The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

The Protests in Hong Kong

SurfpossumSurfpossum A nonentitytrying to preserve the anonymity he so richly deserves.Registered User regular
I want to stay informed about this topic but my main way of staying informed about things is these threads but there wasn't one1 for this so!

yu_show_image_ig.jpg?itok=o-wi_Y1w

This is what prompted me to start thinking about this more:
https://thisamericanlife.org/686/umbrellas-up
Particularly Act One, the prologue, and Act Six. In Act One, a couple of younger folks describe what it feels like to be the transitional generation between the older one, which largely doesn't seem to have a problem with the creeping authoritarianism or won't be around to see its effects, and the younger one, which won't have a memory of what things were like before. They seem largely resigned to the fact that they will fail, but that they need to protest to try and make a mark in history so that future generations will know they tried.

It was... quite moving. I'm not very clear on the politics of the whole thing (tho this seems like a decent primer), but it feels important somehow. There have been protests with millions of demonstrators, mass arrests numbering in the thousands, police using live ammunition, demonstrators building barricades and burning stuff, escalations to violent confrontations, several protesters killed, it goes on and on.

Anyway! You've probably heard people getting mad at Blizzard, and it's due to this. Corporations are being pressured to do stuff like ban players or remove apps or lose access to the Chinese market.
A single tweet by Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey in support of pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong unleashed massive retaliation from China that put the team and the entire NBA on notice. China's state TV cut off preseason games and ominously announced it would "immediately investigate all co-operation and exchanges involving the NBA." Tencent, a major Chinese social media company with a reported $1.5 billion streaming deal with the NBA, said it will no longer stream Rockets games, even though the team is immensely popular in China.
https://www.npr.org/2019/10/09/768373843/analysis-the-long-arm-of-china-and-free-speech
Apple has removed from its App Store a smartphone app used by Hong Kong pro-democracy activists to crowdsource the location of protesters and police, after Chinese state media suggested the tech giant was aiding "rioters."

Apple initially rejected the app last week, saying that it "encourages an activity that is not legal," and allows users to "evade law enforcement," according to its developers.
https://www.npr.org/2019/10/10/768841864/after-china-objects-apple-removes-app-used-by-hong-kong-protesters
Blitzchung wore a gas mask and dark goggles during that interview last Sunday, evoking the gear activists have worn during months of street protests. Toward the end of the segment, he shouted the popular protest chant, "Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times!"

Hong Kong Bans Face Masks At Public Assemblies
ASIA
Hong Kong Bans Face Masks At Public Assemblies
In an announcement released Tuesday, Blizzard Entertainment said the player's statement violated a tournament rule that prohibits any acts that "brings you into public disrepute, offends a portion or group of the public, or otherwise damages Blizzard image [sic]."
https://www.npr.org/2019/10/08/768245386/blizzard-entertainment-bans-esports-player-after-pro-hong-kong-comments
FIFA fined the Hong Kong Football Association Wednesday after fans protested the Chinese national anthem at a World Cup qualifying game against Iran. The Hong Kong and China national teams are separate, but FIFA plays the Chinese anthem because Hong Kong is considered an administrative region of China.
https://www.npr.org/2019/10/09/768679277/fifa-disciplines-hong-kong-football-association-after-chinese-national-anthem-pr

On the flip side, some companies are also taking actions against the Chinese government:
Google has suspended 210 YouTube channels it says were being used as part of a "coordinated" campaign to influence public opinion about the pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.

The move follows Twitter's suspension earlier this week of nearly 1,000 accounts for violating the company's "platform manipulation policies" it said were tied to Chinese state actors trying to undermine the Hong Kong protests. Facebook said it was also taking down several pages and accounts for "coordinated inauthentic behavior as part of a small network that originated in China and focused on Hong Kong."
https://www.npr.org/2019/08/23/753626357/youtube-channels-suspended-for-coordinated-influence-campaign-against-hong-kong

So, uh, aside from being happy that Destiny 2 is no longer on battlenet, how should I feel about things? Should we be boycotting more stuff? Is this something we should be expecting our politicians to weigh in on? Do I just hit post now?

Notes:
1. Specifically for this, anyway. There's been discussion of it in the East Asia thread.

«134

Posts

  • LabelLabel Registered User regular
    I would like to support the people of Hong Kong in their quest. I don't really know how to do that right now.

    I currently don't have the bandwidth to follow their protests closely at all. Which is really missing out, I think. I hear they're doing innovative stuff. And they deserve it, for nothing else than being human.

  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

  • tbloxhamtbloxham Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.

    "That is cool" - Abraham Lincoln
  • RaijuRaiju Shoganai JapanRegistered User regular
    edited November 2019
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    It's hard not to feel helpless and cynical about the plight of the Hong Kong protestors (my family is from there and even if I've never visited personally, I do feel a kinship with HK). I mean, aside from Taiwan, who else is willing to back their corner?

    The U.S. won't do anything to help no matter how much the protesters plead for our aid. It's just not going to happen, not with the orange shitgibbon currently occupying the White House (he'll just say, "Not our problem; let them fight it out like kids," anyway).

    The HK economy is in full recession due to the unrest but the fact of the matter is that it's not nearly as important or relevant to China's GDP as it would've been 20+ years ago. So China has no need to capitulate or negotiate any terms with the protestors to stop.

    Yeah, the reports of police brutality sucks hard but it's sad that I can only say that it's good that China hasn't yet sent in PLA troops and tanks into HK to quell the rebellion only because the optics of it would look terrible on the world stage, especially in this day and age of social media and smart phone cameras to document it all.

    Raiju on
  • GundiGundi Serious Bismuth Registered User regular
    Especially considering current mainland Chinese politics, there's basically no chance of China backing down at all. Like if they had any intention they could have been taking steps for months to deescalate things but they've basically just chosen to rely on force explicitly.

    Honestly, if I had the resources to do a large scale international campaign I'd be trying to help people emigrate outside of Honk Kong because they are just so genuinely screwed. Even in a more stable world few nations would be willing to take serious punitive action to help Hong Kong, and even if they were, I'm not sure that wouldn't just motivate the CCP to "solve" the problem quicker.

    China is becoming explicitly more authoritarian every year and there's no indication that trend is gonna reverse in the foreseeable future. In a bad sort of way, the best that distinct entities like Hong Kong or China's northern or western territories might hope for is if China were to go through a major economic recession, because that *might* make them more willing to compromise with different groups or at least be less willing to spend so much suppressing them.

