The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Is anyone here regretting buying a PS3?

1356717

Posts

  • angrylinuxgeekangrylinuxgeek Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    no, you don't get it. nobody's hating, we corrected a false statement. quit it with the persecution complex.

    angrylinuxgeek on
    sQwJu.png
  • mugginnsmugginns Jawsome Fresh CoastRegistered User regular
    edited September 2008
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    edit: you're trying to turn this into a system war, son.

    oh, i am? i must be in the "diversity day: let's be happy about owning different systems" thread

    i may be being overly defensive but it's only because so often people bring up negligible game differences as a deciding factor against a system that, in the end, plays 90% of games the other one does

    it's like arguing the virtues of black over white and it makes me maaaaaad

    Your definition of negligible must be different to everyone else.

    Half the framerate is not negligible.

    Not existing at all (L4D) is not negligible.
    L4D is a nobody game that nobody cares about.

    mugginns on
    E26cO.jpg
  • Waka LakaWaka Laka Riding the stuffed Unicorn If ya know what I mean.Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    Antihippy wrote: »
    To be fair those were just developers being incompetent.

    You can't say that the PS3 has worse hardware than a 360 with a straight face.

    It has different hardware.

    This 'I'm a PS3 fan and a victim' schtick is the most annoying thing ever and is all over the internet.

    Developers have found it hard to grasp the programming of the PS3 architechture, even one of the greatest programmers out there - John Carmack states that you have to sweat bullets to get the PS3 to do what a PC or 360 can do. It does take longer to code and optimise, the only developers that can really take advantage of it are first party Sony developers, who will have a budget and greater team size than most 3rd party groups, who basically get a new assembly language shoved in their faces and told to learn it if they want to programme - costing time, money and staff to do so. Developers are now grasping what the PS3 can do and are making games side by side with multiplatform games.

    Developers who are building with only PS3 in mind when making a game will get better results.

    Waka Laka on
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    Not existing at all (L4D) is not negligible.

    are we talking about exclusives now?

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • The_ScarabThe_Scarab Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Antihippy wrote: »
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    Antihippy wrote: »
    To be fair those were just developers being incompetent.

    You can't say that the PS3 has worse hardware than a 360 with a straight face.

    It has different hardware.

    This 'I'm a PS3 fan and a victim' schtick is the most annoying thing ever and is all over the internet.

    What, no.

    I'm not saying that at all.

    I'm just saying that if the developers aren't coding it properly for the PS3 it isn't the PS3's fault that it can't pull the punches, since there are games on there that proves that it can pull those punches exceedingly well.

    Harder to code for though, I'm not going to argue about that seeing that I have not a clue if it's true or not.

    The problem is that it is much more proprietary. The 360 is essentially a PC in a small box, and is why there is huge crossover between the two platforms. Code to make things work on the PC can be used for the 360 and vice versa. This isn't the case in many aspects for the PS3.

    So it's not a case of incompetency, it is a case of economics. On one hand you can make one game that works on 2 systems or 1 game which works on 1 system, to be extremely reductionist.

    The_Scarab on
  • jclastjclast Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    bsjezz wrote: »
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    Not existing at all (L4D) is not negligible.

    are we talking about exclusives now?
    L4D isn't an exclusive. It's a multiplat game that isn't getting a PS3 version.

    jclast on
    camo_sig2.png
  • InzignaInzigna Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    jclast wrote: »
    I don't know any numbers, but I suspect you're right regarding lifespan. That being said, I'd still pick up single player games for 360 over PS3 if they're multiplatform, and here's why:
    1) The controller is much better, especially for shooters. The L2 and R2 triggers on the SIXAXIS and DS3 are horrible.
    2) The 360 is a multiplayer powerhouse. I can't get invites to Halo 3, Ticket to Ride, and TF2 (360) if I'm playing my multiplatform SP game on the PS3.

    Of those 2 reasons, 1 is infinitely more important than 2. Also, there are no tacked on motion controls on my 360 games. I don't want to shake my controller to stop being on fire (Resistance). Because it doesn't make any sense, and it's not fun. Just let me run, shoot, and have fun and leave the bad motion controls to Wii games.
    I grew up with the PS and the PS2, the controllers are fine, but I have to agree that the 360's controller is really, really good. Well, aside from the D-Pad that they are now fixing with the new batch of controllers.

