Yes it is. And you are right it is day one and all I have to go on is you switching votes, jumping on a Rainfall is always evil bandwagon, and asserting you are a good guy because you don't ever lie.
Yes it is. And you are right it is day one and all I have to go on is you switching votes, jumping on a Rainfall is always evil bandwagon, and asserting you are a good guy because you don't ever lie.
OrangeSoda voted for me, so I voted back against him. Half the people in the game have done this. Then I later voted for rainfall because like others have said shes a safe vote.
DeShadowC on
0
Options
Quoththe RavenMiami, FL FOR REALRegistered Userregular
edited October 2008
How is she a safe vote, she is not actually always evil.
Its not like I'm trying to cause a bandwagon either. I hate when people follow my vote, it got cj killed in the protection phalla, and I was like WTF why are people voting him off?
DeShadowC on
0
Options
lonelyahavaCall me Ahava ~~She/Her~~Move to New ZealandRegistered Userregular
edited October 2008
awww
Don't vote Rainy out on day 1 again!
It's just not nice to do it to her and to Zot and others like that.
And yes, I'm fully aware that if I defend Rainy and she ends up being evil, then you're all going to look at me and try to kill me.
But still...
It's not nice to vote her out every single day one.
You're defending yourself excessively on day 1. Against three votes.
And voting on me as a 'safe vote because lulz always evil' has been used a few times in the past by the badguys. It's almost a Classic Bad Guy Move.
But the outright desperation against a couple of votes? That's probably the easiest sign to spot a creepy pie-poisoner. I would suggest toning it down, or you might find yourself in exile.
EDIT: Four votes, sorry, I didn't count Orange Soda's.
You're defending yourself excessively on day 1. Against three votes.
And voting on me as a 'safe vote because lulz always evil' has been used a few times in the past by the badguys. It's almost a Classic Bad Guy Move.
But the outright desperation against a couple of votes? That's probably the easiest sign to spot a creepy pie-poisoner. I would suggest toning it down, or you might find yourself in exile.
EDIT: Four votes, sorry, I didn't count Orange Soda's.
You guys are starting a bandwagon against me. Plus I've never played against you so I wouldn't know its a classic bad guy move. When I was bad I kept quiet the first couple days.
You're defending yourself excessively on day 1. Against three votes.
And voting on me as a 'safe vote because lulz always evil' has been used a few times in the past by the badguys. It's almost a Classic Bad Guy Move.
But the outright desperation against a couple of votes? That's probably the easiest sign to spot a creepy pie-poisoner. I would suggest toning it down, or you might find yourself in exile.
EDIT: Four votes, sorry, I didn't count Orange Soda's.
You guys are starting a bandwagon against me. Plus I've never played against you so I wouldn't know its a classic bad guy move. When I was bad I kept quiet the first couple days.
The point of classic bad guy moves is that experienced bad guys don't make them. Or they forget, slip up, and get nailed.
You're defending yourself excessively on day 1. Against three votes.
And voting on me as a 'safe vote because lulz always evil' has been used a few times in the past by the badguys. It's almost a Classic Bad Guy Move.
But the outright desperation against a couple of votes? That's probably the easiest sign to spot a creepy pie-poisoner. I would suggest toning it down, or you might find yourself in exile.
EDIT: Four votes, sorry, I didn't count Orange Soda's.
You guys are starting a bandwagon against me. Plus I've never played against you so I wouldn't know its a classic bad guy move. When I was bad I kept quiet the first couple days.
The point of classic bad guy moves is that experienced bad guys don't make them. Or they forget, slip up, and get nailed.
Well since you've been evil 75% of the time its as safe as a RNG vote. *shrug*
You're defending yourself excessively on day 1. Against three votes.
And voting on me as a 'safe vote because lulz always evil' has been used a few times in the past by the badguys. It's almost a Classic Bad Guy Move.
But the outright desperation against a couple of votes? That's probably the easiest sign to spot a creepy pie-poisoner. I would suggest toning it down, or you might find yourself in exile.
EDIT: Four votes, sorry, I didn't count Orange Soda's.
You guys are starting a bandwagon against me. Plus I've never played against you so I wouldn't know its a classic bad guy move. When I was bad I kept quiet the first couple days.
The point of classic bad guy moves is that experienced bad guys don't make them. Or they forget, slip up, and get nailed.
Well since you've been evil 75% of the time its as safe as a RNG vote. *shrug*
Absolutely not! You must have missed the time that this logic killed off me as the main character in Baldur's Gate Phalla(along with a dick move by plut) and nearly cost us the game.
You're defending yourself excessively on day 1. Against three votes.
And voting on me as a 'safe vote because lulz always evil' has been used a few times in the past by the badguys. It's almost a Classic Bad Guy Move.
But the outright desperation against a couple of votes? That's probably the easiest sign to spot a creepy pie-poisoner. I would suggest toning it down, or you might find yourself in exile.
EDIT: Four votes, sorry, I didn't count Orange Soda's.
