infuriating.

    start stop start stop there's nobody on this road start stop start stop doot doot doo start stop start stop...

    Eventually you just develop a habit of rolling through them which isn't a good habit to have.

    I wonder whether it's cheaper to maintain roundabouts or maintain traffic light electronics tuned to trigger green waves

    both are traffic calming

    aRkpc.gif
Sign In or Register to comment.