  • HeatwaveHeatwave Come, now, and walk the path of explosions with me!Registered User regular
    edited November 2019
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.
    I thought that China harvested the organs of it's minorities. I can't imagine it'd be much of a good deal for people wanting to move there.

    Heatwave on
    P2n5r3l.jpg
    Steam / Origin & Wii U: Heatwave111 / FC: 4227-1965-3206 / Battle.net: Heatwave#11356
  • HappylilElfHappylilElf Registered User regular
    Heatwave wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.
    I thought that China harvested the organs of it's minorities. I can't imagine it'd be much of a good deal for people wanting to move there.

    That's certainly a theory that exiswhat the fuck are you talking about

  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    Heatwave wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.
    I thought that China harvested the organs of it's minorities. I can't imagine it'd be much of a good deal for people wanting to move there.

    That's certainly a theory that exiswhat the fuck are you talking about

    China is chock full of nightmare fuel.

  • HeatwaveHeatwave Come, now, and walk the path of explosions with me!Registered User regular
    Heatwave wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.
    I thought that China harvested the organs of it's minorities. I can't imagine it'd be much of a good deal for people wanting to move there.

    That's certainly a theory that exiswhat the fuck are you talking about
    Given that this practice could end up happening to the HK protestors, I'm going to say this might be somewhat on topic but won't go too far into it

    Here are some links articles in spoilers. Won't be discussing this further as it's not the main point of of this thread, only a potential outcome.
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-18/china-harvesting-organs-from-falun-gong-prisoners,-tribunal-says/11219144
    China is murdering members of the Falun Gong spiritual group and harvesting their organs for transplant, a panel of lawyers and experts said as they invited further investigations into a potential genocide.
    Key points:

    The China Tribunal found crimes against humanity were committed against Falun Gong and Uyghurs
    Falun Gong is a spiritual group based on meditation that China banned 20 years ago
    Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience

    Members said they had heard clear evidence forced organ harvesting had taken place over at least 20 years in a final judgement from the China Tribunal, an independent panel set up to examine the issue.

    Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations by human rights researchers and scholars that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience and said it stopped using organs from executed prisoners in 2015.

    But the panel said it was "satisfied" that the practice was still taking place, with imprisoned Falun Gong members "probably the principal source" of organs for forced harvesting.

    Falun Gong is a spiritual group based around meditation that China banned 20 years ago after 10,000 members appeared at the central leadership compound in Beijing in silent protest.

    Thousands of members have since been jailed.

    It was less clear if the Uyghur Muslim minority had been victims, the tribunal found, though it said they were vulnerable to "being used as a bank of organs"

    Chinese government regulations say human organ donation must be voluntary and without payment, a spokesman for the Chinese embassy said in London.

    "We hope that the British people will not be misled by rumours," the spokesman said in an emailed statement sent before the tribunal's final judgement was released.

    China in the past has said that "the organs being transplanted are in line with ethical principles" and "we insist that Chinese citizens voluntarily donate their organs after death".

    Benjamin Penny, an expert of religious and spiritual movements in China and a professor at Australian National University, last year told the ABC that the shortage of hard evidence and reliance on testimonies made the situation difficult to decipher.

    "My view on it is that I have not seen evidence which convinces me that is true. But I've not seen any evidence that convinces me that it's not true," Dr Penny said at the time.

    "I would say that the case about organ harvesting is not proven and I don't think it will ever be proven. Because if it did ever happen, it probably stopped happening some years ago. I don't think it's going on now."

    But human rights advocate David Kilgour who testified at the tribunal told the ABC's The World program that the fraught practice was getting worse.

    "I was a prosecutor for 10 years. The evidence is overwhelming," he said.

    "This crime is not only continuing, we document that it's in fact getting worse. The machinery that's taking organs from Falun Gong is getting greater, not smaller."

    The China Tribunal was set up by the International Coalition to End Transplant Abuse in China with the aim of examining whether crimes had been committed as a result of China's transplant practices.

    The seven-member panel found it was "beyond doubt" that forced organ harvesting from prisoners has taken place "on a substantial scale by state-supported or approved organisations and individuals", in an interim judgement released in December.

    The panel said its findings were "indicative" of genocide but it had not been clear enough to make a positive ruling, particularly since some Falun Gong prisoners had been released and profit was also a likely motive.

    It noted that it was open to governments and international groups to investigate the issue further.

    Crimes against humanity and torture have been committed against both the Falun Gong and the Uyghurs, it also found.

    Campaigners and Falun Gong members welcomed the ruling.

    "Organ trafficking is often overlooked in our sector but this heinous crime needs more attention and affects us all," said a spokesman for the Human Trafficking Foundation.

    Jennifer Zeng, a Falun Gong practitioner who told the tribunal she had been given blood tests and medical checks while held in a detention camp, said she hoped the tribunal's findings would prompt action.

    "I hope more countries will pass laws to forbid their own citizens from going to China to do organ transplants," she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    "And I do hope the international world will figure out a way to stop the killing in China right now."

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-rights-organ-harvesting/un-urged-to-investigate-organ-harvesting-in-china-idUSKBN1W92FL
    LONDON (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - A senior lawyer called on Tuesday for the top United Nations human rights body to investigate evidence that China is murdering members of the Falun Gong spiritual group and harvesting their organs for transplant.

    Hamid Sabi called for urgent action as he presented the findings of the China Tribunal, an independent panel set up to examine the issue, which concluded in June that China’s organ harvesting amounted to crimes against humanity.

    Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations by human rights researchers and scholars that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience and said it stopped using organs from executed prisoners in 2015.

    But Sabi, Counsel to the China Tribunal, told the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) that forced organ harvesting had been committed “for years throughout China on a significant scale ... and continues today”.

    The harvesting has involved “hundreds of thousands of victims”, mainly practitioners of the banned Falun Gong spiritual movement, he said, adding that detainees from China’s ethnic Uighur minority were also targeted.

    “Victim for victim and death for death, cutting out the hearts and other organs from living, blameless, harmless, peaceable people constitutes one of the worst mass atrocities of this century,” Sabi said.

    “Organ transplantation to save life is a scientific and social triumph. But killing the donor is criminal.”

    Falun Gong is a spiritual group based around meditation that China banned 20 years ago after 10,000 members appeared at the central leadership compound in Beijing in silent protest. Thousands of members have since been jailed.