You guys are starting a bandwagon against me. Plus I've never played against you so I wouldn't know its a classic bad guy move. When I was bad I kept quiet the first couple days.
The point of classic bad guy moves is that experienced bad guys don't make them. Or they forget, slip up, and get nailed.
Well since you've been evil 75% of the time its as safe as a RNG vote. *shrug*
Absolutely not! You must have missed the time that this logic killed off me as the main character in Baldur's Gate Phalla(along with a dick move by plut) and nearly cost us the game.
So you have a greater chance of being a highly important character then a RNG vote would give?
I'll go with !TheLawinator since i never got to properly grudge you for TTR's mini.
JPants on
0
Options
El SkidThe frozen white northRegistered Userregular
edited October 2008
I think FrostMist is a girl too.
And I guess I'll toss a vote on Arasaki for no good reason.
Sheep Have Wool, if you're reading this, please to be playing in more phallas so that I might adequately repay you for the backstabbing guardian phalla incident. It's comforting to have a grudge vote...
Fine then Day 1 reveal. It worked for Kime lets see if it'll work for me. I'm a vig. No special requirements. I'm apparently Emerson Cod, I've never watched the show though. I'll prove myself tonight between the vote close and narration. I will need a guard to guard me of course though.
DeShadowC on
0
Options
lonelyahavaCall me Ahava ~~She/Her~~Move to New ZealandRegistered Userregular
Assuming this is a traditional phalla with all roles covered, DSCs move is not a bad one. Guard, guard him, and then he can prove himself by calling his kill post vote-close.
Rainfall on
0
Options
lonelyahavaCall me Ahava ~~She/Her~~Move to New ZealandRegistered Userregular
edited October 2008
That doesn't mean you should put up a reveal, doll....
I'm already not voting for DSC. I actually don't remember who I am voting for, but oh well. As long as Shadow survives to prove himself (and barring any other fun reveals) doesn't really matter whom else we vote off Day 1.
Quoththe RavenMiami, FL FOR REALRegistered Userregular
edited October 2008
Your logic is bad, kime. Every vote for a random person counts against DSC unless the people voting for him change their votes. So we need to pick a single target in case that doesn't happen.
I was assuming that the people voting for him would change their votes and that would solve the problem. If they don't, though, I agree. Voting for a random person is like condemning him.
Posts
Because it's hilarious!
Strawberry-rhubarb pie is delicious, y'know! Try some!
Shadow, all I said was that I am frequently evil. There are times when I'm not evil. This phalla is one of 'em.
TylerJ on League of Legends (it's free and fun!)
You agreed to it here
Monkey feet
OrangeSoda voted for me, so I voted back against him. Half the people in the game have done this. Then I later voted for rainfall because like others have said shes a safe vote.
Don't vote Rainy out on day 1 again!
It's just not nice to do it to her and to Zot and others like that.
And yes, I'm fully aware that if I defend Rainy and she ends up being evil, then you're all going to look at me and try to kill me.
But still...
It's not nice to vote her out every single day one.
Democrats Abroad! || Vote From Abroad
You're defending yourself excessively on day 1. Against three votes.
And voting on me as a 'safe vote because lulz always evil' has been used a few times in the past by the badguys. It's almost a Classic Bad Guy Move.
But the outright desperation against a couple of votes? That's probably the easiest sign to spot a creepy pie-poisoner. I would suggest toning it down, or you might find yourself in exile.
EDIT: Four votes, sorry, I didn't count Orange Soda's.
You guys are starting a bandwagon against me. Plus I've never played against you so I wouldn't know its a classic bad guy move. When I was bad I kept quiet the first couple days.
The point of classic bad guy moves is that experienced bad guys don't make them. Or they forget, slip up, and get nailed.
Well since you've been evil 75% of the time its as safe as a RNG vote. *shrug*
Absolutely not! You must have missed the time that this logic killed off me as the main character in Baldur's Gate Phalla(along with a dick move by plut) and nearly cost us the game.
So you have a greater chance of being a highly important character then a RNG vote would give?
And I guess I'll toss a vote on Arasaki for no good reason.
Sheep Have Wool, if you're reading this, please to be playing in more phallas so that I might adequately repay you for the backstabbing guardian phalla incident. It's comforting to have a grudge vote...
Cause if not, my only other grudge right now is the guy hosting.
hmmm
Well, and Spectre.
Yes. that sounds like a plan.
!TehSpectre
I think I owe you for Frosteey's D&D game...
Democrats Abroad! || Vote From Abroad
Democrats Abroad! || Vote From Abroad
oh, DSC....
why'd you do that, huh?
Silly silly monkey...
Democrats Abroad! || Vote From Abroad
Everyone get on another bandwagon already. And not on me because I died day 1 in the main game.
There's still 5 hours or so to go...
Democrats Abroad! || Vote From Abroad
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
That said, anyone have a vote count?
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
Day one vote is how I won as a bad guy.