As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

[Canadian Politics] Take care. Listen to health authorities.

14546485051101

Posts

  • Options
    Disco11Disco11 Registered User regular
    Hardtarget wrote: »
    So stuff like this is why this whole issue is basically screwed
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/wet-suwet-en-coastal-gas-link-pipeline-lng-1.5469401
    Like no agreement will ever bring the 2 sides together

    What a mess.

    PSN: Canadian_llama
  • Options
    shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Nova_C wrote: »

    I'm not seeing any source quoted there on the more recent announcement so I'm not sure what they are referring to.

    While googling for CN layoffs, I found this:
    https://globalnews.ca/news/6569418/via-rail-layoffs-service-ontario-quebec/
    Via Rail says partial passenger train service will not resume this week — as was previously announced — while the company moves to temporarily lay off nearly 1,000 people.
    Which sounds different from other layoffs they are doing, mentioned further down the article:
    On Tuesday, CN Rail announced that it would lay off around 450 of its workers following hundreds of train cancellations and network suspensions. The national railway announced plans to lay off roughly 1,600 employees last year, citing international trade tensions and slowing economic growth.

  • Options
    AridholAridhol Daddliest Catch Registered User regular
    B.C. RCMP say they'll withdraw from Wet'suwet'en territory if road is kept clear

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-withdraw-bc-1.5469669

    Not sure this is gonna work as it's functionally the same situation as it is today but maybe it'll ratchet down some of the tension.


  • Options
    ArcticLancerArcticLancer Best served chilled. Registered User regular
    edited February 2020
    Hardtarget wrote: »
    So stuff like this is why this whole issue is basically screwed
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/wet-suwet-en-coastal-gas-link-pipeline-lng-1.5469401
    Like no agreement will ever bring the 2 sides together
    It's definitely a mess, but it's something that needs to be sorted out.
    Also, you're ALWAYS going to find detractors within a group, like doctors and nurses who don't believe in vaccination or a woman's right to choose. It should surprise nobody that there are people within that group who want the protesters to stop.

    ArcticLancer on
  • Options
    Nova_CNova_C I have the need The need for speedRegistered User regular
    Hardtarget wrote: »
    So stuff like this is why this whole issue is basically screwed
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/wet-suwet-en-coastal-gas-link-pipeline-lng-1.5469401
    Like no agreement will ever bring the 2 sides together
    It's definitely a mess, but it's something that needs to be sorted out.
    Also, you're ALWAYS going to find detractors within a group, like doctors and nurses who don't believe in vaccination or a woman's right to choose. It should surprise nobody that there are people within that group who want the protesters to stop.

    Until the legal claim is resolved, this will keep happening. There are people protesting the pipeline because no pipelines. But at the core, what this is really about, is First Nation agency. That's what needs to be sorted out.

  • Options
    HobnailHobnail Registered User regular
    Quite right

  • Options
    Disco11Disco11 Registered User regular
    Nova_C wrote: »
    Hardtarget wrote: »
    So stuff like this is why this whole issue is basically screwed
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/wet-suwet-en-coastal-gas-link-pipeline-lng-1.5469401
    Like no agreement will ever bring the 2 sides together
    It's definitely a mess, but it's something that needs to be sorted out.
    Also, you're ALWAYS going to find detractors within a group, like doctors and nurses who don't believe in vaccination or a woman's right to choose. It should surprise nobody that there are people within that group who want the protesters to stop.

    Until the legal claim is resolved, this will keep happening. There are people protesting the pipeline because no pipelines. But at the core, what this is really about, is First Nation agency. That's what needs to be sorted out.

    The problem is that there is no way to settle this without literally starting over. The treaty/reserve system is fucked to the core.

    And there is no politician in Canada that will touch that with a 10' pole.

