The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

The French Presidential Election

KaputaKaputa Registered User regular
edited April 2017 in Debate and/or Discourse
On Sunday, April 23rd, France will have the first round of voting for its next President (France uses a run-off election system). The stakes are high, not only for France, but for the future of the European Union as a whole. The election is a toss up between four candidates, with a fifth trailing, essentially representing center, center-right, center-left, far right, and far left political philosophies. The poll numbers of each are close enough that any outcome is regarded as possible, especially after the Trump and Brexit upsets reminded everyone of the fallibility of predictions based on polls. Hopefully we have some French or at least French-speaking forumers who can offer some insight on the finer points of the race; as an American I don't know much about the candidates beyond the little I've read in US/UK news outlets.

The candidates with a realistic chance at the Presidency are:

330px-Emmanuel_Macron_crop.jpg
Emmanuel Macron
Representing centrist politics. Pro-EU, liberal/capitalist economically (former investment banker), approves of international trade deals and NATO. Generally pro-migration. Overall seems to advocate your usual liberal EU politics.

330px-Fran%C3%A7ois_Fillon_2010.jpg
Francois Fillon
Running as a Republican and representing the center-right, Fillon is an economic liberal advocating capitalist reforms to the French system, though my impression is that he's socially conservative. Overall anti-immigration from what I've read, although less hardline than Le Pen. He's somewhat pro-EU (with a caveat of advocating some nationalist reforms) but his rhetoric is cool toward NATO, though I don't think he's called for France to exit the alliance. Fillon's candidacy has been marred by a scandal where he apparently gave state money to his family for no good reason, but he remains somewhat competitive in the polls.

330px-2015-03-18_20-21-20_meeting-soc-belfort_%28cropped%29.jpg
Benoît Hamon
Representing the Socialist Party and a center-left ideology, Hamon is trailing in the polls. My impression is that this is largely due to Francois Hollande, also of the Socialist Party, being the most disliked French president ever. It's too bad, IMO, because he's more left-wing than Hollande and has decent policy positions in my personal opinion: universal basic income, heavy investment in renewable energy, anti-austerity. He argues that the "myth" of unlimited economic growth should be abandoned as a goal (a controversial position, though one that I personally agree with). He resigned from Hollande's government in 2014 because Hollande was too much of a capitalist. He called for the Green and Communist Party to join forces with him; Jean-Luc Melenchon, representing the Communists, ruled such an alliance out, despite their agreement on many issues.

330px-Marine-Le-Pen-2017.jpg
Marine Le Pen
Representing the National Front and far right politics, Le Pen is a controversial figure. She has tried to distance her party from the more virulent and blatantly fascist politics of her father, though whether that represents a shift in ideology or just better PR is debatable. Stemming the flow of migration, both of the legal and illegal varieties, and particularly Muslim migration, to France is a centerpiece of her platform. Le Pen is opposed to French membership in various international institutions, advocating an exit from the EU (as well as the Euro) and NATO, and expressing opposition to the IMF and World Trade Organization. Overall she strikes the tone of a hard nationalist with ethnic Frenchness being an unstated part of that nationalism.

330px-Meeting_M%C3%A9lenchon_Toulouse_-_2017-04-16_-_Jean-Luc_M%C3%A9lenchon_-_41_%28cropped_2%29.jpg
Jean-Luc Melenchon
An actual Marxist running for President in 2017 and polling at around 20%, Melenchon stunned the French establishment by rapidly rising in the polls, especially after the first debate, where he apparently performed well (not speaking French, I wouldn't know). Melenchon advocates a radical redistributionist economic policy, taxing incomes above 400k Euro at 90% and vastly increasing public spending. Like Hamon, he advocates heavy investment in renewable energy sources. He's somewhat anti-EU, arguing the benefits of internationalism have been corrupted by neoliberal economics, and frequently criticises Germany as exercising a new form of economic imperialism (he points to the austerity programs demanded of Greece and other heavily in debt nations as the primary example of this). He advocates forcing the EU to make a series of unlikely changes to its system in favor of left-wing economics in exchange for France staying in the system. Also critical of France's membership in NATO. Here's a Reuter's run down of his positions. Some have compared Melenchon to Le Pen, but I think this is incorrect and based on defining them by what they are opposed to rather than what they support; both oppose the current international capitalist system but seek to replace it with entirely different alternatives. Melenchon's camp, for its part, regards the National Front as their ideological opposite and worst foe, although some voters who are mainly motivated by opposition to the current system have indeed wavered between the two candidates.