    It's also hard to argue with the multiplayer invites thing, it's not too much a bugger for me since I generally like to set aside time for multiplayer and single player games.

    So once again we go back to the point on what a gamer emphasizes on, for me, I like to know that I can play any game any time without risking a console failure. By the way jclast, do you own a PS3? I personally don't, so I'm really not using my own life experiences to argue; but you do sound like you own one, and quite dislike it (I might be wrong here).

    Inzigna on
    camo_sig2.png
  • DietarySupplementDietarySupplement Still not approved by the FDA Dublin, OHRegistered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Mattie wrote: »
    there's a lot of stupid going on in this thread

    So let's recap: three, maybe four people that particpated in this thread regret buying PS3's. We done here?

    DietarySupplement on
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    jclast wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    Not existing at all (L4D) is not negligible.

    are we talking about exclusives now?
    L4D isn't an exclusive. It's a multiplat game that isn't getting a PS3 version.

    yeah, and it's a shame. do you want me to buy a 360 for it? 'fraid not, buuu-dy

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • AoiAoi Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    apotheos wrote: »
    Aoi wrote: »
    Antihippy wrote: »
    MagicPrime wrote: »
    I'm looking forward to Ghostbusters, Fallout 3, and Final Fantasy (Which despite being multi-platform now, its a PS3 game at heart.)

    I am still debating on getting Fallout 3 for PC, or PS3.

    Also, Mirror's Edge looks good.

    I don't regret my purchase at all, and when PlayOn gets Netflix working on their service I will be a happy camper.

    Mirror's edge is multiplat.

    Including PC.

    The primary platform of Mirror's Edge is the PS3 though, isn't it? That does tend to give it a slight edge over the others.

    The era where this is true is pretty much over.

    Eh, there are games in this generation alone that prove you wrong, especially when it comes to the 360 and PS3, especially EA.

    Aoi on
  • jclastjclast Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Inzigna wrote: »
    jclast wrote: »
    I don't know any numbers, but I suspect you're right regarding lifespan. That being said, I'd still pick up single player games for 360 over PS3 if they're multiplatform, and here's why:
    1) The controller is much better, especially for shooters. The L2 and R2 triggers on the SIXAXIS and DS3 are horrible.
    2) The 360 is a multiplayer powerhouse. I can't get invites to Halo 3, Ticket to Ride, and TF2 (360) if I'm playing my multiplatform SP game on the PS3.

    Of those 2 reasons, 1 is infinitely more important than 2. Also, there are no tacked on motion controls on my 360 games. I don't want to shake my controller to stop being on fire (Resistance). Because it doesn't make any sense, and it's not fun. Just let me run, shoot, and have fun and leave the bad motion controls to Wii games.
    I grew up with the PS and the PS2, the controllers are fine, but I have to agree that the 360's controller is really, really good. Well, aside from the D-Pad that they are now fixing with the new batch of controllers.

    It's also hard to argue with the multiplayer invites thing, it's not too much a bugger for me since I generally like to set aside time for multiplayer and single player games.

    So once again we go back to the point on what a gamer emphasizes on, for me, I like to know that I can play any game any time without risking a console failure. By the way jclast, do you own a PS3? I personally don't, so I'm really not using my own life experiences to argue; but you do sound like you own one, and quite dislike it (I might be wrong here).
    I don't own one yet, but I do have regular and easy access to one. And I enjoy it. I'm just waiting for a price drop or a great price on a used one before I add to my entertainment center again. Some of what it has is great, but much like the GameCube was for me last gen the PS3 would be used for exclusives only (or maybe multiplat for which the PS3 was the lead device like FF13).

    Also, for what it's worth I had no problems with either the DS or the DS2. It's really just the L2 and R2 triggers that piss me off on the DS3 and SIXAXIS. And you're right, the d-pad on most 360 controllers is complete crap (I don't know if the internals are different, but my Halo 3 360 pad has a great d-pad).

    jclast on
    camo_sig2.png
  • angrylinuxgeekangrylinuxgeek Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Aoi you're about 2 pages late, but you should definitely join in

    angrylinuxgeek on
    sQwJu.png
  • MonkeydryeMonkeydrye Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Waka Laka wrote: »
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    Antihippy wrote: »
    To be fair those were just developers being incompetent.