    Geoffrey Nice, the tribunal’s chairman, told a separate U.N. event on the issue that governments, U.N. bodies and those involved with transplant surgery, could no longer turn a blind eye to the “inconvenient” evidence.

    Nice, who was lead prosecutor in the trial of former Yugoslavian president Slobodan Milosevic, said the tribunal’s findings required immediate action.

    “The time of convenient ‘uncertainty’, when all these entities could say the case against (China) was not proved, is past.”

    Transplant recipients in China include Chinese nationals as well as overseas patients who travel to China in order to receive an organ at a substantial cost, but with a greatly reduced waiting time.

    The tribunal said in June its findings were “indicative” of genocide, but it had not been clear enough to make a positive ruling.

    A spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in London told the Thomson Reuters Foundation at the time that government regulations stipulated that human organ donation must be voluntary and without payment.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organ_harvesting_from_Falun_Gong_practitioners_in_China

    P2n5r3l.jpg
    Steam / Origin & Wii U: Heatwave111 / FC: 4227-1965-3206 / Battle.net: Heatwave#11356
  • daveNYCdaveNYC Why universe hate Waspinator? Registered User regular
    Heatwave wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.
    I thought that China harvested the organs of it's minorities. I can't imagine it'd be much of a good deal for people wanting to move there.

    That's certainly a theory that exiswhat the fuck are you talking about

    The US Foreign Policy thread (I think) had a page or so on this, but here's a fairly solid story on the subject.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/17/china-is-harvesting-organs-from-detainees-uk-tribunal-concludes

    Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
  • sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited November 2019
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.

    I think assuming that ANYthing will “force” the Chinese government to do a single fucking thing short of open revolt is desperately naive. Corporations like Blizzard have maneuvered themselves into this unenviable position by relying on the notion that their involvement in the Chinese economy and demand for the rule of law would force China to liberalize, but the wealth they have helped bring to the nation have only allowed the Chinese government to argue that their rule is legitimate on the basis of competence, a position I have seen touted (mostly by the rich) quite a bit over the last decade or so.

    Edit: additionally, in my admittedly anecdotal experience with Chinese young people, their commitment to Chinese Nationalism are an example Trump and his supporters look up to.

    sarukun on
  • painfulPleasancepainfulPleasance The First RepublicRegistered User regular
    Heatwave wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.
    I thought that China harvested the organs of it's minorities. I can't imagine it'd be much of a good deal for people wanting to move there.

    That's certainly a theory that exiswhat the fuck are you talking about

    Deng got away with openly murdering hundreds(read, thousands) of patriotic Chinese communists in '89. It's not like the PRC's stopped being fascist in the intervening time.

  • HappylilElfHappylilElf Registered User regular
    Heatwave wrote: »
    Heatwave wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.
    I thought that China harvested the organs of it's minorities. I can't imagine it'd be much of a good deal for people wanting to move there.

    That's certainly a theory that exiswhat the fuck are you talking about
    Given that this practice could end up happening to the HK protestors, I'm going to say this might be somewhat on topic but won't go too far into it

    Here are some links articles in spoilers. Won't be discussing this further as it's not the main point of of this thread, only a potential outcome.
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-18/china-harvesting-organs-from-falun-gong-prisoners,-tribunal-says/11219144
    China is murdering members of the Falun Gong spiritual group and harvesting their organs for transplant, a panel of lawyers and experts said as they invited further investigations into a potential genocide.
    Key points:

    The China Tribunal found crimes against humanity were committed against Falun Gong and Uyghurs
    Falun Gong is a spiritual group based on meditation that China banned 20 years ago
    Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience

    Members said they had heard clear evidence forced organ harvesting had taken place over at least 20 years in a final judgement from the China Tribunal, an independent panel set up to examine the issue.

    Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations by human rights researchers and scholars that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience and said it stopped using organs from executed prisoners in 2015.

    But the panel said it was "satisfied" that the practice was still taking place, with imprisoned Falun Gong members "probably the principal source" of organs for forced harvesting.

    Falun Gong is a spiritual group based around meditation that China banned 20 years ago after 10,000 members appeared at the central leadership compound in Beijing in silent protest.

    Thousands of members have since been jailed.

    It was less clear if the Uyghur Muslim minority had been victims, the tribunal found, though it said they were vulnerable to "being used as a bank of organs"

    Chinese government regulations say human organ donation must be voluntary and without payment, a spokesman for the Chinese embassy said in London.

    "We hope that the British people will not be misled by rumours," the spokesman said in an emailed statement sent before the tribunal's final judgement was released.

    China in the past has said that "the organs being transplanted are in line with ethical principles" and "we insist that Chinese citizens voluntarily donate their organs after death".

    Benjamin Penny, an expert of religious and spiritual movements in China and a professor at Australian National University, last year told the ABC that the shortage of hard evidence and reliance on testimonies made the situation difficult to decipher.

    "My view on it is that I have not seen evidence which convinces me that is true. But I've not seen any evidence that convinces me that it's not true," Dr Penny said at the time.

    "I would say that the case about organ harvesting is not proven and I don't think it will ever be proven. Because if it did ever happen, it probably stopped happening some years ago. I don't think it's going on now."

    But human rights advocate David Kilgour who testified at the tribunal told the ABC's The World program that the fraught practice was getting worse.

    "I was a prosecutor for 10 years. The evidence is overwhelming," he said.

    "This crime is not only continuing, we document that it's in fact getting worse. The machinery that's taking organs from Falun Gong is getting greater, not smaller."

    The China Tribunal was set up by the International Coalition to End Transplant Abuse in China with the aim of examining whether crimes had been committed as a result of China's transplant practices.

    The seven-member panel found it was "beyond doubt" that forced organ harvesting from prisoners has taken place "on a substantial scale by state-supported or approved organisations and individuals", in an interim judgement released in December.

    The panel said its findings were "indicative" of genocide but it had not been clear enough to make a positive ruling, particularly since some Falun Gong prisoners had been released and profit was also a likely motive.

    It noted that it was open to governments and international groups to investigate the issue further.

    Crimes against humanity and torture have been committed against both the Falun Gong and the Uyghurs, it also found.

    Campaigners and Falun Gong members welcomed the ruling.

    "Organ trafficking is often overlooked in our sector but this heinous crime needs more attention and affects us all," said a spokesman for the Human Trafficking Foundation.

    Jennifer Zeng, a Falun Gong practitioner who told the tribunal she had been given blood tests and medical checks while held in a detention camp, said she hoped the tribunal's findings would prompt action.