Melenchon, Fillon, and Le Pen all advocate warmer ties with Russia, Hamon and especially Macron do not. Le Pen in particular has been accused of being overly close to the Kremlin, I don't know how true that is.

As far as my uninformed opinion goes, Hamon is my personal favorite, but thanks to Hollande sucking, he's the least popular of the five. A Le Pen or Melenchon victory would be a major blow to the French and European political establishment; I like some of Melenchon's views but am less sold on others, and am unsure what the consequences of his victory would be. Le Pen just terrifies me. Fillon kinda sucks, in my view; austerity and privatization and smashing unions and social conservatism aren't my cup of tea. Macron is pretty much as centrist as you can get in terms of French politics, so whatever. If anyone has any corrections or additions I should make to the OP let me know, I'm going on wiki and a handful of articles I've read in the English language press here. I'll try and read more about the candidates and add to their little blurbs. Nonetheless, I think this is an important election for France, the European Union, and perhaps the world generally, and I think it's worthy of discussion here.

Kaputa on
«13456711

Posts

  • PhyphorPhyphor Building Planet Busters Tasting FruitRegistered User regular
    I think it's worth pointing out the particulars of the voting process. This is the first round vote. If there is no majority winner (there almost certainly won't be) the top two candidates then go to a runoff held a couple weeks later

    Le Pen in particular is very, very likely to make it to the second round and also likely to take a first round plurality, but appears to have a ceiling of about 40% of the second round vote. The most likely other candidate, Macron, appears to have a second round floor of 60%

    So, don't panic if Le Pen wins the first round vote, unless she breaks 40%

  • LabelLabel Registered User regular
    Please don't fuck up, France.

  • KaputaKaputa Registered User regular
    Phyphor wrote: »
    I think it's worth pointing out the particulars of the voting process. This is the first round vote. If there is no majority winner (there almost certainly won't be) the top two candidates then go to a runoff held a couple weeks later

    Le Pen in particular is very, very likely to make it to the second round and also likely to take a first round plurality, but appears to have a ceiling of about 40% of the second round vote. The most likely other candidate, Macron, appears to have a second round floor of 60%

    So, don't panic if Le Pen wins the first round vote, unless she breaks 40%
    Good call, I'm surprised I forgot to mention that, post edited.

  • JoeUserJoeUser Forum Santa Registered User regular
    A lot of foreign exchange traders are going to make or lose a bunch of money, depending on who ends up in the top two and how they bet. If Le Pen and Melenchon, expect the euro to crash like the day after Brexit.

  • JoeUserJoeUser Forum Santa Registered User regular

    Donald Trump: Marine Le Pen is 'strongest candidate' in French election

    Donald Trump has offered a tacit endorsement of Marine Le Pen in the French presidential election, describing the far-right leader as the “strongest” candidate in the first-round vote this Sunday.

    The US president told the Associated Press that although he was not “explicitly endorsing” the leader of the Front National, she was the “strongest on borders, and she’s the strongest on what’s been going on in France.”

    “Whoever is the toughest on radical Islamic terrorism, and whoever is the toughest at the borders, will do well in the election,” he said.

    Typically, US presidents avoid speculation on overseas elections. But Trump suggested his opinion was no different from any other: “Everybody is making predictions on who is going to win. I’m no different than you.”

  • Styrofoam SammichStyrofoam Sammich WANT. normal (not weird)Registered User regular
    I know this is the American part of me talking, but the notion of having a run off election for that high an office gives me symptoms. Once is bad enough.

    wq09t4opzrlc.jpg
  • Phoenix-DPhoenix-D Registered User regular
    I know this is the American part of me talking, but the notion of having a run off election for that high an office gives me symptoms. Once is bad enough.