    You can't say that the PS3 has worse hardware than a 360 with a straight face.

    It has different hardware.

    This 'I'm a PS3 fan and a victim' schtick is the most annoying thing ever and is all over the internet.

    Developers have found it hard to grasp the programming of the PS3 architechture, even one of the greatest programmers out there - John Carmack states that you have to sweat bullets to get the PS3 to do what a PC or 360 can do. It does take longer to code and optimise, the only developers that can really take advantage of it are first party Sony developers, who will have a budget and greater team size than most 3rd party groups, who basically get a new assembly language shoved in their faces and told to learn it if they want to programme - costing time, money and staff to do so. Developers are now grasping what the PS3 can do and are making games side by side with multiplatform games.

    Developers who are building with only PS3 in mind when making a game will get better results.

    I think a big issue is that guys like Gabe Newell and Carmack are PC programmers. So of COURSE they think the pC/360 is easier. It's what they know. And the Wii is easy because Nintendo has basically used the same platform for ages. It's harder up front because it requires learning a new way to think. like people that had been using MS Office for years and switched to Office 2007. It was different. but once they learned it, they were fine.

    I think that is why we hear almost nothing about FF13. Square spent so much time making the PS3 version and decided to go multi after years of single platform developement. So Square has to spend even more time making sure the the two come out the same, because a port of something made with the PS3 in mind would suck.

    Monkeydrye on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Waka LakaWaka Laka Riding the stuffed Unicorn If ya know what I mean.Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    bsjezz wrote: »
    wow, uh, baja. i guess ps3 owners were killing to get a good framrate on a hectic offroad racer

    Actually Motorstorm is a very narrow racer compared to Baja, Motorstorm focuses on small created tracks you can't move from, making it easier to budget polygons/texture space whereas Baja is a few thousand kilometers of open terrain. Engines that stream and are open ended are much harder to get looking good as one that can just load one small area and focus on making it look good (higher def textures and polycount etc)

    Waka Laka on
  • jclastjclast Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    bsjezz wrote: »
    jclast wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    Not existing at all (L4D) is not negligible.

    are we talking about exclusives now?
    L4D isn't an exclusive. It's a multiplat game that isn't getting a PS3 version.

    yeah, and it's a shame. do you want me to buy a 360 for it? 'fraid not, buuu-dy
    I don't care what you buy or why, but L4D's absence on the PS3 is certainly not a negligible difference between the two core gamer-centric consoles. I'd argue that Orange Box 360 getting an update while the PS3 version sits untouched isn't negligible either.

    jclast on
    camo_sig2.png
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Aoi wrote: »
    Eh, there are games in this generation alone that prove you wrong, especially when it comes to the 360 and PS3, especially EA.

    again, i own games from the height of that framerate crisis, and they're still great. they still scored ninety-five. frame-rate never mattered that much until it stood as some arbitrary symbol of a system's power, and i'm not tricked by that

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • angrylinuxgeekangrylinuxgeek Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    so if you owned both systems you would buy the one with half the framerate?

    angrylinuxgeek on
    sQwJu.png
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    jclast wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    jclast wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    Not existing at all (L4D) is not negligible.

    are we talking about exclusives now?
    L4D isn't an exclusive. It's a multiplat game that isn't getting a PS3 version.

    yeah, and it's a shame. do you want me to buy a 360 for it? 'fraid not, buuu-dy
    I don't care what you buy or why, but L4D's absence on the PS3 is certainly not a negligible difference between the two core gamer-centric consoles. I'd argue that Orange Box 360 getting an update while the PS3 version sits untouched isn't negligible either.

    sure, but it's no more a swing-vote than lbp, resistance or wipeout. the two systems have their exclusive assets but that's not the area of discusssion. what i'm trying to say is that even if there are slight, noticable performance issues between two versions of a game, in the end, you're playing the same thing

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • MattieMattie Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    There is nothing slight about 30 fps vs 60 fps.