    PSN: Canadian_llama
  • Options
    tinwhiskerstinwhiskers Registered User regular
    edited February 2020
    Disco11 wrote: »
    Nova_C wrote: »
    Hardtarget wrote: »
    So stuff like this is why this whole issue is basically screwed
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/wet-suwet-en-coastal-gas-link-pipeline-lng-1.5469401
    Like no agreement will ever bring the 2 sides together
    It's definitely a mess, but it's something that needs to be sorted out.
    Also, you're ALWAYS going to find detractors within a group, like doctors and nurses who don't believe in vaccination or a woman's right to choose. It should surprise nobody that there are people within that group who want the protesters to stop.

    Until the legal claim is resolved, this will keep happening. There are people protesting the pipeline because no pipelines. But at the core, what this is really about, is First Nation agency. That's what needs to be sorted out.

    The problem is that there is no way to settle this without literally starting over. The treaty/reserve system is fucked to the core.

    And there is no politician in Canada that will touch that with a 10' pole.

    Not disagreeing in general, but going from here to there seems like a reach.

    It's not like trans-national pipelines aren't a thing everywhere else in the world. Just because Russian and Germany really want a pipeline through Poland, they don't just invade it and okay bad example but still.

    If you want a pipeline through a nation you have to negotiate with them, and they can tell you to fuck off. Then you have to make it longer and go around or what ever not that complicated.

    tinwhiskers on
    6ylyzxlir2dz.png
  • Options
    Gnome-InterruptusGnome-Interruptus Registered User regular
    Disco11 wrote: »
    Nova_C wrote: »
    Hardtarget wrote: »
    So stuff like this is why this whole issue is basically screwed
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/wet-suwet-en-coastal-gas-link-pipeline-lng-1.5469401
    Like no agreement will ever bring the 2 sides together
    It's definitely a mess, but it's something that needs to be sorted out.
    Also, you're ALWAYS going to find detractors within a group, like doctors and nurses who don't believe in vaccination or a woman's right to choose. It should surprise nobody that there are people within that group who want the protesters to stop.

    Until the legal claim is resolved, this will keep happening. There are people protesting the pipeline because no pipelines. But at the core, what this is really about, is First Nation agency. That's what needs to be sorted out.

    The problem is that there is no way to settle this without literally starting over. The treaty/reserve system is fucked to the core.

    And there is no politician in Canada that will touch that with a 10' pole.

    Not disagreeing in general, but going from here to there seems like a reach.

    It's not like trans-national pipelines aren't a thing everywhere else in the world. Just because Russian and Germany really want a pipeline through Poland, they don't just invade it and okay bad example but still.

    If you want a pipeline through a nation you have to negotiate with them, and they can tell you to fuck off. Then you have to make it longer and go around or what ever not that complicated.

    The problem is the members of the nations don’t necessarily agree who speaks with authority to agree or reject any deals negotiated.

    So having to start from scratch on how Canada recognizes and interacts with First Nations, which is currently hamstrung by both existing legislation and treaties as well as years of bad faith on the part of the Federal and Provincial governments.

    steam_sig.png
    MWO: Adamski
  • Options
    AridholAridhol Daddliest Catch Registered User regular
    It's pretty disingenuous and offensive to describe the people in that article as akin to fucking antivaxxers or anti-abortionists.

    Legitimate political disagreements within communities is not science denial nor is it a fringe perspective.

  • Options
    Disco11Disco11 Registered User regular
    edited February 2020
    Disco11 wrote: »
    Nova_C wrote: »
    Hardtarget wrote: »
    So stuff like this is why this whole issue is basically screwed
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/wet-suwet-en-coastal-gas-link-pipeline-lng-1.5469401
    Like no agreement will ever bring the 2 sides together
    It's definitely a mess, but it's something that needs to be sorted out.
    Also, you're ALWAYS going to find detractors within a group, like doctors and nurses who don't believe in vaccination or a woman's right to choose. It should surprise nobody that there are people within that group who want the protesters to stop.

    Until the legal claim is resolved, this will keep happening. There are people protesting the pipeline because no pipelines. But at the core, what this is really about, is First Nation agency. That's what needs to be sorted out.