    In this case it probably would have prevented Trump. Still have symptoms? :p

  • KaputaKaputa Registered User regular
    I know this is the American part of me talking, but the notion of having a run off election for that high an office gives me symptoms. Once is bad enough.
    I've always felt that ranked choice and run-off systems are superior to the American one. It allows people to vote their conscience without having to worry as much about letting someone terrible get in by not voting for a more popular, slightly less terrible candidate. In the last French election (not for President), the National Front made a strong showing in the first round, but in the second round the conservatives and Socialists agreed to form a united front against them, with each party backing the more popular in whichever district was threatened by the FN. As Phyphor points out, Le Pen is fairly likely to win the first round in this election, but much less likely to win the second, because less popular candidates will drop out and voters will back someone they like less in order to oppose Le Pen.

  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    PARIS — The final hours of many electoral campaigns are frantic affairs, dominated by last-minute pitches, late-breaking polls and massive social media campaigns aimed at drumming up turnout.

    Not so in France.

    Rules dating back more than half a century impose a 44-hour time out ahead of the polls' closure Sunday, meaning that politicians, journalists — and even ordinary citizens — are supposed to refrain from broadcasting any form of "electoral propaganda."

    The Twitter feeds of France's 11 presidential candidates went quiet after midnight Friday. French television coverage was subdued. And if you're a journalist who has just received a newsworthy tip about one candidate or the other, you're just too late.

    "The press can't publish such a story," said Pascal Jan, a professor of constitutional law at Sciences Po Bordeaux. "If there were a scandal, it should have been exposed Friday."

    Doesn't Australia have kinda similar laws? Anyways, it might of marginal utility but it strikes me as a pretty good idea. I don't remember ever getting anything of value from last days' campaigning.

    smCQ5WE.jpg
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Elki wrote: »
    PARIS — The final hours of many electoral campaigns are frantic affairs, dominated by last-minute pitches, late-breaking polls and massive social media campaigns aimed at drumming up turnout.

    Not so in France.

    Rules dating back more than half a century impose a 44-hour time out ahead of the polls' closure Sunday, meaning that politicians, journalists — and even ordinary citizens — are supposed to refrain from broadcasting any form of "electoral propaganda."

    The Twitter feeds of France's 11 presidential candidates went quiet after midnight Friday. French television coverage was subdued. And if you're a journalist who has just received a newsworthy tip about one candidate or the other, you're just too late.

    "The press can't publish such a story," said Pascal Jan, a professor of constitutional law at Sciences Po Bordeaux. "If there were a scandal, it should have been exposed Friday."

    Doesn't Australia have kinda similar laws? Anyways, it might of marginal utility but it strikes me as a pretty good idea. I don't remember ever getting anything of value from last days' campaigning.

    If anything, it's too small a window.

  • JragghenJragghen Registered User regular
    Kaputa wrote: »
    I know this is the American part of me talking, but the notion of having a run off election for that high an office gives me symptoms. Once is bad enough.
    I've always felt that ranked choice and run-off systems are superior to the American one. It allows people to vote their conscience without having to worry as much about letting someone terrible get in by not voting for a more popular, slightly less terrible candidate. In the last French election (not for President), the National Front made a strong showing in the first round, but in the second round the conservatives and Socialists agreed to form a united front against them, with each party backing the more popular in whichever district was threatened by the FN. As Phyphor points out, Le Pen is fairly likely to win the first round in this election, but much less likely to win the second, because less popular candidates will drop out and voters will back someone they like less in order to oppose Le Pen.

    And if the last two are Melenchon and Le Pen?

  • DoodmannDoodmann Registered User regular
    Jragghen wrote: »
    Kaputa wrote: »
    I know this is the American part of me talking, but the notion of having a run off election for that high an office gives me symptoms. Once is bad enough.
    I've always felt that ranked choice and run-off systems are superior to the American one. It allows people to vote their conscience without having to worry as much about letting someone terrible get in by not voting for a more popular, slightly less terrible candidate. In the last French election (not for President), the National Front made a strong showing in the first round, but in the second round the conservatives and Socialists agreed to form a united front against them, with each party backing the more popular in whichever district was threatened by the FN. As Phyphor points out, Le Pen is fairly likely to win the first round in this election, but much less likely to win the second, because less popular candidates will drop out and voters will back someone they like less in order to oppose Le Pen.

    And if the last two are Melenchon and Le Pen?

