The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I am in my second year of university. My girlfriend is in her second year as well. I am 20 years old and she will be turning 20 shortly. We have been dating for two months and have known each other since last spring. We are teammates on one of our school's sports teams. She is my second girlfriend (but my first at uni) and I am her second boyfriend (but her first at uni). We have gone up to third base (manual and oral). I am a virgin.
She doesn't want to have vaginal intercorse before marriage.
My highschool girlfriend said the same to me but I was okay with that since it was only high school. I don't know how comfortable I am now, as a 20 year old, with starting a long term relationship with a girl I will never have sex with.
Two questions:
1.)Right now I feel like I don't want to keep dating her, but only because of this. Otherwise she is a great girl and third base ain't bad. Will this bad feeling I get from knowing I'll never have sex with her ever get easier to handle?
2.) Would I be a douchebag to break up with her over this now before we get too attached to each other?
If I end up breaking up with her, I will have to see her multiple times a week at practice, which may be a problem.
if you dont see yourself having a future with her, i dont see why you should maintain a relationship with her.
Renegade on
Savior, conqueror, hero, villain.
0
MrMisterJesus dying on the cross in pain? Morally better than us. One has to go "all in".Registered Userregular
edited December 2006
If vaginal intercourse is too important to you to be in an abstinant relationship, and abstinance is too important to her to practice vaginal sex, then you two have a serious problem.
Still, I wouldn't sweat it. You'll likely eventually break up anyway, so you might as well enjoy what you say is an otherwise good relationship. And hey, if you wind up growing old with her, then it was worth the wait. I don't really see the rush to pop your cherry--it's not like manual and oral are that bad.
Well, if she doesn't want to have sex before marriage she's probably looking for a relationship with a solid future, and if you aren't then maybe you shouldn't be with her. If a sexual relationship is important to you (and there's nothing wrong with that) then you're obviously not going to get that with this girl. It'd be better to break up with her than end up pressuring her to have sex or whatever.
In the end, only you know whether she's an awesome girl who you want to be with regardless of sex. Personally I'd probably stick it out. I think ever man should be in a relationship without sex at least once in their life, it teaches you a lot.
1.)Right now I feel like I don't want to keep dating her, but only because of this. Otherwise she is a great girl and third base ain't bad. Will this bad feeling I get from knowing I'll never have sex with her ever get easier to handle?
It won't.
But the question you should be asking yourself is this: is this girl so great that she is worth being in a relationship with even though you know she won't have sex with you?
If she is that great, why don't you marry her?
If she is not that great, why don't you break up?
It is quite simple.
2.) Would I be a douchebag to break up with her over this now before we get too attached to each other?
No, you wouldn't. People have different tastes and preferences; a relationship without sex may not be your preference. I'm sure people will tell you it is shallow and you're an asshole or shit like that because people love passing judgments. Don't let it stand in the way of doing what you want to do, in this case, because those people don't know what is best for you and being in a relationship you don't want to be in will only hurt you in the long run.
If I end up breaking up with her, I will have to see her multiple times a week at practice, which may be a problem.
It will be a problem only if you perceive it as a problem, because the way you perceive it will affect how you handle it.
My highschool girlfriend said the same to me but I was okay with that since it was only high school. I don't know how comfortable I am now, as a 20 year old, with starting a long term relationship with a girl I will never have sex with.
This is where you lost me. Why "never?" Are you saying you won't marry her no matter how well the relationship turns out?
My highschool girlfriend said the same to me but I was okay with that since it was only high school. I don't know how comfortable I am now, as a 20 year old, with starting a long term relationship with a girl I will never have sex with.
This is where you lost me. Why "never?" Are you saying you won't marry her no matter how well the relationship turns out?
Plenty of people have wonderful relationships in college that could well result in happy marriages, were the two people not possessed of completely incompatible life goals.
1.)Will this bad feeling I get from knowing I'll never have sex with her ever get easier to handle?
Your desire to have full intercourse isn't going to go away, it would be unwise to assume that she'll change her mind about premarital sex at any time in the near future, it would be unkind of you to pressure her over it, and marriage isn't in the cards. Given that none of the things causing your feelings are going to change, it seems unlikely that this is going to become easier for you to deal with.
2.) Would I be a douchebag to break up with her over this now before we get too attached to each other?
You're looking for something she can't give you. Chances are, given that most people saving themselves for marriage are looking to marry sooner rather than later, she's looking for something you can't give her. Breaking it off now would not be a douchebag move unless you do it in a douchebag manner.
If I end up breaking up with her, I will have to see her multiple times a week at practice, which may be a problem.