    The problem is that there is no way to settle this without literally starting over. The treaty/reserve system is fucked to the core.

    And there is no politician in Canada that will touch that with a 10' pole.

    Not disagreeing in general, but going from here to there seems like a reach.

    It's not like trans-national pipelines aren't a thing everywhere else in the world. Just because Russian and Germany really want a pipeline through Poland, they don't just invade it and okay bad example but still.

    If you want a pipeline through a nation you have to negotiate with them, and they can tell you to fuck off. Then you have to make it longer and go around or what ever not that complicated.

    See, this is where it get's complicated.

    They are a nation inside another nation that has zero financial independence, are not self governing 100% of the time and in many cases very limited ways to generate revenue.

    Germany does not pay for Poland's healthcare, roads & utilities.

    I'm not condoning this just calling it out.

    This is what makes every negation a huge deal because we are not dealing with the Native people as we would a foreign nation.

    This has to change but can't because we are stuck in the same cycle. To make things fair Canada would need to cede much power/land/money.

    And no politician will do this.

    Disco11 on
    PSN: Canadian_llama
  • Options
    shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Disco11 wrote: »
    Disco11 wrote: »
    Nova_C wrote: »
    Hardtarget wrote: »
    So stuff like this is why this whole issue is basically screwed
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/wet-suwet-en-coastal-gas-link-pipeline-lng-1.5469401
    Like no agreement will ever bring the 2 sides together
    It's definitely a mess, but it's something that needs to be sorted out.
    Also, you're ALWAYS going to find detractors within a group, like doctors and nurses who don't believe in vaccination or a woman's right to choose. It should surprise nobody that there are people within that group who want the protesters to stop.

    Until the legal claim is resolved, this will keep happening. There are people protesting the pipeline because no pipelines. But at the core, what this is really about, is First Nation agency. That's what needs to be sorted out.

    The problem is that there is no way to settle this without literally starting over. The treaty/reserve system is fucked to the core.

    And there is no politician in Canada that will touch that with a 10' pole.

    Not disagreeing in general, but going from here to there seems like a reach.

    It's not like trans-national pipelines aren't a thing everywhere else in the world. Just because Russian and Germany really want a pipeline through Poland, they don't just invade it and okay bad example but still.

    If you want a pipeline through a nation you have to negotiate with them, and they can tell you to fuck off. Then you have to make it longer and go around or what ever not that complicated.

    See, this is where it get's complicated.

    They are a nation inside another nation that has zero financial independence, are not self governing 100% of the time and in many cases very limited ways to generate revenue.

    Germany does not pay for Poland's healthcare, roads & utilities.

    I'm not condoning this just calling it out.

    I would also say that the general public, who in a democracy get to vote and all that, basically do not even understand the idea that they represent any sort of independent anything.

  • Options
    Disco11Disco11 Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    Disco11 wrote: »
    Disco11 wrote: »
    Nova_C wrote: »
    Hardtarget wrote: »
    So stuff like this is why this whole issue is basically screwed
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/wet-suwet-en-coastal-gas-link-pipeline-lng-1.5469401
    Like no agreement will ever bring the 2 sides together
    It's definitely a mess, but it's something that needs to be sorted out.
    Also, you're ALWAYS going to find detractors within a group, like doctors and nurses who don't believe in vaccination or a woman's right to choose. It should surprise nobody that there are people within that group who want the protesters to stop.

    Until the legal claim is resolved, this will keep happening. There are people protesting the pipeline because no pipelines. But at the core, what this is really about, is First Nation agency. That's what needs to be sorted out.

    The problem is that there is no way to settle this without literally starting over. The treaty/reserve system is fucked to the core.

    And there is no politician in Canada that will touch that with a 10' pole.

    Not disagreeing in general, but going from here to there seems like a reach.

    It's not like trans-national pipelines aren't a thing everywhere else in the world. Just because Russian and Germany really want a pipeline through Poland, they don't just invade it and okay bad example but still.

