The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I've always wondered about this process. I'm sure they have to have had some kind of a control test: normal, psychologically and emotionally healthy people filling out these things, and then another with complete fucking assholes. But, did the fucking assholes do the same thing Gabe's doing here? Is that how they know who is and is not a fucking asshole?
"Sir, the data came back and makes no sense."
"Guess he's a fucking asshole."
Or...
"Sir, the data came back and matches the profiles of several mass murders."
"But it matched an established pattern? He took the time to read and honestly answer? He's fine, put'em back in."
First panel: "so now I have to fill out bullshit survey thing." There needs to be a word between out and bullshit. Maybe you could use 'some'? Second panel. It should be fuck 'with' their data. Last panel, one 'their' too many.
I seriously recommend getting a proofreader. Maybe you could kickstart one?
I don't have any experience with this, but I'm guessing that the survey serves as a very basic barrier to keep out the most extreme trouble players. If you can't or won't give correct answers to an (I'm assuming simple) ethics survey, then why should they bother letting you back into the game?
I've always wondered about this process. I'm sure they have to have had some kind of a control test: normal, psychologically and emotionally healthy people filling out these things, and then another with complete fucking assholes. But, did the fucking assholes do the same thing Gabe's doing here? Is that how they know who is and is not a fucking asshole?
"Sir, the data came back and makes no sense."
"Guess he's a fucking asshole."
Or...
"Sir, the data came back and matches the profiles of several mass murders."
"But it matched an established pattern? He took the time to read and honestly answer? He's fine, put'em back in."
Standard psychological tests have measures to see if the recipient is trying to answer dishonestly. Like innocuous questions they'd have no reason to lie on. And having essentially the same question appear multiple times. So you might not be able to get every sociopath to show it, you can at least learn they are trying to lie about themselves.
Did everyone see? Was everyone looking? When I corrected someone's grammar/spelling/punctuation on the internet? Will you tell me that I'm smart?
I NEED YOU TO TELL ME THAT I AM SMART.
"Internet" is a proper noun.
Well, that's what baby boomers keep telling me, but who cares what they think. I'll start capitalizing the internet as soon as I start calling it "the world wide web".
Did everyone see? Was everyone looking? When I corrected someone's grammar/spelling/punctuation on the internet? Will you tell me that I'm smart?
I NEED YOU TO TELL ME THAT I AM SMART.
"Internet" is a proper noun.
Well, that's what baby boomers keep telling me, but who cares what they think. I'll start capitalizing the internet as soon as I start calling it "the world wide web".
As long as you're willing to respect us elders out here on the Information Superhighway.
Did everyone see? Was everyone looking? When I corrected someone's grammar/spelling/punctuation on the internet? Will you tell me that I'm smart?
I NEED YOU TO TELL ME THAT I AM SMART.
"Internet" is a proper noun.
Well, that's what baby boomers keep telling me, but who cares what they think. I'll start capitalizing the internet as soon as I start calling it "the world wide web".
As long as you're willing to respect us elders out here on the Information Superhighway.
Hm. And here I thought I would find interesting discussion about the line of innocence that Gabe's name walked.
Granted, it's only a comic made in mock of actual situations that might have occurred, but I think it's worth noting that it passes the Miller Test rather cleanly.
Posts
I've always wondered about this process. I'm sure they have to have had some kind of a control test: normal, psychologically and emotionally healthy people filling out these things, and then another with complete fucking assholes. But, did the fucking assholes do the same thing Gabe's doing here? Is that how they know who is and is not a fucking asshole?
"Sir, the data came back and makes no sense."
"Guess he's a fucking asshole."
Or...
"Sir, the data came back and matches the profiles of several mass murders."
"But it matched an established pattern? He took the time to read and honestly answer? He's fine, put'em back in."
I seriously recommend getting a proofreader. Maybe you could kickstart one?
Gabe leaves Tychpos in on purpose when he puts the strip together. Tycho's punishment for each one is a donation to Child's Play.
Standard psychological tests have measures to see if the recipient is trying to answer dishonestly. Like innocuous questions they'd have no reason to lie on. And having essentially the same question appear multiple times. So you might not be able to get every sociopath to show it, you can at least learn they are trying to lie about themselves.
This comic.
I NEED YOU TO TELL ME THAT I AM SMART.
"Internet" is a proper noun.
Well, that's what baby boomers keep telling me, but who cares what they think. I'll start capitalizing the internet as soon as I start calling it "the world wide web".
As long as you're willing to respect us elders out here on the Information Superhighway.
Dad?
There's nothing proper about the Internet. Be serious, now.
For 5 minutes before it went public it was OK.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBfnOtiJOWw
Granted, it's only a comic made in mock of actual situations that might have occurred, but I think it's worth noting that it passes the Miller Test rather cleanly.
Yelling at butts will never NOT be funny. Thanks, Psy!
Also, Abby is awesome. Keep up with TLH because it's the tits!
I love League of Legends, but seriously...screw you, Teemo.