    "I hope more countries will pass laws to forbid their own citizens from going to China to do organ transplants," she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    "And I do hope the international world will figure out a way to stop the killing in China right now."

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-rights-organ-harvesting/un-urged-to-investigate-organ-harvesting-in-china-idUSKBN1W92FL
    LONDON (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - A senior lawyer called on Tuesday for the top United Nations human rights body to investigate evidence that China is murdering members of the Falun Gong spiritual group and harvesting their organs for transplant.

    Hamid Sabi called for urgent action as he presented the findings of the China Tribunal, an independent panel set up to examine the issue, which concluded in June that China’s organ harvesting amounted to crimes against humanity.

    Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations by human rights researchers and scholars that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience and said it stopped using organs from executed prisoners in 2015.

    But Sabi, Counsel to the China Tribunal, told the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) that forced organ harvesting had been committed “for years throughout China on a significant scale ... and continues today”.

    The harvesting has involved “hundreds of thousands of victims”, mainly practitioners of the banned Falun Gong spiritual movement, he said, adding that detainees from China’s ethnic Uighur minority were also targeted.

    “Victim for victim and death for death, cutting out the hearts and other organs from living, blameless, harmless, peaceable people constitutes one of the worst mass atrocities of this century,” Sabi said.

    “Organ transplantation to save life is a scientific and social triumph. But killing the donor is criminal.”

    Falun Gong is a spiritual group based around meditation that China banned 20 years ago after 10,000 members appeared at the central leadership compound in Beijing in silent protest. Thousands of members have since been jailed.

    Geoffrey Nice, the tribunal’s chairman, told a separate U.N. event on the issue that governments, U.N. bodies and those involved with transplant surgery, could no longer turn a blind eye to the “inconvenient” evidence.

    Nice, who was lead prosecutor in the trial of former Yugoslavian president Slobodan Milosevic, said the tribunal’s findings required immediate action.

    “The time of convenient ‘uncertainty’, when all these entities could say the case against (China) was not proved, is past.”

    Transplant recipients in China include Chinese nationals as well as overseas patients who travel to China in order to receive an organ at a substantial cost, but with a greatly reduced waiting time.

    The tribunal said in June its findings were “indicative” of genocide, but it had not been clear enough to make a positive ruling.

    A spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in London told the Thomson Reuters Foundation at the time that government regulations stipulated that human organ donation must be voluntary and without payment.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organ_harvesting_from_Falun_Gong_practitioners_in_China

    jfc that's depressing.

  • CantidoCantido Registered User regular
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.

    My first girlfriend, a Chinese national, told me that this is the demographic that leaves China permanently, and that the Communist Party's attitude for such an exodus is "good riddance."

    3DS Friendcode 5413-1311-3767
  • Man in the MistsMan in the Mists Registered User regular
    Cantido wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.

    My first girlfriend, a Chinese national, told me that this is the demographic that leaves China permanently, and that the Communist Party's attitude for such an exodus is "good riddance."

    Which works oh so great for the US states where the young people flee in droves. The effects will be slower for a large nation like China but they won't escape the consequences for very long.

  • MortiousMortious The Nightmare Begins Move to New ZealandRegistered User regular
    sarukun wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.

    I think assuming that ANYthing will “force” the Chinese government to do a single fucking thing short of open revolt is desperately naive. Corporations like Blizzard have maneuvered themselves into this unenviable position by relying on the notion that their involvement in the Chinese economy and demand for the rule of law would force China to liberalize, but the wealth they have helped bring to the nation have only allowed the Chinese government to argue that their rule is legitimate on the basis of competence, a position I have seen touted (mostly by the rich) quite a bit over the last decade or so.

    Edit: additionally, in my admittedly anecdotal experience with Chinese young people, their commitment to Chinese Nationalism are an example Trump and his supporters look up to.

    I doubt any large US company cared if their efforts would liberalize China or not.

    Move to New Zealand
    It’s not a very important country most of the time
    http://steamcommunity.com/id/mortious
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    sarukun wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.

    I think assuming that ANYthing will “force” the Chinese government to do a single fucking thing short of open revolt is desperately naive. Corporations like Blizzard have maneuvered themselves into this unenviable position by relying on the notion that their involvement in the Chinese economy and demand for the rule of law would force China to liberalize, but the wealth they have helped bring to the nation have only allowed the Chinese government to argue that their rule is legitimate on the basis of competence, a position I have seen touted (mostly by the rich) quite a bit over the last decade or so.

    Edit: additionally, in my admittedly anecdotal experience with Chinese young people, their commitment to Chinese Nationalism are an example Trump and his supporters look up to.

    While I think policy makers and think tank people and the like might have bought into the whole "capitalism will liberalize China", the actual enactors of that defacto western policy were and still are only thinking about the money. Blizzard or movie studios or the NBA or whomever has no interest in anything but making fat stacks.

  • sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited November 2019
    Mortious wrote: »
    sarukun wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.

    I think assuming that ANYthing will “force” the Chinese government to do a single fucking thing short of open revolt is desperately naive. Corporations like Blizzard have maneuvered themselves into this unenviable position by relying on the notion that their involvement in the Chinese economy and demand for the rule of law would force China to liberalize, but the wealth they have helped bring to the nation have only allowed the Chinese government to argue that their rule is legitimate on the basis of competence, a position I have seen touted (mostly by the rich) quite a bit over the last decade or so.

    Edit: additionally, in my admittedly anecdotal experience with Chinese young people, their commitment to Chinese Nationalism are an example Trump and his supporters look up to.

    I doubt any large US company cared if their efforts would liberalize China or not.

    Believe it or not, liberalizing China has a pretty direct impact on bottom lines. They care because it means graft and predicting the outcomes of legal issues costs them money, and is less predictable in a system as opaque and accountless as China.

    Not in the “this is good for the people” sense, certainly not, in the “exactly how much money can we reliably make here” sense.

    sarukun on
  • sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    sarukun wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.

    I think assuming that ANYthing will “force” the Chinese government to do a single fucking thing short of open revolt is desperately naive. Corporations like Blizzard have maneuvered themselves into this unenviable position by relying on the notion that their involvement in the Chinese economy and demand for the rule of law would force China to liberalize, but the wealth they have helped bring to the nation have only allowed the Chinese government to argue that their rule is legitimate on the basis of competence, a position I have seen touted (mostly by the rich) quite a bit over the last decade or so.