    If you want a pipeline through a nation you have to negotiate with them, and they can tell you to fuck off. Then you have to make it longer and go around or what ever not that complicated.

    See, this is where it get's complicated.

    They are a nation inside another nation that has zero financial independence, are not self governing 100% of the time and in many cases very limited ways to generate revenue.

    Germany does not pay for Poland's healthcare, roads & utilities.

    I'm not condoning this just calling it out.

    I would also say that the general public, who in a democracy get to vote and all that, basically do not even understand the idea that they represent any sort of independent anything.

    This is very true as well.

    Hell, bring up healing lodges to the average person and prepare for a rant.

    PSN: Canadian_llama
  • Options
    CorporateGoonCorporateGoon Registered User regular
    On a somewhat less contentious topic, has anyone in Ontario seen one of those anti-carbon tax gas pump stickers lately? I know they had crappy adhesive and people just peeled them off or covered them up, but I think it's still technically the law that gas stations need to have them, and I haven't seen one anywhere in months.

  • Options
    CanadianWolverineCanadianWolverine Registered User regular
    Hardtarget wrote: »
    So stuff like this is why this whole issue is basically screwed
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/wet-suwet-en-coastal-gas-link-pipeline-lng-1.5469401
    Like no agreement will ever bring the 2 sides together

    At least the CBC article on this showed the video of the meeting.

    Not exactly an article that does much to convince me that 200 people are all in agreement (a generous number for the attendees too, not ever seat was filled in that auditorium) or that they represent the opinions of the approximately 5000 people of the Wet’suwet’en. That’s not even ~4% of their population if everyone in that room was Wet’suwet’en, which they most assuredly were not which you can see in the video of the meeting.

    Here is the link to the video http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1700355651736/

    A modern treaty being a priority before development is everyone’s business.

    Here are some handy articles that delve in the issues, and I am surprised this is the case, coming from Maclean's:

    https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/the-wetsuweten-are-more-united-than-pipeline-backers-want-you-to-think/
    Their position has been supported by their system of bahlat as well as a survey that was reported to me by Chief Knedebeas (Warner William), as well as Chief Howihkat (Freda Huson), who was on the council of Witset (the largest Wet’suwet’en community) while the survey was being completed. It was conducted by CopperMoon Communications, a company that doesn’t seem to exist anymore. The surveyed stated that 83 per cent of Witset members (its population is 2,000 among the greater Wet’suwet’en population of 5,000) were against the pipeline.

    https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/these-protestors-know-more-about-indigenous-issues-than-you-think/
    But conversations with those at the centre of the Vancouver events suggests a greater depth of knowledge of the dispute than critics suggest. “In the media coverage thus far, the major outlets have been calling what’s going on a ‘pipeline protest,’” says 25-year-old Kellan Jackson, one of the protesters. “While the action is specifically asking that the Coastal GasLink project not go through, the reason for that is because we are acting in accordance with the Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs.“It’s a movement for Indigenous sovereignty and for respect of Indigenous title. So we’re acting as allies and accomplices in land protection, we’re not protesting a pipeline.”

    Doesn't seem right to just throw up our hands and say its too hard for politicians to get near, we have modern treaties already in play that both the BC NDP (Nisga'a) and BC Liberals (Maa-nulth) have received accolades for. Heck, just the other day we were looking at how the Cree Nation and Quebec just got to bragging about their development deal being signed.

    I think a mistake commonly being made in these discussions is that it gets ignored that Truth & Reconciliation commitments aren't just promises to First Nations people, but to Canadian's writ large.

    steam_sig.png
  • Options
    ArcticLancerArcticLancer Best served chilled. Registered User regular
    edited February 2020
    Aridhol wrote: »
    It's pretty disingenuous and offensive to describe the people in that article as akin to fucking antivaxxers or anti-abortionists.

    Legitimate political disagreements within communities is not science denial nor is it a fringe perspective.
    Ah, sorry, that's not what I meant at all. I meant to suggest that the media never has to look far for a different opinion within any group, not that the supporters are anything akin to the groups I used as examples.

