The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Pluto Flyby July 14th (photos, gifs)

1678911

Posts

  • The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    When I first saw the high res true color images of Pluto, my thoughts were, "That looks... tasty," Then I read articles speculating that some of the bright areas might be different sugars. And that most of the landmass is probably frozen water ice.


    Our next probe better be a round-trip unit that includes a spoon.

    With Love and Courage
  • PaladinPaladin Registered User regular
    Are you suggesting that what we know as pluto is actually a giant spherical valentine's day ice cream cake

    Marty: The future, it's where you're going?
    Doc: That's right, twenty five years into the future. I've always dreamed on seeing the future, looking beyond my years, seeing the progress of mankind. I'll also be able to see who wins the next twenty-five world series.
  • SyngyneSyngyne Registered User regular
    I swear, you cake people.

    It's a tart, now. Deal with it.

    5gsowHm.png
  • The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    Look, I don't care what you want to call it. I just know we now have an obligation to mine into it's chocolate fudge core.

    With Love and Courage
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    [Tycho?] wrote: »
    Nbsp wrote: »
    Threads over. New Horizons is on its way to God knows where, and Pluto will just keep being Pluto. Maybe we'll have some new data in a few months, but it will probably just be footnotes.

    Whenever you post, I wonder what you expect the reaction to them will be.

    Pictures are (supposed to be) released regularly over the next 16 months. Thread probably is on its way out though, I don't think there's enough space content to keep it afloat.

    Per revised forum naming conventions developed after extensive observation, it has been decided that we will no longer classify this Pluto discussion as a "thread". Hence forth, it will be labeled an Intermittently Discussed Forum Object.

    This IDFO will be closely monitored to see if it throws off mass in the form of a new GST, or perhaps crashes into or otherwise merges with the Science thread.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    nh_01_stern_05_pluto_hazenew.jpg

    Pluto back-lit by the sun reveals 50 mile thick atmospheric haze. Evidence from New Horizons shows the atmosphere has recently lost over half it's mass over the past two years, possibly freezing out onto the surface as Pluto heads away from the sun on it's highly elliptical orbit.

    nh_04_mckinnon_02b.jpg

    Nitrogen ice flows spotted in Sputnik Planum (northwestern part of the heart shaped region). See the swirls where the ice meets the beach? That's flowing glacial ice on the surface of Pluto, except wheras on Earth that kind of thing is commonly seen with water ice, this is nitrogen.

    Lots more info at Phil Plait's blog.

    These aren't even the highest resolution images taken by New Horizons, we are still waiting on those goodies to be down-linked.

    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice Blackguard Registered User regular
    Hrrrrgh I want that terrain in KSP so bad

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
  • [Tycho?][Tycho?] As elusive as doubt Registered User regular
    The Ender wrote: »
    When I first saw the high res true color images of Pluto, my thoughts were, "That looks... tasty," Then I read articles speculating that some of the bright areas might be different sugars. And that most of the landmass is probably frozen water ice.


    Our next probe better be a round-trip unit that includes a spoon.

    Tastes like Minmus!

    mvaYcgc.jpg
  • redxredx I(x)=2(x)+1 whole numbersRegistered User regular
    edited July 2015
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    [Tycho?] wrote: »
    Nbsp wrote: »
    Threads over. New Horizons is on its way to God knows where, and Pluto will just keep being Pluto. Maybe we'll have some new data in a few months, but it will probably just be footnotes.

    Whenever you post, I wonder what you expect the reaction to them will be.

    Pictures are (supposed to be) released regularly over the next 16 months. Thread probably is on its way out though, I don't think there's enough space content to keep it afloat.

    Per revised forum naming conventions developed after extensive observation, it has been decided that we will no longer classify this Pluto discussion as a "thread". Hence forth, it will be labeled an Intermittently Discussed Forum Object.

    This IDFO will be closely monitored to see if it throws off mass in the form of a new GST, or perhaps crashes into or otherwise merges with the Science thread.


