The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Still early, just beat the first campaign mission on
Kashyyk
Just went back to explore Dathomir
I'm on Jedi Master, still trying to figure out parry timings for monsters. They seem to want you to parry really early, much more than e.g. Sekiro. Does not feel reliable yet. Even the basic stormtroopers are kind of annoying to parry so far.
Having to manually parry blasters to deflect them back at the attacker is really fun, though.
I'm frankly angered that this chat isn't dedicated to the analysis and commentary of the femCloud cinematic reveal
I have no idea what these words in this order is supposed to mean but you know what
sure, it's dedicated to that
but we've moved past it and are talking about other things
I don’t follow these things but from reading chat I am assuming there was more final fantasy 7 remake footage and it includes bits from the part where cloud wears a dress since he has to be disguised while walking around a city
Steam, LoL: credeiki
+2
TTODewbackPuts the drawl in ya'llI think I'm in HellRegistered Userregular
I'm frankly angered that this chat isn't dedicated to the analysis and commentary of the femCloud cinematic reveal
I have no idea what these words in this order is supposed to mean but you know what
sure, it's dedicated to that
but we've moved past it and are talking about other things
I don’t follow these things but from reading chat I am assuming there was more final fantasy 7 remake footage and it includes bits from the part where cloud wears a dress since he has to be disguised while walking around a city
I get googly eyed when it comes to FF7
It kept me going for a long time
The funny thing about writing JavaScript is that it's so fluid and has so many frameworks and syntax tricks you can exploit (and things that only got added in later versions) that writing-style in JavaScript is absurdly variable. Like you look at something from eight years ago that's made of traditional-style closures and jQuery and then you look at some modern ES6+ React components and they might as well be entirely different languages (even if you're explicitly excluding the JSX).
Also I get the strong sense that there is a culture among JS devs where they want to style on everyone else by having the weirdest, most compact syntax that exploits the most strange loopholes in JavaSript just to demonstrate they know how to pull it apart or to save themselves a couple lines of code, and since JavaScript is mostly disposable and we'll all be on to a new framework in two years no one ever really cares about readability or maintainability.
Like in JavaScript using unintuitive implicit type coercion and exploiting the way JS handles boolean evalution isn't just allowed by best practice, it's a way of life.
0
BrodyThe WatchThe First ShoreRegistered Userregular
edited February 2020
So, dumb math question because I haven't done real math in forever and I'm getting confused. Seriously, don't look in the spoilers, it will reveal how dumb I am.
I think I'm being really dumb here, looks like its percentage of the population, not actually number of rabbits, so my brain was going in the wrong direction entirely.
Veritasium released a video talking about a bunch of stuff, but I'm stuff at 1:45 because he shows the equation
Xn+1=rXn(5-Xn
and if you put it in a graphing calculator, you indeed get an inverse parabola. But the whole point is that its supposed to be a population chart with a population limit of 5 (his formula had 1 for the limit, but that involves a lot decimals, using 5 gave me more integers to work with). And when I plug in Xn=0=1, Xn=1=2, Xn=2=3, I did indeed get an inverse parabola. But my understanding was that X is population, not year, so it would be Xn=0=1, Xn=1=8, Xn=2= -48...
Is there something dumb I'm missing here?
Edit: I guess what initially gave me pause is that given a limit, your population would plateau like a log, not sink back to 0 like a parabola, right?
Brody on
"I will write your name in the ruin of them. I will paint you across history in the color of their blood."
Still early, just beat the first campaign mission on
Kashyyk
Just went back to explore Dathomir
I'm on Jedi Master, still trying to figure out parry timings for monsters. They seem to want you to parry really early, much more than e.g. Sekiro. Does not feel reliable yet. Even the basic stormtroopers are kind of annoying to parry so far.
Having to manually parry blasters to deflect them back at the attacker is really fun, though.
Okay. Your comments make sense to me.
Dathomir is my favorite planet in a lot of ways. Kashykk was okay.
I think also it is good to think of this being like a metroidvania with very different combat.
The funny thing about writing JavaScript is that it's so fluid and has so many frameworks and syntax tricks you can exploit (and things that only got added in later versions) that writing-style in JavaScript is absurdly variable. Like you look at something from eight years ago that's made of traditional-style closures and jQuery and then you look at some modern ES6+ React components and they might as well be entirely different languages (even if you're explicitly excluding the JSX).
