if you look at this link the /URL likes to nest it self into the parentheses. I'm not sure this is a full on glitch or anything that can really be addressed but just letting you know its out there.
RamiusJoined: July 19, 2000Administrator, ClubPAadmin
edited August 2008
Auto-linking has its limitations. If you were to post a URL something like this: Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/) you would NOT want the parenthesis included. But posting a URL like your MegaMan example, you DO want the parenthesis included.
The solution is to use the [noparse][URL][/URL][/noparse] tags explicitly when posting URLs which the parser cannot auto-link.
Auto-linking has its limitations. If you were to post a URL something like this: Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/) you would NOT want the parenthesis included. But posting a URL like your MegaMan example, you DO want the parenthesis included.
The solution is to use the [noparse][URL][/URL][/noparse] tags explicitly when posting URLs which the parser cannot auto-link.
Why doesn't the autolinker like ) in URLs? It's an allowed character like any other.
Auto-linking has its limitations. If you were to post a URL something like this: Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/) you would NOT want the parenthesis included. But posting a URL like your MegaMan example, you DO want the parenthesis included.
The solution is to use the [noparse][URL][/URL][/noparse] tags explicitly when posting URLs which the parser cannot auto-link.
Why doesn't the autolinker like ) in URLs? It's an allowed character like any other.
Auto-linking has its limitations. If you were to post a URL something like this: Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/) you would NOT want the parenthesis included. But posting a URL like your MegaMan example, you DO want the parenthesis included.
The solution is to use the [noparse][URL][/URL][/noparse] tags explicitly when posting URLs which the parser cannot auto-link.
k, I wasn't sure this was something really addressable but thanks. I'll keep that in mind.
Viscountalpha on
0
HenroidMexican kicked from Immigration ThreadCentrism is Racism :3Registered Userregular
Auto... linker? No wonder I didn't know what the hell we were talking about.
Paste a URL in a post, hit submit reply, and the URL tags are automatically applied. What this thread is about is basically that automatic function not putting the end tag in the right place. But it's not biggy methinks.
Henroid on
0
RamiusJoined: July 19, 2000Administrator, ClubPAadmin
edited August 2008
There isn't actually a right place in this case. This thread is about people who want the end tag to be put in a different place, which would cause a new "problem" for a different class of URLs.
There isn't actually a right place in this case. This thread is about people who want the end tag to be put in a different place, which would cause a new "problem" for a different class of URLs.
Depending on how complicated the autolinker is, can you just count parens? so if it hits ( in a link and it ends with ) you include the trailing paren?
Posts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mega_Man_(video_game)
Seems to work fine for me.
The solution is to use the [noparse][URL][/URL][/noparse] tags explicitly when posting URLs which the parser cannot auto-link.
Why doesn't the autolinker like ) in URLs? It's an allowed character like any other.
autolinker testing:
http://google.com/-
http://google.com/_
http://google.com/.
http://google.com/+
http://google.com/!
http://google.com/*
http://google.com/'
http://google.com/(
http://google.com/)
Simple. Because experience shows that when posting links on forums, people want to write something like this: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/) and not end up with something like this: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/)
k, I wasn't sure this was something really addressable but thanks. I'll keep that in mind.
Paste a URL in a post, hit submit reply, and the URL tags are automatically applied. What this thread is about is basically that automatic function not putting the end tag in the right place. But it's not biggy methinks.
Depending on how complicated the autolinker is, can you just count parens? so if it hits ( in a link and it ends with ) you include the trailing paren?