    Ummm... adding even this much mass to the current science thread will probably cause it to nova.


    redx on
    They moistly come out at night, moistly.
  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bpWaB39Vv8


    Two months later, it still gives me a funny feeling to think that kids today will have actual pictures of Pluto in their textbooks in school. I think I might shed a tear the first time I'll open an astronomy textbook and see Pluto's heart.

    sig.gif
  • MayabirdMayabird Pecking at the keyboardRegistered User regular
    The major downlinking just began. 95% of the data New Horizons collected hasn't been sent back yet - since there was so little time on the flyby most of its resources were put into collecting data. Since it survived there's plenty of time now to get all the images.

    Also there's a tentative plan for the next phase of the mission, because why waste a space probe that's already gone the distance? If it goes through there will be a flyby of a 45 km (30 mi) kuiper belt object on January 1st, 2019.

  • PolaritiePolaritie Sleepy Registered User regular
    When was the last NASA probe that didn't get new missions tacked on? Seriously, their stuff is amazing at this.

    Steam: Polaritie
    3DS: 0473-8507-2652
    Switch: SW-5185-4991-5118
    PSN: AbEntropy
  • TraceTrace GNU Terry Pratchett; GNU Gus; GNU Carrie Fisher; GNU Adam We Registered User regular
    Hyperdrive or bust.

  • [Tycho?][Tycho?] As elusive as doubt Registered User regular
    Polaritie wrote: »
    When was the last NASA probe that didn't get new missions tacked on? Seriously, their stuff is amazing at this.

    Yeah they really over-engineer their stuff. It's amazing to think useful data us still being received from the voyager probes, launched almost 40 years ago.

    mvaYcgc.jpg
  • Rhan9Rhan9 Registered User regular
    edited September 2015
    I really wish that someone would just make a test probe and shoot it to the orbit and see if it works or not.

    Stupidly expensive way to test it out, but at least it would prove or disprove the EMDrive quickly. If it works, then fuck the naysayers, and if not, move on to the next idea.

    Rhan9 on
  • darleysamdarleysam On my way to UKRegistered User regular
    Rhan9 wrote: »
    I really wish that someone would just make a test probe and shoot it to the orbit and see if it works or not.

    Stupidly expensive way to test it out, but at least it would prove or disprove the EMDrive quickly. If it works, then fuck the naysayers, and if not, move on to the next idea.

    Seriously. Can we not just go hard on this thing and finally prove or disprove it, rather than keep going "yeah, that's cool, but can it do two backflips?".

    forumsig.png
  • Emissary42Emissary42 Registered User regular
    darleysam wrote: »
    Rhan9 wrote: »
    I really wish that someone would just make a test probe and shoot it to the orbit and see if it works or not.

    Stupidly expensive way to test it out, but at least it would prove or disprove the EMDrive quickly. If it works, then fuck the naysayers, and if not, move on to the next idea.

    Seriously. Can we not just go hard on this thing and finally prove or disprove it, rather than keep going "yeah, that's cool, but can it do two backflips?".

    Apparently someone is working on a cubesat-scale version, but it's still unclear if they'll be able to get enough cash together to have it hitch a ride to orbit.

  • Rhan9Rhan9 Registered User regular
    Practical trial and error testing is a shitload faster at getting results than waffling about with theory. Sure, it'd be extremely important to figure out the underlying mechanism for further development if it works, but I'd think that actually verifying whether it works or not would be of utmost importance. Not on paper, in practice. Because if it works in practice, we'd know that there is something extremely important in our understanding of physics to remedy, and if not, it's confirmation of an error. Still important to figure out, but lower priority than a direct challenge at one of the fundamentals of physics.

    Because if it works, we need to get on investing more resources on the tech, pronto!

  • PolaritiePolaritie Sleepy Registered User regular
    Emissary42 wrote: »
    darleysam wrote: »
    Rhan9 wrote: »
    I really wish that someone would just make a test probe and shoot it to the orbit and see if it works or not.