    Edit: additionally, in my admittedly anecdotal experience with Chinese young people, their commitment to Chinese Nationalism are an example Trump and his supporters look up to.

    While I think policy makers and think tank people and the like might have bought into the whole "capitalism will liberalize China", the actual enactors of that defacto western policy were and still are only thinking about the money. Blizzard or movie studios or the NBA or whomever has no interest in anything but making fat stacks.

    Again, this is what liberalization means. Relying on (comparatively) liberal legal structures to protect their intellectual property, profits, and asses from going to jail.

  • silence1186silence1186 Character shields down! As a wingmanRegistered User regular
    Cantido wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.

    My first girlfriend, a Chinese national, told me that this is the demographic that leaves China permanently, and that the Communist Party's attitude for such an exodus is "good riddance."

    Won't that end up as a brain drain on the country?

    Kind of like the one Trump is starting in America by making the lives of international students and scholars hell, so they take their degrees and leave America.

    Where will all the brains end up?

  • rahkeesh2000rahkeesh2000 Registered User regular
    edited November 2019
    This is China transforming itself to be more like China. This isn't some bullshit invasion a la Tibet, it was just the UK returning the colony they took. The long term goal isn't to antagonize HK like some unwanted minority, its to turn them into the same oppressed majority on the mainland. You would need some insane kind of pressure to force a country to back off from unifying itself like this.

    To me its also a little bizarre this issue has kicked up so much dirt. Yes HK losing freedom is a problem, but the bigger problem is the larger mainland populus not having that freedom in the first place. Companies bowing to China's wishes to censor is a problem, but the bigger problem is all the wealth and stability they pump in to legitimate and support the CPP while bowing to their protectionist practices and thought policing of products.

    What all democratic countries need to ask themselves is if they are so worried about China as a growing geopolitical threat, is why they continue to trade with them rather than carrying out a concerted economic isolation like Russia is suffering from. I suspect the answer constists of a huge economic downturn given how integral China is to the world economy, but prioritizing those economic boons is likely the wrong choice in the long term. And you certainly can't expect most companies to make this choice, you have to put pressure on governments to make it happen.

    rahkeesh2000 on
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    edited November 2019
    This is China transforming itself to be more like China. This isn't some bullshit invasion a la Tibet, it was just the UK returning the colony they took. The long term goal isn't to antagonize HK like some unwanted minority, its to turn them into the same oppressed majority on the mainland. You would need some insane kind of pressure to force a country to back off from unifying itself like this.

    To me its also a little bizarre this issue has kicked up so much dirt. Yes HK losing freedom is a problem, but the bigger problem is the larger mainland populus not having that freedom in the first place. Companies bowing to China's wishes to censor is a problem, but the bigger problem is all the wealth and stability they pump in to legitimate and support the CPP while bowing to their protectionist practices and thought policing of products.

    What all democratic countries need to ask themselves is if they are so worried about China as a growing geopolitical threat, is why they continue to trade with them rather than carrying out a concerted economic isolation like Russia is suffering from. I suspect the answer constists of a huge economic downturn given how integral China is to the world economy, but prioritizing those economic boons is likely the wrong choice in the long term. And you certainly can't expect most companies to make this choice, you have to put pressure on governments to make it happen.

    Why is it bizarre that people are concerned about people in Hong Kong fighting against losing their freedoms in a very visible manner? The reasons why this sets off a large reaction seem extremely obvious.

    And most of Russia's suffering is not because of a deliberate policy of economic isolation. The Russian economy has kinda sucked all along. And was never as economically powerful or integrated as China.

    shryke on
  • sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    It’s not bizarre, but it shouldn’t be surprising. The Chinese government has zero incentive to let Hong Kong do or be anything other than just another part of China in the same way they consider Tibet, Taiwan, and every other piece of territory they are allowed to get their hands on to be “part of China”.

    I do think the larger point rahkeesh is making here, that pressuring companies maybe isn’t the best strategy here, has something to it, but I rather prefer to do both. Exposing companies for behaving counter to their public expressed values (“every voice matters, in Blizzard’s case”), and punishing them for it is perfectly reasonable in this case, but it should definitely be accompanied by pressure on governments to punish China for its treatment of its citizens.

  • L Ron HowardL Ron Howard The duck MinnesotaRegistered User regular
    So it looks to me like it's basically all-out civil war there.
    Protesters are getting executed by police in broad daylight, being shot like it's nothing.
    And the police are raiding the university, which is the internet data center. If the police successfully raid it, Hong Kong will have China's Great Firewall filtering and censoring them. This would make it harder for the resistance to get organized, and could even out many of the students, leading to more executions. The last part there is the fear anyway.

  • MortiousMortious The Nightmare Begins Move to New ZealandRegistered User regular
    edited November 2019
    So it looks to me like it's basically all-out civil war there.
    Protesters are getting executed by police in broad daylight, being shot like it's nothing.
    And the police are raiding the university, which is the internet data center. If the police successfully raid it, Hong Kong will have China's Great Firewall filtering and censoring them. This would make it harder for the resistance to get organized, and could even out many of the students, leading to more executions. The last part there is the fear anyway.

    Do you have any news links? I've been following the BBC coverage on this, and while it looks bad, the only serious injuries reported was someone set on fire (yikes) and one protestor shot by the police during an altercation.

    Which honestly is a good example of why the standard police forces shouldn't be armed. Pulling out a gun and then wrestling with people is only going to end with someone getting shot, it's idiotic.

    edit: So I went back to make sure I got my facts right, and I could have sworn an earlier version of the article described it as the protestor was trying to grab the gun (or the police claiming that the protestor was trying to grab the gun), and that's no longer there.

    The video itself does show the protestor making a move towards it, but to me it looked like he was just trying to push it away.

    Mortious on
    Move to New Zealand
    It’s not a very important country most of the time
    http://steamcommunity.com/id/mortious
  • painfulPleasancepainfulPleasance The First RepublicRegistered User regular
    edited November 2019
    Heatwave wrote: »
    Heatwave wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.
    I thought that China harvested the organs of it's minorities. I can't imagine it'd be much of a good deal for people wanting to move there.