Also I get the strong sense that there is a culture among JS devs where they want to style on everyone else by having the weirdest, most compact syntax that exploits the most strange loopholes in JavaSript just to demonstrate they know how to pull it apart or to save themselves a couple lines of code, and since JavaScript is mostly disposable and we'll all be on to a new framework in two years no one ever really cares about readability or maintainability.
Like in JavaScript using unintuitive implicit type coercion and exploiting the way JS handles boolean evalution isn't just allowed by best practice, it's a way of life.
It is very much a metroidvania- or Zelda-feeling game. The backtracking to open up new paths with new powers hasn't happened much but is extremely obvious
The funny thing about writing JavaScript is that it's so fluid and has so many frameworks and syntax tricks you can exploit (and things that only got added in later versions) that writing-style in JavaScript is absurdly variable. Like you look at something from eight years ago that's made of traditional-style closures and jQuery and then you look at some modern ES6+ React components and they might as well be entirely different languages (even if you're explicitly excluding the JSX).
Also I get the strong sense that there is a culture among JS devs where they want to style on everyone else by having the weirdest, most compact syntax that exploits the most strange loopholes in JavaSript just to demonstrate they know how to pull it apart or to save themselves a couple lines of code, and since JavaScript is mostly disposable and we'll all be on to a new framework in two years no one ever really cares about readability or maintainability.
Like in JavaScript using unintuitive implicit type coercion and exploiting the way JS handles boolean evalution isn't just allowed by best practice, it's a way of life.
The best part is trying to do something that was trivially easy in jQuery and now is almost impossible and requires all sorts of weird hacky shit because React fundamentally doesn't work that way.
And then explaining to your boss that yes, while our legacy site easily manages this thing you want me to do in a single line of code, I'm going to need to make feature-sized PRs to two different open sources packages just to be able to get our new site to do it.
0
zepherinRussian warship, go fuck yourselfRegistered Userregular
I have to fart. I feel it is my duty to crop dust the IT help desk.
Hey @credeiki , what's a standard team comp in League these days? One jungler, two carries, two support?
Or let's assume I can't teach people who have played less than 5 hours of league to jungle, is jungling necessary?
@SniperGuy you’re thinking of it like dota but that’s not quite the way people talk about league meta
In league you have one toplaner, one jungler, one midlander, and then two people botlane, one called adc/bot and one called support.
This is always true (in someone’s first 10 hours of play they may see duo toplanes and no jg but this will evaporate as soon as people have any idea how to play the game); the positions are mandatory and coded into draft pick/ranked.
‘Carry’ is a nebulous term. Everyone farms except for the support. The support starts with a gold generation item that gives them income. The jungler only farms the jungle and should not farm lanes (after lane phase is over, the jungler might split push and farm lanes though). You can play as mage supports that do more damage than the rest of the team and build full damage, so does that make you a carry? In general, the term ‘carrying’ refers to someone doing well and having an impact on the game rather than to the act of funneling farm into someone.
Steam, LoL: credeiki
+1
jungleroomxIt's never too many graves, it's always not enough shovelsRegistered Userregular
My cities skyline is nothing special
+2
Mojo_JojoWe are only now beginning to understand the full power and ramifications of sexual intercourseRegistered Userregular
This does not appear to be the junglist massive chat that the title promises
It is not wicked wicked nor incredible
Homogeneous distribution of your varieties of amuse-gueule
+1
DemonStaceyTTODewback's DaughterIn love with the TaySwayRegistered Userregular
I'm frankly angered that this chat isn't dedicated to the analysis and commentary of the femCloud cinematic reveal
I have no idea what these words in this order is supposed to mean but you know what
sure, it's dedicated to that
but we've moved past it and are talking about other things
I don’t follow these things but from reading chat I am assuming there was more final fantasy 7 remake footage and it includes bits from the part where cloud wears a dress since he has to be disguised while walking around a city
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56TfvcTWGJg
Posts
Charles IX
Joan of Arc
Voltaire
dead
dead
dead
DO YOU THINK THIS IS A JOKE KAREN
Oh no, I haven't heard
What news is yonder this?
Egads!
I can do this
Just went back to explore Dathomir
I'm on Jedi Master, still trying to figure out parry timings for monsters. They seem to want you to parry really early, much more than e.g. Sekiro. Does not feel reliable yet. Even the basic stormtroopers are kind of annoying to parry so far.