    Stupidly expensive way to test it out, but at least it would prove or disprove the EMDrive quickly. If it works, then fuck the naysayers, and if not, move on to the next idea.

    Seriously. Can we not just go hard on this thing and finally prove or disprove it, rather than keep going "yeah, that's cool, but can it do two backflips?".

    Apparently someone is working on a cubesat-scale version, but it's still unclear if they'll be able to get enough cash together to have it hitch a ride to orbit.

    Is that small enough for NASA to put in the next ISS resupply so they can chuck it out the airlock?

    Steam: Polaritie
    3DS: 0473-8507-2652
    Switch: SW-5185-4991-5118
    PSN: AbEntropy
  • darleysamdarleysam On my way to UKRegistered User regular
    Polaritie wrote: »
    Emissary42 wrote: »
    darleysam wrote: »
    Rhan9 wrote: »
    I really wish that someone would just make a test probe and shoot it to the orbit and see if it works or not.

    Stupidly expensive way to test it out, but at least it would prove or disprove the EMDrive quickly. If it works, then fuck the naysayers, and if not, move on to the next idea.

    Seriously. Can we not just go hard on this thing and finally prove or disprove it, rather than keep going "yeah, that's cool, but can it do two backflips?".

    Apparently someone is working on a cubesat-scale version, but it's still unclear if they'll be able to get enough cash together to have it hitch a ride to orbit.

    Is that small enough for NASA to put in the next ISS resupply so they can chuck it out the airlock?

    They turn it on, it winks off into infinity, snaps a picture from the other side of the galaxy, and returns.

    "Yeah but we still don't know how it works so we have to conclude it's a fraud."

    forumsig.png
  • DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice Blackguard Registered User regular
    darleysam wrote: »
    Polaritie wrote: »
    Emissary42 wrote: »
    darleysam wrote: »
    Rhan9 wrote: »
    I really wish that someone would just make a test probe and shoot it to the orbit and see if it works or not.

    Stupidly expensive way to test it out, but at least it would prove or disprove the EMDrive quickly. If it works, then fuck the naysayers, and if not, move on to the next idea.

    Seriously. Can we not just go hard on this thing and finally prove or disprove it, rather than keep going "yeah, that's cool, but can it do two backflips?".

    Apparently someone is working on a cubesat-scale version, but it's still unclear if they'll be able to get enough cash together to have it hitch a ride to orbit.

    Is that small enough for NASA to put in the next ISS resupply so they can chuck it out the airlock?

    They turn it on, it winks off into a Hell Dimension and when it comes back, it's not alone.

    C'mon we're all thinking it.

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
  • FoefallerFoefaller Registered User regular
    Jragghen wrote: »

    That kinda reminds me of that Scifi novel where the secret to FTL travel is so fundamentally wrong according to Newtonian Physics/Relativity that most races slowed down or stop technological advancement when they discovered it... during their equivalent of the Industrial Revolution or earlier.

    steam_sig.png
  • darleysamdarleysam On my way to UKRegistered User regular
    darleysam wrote: »
    Polaritie wrote: »
    Emissary42 wrote: »
    darleysam wrote: »
    Rhan9 wrote: »
    I really wish that someone would just make a test probe and shoot it to the orbit and see if it works or not.

    Stupidly expensive way to test it out, but at least it would prove or disprove the EMDrive quickly. If it works, then fuck the naysayers, and if not, move on to the next idea.

    Seriously. Can we not just go hard on this thing and finally prove or disprove it, rather than keep going "yeah, that's cool, but can it do two backflips?".

    Apparently someone is working on a cubesat-scale version, but it's still unclear if they'll be able to get enough cash together to have it hitch a ride to orbit.

    Is that small enough for NASA to put in the next ISS resupply so they can chuck it out the airlock?

    They turn it on, it winks off into a Hell Dimension and when it comes back, it's not alone.