    We all start wearing black goatees.

    Whippy wrote: »
    nope nope nope nope abort abort talk about anime
    I like to ART
  • Solomaxwell6Solomaxwell6 Registered User regular
    Jragghen wrote: »
    Kaputa wrote: »
    I know this is the American part of me talking, but the notion of having a run off election for that high an office gives me symptoms. Once is bad enough.
    I've always felt that ranked choice and run-off systems are superior to the American one. It allows people to vote their conscience without having to worry as much about letting someone terrible get in by not voting for a more popular, slightly less terrible candidate. In the last French election (not for President), the National Front made a strong showing in the first round, but in the second round the conservatives and Socialists agreed to form a united front against them, with each party backing the more popular in whichever district was threatened by the FN. As Phyphor points out, Le Pen is fairly likely to win the first round in this election, but much less likely to win the second, because less popular candidates will drop out and voters will back someone they like less in order to oppose Le Pen.

    And if the last two are Melenchon and Le Pen?

    Right. And how often do we end up seeing a blue district in California end up with two Republicans going into the run off because they split 35% of the vote and two dozen Democrats split the other 65%? Two person run off voting really isn't any better than a one round plurality vote. Ranked systems are way better (and still allow for strategic voting, but that can't really be helped).

  • [Expletive deleted][Expletive deleted] The mediocre doctor NorwayRegistered User regular
    Jragghen wrote: »
    Kaputa wrote: »
    I know this is the American part of me talking, but the notion of having a run off election for that high an office gives me symptoms. Once is bad enough.
    I've always felt that ranked choice and run-off systems are superior to the American one. It allows people to vote their conscience without having to worry as much about letting someone terrible get in by not voting for a more popular, slightly less terrible candidate. In the last French election (not for President), the National Front made a strong showing in the first round, but in the second round the conservatives and Socialists agreed to form a united front against them, with each party backing the more popular in whichever district was threatened by the FN. As Phyphor points out, Le Pen is fairly likely to win the first round in this election, but much less likely to win the second, because less popular candidates will drop out and voters will back someone they like less in order to oppose Le Pen.

    And if the last two are Melenchon and Le Pen?

    That would be bad. Melenchon is almost surely better than Le Pen, but I'm afraid the French electorate might not come to the same conclusion.

    If it's Le Pen vs anyone else, the not-Le Pen candidate will probably win.

    Knock on wood.

    Sic transit gloria mundi.
  • BasarBasar IstanbulRegistered User regular
    I don't think MLP has a chance in the second round. She did get her father pushed out of the party he founded and she appears to have herself distanced from him but at the end NF is still a far right party that tries to detoxify its leadership but cannot do the same about the party base.
    Elki wrote: »
    PARIS — The final hours of many electoral campaigns are frantic affairs, dominated by last-minute pitches, late-breaking polls and massive social media campaigns aimed at drumming up turnout.

    Not so in France.

    Rules dating back more than half a century impose a 44-hour time out ahead of the polls' closure Sunday, meaning that politicians, journalists — and even ordinary citizens — are supposed to refrain from broadcasting any form of "electoral propaganda."

    The Twitter feeds of France's 11 presidential candidates went quiet after midnight Friday. French television coverage was subdued. And if you're a journalist who has just received a newsworthy tip about one candidate or the other, you're just too late.

    "The press can't publish such a story," said Pascal Jan, a professor of constitutional law at Sciences Po Bordeaux. "If there were a scandal, it should have been exposed Friday."

    Doesn't Australia have kinda similar laws? Anyways, it might of marginal utility but it strikes me as a pretty good idea. I don't remember ever getting anything of value from last days' campaigning.

    We have similar laws in Turkey as well. I don't know the reasoning though.

    i live in a country with a batshit crazy president and no, english is not my first language

  • OldSlackerOldSlacker Registered User regular
    We have something similar in Croatia - there is a 24 hour mandatory "Electoral Silence" before any major election day.

  • ahavaahava Call me Ahava ~~She/Her~~ Move to New ZealandRegistered User regular
    I know there's no campaigning allowed on election day down here in NZ. But then most of our elections are some primarily by mail. Although you can still go to the polls as well.

    I do know that you need to take down all your electioneering signs and things within 24 hours of the vote being called.