Having to manually parry blasters to deflect them back at the attacker is really fun, though.
I have no idea what these words in this order is supposed to mean but you know what
sure, it's dedicated to that
but we've moved past it and are talking about other things
The First Order TIE interceptor that FFG released this weekend (and based on Star Wars: Resistance)...
... is not the same TIE Interceptor that Kylo Ren flew in Episode 9.
This seems like something minor that the powers that be for LucasFilm could've coordinated?
And naturally both of those are different than the TIE Silencer Kylo Ren flew in Episode 8...
I don't envy the lady in charge of Lucasfilm right now. But I really, REALLY hope they get their own version of Kevin Feige... Or maybe Kevin Feige.
I don’t follow these things but from reading chat I am assuming there was more final fantasy 7 remake footage and it includes bits from the part where cloud wears a dress since he has to be disguised while walking around a city
I get googly eyed when it comes to FF7
It kept me going for a long time
Also I get the strong sense that there is a culture among JS devs where they want to style on everyone else by having the weirdest, most compact syntax that exploits the most strange loopholes in JavaSript just to demonstrate they know how to pull it apart or to save themselves a couple lines of code, and since JavaScript is mostly disposable and we'll all be on to a new framework in two years no one ever really cares about readability or maintainability.
Like in JavaScript using unintuitive implicit type coercion and exploiting the way JS handles boolean evalution isn't just allowed by best practice, it's a way of life.
I think I'm being really dumb here, looks like its percentage of the population, not actually number of rabbits, so my brain was going in the wrong direction entirely.
Xn+1=rXn(5-Xn
and if you put it in a graphing calculator, you indeed get an inverse parabola. But the whole point is that its supposed to be a population chart with a population limit of 5 (his formula had 1 for the limit, but that involves a lot decimals, using 5 gave me more integers to work with). And when I plug in Xn=0=1, Xn=1=2, Xn=2=3, I did indeed get an inverse parabola. But my understanding was that X is population, not year, so it would be Xn=0=1, Xn=1=8, Xn=2= -48...
Is there something dumb I'm missing here?
Edit: I guess what initially gave me pause is that given a limit, your population would plateau like a log, not sink back to 0 like a parabola, right?
The Monster Baru Cormorant - Seth Dickinson
Steam: Korvalain
Okay. Your comments make sense to me.
I think also it is good to think of this being like a metroidvania with very different combat.
@winky
https://hackernoon.com/how-it-feels-to-learn-javascript-in-2016-d3a717dd577f
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
Or let's assume I can't teach people who have played less than 5 hours of league to jungle, is jungling necessary?
Strong start
Arch,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_goGR39m2k
but even more exciting:
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
https://kube933.iheart.com/featured/the-wake-up-show/content/2020-02-02-shot-of-love-top-15/
Arch,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_goGR39m2k
Meanwhile, an interactive map creator in pure CSS+HTML5. Zero JS:
https://codepen.io/onediv/pen/NrNebj
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
And then explaining to your boss that yes, while our legacy site easily manages this thing you want me to do in a single line of code, I'm going to need to make feature-sized PRs to two different open sources packages just to be able to get our new site to do it.
which one is you though
is this sample of dudes indicative of what the actual online dating biography landscape looks like
@SniperGuy you’re thinking of it like dota but that’s not quite the way people talk about league meta
In league you have one toplaner, one jungler, one midlander, and then two people botlane, one called adc/bot and one called support.
This is always true (in someone’s first 10 hours of play they may see duo toplanes and no jg but this will evaporate as soon as people have any idea how to play the game); the positions are mandatory and coded into draft pick/ranked.
‘Carry’ is a nebulous term. Everyone farms except for the support. The support starts with a gold generation item that gives them income. The jungler only farms the jungle and should not farm lanes (after lane phase is over, the jungler might split push and farm lanes though). You can play as mage supports that do more damage than the rest of the team and build full damage, so does that make you a carry? In general, the term ‘carrying’ refers to someone doing well and having an impact on the game rather than to the act of funneling farm into someone.
It is not wicked wicked nor incredible
Don't sleep on your force skills. They are very strong. And with upgrades can be pretty damn OP.
Just Stunlocking bosses all day err day.
I... see.