    C'mon we're all thinking it.

    liberate tutemet ex inferis

    forumsig.png
  • TofystedethTofystedeth Registered User regular
    Foefaller wrote: »
    Jragghen wrote: »

    That kinda reminds me of that Scifi novel where the secret to FTL travel is so fundamentally wrong according to Newtonian Physics/Relativity that most races slowed down or stop technological advancement when they discovered it... during their equivalent of the Industrial Revolution or earlier.

    Is that the one where Earth gets attacked by a bunch of alien races in wooden ships with muskets?

    steam_sig.png
  • Rhan9Rhan9 Registered User regular
    Foefaller wrote: »
    Jragghen wrote: »

    That kinda reminds me of that Scifi novel where the secret to FTL travel is so fundamentally wrong according to Newtonian Physics/Relativity that most races slowed down or stop technological advancement when they discovered it... during their equivalent of the Industrial Revolution or earlier.

    Is that the one where Earth gets attacked by a bunch of alien races in wooden ships with muskets?

    That sounds kinda incredible. Alien conquistadors?

  • TaranisTaranis Registered User regular
    You'd think all of the ancillary technologies surrounding space travel would still necessitate tech beyond the industrial revolution, but it all smacks of unilinealism anyway which is a real problem in SciFi.

    EH28YFo.jpg
  • AiouaAioua Ora Occidens Ora OptimaRegistered User regular
    So not to burst any bubbles, but we can't just toss an EM drive into orbit and then really see if it works.

    Right now the effect--if it produces any effect at all--is so tiny we can't reasonably discern it from background noise.

    It's not like it'd suddenly kick off at 0.5c by being in space.

    That said,
    j8Z21PU.png

    life's a game that you're bound to lose / like using a hammer to pound in screws
    fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
    that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
    bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
  • minirhyderminirhyder BerlinRegistered User regular
    Rhan9 wrote: »
    Foefaller wrote: »
    Jragghen wrote: »

    That kinda reminds me of that Scifi novel where the secret to FTL travel is so fundamentally wrong according to Newtonian Physics/Relativity that most races slowed down or stop technological advancement when they discovered it... during their equivalent of the Industrial Revolution or earlier.

    Is that the one where Earth gets attacked by a bunch of alien races in wooden ships with muskets?

    That sounds kinda incredible. Alien conquistadors?

    Oh my god tell us the title of this novel please please please

  • Rhan9Rhan9 Registered User regular
    Aioua wrote: »
    So not to burst any bubbles, but we can't just toss an EM drive into orbit and then really see if it works.

    Right now the effect--if it produces any effect at all--is so tiny we can't reasonably discern it from background noise.

    It's not like it'd suddenly kick off at 0.5c by being in space.

    That said,
    j8Z21PU.png

    Any particular reason why it couldn't be tested? Beyond funding, I see no limitation why a prototype couldn't be assembled, thrown to orbit, engaged and monitored for changes in velocity that differ from an unpowered object.

    You don't need to understand the physics behind something to observe the effects of that something. Currently it seems that the discourse around the EM drive is concentrating on trying to explain how it might or might not produce thrust, before actually testing whether it produces thrust in the intended environment or not.

    In any case, even minuscule thrust would add up in space, as there is no air resistance, and thus it would be observable.

  • TofystedethTofystedeth Registered User regular
    My under standing of the EM drive was that every more sensitive test of it reduces the measure thrust, and the measured thrust is under the margin of error for the devices measuring it.

    As far as testing it in space, if there is any actual thrust, and it is so tiny, it could be overwhelmed by things like solar pressure, impacts from space dust, etc.

    steam_sig.png
  • FoefallerFoefaller Registered User regular
    minirhyder wrote: »
    Rhan9 wrote: »
    Foefaller wrote: »
    Jragghen wrote: »

    That kinda reminds me of that Scifi novel where the secret to FTL travel is so fundamentally wrong according to Newtonian Physics/Relativity that most races slowed down or stop technological advancement when they discovered it... during their equivalent of the Industrial Revolution or earlier.

