The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
So, pretty simple question, can you turn right on a red arrow? I know that you can usually make a right on a red light unless a sign says otherwise, but Im just not sure if that applies to a red turn signal too. This is somethin thats just been botherin me for a while.
Actually, I'm pretty sure the rule is that you only can't turn right if there is a sign that says "No Turn On Red". I think generally the arrows are to indicate that the right lane can only turn right, and/or that you don't need to yield to oncoming traffic when the right turn arrow is green.
i can't imagine a street where this would come up. 'arrow' lights point left, they are for the turning lanes or leftmost of more than one lane of traffic. right turns are done from the right lane, which should have a solid light.
In general, no, but it probably depends upon state.
What? You basically just said "No, but yes."
Edit - I have lived in California or Montana all my life and have never seen a red right turn arrow. Perhaps there is a distinction here that needs to be made.
i can't imagine a street where this would come up. 'arrow' lights point left, they are for the turning lanes or leftmost of more than one lane of traffic. right turns are done from the right lane, which should have a solid light.
o_O
Red right turn arrows are found all over the place. We also have electric lighting, and indoor plumbing these days, too.
In general, no, but it probably depends upon state.
What? You basically just said "No, but yes."
I would give the same response to a question about whether or not prostitution is legal in the U.S.; in general, in the majority of states, no, it's not legal; in Nevada, yes, it happens to be.
In general, no, but it probably depends upon state.
What? You basically just said "No, but yes."
I would give the same response to a question about whether or not prostitution is legal in the U.S.; in general, in the majority of states, no, it's not legal; in Nevada, yes, it happens to be.
So in general, no, but it depends upon the state.
Ah, I took that as a minor harping on my post above it. I guess you obviously didn't mean it that way as you didn't quote me.
Carry on.
UnknownSaint on
0
Inquisitor772 x Penny Arcade Fight Club ChampionA fixed point in space and timeRegistered Userregular
edited November 2008
Red arrow means no turn, because it means you are sitting at an intersection that requires a protected right turn (i.e. green arrow) to proceed. The red arrow is being used to differentiate between being allwoed to make a right turn and being allowed to go straight (or turn left). Otherwise, they'd just slap a red light on the top and call it a day. This is definitely the case in California. Not sure about other States, but it stands to reason...
There is also the point that if they have to protect the turn, there's probably a good reason. It can't hurt to be safe and wait until the green arrow shows up.
Edit Add: Found this. Looks like we're right - the safe thing is to just not turn until it turns green.
We should cover all interpretations just to be safe.
But yeah, I would think a red arrow instead of a solid red would imply no turning in whatever state it is in. I'm sure this information is google-able.
Edit - I have lived in California or Montana all my life and have never seen a red right turn arrow. Perhaps there is a distinction here that needs to be made.
I lived in California for 20+ years. There are most definitely right-turn arrows in California.
In any case, the North Carolina Driver's Handbook seems to state that no, you may not make an unprotected right turn on a red right arrow:
Unless there is a sign indicating "NO TURN ON RED," you can turn right on a circular a steady, red, circular traffic signal after stopping and making sure that the turn can be made safely.
Further:
* A green arrow means that you have a "protected" turning movement with no other conflicting traffic in the intersection except U-turn traffic that should yield to all other traffic entering the intersection.
Having taken a course in traffic engineering, I'm 99% certain a right arrow means you cannot turn "right on red". There may be a precious few exceptions that I'm unaware of, but other than that, I'm certain.
Red arrows always mean you can't turn right. They're there because that intersection is particularly dangerous for right turns. It's why you generally only see them at certain intersections and not at every one.
Even beyond legality, the traffic engineers are telling you that making that turn is a bad idea.
I mean, I know it'd suck to get a ticket or something, but it'd suck worse to be hit by a car and/or hit something that you couldn't see due to some obstruction or something.
Honest to god, we need more of those around here. There are intersections where the no turn signs are printed way too small to read (and have fine print indicating what times they apply).
Lt. Clendenin lays down the law on right turns. Solid red and right-arrow red mean the same thing, he says:
Stop, look and then turn. The only time you're not allowed to turn right on red in North Carolina is where there's a sign that says no right turn on red.