If you act like a gentleman about it, you've done your part. You can't ensure that she won't turn it into a problem, of course, but your chances of nobody deciding to act like a dick are better the less emotional investment either of you have in this relationship. If you're pretty sure you want out, it's better to do it sooner rather than later.
Ecoterrorism is actually the single largest terrorist threat at the moment. They don't usually kill people, but they blow up or set on fire very expensive things.
Sex is an important part of most people's lives, and some would argue that the difference between a girlfriend/wife and a good friend is the sexual intimacy.
What that also means for many people is that sexual intimacy, such as vaginal intercourse, is too important an element to leave "to chance," and you might as well get it out of the way before marriage is even an issue.
So no, you're not shallow or a jerk if you say "look, this is really important to me. I can't imagine not having sex until I'm married, because that level of intimacy is something I want to share with someone and THEN know that they're the one for me."
As for the awkwardness, if you say that you think she's awesome but you're just not into the intimacy you have if you know it's a dead end, say you'll be friends but then STOP the intimacy.
I think if you're seriously considering breaking up with her over this, then you probably should. That would be highly preferable to leading her on for several months and then ditching her when someone more willing to put out comes along.
Of course, it all depends just how fixated on sex you actually are. I could tell you that there's more to life and relationships than constant fucking, that strong friendships and an ability to relate to a partner are more vital for a relationship to last than your penis/vagina compatibility but that might not necessarily be true for everybody. Neither argument is more sound - you aren't a jerk for wanting sex and she isn't a bitch for holding out.
I guess what you really need to do is sit down and have a long hard think about your future. Are you going to hate yourself for breaking up with her? Imagine losing her and how you'll feel without her around. If the concept of that doesn't hurt then you should probably break up. On the other hand, if the mere thought of life without her tears your heart apart and makes you want to kill yourself for even considering it, you might want to stick it out. If you really like her that much, then you'll get the sex eventually plus all the other great things that she already gives you and you won't regret breaking up with her for the rest of your life either.
I personally believe that you shouldn't even be considering marriage in the 20's, hell, the 30's at the earliest. Having said that, do you see your self with this girl in a relationship without sex 10 years down the track?
If the answer is no, then i believe you should end it/start looking for someone new. However, being a virgin, you are probably not too sure how important sex is in a relationship for you.
If sex is that important to you in the relationship and she doesn't want vaginal intercourse, you could ask her how she feels about anal.
Please be tactful and tasteful.
Put it in da....
Okay seriously, this isn't all together a bad suggestion. I've known of multiple women who didn't want to have vaginal sex, but were completely okay with having anal sex. Weird but true.
I personally believe that you shouldn't even be considering marriage in the 20's, hell, the 30's at the earliest. Having said that, do you see your self with this girl in a relationship without sex 10 years down the track?
If the answer is no, then i believe you should end it/start looking for someone new. However, being a virgin, you are probably not too sure how important sex is in a relationship for you.
This is a very true statement. I can't see myself getting married anytime soon (at the earliest would be 29 or so). It's hard to imagine marrying someone and then finding out you're not sexually compatible with somebody. Because trust me, there will be women you absolutely have fantastic sex with, and there will be women who just aren't going to do it for you. That's quite a chance to be making, especially if you're talking post-marriage.
I don't think you're a jerk for wanting to break up with her because of this. It boils down to you two just not being compatible, and that should be one of the foundations of a strong relationship, correct? If sex is important to you, don't lead her on. There's plenty of women out there who aren't worried about having sex until marriage. Plenty.
Magus`The fun has been DOUBLED!Registered Userregular
edited December 2006
As most people have said, if you don't see yourself ending up together, just break it off as well as you can.
I personally think it's rather foolish to wait that long because it would be really rather unfortunate to find out that the person you married and yourself aren't as good as you'd like in the sack.
Yes, you can practice but sometimes people just don't share the same tastes (rough vs gentle, on top vs on bottom, etc) and to find that stuff out after you're married is really problematic.
If she won't concede (and nothing against her if she doesn't) I highly suggest going out and finding someone who is more on your wavelength.
That being said, don't go with a girl just for sex, you still need all that emotional stuff, too.
I personally believe that you shouldn't even be considering marriage in the 20's, hell, the 30's at the earliest. Having said that, do you see your self with this girl in a relationship without sex 10 years down the track?
If the answer is no, then i believe you should end it/start looking for someone new. However, being a virgin, you are probably not too sure how important sex is in a relationship for you.
This is a very true statement. I can't see myself getting married anytime soon (at the earliest would be 29 or so).
Hey, that was noobert that wrote that, not me. Also, it's utter bollocks, you can start considering marriage whenever the hell you want. Plus, sex isn't the be-all and end-all of a relationship. You can have mediocre sex but a fantastic relationship and utterly amazing sex but an absolutely lousy relationship. In fact, if you judge a relationship squarely on the quality of the sex, you're likely to end up pretty miserable, because sex only lasts a couple of hours a day and that leaves another 22 hours of not-sex.