    ArcticLancer on
  • Options
    AridholAridhol Daddliest Catch Registered User regular
    Aridhol wrote: »
    It's pretty disingenuous and offensive to describe the people in that article as akin to fucking antivaxxers or anti-abortionists.

    Legitimate political disagreements within communities is not science denial nor is it a fringe perspective.
    Ah, sorry, that's not what I meant at all. I was suggesting that the media never has to look far for a different opinion in any group, not that the supporters are anything akin to the groups I used as examples.

    That's fair, I do agree the reporting / media seeks out "both sides" narratives but I'd maintain they didn't need to look far at all in this situation given there is significant support for the project.

  • Options
    NosfNosf Registered User regular
    On a somewhat less contentious topic, has anyone in Ontario seen one of those anti-carbon tax gas pump stickers lately? I know they had crappy adhesive and people just peeled them off or covered them up, but I think it's still technically the law that gas stations need to have them, and I haven't seen one anywhere in months.

    I see where a lot used to be, they've either fallen apart or been torn off. I saw a fair number that faded right out.

  • Options
    AegisAegis Fear My Dance Overshot Toronto, Landed in OttawaRegistered User regular
    Nosf wrote: »
    On a somewhat less contentious topic, has anyone in Ontario seen one of those anti-carbon tax gas pump stickers lately? I know they had crappy adhesive and people just peeled them off or covered them up, but I think it's still technically the law that gas stations need to have them, and I haven't seen one anywhere in months.

    I see where a lot used to be, they've either fallen apart or been torn off. I saw a fair number that faded right out.

    Ah, so they used the same manufacturer as the new licence plates.

    We'll see how long this blog lasts
    Currently DMing: None :(
    Characters
    [5e] Dural Melairkyn - AC 18 | HP 40 | Melee +5/1d8+3 | Spell +4/DC 12
  • Options
    breton-brawlerbreton-brawler Registered User regular
    On a somewhat less contentious topic, has anyone in Ontario seen one of those anti-carbon tax gas pump stickers lately? I know they had crappy adhesive and people just peeled them off or covered them up, but I think it's still technically the law that gas stations need to have them, and I haven't seen one anywhere in months.

    I see them regularly in ottawa at multiple gas station. I still believe they have to have them in place.

  • Options
    darkmayodarkmayo Registered User regular
    edited February 2020
    My wife is a psychiatrist here in Alberta, they just got wind of a memo regarding changes to billing codes in AHS funded sites.
    90% of the code my wife bills while she is at these sites is effected. They have new codes that they would have to use but there is no rates posted for these new codes and they may not have the rates determined when the changes go in effect beginning of April.. physicians can still bill those codes but any changes will be retroactively reclaimed once rates are determined.

    Tyler Shandro went on the news and was all “oh doctors aren’t willing to negotiate” which is bullshit, UCP dropped it on the doctors lap and said we aren’t honoring the contracts and what we say goes. It then went to arbitration (or was it mediation.. ) which failed for the same reason despite the AMA offering up potential solutions.

    UCP are both setting the narrative that oh doctors are greedy they are leaving AHS sites because of Money, and to point and say oh look public health isn’t sustainable we need private.

    As it stands we can’t budget we have no idea of what rates are but she is expected to work without knowing how much she makes with the risk of any money she does make getting clawed back. We aren't sure what percentage of a decrease in those codes would be a deal breaker for us either.


    https://www.alberta.ca/assets/documents/health-med-215-bulletin-facility-based-codes.pdf

    darkmayo on
    Switch SW-6182-1526-0041
  • Options
    CaedwyrCaedwyr Registered User regular
    Also, apparently public pension plans in Alberta have been used to prop up higher risk small oil and gas producers.

  • Options
    darkmayodarkmayo Registered User regular
    Caedwyr wrote: »
    Also, apparently public pension plans in Alberta have been used to prop up higher risk small oil and gas producers.

    Was that in regards to the change in pension management companies from internal management over to AIMco?