Also, Thanatos, the law you cited says you need to stop when there's an arrow, that doesn't preclude moving after the stop (it's covered in the link above by the NC cop).
Ninja edit: Of course, if you don't feel comfortable going when the light is red, then by all means wait until it turns green.
In Washington about half of the people think one thing and half think the other. There's a red right turn arrow at a certain intersection which invariably ends up with someone honking at the guy in front after everyone who has decided they can make the turn has done so.
I've only seen one of these lights in Michigan, but it does mean no turning, regardless of the state of through traffic.
The intersection it's at is T-shaped, where Brockway runs into Gratiot. There's a right turn lane from Gratiot to Brockway that normally has a permanent green arrow, since there's no through traffic to interfere with it. There's a button for pedestrians, though, and when they push it, the next time Gratiot gets the green light for through traffic, that right turn lane gets a red arrow and the crosswalk gets a walk sign. I've only actually seen it red twice - most pedestrians don't seem to realize the button's there and instead stand blocking Brockway's left turn lane and waiting for a break.
Unless there is a sign indicating "NO TURN ON RED," you can turn right on a circular a steady, red, circular traffic signal after stopping and making sure that the turn can be made safely.
well, apparently some states do not allow right turns on red arrows, trying to find which ones
Yeah, and it sounds like some DO allow it.
Which is pretty stupid. At that point why have the red right arrow anyway? Legally it's in no way distinguished from the full right circle, unless there is some situation in which you'd want right turns to stop and yield while through traffic does not (and instead proceeds through on green).
I can't think of any such road/intersection configuration.
Parallel road traffic and high-traffic crosswalk, using the signal as a reminder to drivers that green doesn't mean mow pedestrians down. Yes I'm bitter.
You guys want complicated, try figuring out what states allow LEFT TURNS on red, when you're turning onto a one-way street
You have to be on a one-way street turning on to another one-way street to make a left turn on red.
In my area the turning lanes at the intersection have green and yellow arrows, but a normal red light.
So right on red follows the normal order of things.
Red arrow means no turn, because it means you are sitting at an intersection that requires a protected right turn (i.e. green arrow) to proceed. The red arrow is being used to differentiate between being allwoed to make a right turn and being allowed to go straight (or turn left). Otherwise, they'd just slap a red light on the top and call it a day. This is definitely the case in California. Not sure about other States, but it stands to reason...
There is also the point that if they have to protect the turn, there's probably a good reason. It can't hurt to be safe and wait until the green arrow shows up.
Edit Add: Found this. Looks like we're right - the safe thing is to just not turn until it turns green.
That link seems to have old information. I could almost swear my driving manual for when I first got my license indicated that RTOR arrow lights are only disallowed when posted. Especially since NY is on that "no go" list and I don't see any information citing that on the web or on their website.
I think it got lifted in 1980something and the only place it still applies is in NYC.
bowen on
not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
Unless there is a sign indicating "NO TURN ON RED," you can turn right on a circular a steady, red, circular traffic signal after stopping and making sure that the turn can be made safely.
Well, it seems rather straightforward.
I'm curious why the OP wanted to know.
That's not straightforward because it refers specifically to the steady red circular traffic signal, not the red right arrow.
And he probably wants to know because the fuckers behind him were honking while he waited at the red arrow not knowing if he was going to get a ticket for $texas if he went through it after stopping. And these are uncommon enough that they probably aren't covered in the written or road tests to get a license, and may well not be covered as more than a footnote in full-blown driver's ed courses.
Ha, I'm sorry, I was hella tired and just filling in the details. I mean...the red arrows lights come in a circular container...
Still, uh, I support turning on red arrows. I remember it from my driver's ed handbook.
I remember from my tests and the one website linked before basically explains that in Michigan (where I live) that it is used in one way only (turn right only) lanes. I don't think they use them (I have never seen one) because its confusing (why put the arrow in red when everyone knows that you can't go forward in red anyways). The confusion also comes from the use in left turn lanes, of course you can't turn if its red or a red arrow. So in Michigan it is fine and used more to keep people from making the mistake of thinking they can go straight cutting off the lane to the right or causing some kind of incident.
