Penny Arcade - Comic - Six Pack

Dog

Penny Arcade - Comic - Six Pack

Videogaming-related online strip by Mike Krahulik and Jerry Holkins. Includes news and commentary.

Read the full story here

Overkillengine

Lack of hexamammaried warbrood-rearers aside, it looks almost like a modern Ogre Battle:TMotBQ....I am so there.

MichaelLC

I'd wait in line for a chance at that.

ani_game_bum

Gabe taking one for the readers so we don't get the long version. With slides.

:salute:

palidine40

Gabe is life

Man in the Mists

Gabe is getting the life withered out of him.

MichaelLC

Man in the Mists wrote: »

Gabe is getting the life withered out of him.

Needs some nutritional fox-lady milk.

V1m

Don't we all?

Delzhand

I guess they opted for two larges over 6 regulars, I don't know enough about vulpine nursing to know if that's a good trade or not

Djiem

When you care about your readers, sometimes you just have to break the 4th wall.

furlion

You really only need as many nips as you have young. Of course, that discounts chafing and teething. But that's a small sacrifice for the furries to have access to even more big tittied fox ladies.

Grendus

Delzhand wrote: »

I guess they opted for two larges over 6 regulars, I don't know enough about vulpine nursing to know if that's a good trade or not

Probably?

Honestly, I gotta imagine that any other anthro-animal would make the same evolutionary trade offs we did - big heads, small litters. Foxkin would probably have singles or twins same as us, not full litters like wild foxes do, so you really only need two mammaries in the first place.

So the real question is: why do humans have big tiddies in the first place? Which we're still not entirely sure on. Flat chested women aren't less likely to have children or more likely to have them die in childhood... but apparently it was a huge selection pressure because we're obsessed with them. So if foxkin go through the same selection pressure, whatever that is, they'd wind up with a pair of honkers instead of a sextuplet of nips.

dennis

I only just realized Gabe is not only breaking the invisible 4th wall, but in panels two and three it looks like his hands are pressed up against them.

Golden Yak

Each breast actually has three nipples.

dennis

Golden Yak wrote: »

Each breast actually has three nipples.

Not nipples. Breastlets.

Armored Chocobo

furlion wrote: »

You really only need as many nips as you have young. Of course, that discounts chafing and teething. But that's a small sacrifice for the furries to have access to even more big tittied fox ladies.

I'm sorry was there a fox lady shortage in the Furry community I was unaware of?

hibryd7

I checked the website. Those kits are gonna starve.

Darkewolfe

Unicorn Overlord has a 7 hour demo on all consoles and it's so good.

Rhesus Positive

dennis wrote: »

Golden Yak wrote: »

Each breast actually has three nipples.

Not nipples. Breastlets.

Fractal boobs

Mandelbreasts

Anon von Zilch

Armored Chocobo wrote: »

I'm sorry was there a fox lady shortage in the Furry community I was unaware of?

The hunger of the ravening furry packs for breasty foxgirls is unquenchable, creating a perpetual shortage.

Overkillengine

Anon von Zilch wrote: »

Armored Chocobo wrote: »

I'm sorry was there a fox lady shortage in the Furry community I was unaware of?

The hunger of the ravening furry packs for breasty foxgirls is unquenchable, creating a perpetual shortage.

Like pouring water filled XD-cups out into the Sahara.

Emperor Megaman

again Tycho with is barely hidden furry interests.

MichaelLC

Emperor Megaman wrote: »

again Tycho with is barely hidden furry interests.

I think he prefers to skip the middleman as it were and go straight to the source.

see317

Emperor Megaman wrote: »

again Tycho with is barely hidden furry interests.

I don't think the common denominator for Tycho is "Furry" here.
https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2007/09/19/in-the-love-nest-of-harakki

Hevach

Grendus wrote: »

Delzhand wrote: »

I guess they opted for two larges over 6 regulars, I don't know enough about vulpine nursing to know if that's a good trade or not

Probably?

Honestly, I gotta imagine that any other anthro-animal would make the same evolutionary trade offs we did - big heads, small litters. Foxkin would probably have singles or twins same as us, not full litters like wild foxes do, so you really only need two mammaries in the first place.

So the real question is: why do humans have big tiddies in the first place? Which we're still not entirely sure on. Flat chested women aren't less likely to have children or more likely to have them die in childhood... but apparently it was a huge selection pressure because we're obsessed with them. So if foxkin go through the same selection pressure, whatever that is, they'd wind up with a pair of honkers instead of a sextuplet of nips.

The most widely accepted theory of why humans have large breasts that don't go away when not lactating is because of how we walk. Every other primate loves butts, but butts are inconvenient when they're halfway down to the ground, so we needed a butt substitute in more effective face range.

Canines are also all about butts, but use scent rather than sight like apes, so logically speaking fox people should have scent glands on their upper body rather than mammaries.

dennis

see317 wrote: »

Emperor Megaman wrote: »

again Tycho with is barely hidden furry interests.

I don't think the common denominator for Tycho is "Furry" here.
https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2007/09/19/in-the-love-nest-of-harakki

"Furry" covers more ground than you think.

Emperor Megaman

see317 wrote: »

Emperor Megaman wrote: »

again Tycho with is barely hidden furry interests.

I don't think the common denominator for Tycho is "Furry" here.
https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2007/09/19/in-the-love-nest-of-harakki

Okay he is in way deeper than we thought. i only remembered the giraffes and other assorted incidents. but i supose he has 4 good reasons to be interested in them beyond their long, slender necks.
That said, i'm not sure we can affirm that the number of breastlets is the common denominator either. Plants don't have any.