The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Great Balls of Fire!
Metzger MeisterIt Gets Worsebefore it gets any better.Registered Userregular
Not only a fantastic movie, but the one song amongst a multitude of brilliant others that Jerry Lee Lewis is famous for. I love Jerry Lee.
Elvis, The Temptations, The Dell-Vikings, Frankie Valon and the Teenagers, Buddy Holly, and various others make for some odd stares when a fat teenager is humming them as he walked through the mall.
What kind of old music do you courtisans and gentle-fops listen to?
Sinatra was awesome and so were his movies but Bobby Darin wrote all his own music. God knows who the man would have surpassed had he been given a stronger heart.
t Metzger Meister: Jerry Lewis did one thing right. He gave us Gary Lewis.
Metzger MeisterIt Gets Worsebefore it gets any better.Registered Userregular
edited May 2007
My dad once told me that Sam Cooke was arrested for anti-American activities, which I took to mean that he was a Commie in the wrong era. True or false?
Is that from CSI:Miami? I don't remember which theme song they have...
But the intro to Baba O'Riley makes my ears bleed with pleasure. I used to smoke a little weed after work, crank the windows down, and blast that shit.
Man those were the days.
IHasABucket on
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
0
ButtersA glass of some milksRegistered Userregular
The Who, Bob Dylan, post-drug Beatles, Marley, Dire Straights, Simon & Garfunkel.
Some of those might not be considered old but I'm only 22 so they're old enough for me.
You're a generation ahead of this thread dude.
Ehhhhhh. Someone else talked about a kid shitting in a shower stall, I don't feel too bad about bringing up The Who or Dylan.
What really scares me is that one day, when I'm old and decrepit, I will turn on the oldies station, and 50 Cent, Lil Jon, "Diddy" or some bullshit like that will come on.
And that will be the day that I kill myself.
IHasABucket on
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
0
Metzger MeisterIt Gets Worsebefore it gets any better.Registered Userregular
edited May 2007
I listen to a lot of music that makes my friends go O_o. Because they listen to one genre of music, typically, and I listen to shit like The Doors and then Bob Marley and then some Mozart and maybe some Tanya Tucker.
Metzger MeisterIt Gets Worsebefore it gets any better.Registered Userregular
edited May 2007
I hope not. The difference between today and music in the fifties, sixties and seventies is that way more people wrote their own music. At least, that's how it seems to me.
Metzger Meister on
0
Lord DaveGrief CauserBitch Free ZoneRegistered Userregular
edited May 2007
man, Dire Straits isn't oldies
I love them though
Lord Dave on
0
Metzger MeisterIt Gets Worsebefore it gets any better.Registered Userregular
edited May 2007
.... Just a small town girl,
livin' in a loooonely world... :whistle:
This thread is about oldies, and since Journey is officially on oldies stations, they count.
I hope not. The difference between today and music in the fifties, sixties and seventies is that way more people wrote their own music. At least, that's how it seems to me.
My friend and I were talking about that the other day; he claimed that today's music is less meaningful because it's more produced, engineered, written by others, etc. I disagreed, citing primarily Modest Mouse. Sure, their older albums are great, with little to no production, and carry a lot of value. However, you look at stuff like Good News for People Who Love Bad News or WWDBTSES, it's obviously more produced, but just as good as the previous stuff. Is the music worse because it's more produced? Not in my opinion, it's just that the engineers and producers deserve a lot of musical credit right alongside the band. And in the case of those who don't write their own material, the writers deserve credit too.
Keep in mind bad music is bad music, regardless of how the production process goes, and that's not what I'm talking about.
IHasABucket on
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
0
HunterChemist with a heart of AuRegistered Userregular
edited May 2007
I've been listening to a lot of Neil Diamond stuff lately, especially his songs he wrote for The Monkees. Niel Diamond does the Beatles is pretty cool.
Anything my dad made me listen to is oldies to me, so sorry if I derailed your talk of Sinatra and big bands of the 20's and 30's. I probably skimmed more than I should have when reading the other posts...
IHasABucket on
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
0
HunterChemist with a heart of AuRegistered Userregular
I hope not. The difference between today and music in the fifties, sixties and seventies is that way more people wrote their own music. At least, that's how it seems to me.