    That's certainly a theory that exiswhat the fuck are you talking about
    Given that this practice could end up happening to the HK protestors, I'm going to say this might be somewhat on topic but won't go too far into it

    Here are some links articles in spoilers. Won't be discussing this further as it's not the main point of of this thread, only a potential outcome.
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-18/china-harvesting-organs-from-falun-gong-prisoners,-tribunal-says/11219144
    China is murdering members of the Falun Gong spiritual group and harvesting their organs for transplant, a panel of lawyers and experts said as they invited further investigations into a potential genocide.
    Key points:

    The China Tribunal found crimes against humanity were committed against Falun Gong and Uyghurs
    Falun Gong is a spiritual group based on meditation that China banned 20 years ago
    Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience

    Members said they had heard clear evidence forced organ harvesting had taken place over at least 20 years in a final judgement from the China Tribunal, an independent panel set up to examine the issue.

    Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations by human rights researchers and scholars that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience and said it stopped using organs from executed prisoners in 2015.

    But the panel said it was "satisfied" that the practice was still taking place, with imprisoned Falun Gong members "probably the principal source" of organs for forced harvesting.

    Falun Gong is a spiritual group based around meditation that China banned 20 years ago after 10,000 members appeared at the central leadership compound in Beijing in silent protest.

    Thousands of members have since been jailed.

    It was less clear if the Uyghur Muslim minority had been victims, the tribunal found, though it said they were vulnerable to "being used as a bank of organs"

    Chinese government regulations say human organ donation must be voluntary and without payment, a spokesman for the Chinese embassy said in London.

    "We hope that the British people will not be misled by rumours," the spokesman said in an emailed statement sent before the tribunal's final judgement was released.

    China in the past has said that "the organs being transplanted are in line with ethical principles" and "we insist that Chinese citizens voluntarily donate their organs after death".

    Benjamin Penny, an expert of religious and spiritual movements in China and a professor at Australian National University, last year told the ABC that the shortage of hard evidence and reliance on testimonies made the situation difficult to decipher.

    "My view on it is that I have not seen evidence which convinces me that is true. But I've not seen any evidence that convinces me that it's not true," Dr Penny said at the time.

    "I would say that the case about organ harvesting is not proven and I don't think it will ever be proven. Because if it did ever happen, it probably stopped happening some years ago. I don't think it's going on now."

    But human rights advocate David Kilgour who testified at the tribunal told the ABC's The World program that the fraught practice was getting worse.

    "I was a prosecutor for 10 years. The evidence is overwhelming," he said.

    "This crime is not only continuing, we document that it's in fact getting worse. The machinery that's taking organs from Falun Gong is getting greater, not smaller."

    The China Tribunal was set up by the International Coalition to End Transplant Abuse in China with the aim of examining whether crimes had been committed as a result of China's transplant practices.

    The seven-member panel found it was "beyond doubt" that forced organ harvesting from prisoners has taken place "on a substantial scale by state-supported or approved organisations and individuals", in an interim judgement released in December.

    The panel said its findings were "indicative" of genocide but it had not been clear enough to make a positive ruling, particularly since some Falun Gong prisoners had been released and profit was also a likely motive.

    It noted that it was open to governments and international groups to investigate the issue further.

    Crimes against humanity and torture have been committed against both the Falun Gong and the Uyghurs, it also found.

    Campaigners and Falun Gong members welcomed the ruling.

    "Organ trafficking is often overlooked in our sector but this heinous crime needs more attention and affects us all," said a spokesman for the Human Trafficking Foundation.

    Jennifer Zeng, a Falun Gong practitioner who told the tribunal she had been given blood tests and medical checks while held in a detention camp, said she hoped the tribunal's findings would prompt action.

    "I hope more countries will pass laws to forbid their own citizens from going to China to do organ transplants," she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    "And I do hope the international world will figure out a way to stop the killing in China right now."

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-rights-organ-harvesting/un-urged-to-investigate-organ-harvesting-in-china-idUSKBN1W92FL
    LONDON (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - A senior lawyer called on Tuesday for the top United Nations human rights body to investigate evidence that China is murdering members of the Falun Gong spiritual group and harvesting their organs for transplant.

    Hamid Sabi called for urgent action as he presented the findings of the China Tribunal, an independent panel set up to examine the issue, which concluded in June that China’s organ harvesting amounted to crimes against humanity.

    Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations by human rights researchers and scholars that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience and said it stopped using organs from executed prisoners in 2015.

    But Sabi, Counsel to the China Tribunal, told the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) that forced organ harvesting had been committed “for years throughout China on a significant scale ... and continues today”.

    The harvesting has involved “hundreds of thousands of victims”, mainly practitioners of the banned Falun Gong spiritual movement, he said, adding that detainees from China’s ethnic Uighur minority were also targeted.

    “Victim for victim and death for death, cutting out the hearts and other organs from living, blameless, harmless, peaceable people constitutes one of the worst mass atrocities of this century,” Sabi said.

    “Organ transplantation to save life is a scientific and social triumph. But killing the donor is criminal.”

    Falun Gong is a spiritual group based around meditation that China banned 20 years ago after 10,000 members appeared at the central leadership compound in Beijing in silent protest. Thousands of members have since been jailed.

    Geoffrey Nice, the tribunal’s chairman, told a separate U.N. event on the issue that governments, U.N. bodies and those involved with transplant surgery, could no longer turn a blind eye to the “inconvenient” evidence.

    Nice, who was lead prosecutor in the trial of former Yugoslavian president Slobodan Milosevic, said the tribunal’s findings required immediate action.

    “The time of convenient ‘uncertainty’, when all these entities could say the case against (China) was not proved, is past.”

    Transplant recipients in China include Chinese nationals as well as overseas patients who travel to China in order to receive an organ at a substantial cost, but with a greatly reduced waiting time.

    The tribunal said in June its findings were “indicative” of genocide, but it had not been clear enough to make a positive ruling.

    A spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in London told the Thomson Reuters Foundation at the time that government regulations stipulated that human organ donation must be voluntary and without payment.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organ_harvesting_from_Falun_Gong_practitioners_in_China

    So I read up on that, and it turns out the story originated in the Epoch Times. Not that anyone should want to be taken as a political prisoner by the PRC.

    painfulPleasance on
  • RchanenRchanen Registered User regular
    Heatwave wrote: »
    Heatwave wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.
    I thought that China harvested the organs of it's minorities. I can't imagine it'd be much of a good deal for people wanting to move there.

