CrimsonKing needs to learn that no one cares what his opinions are because said opinions are retarded.
Plus, he's never backed a single one up. The only thing separating him from the legion of banned trolls is lack of motivation. He just doesn't post enough.
That may be the most pathetic thing I've ever heard.
CrimsonKing needs to learn that no one cares what his opinions are because said opinions are retarded.
Plus, he's never backed a single one up.
Oh he "doesn't have to, because they're opinions". That's exactly why that's all he ever contributes, because he doesn't want to back shit up, because he can't.
Funny thing though, most of the people I know who smoke are smarter than him. So if they're fuckwits, what's he?
CrimsonKing needs to learn that no one cares what his opinions are because said opinions are retarded.
Plus, he's never backed a single one up.
Oh he "doesn't have to, because they're opinions". That's exactly why that's all he ever contributes, because he doesn't want to back shit up, because he can't.
Funny thing though, most of the people I know who smoke are smarter than him. So if they're fuckwits, what's he?
Most likely not a pro-lifer so much as an anti-women-having-a-career-other-than-"mother"er, frankly.
What's the difference?
sdrawkcaB emaN on
0
Options
AegeriTiny wee bacteriumsPlateau of LengRegistered Userregular
edited April 2007
I love posts from people who get owned in an argument and go into 'martyr' mode, trying to make it sound like the person attacking their points was personally attacking them.
Then they turn around and admit they weren't reading what was being written. I mean ololololol.
I love posts from people who get owned in an argument and go into 'martyr' mode, trying to make it sound like the person attacking their points was personally attacking them.
Then they turn around and admit they weren't reading what was being written. I mean ololololol.
Most likely not a pro-lifer so much as an anti-women-having-a-career-other-than-"mother"er, frankly.
What's the difference?
Most pro-lifers aren't aware of the consequences of their position.
I wonder. I think the pro-life stance goes somewhat hand-in-hand with a more regressive view of women's "purpose" (as if there could be such a thing), value to humanity (instead of just you know, thinking of them as people), etc etc.
Maybe they don't realize that pro-life is a way to support these ideas, maybe they do, but I think a great deal of pro-lifers are also "anti-women-having-a-career-other-than-'mother'er"s. At least that's been my personal experience.
Maybe they don't realize that pro-life is a way to support these ideas, maybe they do, but I think a great deal of pro-lifers are also "anti-women-having-a-career-other-than-'mother'er"s. At least that's been my personal experience.
Mostly just the loud ones, who are a minority. The quiet ones tend not to have any idea what's going on in any part of the issue, hence being quiet about it and on the wrong side.
ViolentChemistry on
0
Options
AegeriTiny wee bacteriumsPlateau of LengRegistered Userregular
Most likely not a pro-lifer so much as an anti-women-having-a-career-other-than-"mother"er, frankly.
What's the difference?
Most pro-lifers aren't aware of the consequences of their position.
I wonder. I think the pro-life stance goes somewhat hand-in-hand with a more regressive view of women's "purpose" (as if there could be such a thing), value to humanity (instead of just you know, thinking of them as people), etc etc.
Maybe they don't realize that pro-life is a way to support these ideas, maybe they do, but I think a great deal of pro-lifers are also "anti-women-having-a-career-other-than-'mother'er"s. At least that's been my personal experience.
You know, one of the interesting debates I remember reading about in history in New Zealand, many years ago, was if women should be given painkillers during childbirth. I recall the primary argument against such a practice was just that God decided that Eve should suffer during childbirth and thus it would be wrong to give them painkillers.
I'm still rather stunned at that argument even today.
Actually I don't know anything about New Zealand. That just seemed like the obvious answer. Their political climate may not reflect the name, as far as I know.
Why doesn't Epic want people to play Gears of War online?
They hate you and your dog, plus your kitten.
Cliffy B came to my house just the other day and beat the everloving shit out of me for turning on my 360 with GoW in it, that's how seriously he takes his job.
Why doesn't Epic want people to play Gears of War online?
They hate you and your dog, plus your kitten.
Cliffy B came to my house just the other day and beat the everloving shit out of me for turning on my 360 with GoW in it, that's how seriously he takes his job.
I swear to god that's what the next patch is going to be.