    Mattie on
    3DS Code 0001-3323-2884
    Xbox Live Gamertag: Suplex86
  • MonkeydryeMonkeydrye Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    jclast wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    jclast wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    Not existing at all (L4D) is not negligible.

    are we talking about exclusives now?
    L4D isn't an exclusive. It's a multiplat game that isn't getting a PS3 version.

    yeah, and it's a shame. do you want me to buy a 360 for it? 'fraid not, buuu-dy
    I don't care what you buy or why, but L4D's absence on the PS3 is certainly not a negligible difference between the two core gamer-centric consoles. I'd argue that Orange Box 360 getting an update while the PS3 version sits untouched isn't negligible either.

    I don't even know what Left for Dead is. To me, it's a game on some other system. That stuff happens. I mean, Can I claim that the Wii is better than the 360 because Mad World is only coming to the Wii? Or House of the Dead?

    But you are right about the Orange Box stuff. I am basically giving Valve the finger on that one. It gives me this "Gabe never liked the multi core thing anyway, but we did make a subpar port and got your money...but now we're through with you" vibe. Regardless, it does suck to have a major developer decide not to support a platform.

    Monkeydrye on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • corin7corin7 San Diego, CARegistered User regular
    edited September 2008
    My PS3 gets the least amount of play time out of all my machines. I don't regret the purchase one bit though. The games I have played on it have been awesome and I actually get a lot of Blu-Ray discs. If I could only have one system though it would be the 360 all the way.

    corin7 on
  • InzignaInzigna Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    bsjezz wrote: »
    sure, but it's no more a swing-vote than lbp, resistance or wipeout. the two systems have their exclusive assets but that's not the area of discusssion. what i'm trying to say is that even if there are slight, noticable performance issues between two versions of a game, in the end, you're playing the same thing
    But why would you buy a game that performed less smoothly?

    I'm not arguing for the 360 OR the PS3, but the thing is, you're playing the same thing, so why would you not want to buy the game for a system it plays more smoothly on?

    Inzigna on
    camo_sig2.png
  • jclastjclast Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    bsjezz wrote: »
    jclast wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    jclast wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    Not existing at all (L4D) is not negligible.

    are we talking about exclusives now?
    L4D isn't an exclusive. It's a multiplat game that isn't getting a PS3 version.

    yeah, and it's a shame. do you want me to buy a 360 for it? 'fraid not, buuu-dy
    I don't care what you buy or why, but L4D's absence on the PS3 is certainly not a negligible difference between the two core gamer-centric consoles. I'd argue that Orange Box 360 getting an update while the PS3 version sits untouched isn't negligible either.

    sure, but it's no more a swing-vote than lbp, resistance or wipeout. the two systems have their exclusive assets but that's not the area of discusssion. what i'm trying to say is that even if there are slight, noticable performance issues between two versions of a game, in the end, you're playing the same thing
    And I'm saying that sometimes you're not. And the big factor there is DLC. Fallout 3 and GTA IV - if you own both systems (and not a decent PC) should be bought on 360 because they have more content available to the player. Similarly, it sounds like Mirror's Edge will have more content on the PS3 so it would make more sense to buy it for that. And just to drive the point home a little more, if you have - say a PS2, a Wii, and a 360 (like I do at home) it makes infinitely more sense to pick up GH2 and Rock Band for the 360 since you get extra songs on the disc (GH2) or honest-to-God DLC support (RB).

    Just because games look about the same from one platform to another doesn't mean the experiences between them are equal.

    jclast on
    camo_sig2.png
  • cloudeaglecloudeagle Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Yup, this thread is going pretty much the same way every other "I'm regretting buying (name of console)" thread goes.

    Eh, the PS3 is absolutely fine if it's the only high-def console you have. There's a lot of crossover between the 360 and PS3 though, so I'd only buy both if the few exclusives on both sides appeal to you enough. The 360 seems to be getting a few more exclusives, then again it's been out longer and has a lead in sales so that's to be expected.

    cloudeagle on
    Switch: 3947-4890-9293
  • AoiAoi Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    bsjezz wrote: »
    Inzigna wrote: »
    Resistance (looks typical, but I'm sure it's not bad)

    don't underestimate this one. insomniac are about the classiest guys around, all their products are completely polished and full of features, and resistance 2, pound for pound, will be the most valuable fps ever released on a console. that much is almost certain.