    That's certainly a theory that exiswhat the fuck are you talking about
    Given that this practice could end up happening to the HK protestors, I'm going to say this might be somewhat on topic but won't go too far into it

    Here are some links articles in spoilers. Won't be discussing this further as it's not the main point of of this thread, only a potential outcome.
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-18/china-harvesting-organs-from-falun-gong-prisoners,-tribunal-says/11219144
    China is murdering members of the Falun Gong spiritual group and harvesting their organs for transplant, a panel of lawyers and experts said as they invited further investigations into a potential genocide.
    Key points:

    The China Tribunal found crimes against humanity were committed against Falun Gong and Uyghurs
    Falun Gong is a spiritual group based on meditation that China banned 20 years ago
    Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience

    Members said they had heard clear evidence forced organ harvesting had taken place over at least 20 years in a final judgement from the China Tribunal, an independent panel set up to examine the issue.

    Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations by human rights researchers and scholars that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience and said it stopped using organs from executed prisoners in 2015.

    But the panel said it was "satisfied" that the practice was still taking place, with imprisoned Falun Gong members "probably the principal source" of organs for forced harvesting.

    Falun Gong is a spiritual group based around meditation that China banned 20 years ago after 10,000 members appeared at the central leadership compound in Beijing in silent protest.

    Thousands of members have since been jailed.

    It was less clear if the Uyghur Muslim minority had been victims, the tribunal found, though it said they were vulnerable to "being used as a bank of organs"

    Chinese government regulations say human organ donation must be voluntary and without payment, a spokesman for the Chinese embassy said in London.

    "We hope that the British people will not be misled by rumours," the spokesman said in an emailed statement sent before the tribunal's final judgement was released.

    China in the past has said that "the organs being transplanted are in line with ethical principles" and "we insist that Chinese citizens voluntarily donate their organs after death".

    Benjamin Penny, an expert of religious and spiritual movements in China and a professor at Australian National University, last year told the ABC that the shortage of hard evidence and reliance on testimonies made the situation difficult to decipher.

    "My view on it is that I have not seen evidence which convinces me that is true. But I've not seen any evidence that convinces me that it's not true," Dr Penny said at the time.

    "I would say that the case about organ harvesting is not proven and I don't think it will ever be proven. Because if it did ever happen, it probably stopped happening some years ago. I don't think it's going on now."

    But human rights advocate David Kilgour who testified at the tribunal told the ABC's The World program that the fraught practice was getting worse.

    "I was a prosecutor for 10 years. The evidence is overwhelming," he said.

    "This crime is not only continuing, we document that it's in fact getting worse. The machinery that's taking organs from Falun Gong is getting greater, not smaller."

    The China Tribunal was set up by the International Coalition to End Transplant Abuse in China with the aim of examining whether crimes had been committed as a result of China's transplant practices.

    The seven-member panel found it was "beyond doubt" that forced organ harvesting from prisoners has taken place "on a substantial scale by state-supported or approved organisations and individuals", in an interim judgement released in December.

    The panel said its findings were "indicative" of genocide but it had not been clear enough to make a positive ruling, particularly since some Falun Gong prisoners had been released and profit was also a likely motive.

    It noted that it was open to governments and international groups to investigate the issue further.

    Crimes against humanity and torture have been committed against both the Falun Gong and the Uyghurs, it also found.

    Campaigners and Falun Gong members welcomed the ruling.

    "Organ trafficking is often overlooked in our sector but this heinous crime needs more attention and affects us all," said a spokesman for the Human Trafficking Foundation.

    Jennifer Zeng, a Falun Gong practitioner who told the tribunal she had been given blood tests and medical checks while held in a detention camp, said she hoped the tribunal's findings would prompt action.

    "I hope more countries will pass laws to forbid their own citizens from going to China to do organ transplants," she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    "And I do hope the international world will figure out a way to stop the killing in China right now."

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-rights-organ-harvesting/un-urged-to-investigate-organ-harvesting-in-china-idUSKBN1W92FL
    LONDON (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - A senior lawyer called on Tuesday for the top United Nations human rights body to investigate evidence that China is murdering members of the Falun Gong spiritual group and harvesting their organs for transplant.

    Hamid Sabi called for urgent action as he presented the findings of the China Tribunal, an independent panel set up to examine the issue, which concluded in June that China’s organ harvesting amounted to crimes against humanity.

    Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations by human rights researchers and scholars that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience and said it stopped using organs from executed prisoners in 2015.

    But Sabi, Counsel to the China Tribunal, told the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) that forced organ harvesting had been committed “for years throughout China on a significant scale ... and continues today”.

    The harvesting has involved “hundreds of thousands of victims”, mainly practitioners of the banned Falun Gong spiritual movement, he said, adding that detainees from China’s ethnic Uighur minority were also targeted.

    “Victim for victim and death for death, cutting out the hearts and other organs from living, blameless, harmless, peaceable people constitutes one of the worst mass atrocities of this century,” Sabi said.

    “Organ transplantation to save life is a scientific and social triumph. But killing the donor is criminal.”

    Falun Gong is a spiritual group based around meditation that China banned 20 years ago after 10,000 members appeared at the central leadership compound in Beijing in silent protest. Thousands of members have since been jailed.

    Geoffrey Nice, the tribunal’s chairman, told a separate U.N. event on the issue that governments, U.N. bodies and those involved with transplant surgery, could no longer turn a blind eye to the “inconvenient” evidence.

    Nice, who was lead prosecutor in the trial of former Yugoslavian president Slobodan Milosevic, said the tribunal’s findings required immediate action.

    “The time of convenient ‘uncertainty’, when all these entities could say the case against (China) was not proved, is past.”

    Transplant recipients in China include Chinese nationals as well as overseas patients who travel to China in order to receive an organ at a substantial cost, but with a greatly reduced waiting time.

    The tribunal said in June its findings were “indicative” of genocide, but it had not been clear enough to make a positive ruling.

    A spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in London told the Thomson Reuters Foundation at the time that government regulations stipulated that human organ donation must be voluntary and without payment.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organ_harvesting_from_Falun_Gong_practitioners_in_China

    So I read up on that, and it turns out the story originated in the Epoch Times. Not that anyone should want to be taken as a political prisoner by the PRC.

    Whether or not that story originated in the Epoch Times, you do always have the old Kilgour-Matas report. And the Chinese government backtracking on the acceptability of organs from Death Row Inmates.

    So as far as sketchy ass organ harvesting.... yeah there is some sketchy shit going on.

    Stay safe HK protesters. You're up against a nightmarish regime.