--
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the question before you today is a simple one. Besides pointing to traditional fossil forms, or DNA polymorphism, or tonsils, or domesticated animals, or gene sequences, or male nipples, or common sense, how does one prove evolution?"
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the question before you today is a simple one. Besides pointing to traditional fossil forms, or DNA polymorphism, or tonsils, or domesticated animals, or gene sequences, or male nipples, or common sense, how does one prove evolution?"
Clearly, evolution is wrong because I can pull a huge sounding probability out of my ass and the chance of that probability occuring is too low, so clearly Goddidit.
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the question before you today is a simple one. Besides pointing to traditional fossil forms, or DNA polymorphism, or tonsils, or domesticated animals, or gene sequences, or male nipples, or common sense, how does one prove evolution?"
Clearly, evolution is wrong because I can pull a huge sounding probability out of my ass and the chance of that probability occuring is too low, so clearly Goddidit.
A magic-man dunnit.
ViolentChemistry on
0
Options
DynagripBreak me a million heartsHoustonRegistered User, ClubPAregular
edited April 2007
I was really confused this morning when I clicked on the Fornicator thread thinking it was the [chat] thread.
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the question before you today is a simple one. Besides pointing to traditional fossil forms, or DNA polymorphism, or tonsils, or domesticated animals, or gene sequences, or male nipples, or common sense, how does one prove evolution?"
Clearly, evolution is wrong because I can pull a huge sounding probability out of my ass and the chance of that probability occuring is too low, so clearly Goddidit.
A magic-man dunnit.
Man, that Harvey Birdman episode is awesome.
Also, this is equally as amusing satire (painful font though): Wrathful Dispersion
Posts
That may be the most pathetic thing I've ever heard.
Oh he "doesn't have to, because they're opinions". That's exactly why that's all he ever contributes, because he doesn't want to back shit up, because he can't.
Funny thing though, most of the people I know who smoke are smarter than him. So if they're fuckwits, what's he?
A pro-lifer.
He seems to think so, at least. People like him are a problem in society.
Most likely not a pro-lifer so much as an anti-women-having-a-career-other-than-"mother"er, frankly.
What's the difference?
Then they turn around and admit they weren't reading what was being written. I mean ololololol.
I have missed this forum
Most pro-lifers aren't aware of the consequences of their position.
I wonder. I think the pro-life stance goes somewhat hand-in-hand with a more regressive view of women's "purpose" (as if there could be such a thing), value to humanity (instead of just you know, thinking of them as people), etc etc.
Maybe they don't realize that pro-life is a way to support these ideas, maybe they do, but I think a great deal of pro-lifers are also "anti-women-having-a-career-other-than-'mother'er"s. At least that's been my personal experience.
Mostly just the loud ones, who are a minority. The quiet ones tend not to have any idea what's going on in any part of the issue, hence being quiet about it and on the wrong side.
You know, one of the interesting debates I remember reading about in history in New Zealand, many years ago, was if women should be given painkillers during childbirth. I recall the primary argument against such a practice was just that God decided that Eve should suffer during childbirth and thus it would be wrong to give them painkillers.
I'm still rather stunned at that argument even today.
?
They hate you and your dog, plus your kitten.
Cliffy B came to my house just the other day and beat the everloving shit out of me for turning on my 360 with GoW in it, that's how seriously he takes his job.
I swear to god that's what the next patch is going to be.
--
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the question before you today is a simple one. Besides pointing to traditional fossil forms, or DNA polymorphism, or tonsils, or domesticated animals, or gene sequences, or male nipples, or common sense, how does one prove evolution?"
Oh, Harvey Birdman
What's the good word? All New And Zealous?
- Soren Kierkegaard
Don't.
Clearly, evolution is wrong because I can pull a huge sounding probability out of my ass and the chance of that probability occuring is too low, so clearly Goddidit.
Hello [chat].
You're not paid to think. A mindless worker is a happy worker. Shut up and do your job!
This dreg is using his power brick to keep the dregs of his hot coccoa warm.
- Soren Kierkegaard
What kind of cereal? Is it grrrrrrrrrrreeeaat?
(such a terrible joke)
Breakfast is no joking matter.
- Soren Kierkegaard
A magic-man dunnit.
I hear breakfast prevents AIDS.
Man, that Harvey Birdman episode is awesome.
Also, this is equally as amusing satire (painful font though): Wrathful Dispersion