The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
you forgot to re-enable posting in Awesome Posts? (Solved)
I like it without the posting. Vote, move on. I don't need to read why you voted 2, or cross forum bullshit.
Another typical gasbag from the ClubPA Library forum :evil:
On one hand, it eliminates all the unecessary I voted spam that I fill up every single thread on that forum with. On the other, it also eliminates any chance of anyone but the original reporter from providing context or posting additions. Mm..?
JAEF on
0
EvilBadmanDO NOT TRUST THIS MANRegistered Userregular
I like it without the posting. Vote, move on. I don't need to read why you voted 2, or cross forum bullshit.
Another typical gasbag from the ClubPA Library forum :evil:
On one hand, it eliminates all the unecessary I voted spam that I fill up every single thread on that forum with. On the other, it also eliminates any chance of anyone but the original reporter from providing context or posting additions. Mm..?
If they had to provide more context, they might as well write a newspost on the mainsite to go with the joke.:P
It occurs to me that if someone wanted to contribute badly enough, they could just report the post for awesome as well, which would let them add context.
But then some jackasses would probably abuse it to get around the no-posting setup.
But then they might get infractions.
So it might work out in the long run.
Edit: also, yes, there is a disturbing lack of Awesome in those last two additions. Is it true that after a while, non-awesome things get deleted?
Forar on
First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
Posts
Doesn't everything 2 stars or less get deleted after a while anyway?
On one hand, it eliminates all the unecessary I voted spam that I fill up every single thread on that forum with. On the other, it also eliminates any chance of anyone but the original reporter from providing context or posting additions. Mm..?
If they had to provide more context, they might as well write a newspost on the mainsite to go with the joke.:P
Edit: Fuckin' New Forum Kinks Blowhard.
But then some jackasses would probably abuse it to get around the no-posting setup.
But then they might get infractions.
So it might work out in the long run.
Edit: also, yes, there is a disturbing lack of Awesome in those last two additions. Is it true that after a while, non-awesome things get deleted?
All I meant was that it would be nice if he could fix it, which he did. If he didn't, it didn't really matter.
Thank you Ramius.