    Class doesn't always gurantee quality. The first Resistance was a decent game, but the environments were pretty sparse, and there wasn't really anything new about the gameplay or the story. Don't get me wrong, it was a fun game, and the online had some good modes. Totally worth 30. But judging from the original, though this one will have legs because it's exclusive, the single player can totally go either way on it. Multi sounds nice, especially co-op, but don't even get me started on how the lack of a pack in mic really REALLY hurts anything multi on the system.

    Aoi on
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Mattie wrote: »
    There is nothing slight about 30 fps vs 60 fps.

    are you trying to say my versions of fifa and nhl '08 are unplayable y/n

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • DiarmuidDiarmuid Amazing Meatball Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Jesus, a thread with people bitching about framerates and dev platforms, why did I click on it?

    Listen, framerates only matter when they're noticeably slow. No one gives a shit about dev platforms outside of games programmers and anal idiots.

    Fun games are fun, whichever box you play 'em on doesn't matter.

    Diarmuid on
  • MattieMattie Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    cloudeagle wrote: »
    Yup, this thread is going pretty much the same way every other "I'm regretting buying (name of console)" thread goes.

    Its a baiting thread. They should be locked since noting good really comes out of them or any console war thread.

    Mattie on
    3DS Code 0001-3323-2884
    Xbox Live Gamertag: Suplex86
  • jclastjclast Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Monkeydrye wrote: »
    jclast wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    jclast wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    Not existing at all (L4D) is not negligible.

    are we talking about exclusives now?
    L4D isn't an exclusive. It's a multiplat game that isn't getting a PS3 version.

    yeah, and it's a shame. do you want me to buy a 360 for it? 'fraid not, buuu-dy
    I don't care what you buy or why, but L4D's absence on the PS3 is certainly not a negligible difference between the two core gamer-centric consoles. I'd argue that Orange Box 360 getting an update while the PS3 version sits untouched isn't negligible either.

    I don't even know what Left for Dead is. To me, it's a game on some other system. That stuff happens. I mean, Can I claim that the Wii is better than the 360 because Mad World is only coming to the Wii? Or House of the Dead?

    But you are right about the Orange Box stuff. I am basically giving Valve the finger on that one. It gives me this "Gabe never liked the multi core thing anyway, but we did make a subpar port and got your money...but now we're through with you" vibe. Regardless, it does suck to have a major developer decide not to support a platform.
    Every system has its exclusives. It's kind of a big deal when a multiplatform game (typically 360, PS3, and PC for this generation) only hits 2 of those 3 systems. We're not talking about "OMG Nintendo only makes Zelda on Wii." This would be more like "Wow, Resident Evil 5 is only going to be on PS3 and PC." It's a big deal because it isn't typically how multiplatform games are distributed.

    jclast on
    camo_sig2.png
  • KlykaKlyka DO you have any SPARE BATTERIES?Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Why is this thread even still going?

    Every thread like this ALWAYS ends in PS3 vs 360 debates

    Klyka on
    SC2 EU ID Klyka.110
    lTDyp.jpg
  • Dublo7Dublo7 Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Yeah, I didn't really intend for this to happen.

    I've decided I'm going to sell my PS3 anyway.

    Dublo7 on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • angrylinuxgeekangrylinuxgeek Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    bsjezz wrote: »
    Mattie wrote: »
    There is nothing slight about 30 fps vs 60 fps.

    are you trying to say my versions of fifa and nhl '08 are unplayable y/n

    will you stop posting if he says n

    angrylinuxgeek on
    sQwJu.png
  • MattieMattie Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    bsjezz wrote: »
    Mattie wrote: »
    There is nothing slight about 30 fps vs 60 fps.

    are you trying to say my versions of fifa and nhl '08 are unplayable y/n

    n

    But it is very noticeable and really jarring if you are accustomed to the 60 fps version. But you can't miss something that you've never had so I guess it doesn't matter for you.