Topweasel on
0
acidlacedpenguinInstitutionalizedSafe in jail.Registered Userregular
edited November 2008
In Quebec you can't even make a right on a red light ever. Makes for some interesting trips from English East to English West Canada. Also, because Quebec doesn't support the "trans-Canada" highway idea, the highway coming from the direction of Ottawa goes directly into Quebec city, and you have to make a turn off to stay on the highway.
Coming back from NIN on the 11th, I shat bricks when I was crusing along at 140kph and suddenly was hit with a wall of red traffic lights.
Posts
NC, USA.
Jordan of Elienor, Human Shaman
What? You basically just said "No, but yes."
Edit - I have lived in California or Montana all my life and have never seen a red right turn arrow. Perhaps there is a distinction here that needs to be made.
Red right turn arrows are found all over the place. We also have electric lighting, and indoor plumbing these days, too.
So in general, no, but it depends upon the state.
Ah, I took that as a minor harping on my post above it. I guess you obviously didn't mean it that way as you didn't quote me.
Carry on.
There is also the point that if they have to protect the turn, there's probably a good reason. It can't hurt to be safe and wait until the green arrow shows up.
Edit Add: Found this. Looks like we're right - the safe thing is to just not turn until it turns green.
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/2835226/2/istockphoto_2835226-red-traffic-light.jpg
is he asking if he can turn right at a sign which translates to "do not turn right"?
But yeah, I would think a red arrow instead of a solid red would imply no turning in whatever state it is in. I'm sure this information is google-able.
In any case, the North Carolina Driver's Handbook seems to state that no, you may not make an unprotected right turn on a red right arrow:
Further:
I mean, I know it'd suck to get a ticket or something, but it'd suck worse to be hit by a car and/or hit something that you couldn't see due to some obstruction or something.
Honest to god, we need more of those around here. There are intersections where the no turn signs are printed way too small to read (and have fine print indicating what times they apply).
http://blogsarchive.newsobserver.com/crosstown/index.php?title=turn_turn_turn&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Also, Thanatos, the law you cited says you need to stop when there's an arrow, that doesn't preclude moving after the stop (it's covered in the link above by the NC cop).
Ninja edit: Of course, if you don't feel comfortable going when the light is red, then by all means wait until it turns green.
I am intrigued and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
The intersection it's at is T-shaped, where Brockway runs into Gratiot. There's a right turn lane from Gratiot to Brockway that normally has a permanent green arrow, since there's no through traffic to interfere with it. There's a button for pedestrians, though, and when they push it, the next time Gratiot gets the green light for through traffic, that right turn lane gets a red arrow and the crosswalk gets a walk sign. I've only actually seen it red twice - most pedestrians don't seem to realize the button's there and instead stand blocking Brockway's left turn lane and waiting for a break.
I definitely have not seen these. They seem to be just an expensive alternative to the "no turn on red" sign.
Well, it seems rather straightforward.
I'm curious why the OP wanted to know.
I think you need to be more specific with what it looked like (maybe draw it) because a lot of people seem to be confused
a signal light that has no full circle colors, but is in the right lane at a stoplight, pointing right
Parallel road traffic and high-traffic crosswalk, using the signal as a reminder to drivers that green doesn't mean mow pedestrians down. Yes I'm bitter.
You have to be on a one-way street turning on to another one-way street to make a left turn on red.
In my area the turning lanes at the intersection have green and yellow arrows, but a normal red light.
So right on red follows the normal order of things.
Critical Failures - Havenhold Campaign • August St. Cloud (Human Ranger)
That link seems to have old information. I could almost swear my driving manual for when I first got my license indicated that RTOR arrow lights are only disallowed when posted. Especially since NY is on that "no go" list and I don't see any information citing that on the web or on their website.
I think it got lifted in 1980something and the only place it still applies is in NYC.
Ha, I'm sorry, I was hella tired and just filling in the details. I mean...the red arrows lights come in a circular container...
Still, uh, I support turning on red arrows. I remember it from my driver's ed handbook.
Coming back from NIN on the 11th, I shat bricks when I was crusing along at 140kph and suddenly was hit with a wall of red traffic lights.