  • kaidkaid Registered User regular
    The problem for hong kong is they are just too close to the mainland and once they were turned over the one nation two systems thing never was going to hold for long. Its just that china tried to push the end game up a bit and the peasants are revolting. In the end I don't see how this has a happy ending and likely at some point china runs the tanks in kills a ton of people and what made hong kong useful to it evaporates as the multinationals flee to tiawan/japan/korea.

  • PantsBPantsB Fake Thomas Jefferson Registered User regular
    tbloxham wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    The saddest part of following any of this stuff about the protests is the seeming futility of it all. That even some of the protesters seem to acknowledge. There is basically nothing that we can do about the situation and likely no way they can really "win" here.

    China just has no reason to capitulate that I can see.

    The only hope they have is that their protests become infectious and other young people in china, especially wealthy young people, take up their cause. Beyond that, they can hope for a resurgent left wing movement in the US which reforges strength into the pan Pacific pact to force china back to a softly softly approach.

    Chinas demographic crisis may soon force them to allow extensive immigration, exposing mainland china populations to new viewpoints and perhaps again forcing the government to take a more gentle approach.

    Unfortunately the TPP that would have functionally put pressure on China was killed and almost everyone feasible to win the WH were/are publicly against it. So there doesn't seem to be any reasonable hope for help from the US given our effective withdrawal from the region post-Obama even in the medium (2-4 years) term.

    11793-1.png
    day9gosu.png
    QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
  • painfulPleasancepainfulPleasance The First RepublicRegistered User regular
    edited November 2019
    The way to get US support for joining the CPTPP is to admit the faults of the TPP and thank those Americans who opposed it for saving a dozen countries from that bullshit.

    painfulPleasance on
  • JazzJazz Registered User regular
    The way to get US support for joining the CPTPP is to admit the faults of the TPP and thank those Americans who opposed it for saving a dozen countries from that bullshit.

    Like with TTIP across the Atlantic.

  • LanzLanz ...Za?Registered User regular
    How, exactly, does a Trade Bill manage to keep an increasingly authoritarian mainland China from attempting to exercise said authoritarianism against the residents of Hong Kong, a territory ostensibly under their domain since being ceded back decades ago by the British?

    waNkm4k.jpg?1
  • PolaritiePolaritie Sleepy Registered User regular
    edited November 2019
    Lanz wrote: »
    How, exactly, does a Trade Bill manage to keep an increasingly authoritarian mainland China from attempting to exercise said authoritarianism against the residents of Hong Kong, a territory ostensibly under their domain since being ceded back decades ago by the British?

    I believe the idea is that it would allow the US to apply pressure by threat of concerted action by the trade bloc.

    Edit: Of course this doesn't work as well when there's a new dictator who cares about self-aggrandizement there.

    Polaritie on
    Steam: Polaritie
    3DS: 0473-8507-2652
    Switch: SW-5185-4991-5118
    PSN: AbEntropy
  • dispatch.odispatch.o Registered User regular
    edited November 2019
    Getting China to recognize basic human rights and the needs of it's people for basic dignity is one thing.

    Specifically getting China to change it's policy WRT to Hong Kong, Tibet or Taiwan is impossible if we want to continue doing business with them. I would argue it would be much easier to advocate for a free Tibet or Taiwan long before you could make an argument for Hong Kong autonomy. There's at least some standing of Tibet and Taiwan being distinctly separate nations from China.

    Hong Kong is a city in China.

    I don't think there's any chance at influencing a country to treat a specific city in any particular way. You might more broadly make human rights violations become unprofitable and Hong Kong could hold out and make this whole thing a spotlight on the injustices that the Chinese government more discreetly visit on it's citizens every day everywhere else in their territory. I still don't think they're staying independent / autonomous. The best case is China has to adjust it's behavior to treat everyone less shitty and Hong Kong eventually loses autonomy even then.

    dispatch.o on
  • sarukunsarukun RIESLING OCEANRegistered User regular
    edited November 2019
    China is going to continue to do as it likes until its government is replaced.

    Sanctioning Iran has not significantly altered its political trajectory, and done measurable damage to its people. Nationalist as the most publicly visible Chinese seem to be, I do not think pushing them to the brink of starvation or slapping tools out of their hands is a good solution, nor do I think it would be effective in bringing about a change in the government or its behavior with respect to territory it claims as its own.

    sarukun on
  • GONG-00GONG-00 Registered User regular
    WTOP, a Washington, DC news talk radio station, was reporting this morning that protesters inside the university are wielding homemade bow and arrows and making molotov cocktails. If such details are being reported, I have to imagine a military crackdown has to be imminent. Stay safe HK folks :(

    “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
    Law and Order ≠ Justice
    xu257gunns6e.png
  • PolaritiePolaritie Sleepy Registered User regular
    sarukun wrote: »
    China is going to continue to do as it likes until its government is replaced.

    Sanctioning Iran has not significantly altered its political trajectory, and done measurable damage to its people. Nationalist as the most publicly visible Chinese seem to be, I do not think pushing them to the brink of starvation or slapping tools out of their hands is a good solution, nor do I think it would be effective in bringing about a change in the government or its behavior with respect to territory it claims as its own.

    I don't know why people keep assuming sanctions have to hurt everyone. There is such a thing as targeting the people in power (see: Russia).

    I don't expect China's government to change any time soon when the guy at the top has all but crowned himself emperor. Truthfully that may be related to the situation.

    Steam: Polaritie
    3DS: 0473-8507-2652
    Switch: SW-5185-4991-5118
    PSN: AbEntropy
  • JazzJazz Registered User regular
    edited November 2019
    Found on Imgur:

    J27vPmq.jpg

    I can't really add a lot to that, but I felt I had to share it with you guys. This is getting so far beyond scary.

    Jazz on
  • TofystedethTofystedeth Registered User regular
    I really like Hong Kong. My ex-wife was from there, so I visited 3 times for 2-3 weeks each. Her parents left the mainland for HK during the Cultural Revolution. It makes me sad that they're seeing such a crackdown. When I was there they had a huge memorial for Tiananmen Square and could post about Falun Gong openly, and that's all going to quickly change. It saddens me to see what's going on there.

    steam_sig.png
  • enc0reenc0re Registered User regular
    All things considered, I think China can afford to continue stepping softly when it comes to Hong Kong. The deal was for Hong Kong to lose its political and economic freedoms in 2047. Why risk an unpredictable situation now just to speed up that timetable by fewer than three decades?

Sign In or Register to comment.