    Mattie on
    3DS Code 0001-3323-2884
    Xbox Live Gamertag: Suplex86
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Inzigna wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    sure, but it's no more a swing-vote than lbp, resistance or wipeout. the two systems have their exclusive assets but that's not the area of discusssion. what i'm trying to say is that even if there are slight, noticable performance issues between two versions of a game, in the end, you're playing the same thing
    But why would you buy a game that performed less smoothly?

    I'm not arguing for the 360 OR the PS3, but the thing is, you're playing the same thing, so why would you not want to buy the game for a system it plays more smoothly on?

    because i only own a ps3

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • InzignaInzigna Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    Diarmuid wrote: »
    Jesus, a thread with people bitching about framerates and dev platforms, why did I click on it?

    Listen, framerates only matter when they're noticeably slow. No one gives a shit about dev platforms outside of games programmers and anal idiots.

    Fun games are fun, whichever box you play 'em on doesn't matter.

    I agree with your last line, but my question still stands.

    If you could play the game on 30FPS or 60PFS which would you choose? I'm not arguing for either console, but it seems to me obvious that it's logical to go for the game that performs more smoothly.

    It's the same game, it's still fun. But if I can buy the version that runs better, even just slightly better, why not?

    EDIT: To bsjezz, that's fair enough, but I guess I should clarify matters a little and say that I'm arguing from a point of view where both consoles are available. If you only have either console, then this really doesn't apply. I'm just saying IF you had the choice, why not.

    Inzigna on
    camo_sig2.png
  • scootchscootch Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    I don't regret it one bit. even if I only have a couple games for it.
    there aren't too many standalone player that come close to PS3 in video quality for BD and DVD. I would of bought the PS3 as a standalone player even if there were zero games to play.

    scootch on
    TF2 stats
    PSN: super_emu
    Xbox360 Gamertag: Emuchop
  • MattieMattie Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    bsjezz wrote: »
    Inzigna wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    sure, but it's no more a swing-vote than lbp, resistance or wipeout. the two systems have their exclusive assets but that's not the area of discusssion. what i'm trying to say is that even if there are slight, noticable performance issues between two versions of a game, in the end, you're playing the same thing
    But why would you buy a game that performed less smoothly?

    I'm not arguing for the 360 OR the PS3, but the thing is, you're playing the same thing, so why would you not want to buy the game for a system it plays more smoothly on?

    because i only own a ps3

    211e63c.jpg

    "Well there's your problem"

    Mattie on
    3DS Code 0001-3323-2884
    Xbox Live Gamertag: Suplex86
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    if you expect me to buy a 360 for halo 3, castle crashers and an extra 2.879 frames per second on EA's next big curling title you are sorely mistaken

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • Waka LakaWaka Laka Riding the stuffed Unicorn If ya know what I mean.Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    * Reads on *

    * Is amused *

    Waka Laka on
  • jclastjclast Registered User regular
    edited September 2008
    bsjezz wrote: »
    jclast wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    jclast wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    The_Scarab wrote: »
    Not existing at all (L4D) is not negligible.

    are we talking about exclusives now?
    L4D isn't an exclusive. It's a multiplat game that isn't getting a PS3 version.

    yeah, and it's a shame. do you want me to buy a 360 for it? 'fraid not, buuu-dy
    I don't care what you buy or why, but L4D's absence on the PS3 is certainly not a negligible difference between the two core gamer-centric consoles. I'd argue that Orange Box 360 getting an update while the PS3 version sits untouched isn't negligible either.

    sure, but it's no more a swing-vote than lbp, resistance or wipeout. the two systems have their exclusive assets but that's not the area of discusssion. what i'm trying to say is that even if there are slight, noticable performance issues between two versions of a game, in the end, you're playing the same thing

    Okay, let's argue this from your perspective. For games that I could buy for either platform - like Assassin's Creed or DMC4 - I'm getting the same general experience. Now take that knowledge and run with it. If I can get roughly the same experience out of either console why would I buy the more expensive console for anything but exclusives - especially if some multiplatform games don't come out for it and other multiplat games don't ship for it at the same time as 360 (like RB2)?

    jclast on
    camo_sig2.png
Sign In or Register to comment.