    Is that the one where Earth gets attacked by a bunch of alien races in wooden ships with muskets?

    That sounds kinda incredible. Alien conquistadors?

    Oh my god tell us the title of this novel please please please

    I wish I could, but for the life of me, I can't remember.

    Maybe when I come back from work I can google it.

    steam_sig.png
  • DesyDesy She/Her YeenRegistered User regular
    Emissary42 wrote: »

    And here I was reading all the responses to make sure somebody else hadn't already posted it.

    Because, if not, I was going to.

    camo_sig2.png
  • TofystedethTofystedeth Registered User regular
    Emissary42 wrote: »
    Okay, so steel ships with muskets. I was close!

    steam_sig.png
  • Rhan9Rhan9 Registered User regular
    Emissary42 wrote: »

    That was amusing. Much obliged!

  • SyngyneSyngyne Registered User regular
    darleysam wrote: »
    Polaritie wrote: »
    Emissary42 wrote: »
    darleysam wrote: »
    Rhan9 wrote: »
    I really wish that someone would just make a test probe and shoot it to the orbit and see if it works or not.

    Stupidly expensive way to test it out, but at least it would prove or disprove the EMDrive quickly. If it works, then fuck the naysayers, and if not, move on to the next idea.

    Seriously. Can we not just go hard on this thing and finally prove or disprove it, rather than keep going "yeah, that's cool, but can it do two backflips?".

    Apparently someone is working on a cubesat-scale version, but it's still unclear if they'll be able to get enough cash together to have it hitch a ride to orbit.

    Is that small enough for NASA to put in the next ISS resupply so they can chuck it out the airlock?

    They turn it on, it winks off into a Hell Dimension and when it comes back, it's not alone.

    C'mon we're all thinking it.

    where we're going, we don't need budgets

    5gsowHm.png
  • NaphtaliNaphtali Hazy + Flow SeaRegistered User regular
    "Teddy bears!"

    god damn ewoks, get off my lawn with your interstellar galleons

    Steam | Nintendo ID: Naphtali | Wish List
  • AiouaAioua Ora Occidens Ora OptimaRegistered User regular
    Rhan9 wrote: »
    Aioua wrote: »
    So not to burst any bubbles, but we can't just toss an EM drive into orbit and then really see if it works.

    Right now the effect--if it produces any effect at all--is so tiny we can't reasonably discern it from background noise.

    It's not like it'd suddenly kick off at 0.5c by being in space.

    That said,
    j8Z21PU.png

    Any particular reason why it couldn't be tested? Beyond funding, I see no limitation why a prototype couldn't be assembled, thrown to orbit, engaged and monitored for changes in velocity that differ from an unpowered object.

    You don't need to understand the physics behind something to observe the effects of that something. Currently it seems that the discourse around the EM drive is concentrating on trying to explain how it might or might not produce thrust, before actually testing whether it produces thrust in the intended environment or not.

    In any case, even minuscule thrust would add up in space, as there is no air resistance, and thus it would be observable.

    It's not inherently more observable in space than it is on the ground. And out in some random orbit is not a good place to test for minuscule effects. Okay so after you run your test the apoapsis is 10 feet higher. Maybe it was the EM drive. Maybe a piece of rock floated past the thing. Maybe it caught some height via solar wind.

    life's a game that you're bound to lose / like using a hammer to pound in screws
    fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
    that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
    bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
  • TraceTrace GNU Terry Pratchett; GNU Gus; GNU Carrie Fisher; GNU Adam We Registered User regular
    My under standing of the EM drive was that every more sensitive test of it reduces the measure thrust, and the measured thrust is under the margin of error for the devices measuring it.

    As far as testing it in space, if there is any actual thrust, and it is so tiny, it could be overwhelmed by things like solar pressure, impacts from space dust, etc.

    So the closer we observe it the tinier and harder it gets to observe.

    Quantum shenanigans if I've ever seen it.

Sign In or Register to comment.