    At least the lay time i checked that's what i was told.

  • RMS OceanicRMS Oceanic Registered User regular
    In the UK there is no reporting on elections beyond "an election is happening" while the polls are open. It's a calm before the storm.

    I actually like the French idea of a short break before it.

  • PLAPLA The process.Registered User regular
    Ne fuck up pas aussi.

  • JoeUserJoeUser Forum Santa Registered User regular
    France doesn't have exit polls either, which is interesting. Instead they take a sample of the first 100 ballots at a polling station and extrapolate from there, which is surprisingly accurate.

  • EinzelEinzel Registered User regular
    JoeUser wrote: »
    France doesn't have exit polls either, which is interesting. Instead they take a sample of the first 100 ballots at a polling station and extrapolate from there, which is surprisingly accurate.

    With a multi candidate field I can see it being pretty accurate. If it's just two then I think it would slip.

  • TryCatcherTryCatcher Registered User regular
    Melénchon looks and acts like a Le Monde Diplomatique article come to life:
    738_jlmcastro.jpg
    So, in my 100% biased opinion, even Le Pen would be better. And that's a loaded statement.

  • CptKemzikCptKemzik Registered User regular
    Melenchon was part of two-term president Francois Mitterand's administration back in the 80's and early 90's, so he actually has experience governing unlike Le Pen. Chavez/Castro/whoever else in Latin America admiration aside he would be assuredly better than some crass xenophobe from the party literally descended from Nazi France.

    That said, there are legit reasons to cast a jaundiced eye towards him - not the least his current use of cult-of-personality politics to be within spitting distance of the first round - which I will cross post below:
    CptKemzik wrote: »
    Kaputa wrote: »
    Oghulk wrote: »
    If le pen doesn't make the runoff I'll sleep a lot easier

    Worst-case scenario is Le Pen vs Mélenchon in the second round.

    Mélenchon is a far-left fan of Chavez. His platform includes 100% tax on income above 400 kEuro, getting rid of the current French presidential system, wants out of NATO and reform the EU to "serve the people" (or failing that, a referendum on Frexit). Oh, and he also likes Russia.

    He can't possibly be worse than Le Pen, but
    Mélenchon vs Le Pen will give the voters two choices: Economic disaster or economic chaos.
    Of course the employers's association would say that, though. They're the ones he wants to tax.

    Half the sources I see when Googling list his top tax rate as 90% and the other half as 100%, do you why the discrepancy/which is correct? I do see that he wants to cap CEO income at 20 times workers' wages.

    I don't know enough about French politics have an opinion on reforming the Presidential system to one where Parliament has more power, but I don't see giving the legislative more power in proportion to the executive as a self-evidently bad thing.

    And I think some of his criticisms of the EU, particularly those relating to fiscal conservatism/austerity and a structure that reduces the power of democracy, hold some merit (I've felt this way since the Greek debt crisis), although not being in the EU I'm not gonna weigh in on whether those reasons justify leaving the organization.

    Tangential: Melenchon is basically a far-left nationalist who gives credence to the idea of the horseshoe theory. He wants to renegotiate ties with, or straight up leave, the EU and NATO because the "West" is the root of all evil, but Putin's excursions into Ukraine and his steadfast abetting of Assad go unmentioned when he talks foreign policy. Moreover he apparently victim-blamed late opposition figure Boris Nemstov rather than, you know, criticize the fascist regime that allows such a murderous culture run unchecked.

    Also very pro celebrating and exerting the force of the French state (police and military) despite what some folks may think of him at first glance RE being anti NATO (which to me just reads as anti-multilateralism). Also softly anti immigrant and refugee rather than viciously anti immigrant/refugee (he wants refugees to be going back to their war torn home countries rather than countries like France, well how does he propose that happen?!). Finally very uncritical of both France's colonialism, and the Fifth Republic's policy of secularism with regards to how it has disenfranchised non-catholic French. Oh also he wants to start a more parliamentary sixth republic through a sweeping referendum, but is running absent any party behind his program.

    These are all points from left wing French writers' impressions of Melenchon who are basically tepidly pro-Melenchon only because Hamon's socialist campaign is now a lost cause and Macron is obviously too liberal (in the classical sense) for their tastes.