    Switch SW-6182-1526-0041
  • Options
    vsovevsove ....also yes. Registered User regular
    The UCP has been, without exaggeration, the worst government we've ever had.

    WATCH THIS SPACE.
  • Options
    Gnome-InterruptusGnome-Interruptus Registered User regular
    On a somewhat less contentious topic, has anyone in Ontario seen one of those anti-carbon tax gas pump stickers lately? I know they had crappy adhesive and people just peeled them off or covered them up, but I think it's still technically the law that gas stations need to have them, and I haven't seen one anywhere in months.

    I saw a somewhat similar posting at a local Coop gas station blaming the striking Unifor refinery workers for the gas shortages after it was management that clawed back benefits and refused to negotiate.

    But then I saw all the anti union posts about it on Facebook and I had a sad.

    steam_sig.png
    MWO: Adamski
  • Options
    CaedwyrCaedwyr Registered User regular
    darkmayo wrote: »
    Caedwyr wrote: »
    Also, apparently public pension plans in Alberta have been used to prop up higher risk small oil and gas producers.

    Was that in regards to the change in pension management companies from internal management over to AIMco?
    This was the article I found on the matter:

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/carbon-risk-alberta-public-pension-1.5469552

  • Options
    daveNYCdaveNYC Why universe hate Waspinator? Registered User regular
    edited February 2020
    So the pension fund of the province that is very dependent on energy extraction companies is putting its investment funds into energy extraction companies. So when the inevitable downturn hits not only will jobs, salaries, and tax revenue take a hit, but pensions will be negatively impacted too.

    This is not a good investment strategy.

    daveNYC on
    Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
  • Options
    RichyRichy Registered User regular
    daveNYC wrote: »
    This is not a good investment strategy.

    I believe this is Alberta's licence-plate motto.

    sig.gif
  • Options
    SteelhawkSteelhawk Registered User regular
    That's a funny dig, sure. But I also think that any halfway decent pension fund manager will ditch oil and gas investments the hot second their fortunes start to tank.

    That won't help industry jobs or salaries of workers or the income tax reaping of the province...but the fund managers will quickly act if a winner becomes a loser on the market.

  • Options
    daveNYCdaveNYC Why universe hate Waspinator? Registered User regular
    Steelhawk wrote: »
    That's a funny dig, sure. But I also think that any halfway decent pension fund manager will ditch oil and gas investments the hot second their fortunes start to tank.

    That won't help industry jobs or salaries of workers or the income tax reaping of the province...but the fund managers will quickly act if a winner becomes a loser on the market.

    The relative performance of managed funds to things like index funds or ETFs would indicate otherwise.

    Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
  • Options
    Disco11Disco11 Registered User regular

    Richy wrote: »
    daveNYC wrote: »
    This is not a good investment strategy.

    I believe this is Alberta's licence-plate motto.

    It's actually :

    "When you can't put more stuff in your one basket, buy a bigger basket" .

    PSN: Canadian_llama
  • Options
    DaimarDaimar A Million Feet Tall of Awesome Registered User regular
    edited February 2020
    Disco11 wrote: »
    Richy wrote: »
    daveNYC wrote: »
    This is not a good investment strategy.

    I believe this is Alberta's licence-plate motto.

    It's actually :

    "When you can't put more stuff in your one basket, buy a bigger basket" .

    That's only because KFC sued to prevent them from using the much simpler "Double Down"

    Daimar on
    steam_sig.png
  • Options
    darkmayodarkmayo Registered User regular
    edited February 2020
    Daimar wrote: »
    Disco11 wrote: »
    Richy wrote: »
    daveNYC wrote: »
    This is not a good investment strategy.

    I believe this is Alberta's licence-plate motto.

    It's actually :

    "When you can't put more stuff in your one basket, buy a bigger basket" .

    That's only because KFC sued to prevent them from using the much simpler "Double Down"

    Though in this case Triple down, or are we Quadruple down now.. how many boom/busts have we had?