My friend and I were talking about that the other day; he claimed that today's music is less meaningful because it's more produced, engineered, written by others, etc. I disagreed, citing primarily Modest Mouse. Sure, their older albums are great, with little to no production, and carry a lot of value. However, you look at stuff like Good News for People Who Love Bad News or WWDBTSES, it's obviously more produced, but just as good as the previous stuff. Is the music worse because it's more produced? Not in my opinion, it's just that the engineers and producers deserve a lot of musical credit right alongside the band. And in the case of those who don't write their own material, the writers deserve credit too.
Keep in mind bad music is bad music, regardless of how the production process goes, and that's not what I'm talking about.
See, the thing is, music being produced obviously does not lessen it's value. To me, that just says the artist who is handling the music just takes it seriously and wants it to sound as good as possible. However, if the only talent of the performer in question comes from some good filters and an awesome studio engineer, then there's a problem.
Metzger Meister on
0
Lord DaveGrief CauserBitch Free ZoneRegistered Userregular
Anything my dad made me listen to is oldies to me, so sorry if I derailed your talk of Sinatra and big bands of the 20's and 30's. I probably skimmed more than I should have when reading the other posts...
My dad "made me" listen to it growing up, but it's still not oldies.
"On Every Street" came out in 1991!
Lord Dave on
0
Lord DaveGrief CauserBitch Free ZoneRegistered Userregular
Posts
His 15 yearold cousin?
I listen to a lot of 30s-50s music :<
don't you have a more active metabolism anyway
you look like a beached whale
without the beach
Like, rude ones.
Shit yeah.
as if that kid isnt bad enough bein a fucking goth
but what he does in the shower fuuuuck
SEXUALLY
Sheri Baldwin Photography | Facebook | Twitter | Etsy Shop | BUY ME STUFF (updated for 2014!)
But he's no Boccherini.
He... uh... yeah, you're right, nevermind.
Gary Lewis and the Playboys
The Drifters
The Vogues
Dianna Ross and the Supremes
I don't care what anyone says. I fucking love the Supremes.
Bobby Darin was the shit before he turned all hippie on everyone.
Edit: Ray Charles, too.
Sinatra was awesome and so were his movies but Bobby Darin wrote all his own music. God knows who the man would have surpassed had he been given a stronger heart.
t Metzger Meister: Jerry Lewis did one thing right. He gave us Gary Lewis.
Some of those might not be considered old but I'm only 22 so they're old enough for me.
But the intro to Baba O'Riley makes my ears bleed with pleasure. I used to smoke a little weed after work, crank the windows down, and blast that shit.
Man those were the days.
You're a generation ahead of this thread dude.
It's more because of the Youtube video that compiled all the one-liners and a particular Weebl and Bob toon
Ehhhhhh. Someone else talked about a kid shitting in a shower stall, I don't feel too bad about bringing up The Who or Dylan.
What really scares me is that one day, when I'm old and decrepit, I will turn on the oldies station, and 50 Cent, Lil Jon, "Diddy" or some bullshit like that will come on.
And that will be the day that I kill myself.
e: this was directed at bucket
I love them though
livin' in a loooonely world... :whistle:
This thread is about oldies, and since Journey is officially on oldies stations, they count.
DOOOON'T STOP, BELIEEEEEVIN'! :whistle:
My friend and I were talking about that the other day; he claimed that today's music is less meaningful because it's more produced, engineered, written by others, etc. I disagreed, citing primarily Modest Mouse. Sure, their older albums are great, with little to no production, and carry a lot of value. However, you look at stuff like Good News for People Who Love Bad News or WWDBTSES, it's obviously more produced, but just as good as the previous stuff. Is the music worse because it's more produced? Not in my opinion, it's just that the engineers and producers deserve a lot of musical credit right alongside the band. And in the case of those who don't write their own material, the writers deserve credit too.
Keep in mind bad music is bad music, regardless of how the production process goes, and that's not what I'm talking about.
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
Anything my dad made me listen to is oldies to me, so sorry if I derailed your talk of Sinatra and big bands of the 20's and 30's. I probably skimmed more than I should have when reading the other posts...
Dire Straits is awesome. Along with Stevie Ray Vaughn and George Thoroughgood, you have a white guys do blues guitar correctly super team.
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
See, the thing is, music being produced obviously does not lessen it's value. To me, that just says the artist who is handling the music just takes it seriously and wants it to sound as good as possible. However, if the only talent of the performer in question comes from some good filters and an awesome studio engineer, then there's a problem.
My dad "made me" listen to it growing up, but it's still not oldies.
"On Every Street" came out in 1991!
If I had to list my top 20 songs, probably at least 5 would be Dire Straits.