    Like @Kaputa I would likely have put my support behind Benoit Hamon, unfortunately he made the mistake of running with the party that has perhaps irreparably sunk through the joint efforts of Francois Hollande and Manuel Valls. Thus I'm nominally hopeful of a Macron victory instead. Regardless of who wins however we will have to see how June's legislative elections turn out (lol like international English-speaking media will bother covering that exhaustively).

  • FoefallerFoefaller Registered User regular
    CptKemzik wrote: »
    Melenchon was part of two-term president Francois Mitterand's administration back in the 80's and early 90's, so he actually has experience governing unlike Le Pen. Chavez/Castro/whoever else in Latin America admiration aside he would be assuredly better than some crass xenophobe from the party literally descended from Nazi France.

    That said, there are legit reasons to cast a jaundiced eye towards him - not the least his current use of cult-of-personality politics to be within spitting distance of the first round - which I will cross post below:
    CptKemzik wrote: »
    Kaputa wrote: »
    Oghulk wrote: »
    If le pen doesn't make the runoff I'll sleep a lot easier

    Worst-case scenario is Le Pen vs Mélenchon in the second round.

    Mélenchon is a far-left fan of Chavez. His platform includes 100% tax on income above 400 kEuro, getting rid of the current French presidential system, wants out of NATO and reform the EU to "serve the people" (or failing that, a referendum on Frexit). Oh, and he also likes Russia.

    He can't possibly be worse than Le Pen, but
    Mélenchon vs Le Pen will give the voters two choices: Economic disaster or economic chaos.
    Of course the employers's association would say that, though. They're the ones he wants to tax.

    Half the sources I see when Googling list his top tax rate as 90% and the other half as 100%, do you why the discrepancy/which is correct? I do see that he wants to cap CEO income at 20 times workers' wages.

    I don't know enough about French politics have an opinion on reforming the Presidential system to one where Parliament has more power, but I don't see giving the legislative more power in proportion to the executive as a self-evidently bad thing.

    And I think some of his criticisms of the EU, particularly those relating to fiscal conservatism/austerity and a structure that reduces the power of democracy, hold some merit (I've felt this way since the Greek debt crisis), although not being in the EU I'm not gonna weigh in on whether those reasons justify leaving the organization.

    Tangential: Melenchon is basically a far-left nationalist who gives credence to the idea of the horseshoe theory. He wants to renegotiate ties with, or straight up leave, the EU and NATO because the "West" is the root of all evil, but Putin's excursions into Ukraine and his steadfast abetting of Assad go unmentioned when he talks foreign policy. Moreover he apparently victim-blamed late opposition figure Boris Nemstov rather than, you know, criticize the fascist regime that allows such a murderous culture run unchecked.

    Also very pro celebrating and exerting the force of the French state (police and military) despite what some folks may think of him at first glance RE being anti NATO (which to me just reads as anti-multilateralism). Also softly anti immigrant and refugee rather than viciously anti immigrant/refugee (he wants refugees to be going back to their war torn home countries rather than countries like France, well how does he propose that happen?!). Finally very uncritical of both France's colonialism, and the Fifth Republic's policy of secularism with regards to how it has disenfranchised non-catholic French. Oh also he wants to start a more parliamentary sixth republic through a sweeping referendum, but is running absent any party behind his program.

    These are all points from left wing French writers' impressions of Melenchon who are basically tepidly pro-Melenchon only because Hamon's socialist campaign is now a lost cause and Macron is obviously too liberal (in the classical sense) for their tastes.

    Like Kaputa I would likely have put my support behind Benoit Hamon, unfortunately he made the mistake of running with the party that has perhaps irreparably sunk through the joint efforts of Francois Hollande and Manuel Valls. Thus I'm nominally hopeful of a Macron victory instead. Regardless of who wins however we will have to see how June's legislative elections turn out (lol like international English-speaking media will bother covering that exhaustively).

    Didn't he also once suggest, with a straight face, that the solution to France's unemployment problem was to shrink the French work week so businesses would have to hire more people to get the same amount of work done?

    steam_sig.png
  • TryCatcherTryCatcher Registered User regular
    Melénchon threathened to have France leave the EU if his proposals don't make it through, and, since they are communist crazyness, and the EU won't accept another country making demands after Brexit, that won't happen, so in both cases the EU collapses after Germany tries and fails to hold it by itself.