    Inflation-Adjusted-Crude-Oil-Price-Mar-2019b.png

    darkmayo on
    Switch SW-6182-1526-0041
  • Options
    quovadis13quovadis13 Registered User regular
    Happy "No one in Ontario has school" day!

  • Options
    RichyRichy Registered User regular
    Speaking of Alberta, four Albertans MPs have apprently released their "Buffalo Declaration", in which they decry "Western alienation" caused by being sore losers after the last election. It proposed a set of solutions, which all boil down to giving Alberta more power, and includes recognizing Alberta as a distinct people within Canada, revamping our entire democracy to make it an Albertacracy, exempting Alberta from paying federal taxes, and giving "provinces" complete and exclusive control over energy projects (and by "provinces" I assume they mean Alberta, because I don't think they'd like it if BC and Québec had control over energy projects), and threathen Alberta separation if they don't get it. They of course take a sideline to bitch against Pierre Trudeau's NEP, because why the fuck not at this point. And my favourite bit, which was a hard call, is:
    “At time of writing, activists with a colonial ideology are breaking laws in blockades of critical industry, for the sake of closing down Alberta industry.”
    You heard it from Alberta: the real colonial oppressor in Canada are the First Nations! :rotate:

    sig.gif
  • Options
    Al_watAl_wat Registered User regular
    I gave that a hearty eyeroll when i read the article this morning

  • Options
    darkmayodarkmayo Registered User regular
    Fucking crackpots, fuck the UCP, fuck their ignorant lickspittle supporters. They are ransacking services so they can prop up oil and gas companies.

    Ugh.. Iceland is looking more and more attractive every passing day.

    Switch SW-6182-1526-0041
  • Options
    Disco11Disco11 Registered User regular
    Richy wrote: »
    Speaking of Alberta, four Albertans MPs have apprently released their "Buffalo Declaration", in which they decry "Western alienation" caused by being sore losers after the last election. It proposed a set of solutions, which all boil down to giving Alberta more power, and includes recognizing Alberta as a distinct people within Canada, revamping our entire democracy to make it an Albertacracy, exempting Alberta from paying federal taxes, and giving "provinces" complete and exclusive control over energy projects (and by "provinces" I assume they mean Alberta, because I don't think they'd like it if BC and Québec had control over energy projects), and threathen Alberta separation if they don't get it. They of course take a sideline to bitch against Pierre Trudeau's NEP, because why the fuck not at this point. And my favourite bit, which was a hard call, is:
    “At time of writing, activists with a colonial ideology are breaking laws in blockades of critical industry, for the sake of closing down Alberta industry.”
    You heard it from Alberta: the real colonial oppressor in Canada are the First Nations! :rotate:

    This is the shit I was talking about a few pages ago.

    PSN: Canadian_llama
  • Options
    darkmayodarkmayo Registered User regular
    Disco11 wrote: »
    Richy wrote: »
    Speaking of Alberta, four Albertans MPs have apprently released their "Buffalo Declaration", in which they decry "Western alienation" caused by being sore losers after the last election. It proposed a set of solutions, which all boil down to giving Alberta more power, and includes recognizing Alberta as a distinct people within Canada, revamping our entire democracy to make it an Albertacracy, exempting Alberta from paying federal taxes, and giving "provinces" complete and exclusive control over energy projects (and by "provinces" I assume they mean Alberta, because I don't think they'd like it if BC and Québec had control over energy projects), and threathen Alberta separation if they don't get it. They of course take a sideline to bitch against Pierre Trudeau's NEP, because why the fuck not at this point. And my favourite bit, which was a hard call, is:
    “At time of writing, activists with a colonial ideology are breaking laws in blockades of critical industry, for the sake of closing down Alberta industry.”
    You heard it from Alberta: the real colonial oppressor in Canada are the First Nations! :rotate:

    This is the shit I was talking about a few pages ago.

    They were going to do shit like that whether there was blockades or not.

    Switch SW-6182-1526-0041
Sign In or Register to comment.