    Fun times ahead.

  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    Macron '16?

  • TryCatcherTryCatcher Registered User regular
    Macron '16?

    Seems like the most sane option.

  • KamarKamar Registered User regular
    Foefaller wrote: »
    CptKemzik wrote: »
    Melenchon was part of two-term president Francois Mitterand's administration back in the 80's and early 90's, so he actually has experience governing unlike Le Pen. Chavez/Castro/whoever else in Latin America admiration aside he would be assuredly better than some crass xenophobe from the party literally descended from Nazi France.

    That said, there are legit reasons to cast a jaundiced eye towards him - not the least his current use of cult-of-personality politics to be within spitting distance of the first round - which I will cross post below:
    CptKemzik wrote: »
    Kaputa wrote: »
    Oghulk wrote: »
    If le pen doesn't make the runoff I'll sleep a lot easier

    Worst-case scenario is Le Pen vs Mélenchon in the second round.

    Mélenchon is a far-left fan of Chavez. His platform includes 100% tax on income above 400 kEuro, getting rid of the current French presidential system, wants out of NATO and reform the EU to "serve the people" (or failing that, a referendum on Frexit). Oh, and he also likes Russia.

    He can't possibly be worse than Le Pen, but
    Mélenchon vs Le Pen will give the voters two choices: Economic disaster or economic chaos.
    Of course the employers's association would say that, though. They're the ones he wants to tax.

    Half the sources I see when Googling list his top tax rate as 90% and the other half as 100%, do you why the discrepancy/which is correct? I do see that he wants to cap CEO income at 20 times workers' wages.

    I don't know enough about French politics have an opinion on reforming the Presidential system to one where Parliament has more power, but I don't see giving the legislative more power in proportion to the executive as a self-evidently bad thing.

    And I think some of his criticisms of the EU, particularly those relating to fiscal conservatism/austerity and a structure that reduces the power of democracy, hold some merit (I've felt this way since the Greek debt crisis), although not being in the EU I'm not gonna weigh in on whether those reasons justify leaving the organization.

    Tangential: Melenchon is basically a far-left nationalist who gives credence to the idea of the horseshoe theory. He wants to renegotiate ties with, or straight up leave, the EU and NATO because the "West" is the root of all evil, but Putin's excursions into Ukraine and his steadfast abetting of Assad go unmentioned when he talks foreign policy. Moreover he apparently victim-blamed late opposition figure Boris Nemstov rather than, you know, criticize the fascist regime that allows such a murderous culture run unchecked.

    Also very pro celebrating and exerting the force of the French state (police and military) despite what some folks may think of him at first glance RE being anti NATO (which to me just reads as anti-multilateralism). Also softly anti immigrant and refugee rather than viciously anti immigrant/refugee (he wants refugees to be going back to their war torn home countries rather than countries like France, well how does he propose that happen?!). Finally very uncritical of both France's colonialism, and the Fifth Republic's policy of secularism with regards to how it has disenfranchised non-catholic French. Oh also he wants to start a more parliamentary sixth republic through a sweeping referendum, but is running absent any party behind his program.

    These are all points from left wing French writers' impressions of Melenchon who are basically tepidly pro-Melenchon only because Hamon's socialist campaign is now a lost cause and Macron is obviously too liberal (in the classical sense) for their tastes.

    Like Kaputa I would likely have put my support behind Benoit Hamon, unfortunately he made the mistake of running with the party that has perhaps irreparably sunk through the joint efforts of Francois Hollande and Manuel Valls. Thus I'm nominally hopeful of a Macron victory instead. Regardless of who wins however we will have to see how June's legislative elections turn out (lol like international English-speaking media will bother covering that exhaustively).

    Didn't he also once suggest, with a straight face, that the solution to France's unemployment problem was to shrink the French work week so businesses would have to hire more people to get the same amount of work done?

    Is that, like...an extreme position? If I'm not mistaken, similar sentiments re: shrinking the work week have been popular when the subject's come up here.

  • CptKemzikCptKemzik Registered User regular
    edited April 2017
    TryCatcher wrote: »
    Melénchon threathened to have France leave the EU if his proposals don't make it through, and, since they are communist crazyness, and the EU won't accept another country making demands after Brexit, that won't happen, so in both cases the EU collapses after Germany tries and fails to hold it by itself.

    Fun times ahead.

    Again, legislative elections in June are going to be the real lynchpin for France going forward. Assuming Melenchon even wins the presidency, he doesn't have a party unlike Le Pen (though as we saw with provincial elections in 2015, FN was strategically outvoted in every second round they made it to), and without a parliamentary majority the presidency can't exert too much influence. So I'll take the person that has people succumbing to red-baiting over the person who comes from a political party, and family, that are anti-Semitic. Meanwhile Macron, though running an independent campaign, is planning to have his org run candidates in the June elections, and even then it is far more likely his presidency would draw support from centre-right and left folks even if En Marche doesn't make big waves in the legislature.
    Foefaller wrote: »
    Didn't he also once suggest, with a straight face, that the solution to France's unemployment problem was to shrink the French work week so businesses would have to hire more people to get the same amount of work done?

    Hollande literally gave corporations massive tax breaks/rebates (good bye revenue!) for the "promise" of these companies hiring more workers, and attempted a farcial legislative-by-decree attempt to gut union activity and worker protections that I think ended up getting scaled back anyway because of organized protests. I'll let you guess if corporations followed through on their "promise." So I don't see how reducing working hours is any more ridiculous.

    France does have real issues with it's economy and unemployment rate that may involve having to coddle capitalists, but if it is Macron, with a legislative majority, let's hope it's more like his proposed flexibility on negotiating the 35 hour workweek rather than arbitrarily increasing it a la Fillon, and his labor reform to allow businesses to operate more frequently on Sundays (one of his accomplishments as a cabinet member for Hollande), rather than tax cuts to nowhere.

    CptKemzik on
  • PhyphorPhyphor Building Planet Busters Tasting FruitRegistered User regular
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/23/french-election-live-results-exit-polls/

    Some interesting things so far:
    - Belgian media claims Macron is in the lead according to polls; Belgian media doesn't have to follow French non-reporting rules
    - turnout is expected to be around 80% - go France!
    - French expats apparently physically vote at polling places too

    Polls close in about an hour and a half

  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    Presumably 80% is high?

  • CptKemzikCptKemzik Registered User regular
    edited April 2017
    80% is apparently average for France's presidential elections. The concern for today was that it would be below 4/5 of their population voting. If only turnout was like that in the US.

    CptKemzik on
  • RMS OceanicRMS Oceanic Registered User regular
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Presumably 80% is high?

    US Turnout in November was 58%. The last UK election was 66.1%, and Brexit was 72%. So 80% is nothing to sneeze at.

  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    Man, I wish we had 70% participation

  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Man, I wish we had 70% participation

    Well, to be fair you've got a lot of people, including half your government, working very hard to keep it down.

  • davidsdurionsdavidsdurions Your Trusty Meatshield Panhandle NebraskaRegistered User regular
    Phyphor wrote: »
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/23/french-election-live-results-exit-polls/

    Some interesting things so far:
    - Belgian media claims Macron is in the lead according to polls; Belgian media doesn't have to follow French non-reporting rules
    - turnout is expected to be around 80% - go France!
    - French expats apparently physically vote at polling places too

    Polls close in about an hour and a half

    Okay, but who is second? I hate waiting...

  • ArcTangentArcTangent Registered User regular
    edited April 2017


    Yuck. Just... yuck.

    Please let this rag just be blowing hot air.

    ArcTangent on
    ztrEPtD.gif
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    ArcTangent wrote: »
    I thought she was expected to make it into the second round though?

  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Couscous wrote: »
    ArcTangent wrote: »
    I thought she was expected to make it into the second round though?

    Yup. This was like 100% expected.

    If she hadn't made it, it would have been shocking.

  • ArcTangentArcTangent Registered User regular
    Couscous wrote: »
    ArcTangent wrote: »
    I thought she was expected to make it into the second round though?

    Yeah, generally. It still would've been nice had that bullet been dodged early.

    ztrEPtD.gif
This discussion has been closed.