I think you need to have a talk with this girl about what your needs are and what her needs are. If they prove incompatible, then you should break off the relationship. Being open may help to resolve things more amicably.
Sex, as has been said, is not the be-all/end-all of a successful relationship, but it is a major component thereof, and worrying about it doesn't make you shallow or a jerk.
You can break up with her over it if you want. But the way I see it, these are the facts:
- To break up with her, you either have to tell her the truth and come across as a sex-obsessed asshole or lie to her and be a liar.
- You still get manual/oral/etc. You can still get your rocks off this way. I realise this isn't the same, but on a totally practical level, would you rather be jacking yourself off in the meantime?
- If this girl means so little to you that not having sex would cause you to break up with her, maybe you should break up with her.
I'm actually in a very similar situation, at least externally.
My girlfriend and I are both Sophomores in college. We've been going out for 4 years, having met in high school. Both of us have had 2 previous relationships, nothing serious. We're both virgins. I'm 20, she's 19. She actually made a "promise to God" that she wouldn't have sex (or go to third base, even, but that one's been forgotten occasionally) before marriage. Basically, we get each other off through our underwear.
We're both in the school chorale, and share a lot of the same friends as well.
It's really not a fun situation to be in. You're in college, sex all over the place, and you just... can't. My little brother is having sex now. You can't pressure her, that would pretty much be evil, but you can't not feel like you want more.
She, of course, wants to get married, and would be overjoyed if I proposed to her tomorrow. I just honestly know almost nothing about what I'll be doing in the future, so I don't feel like I can plan anything that permanent. I didn't even decide I wanted to major in physics until this semester, and I still haven't declared it. It wouldn't work monetarily, or with regard to living space, but she feels that getting engaged would make us more important as a couple in our family's eyes.
My problem is that I don't even think I can trust how I feel. Most of the time I'm happy- I'm a content guy in general- but when she's been too tired to do anything for a few nights in a row, or when we're fighting over something, I can't help but think that if I ended it, I would finally have a chance to have sex. It's tough to think that about someone you've been professing to love for so long- it makes you wonder how much was really what you felt, and what was just gut reaction and reflex.
Most of the time, when we fight, it's because she feel like she loves me more than I love her, because she wants to get married and I don't feel ready yet. If either of us really wanted to break up with the other one, we would have about a week ago.
I'm not sure I'm really qualified to give advice here, but what I'm thinking is that if this is what you want out of a relationship that doesn't end in marriage, it's fine to stay in it. If you like the girl enough to find out if you love her, I'd say it's worth it to give it more time at least. If not, it's probably best to break it off, and remain friends if possible.
I'm a bit weird in that my current girlfriend, myself, and both of my ex-girlfriends can all hang out together, and we do when we're back home. It probably helps that they broke up with me, and I'm an easy going guy. Still, it's possible you could end up the say way.
- To break up with her, you either have to tell her the truth and come across as a sex-obsessed asshole or lie to her and be a liar.
- You still get manual/oral/etc. You can still get your rocks off this way. I realise this isn't the same, but on a totally practical level, would you rather be jacking yourself off in the meantime?
- If this girl means so little to you that not having sex would cause you to break up with her, maybe you should break up with her.
Holy value judgements, batman. It's painfully obvious that your opinion is that sex shouldn't be that important to a relationship, but other people can and do hold a different opinion, the OP and myself included.
My advice to the OP would go along with the majority of those who've posted so far. You need to decide how important it is to you. If you can't make the sacrifice she's asking you to make, then you're just not compatible people, and I don't think there's any shame in breaking it off as long as you do it in a respectful manner.
Most of the time I'm happy- I'm a content guy in general- but when she's been too tired to do anything for a few nights in a row, or when we're fighting over something, I can't help but think that if I ended it, I would finally have a chance to have sex. It's tough to think that about someone you've been professing to love for so long- it makes you wonder how much was really what you felt, and what was just gut reaction and reflex.
This is why I disagree with the whole policy, personally. It creates a source of tension in the relationship, causing doubt, creating drama, all for the sake of a notion of courtship that I feel is now completely outdated and was never conducive to healthy relationships in the first place. But that's my opinion, and each individual needs to decide for themselves how important it is to them. If your feelings on the matter aren't compatible with your partner's feeling on the matter, then you're in for a rough ride if you choose to stay in the relationship.
It seems to me, that sex *IS* an important thing in every relationship, or at least, people's opinions about it are.
Her opinion that it's *not* important, and that she can have a full relationship without it until she gets married is a significant opinion.
Your thoughts that it *is* important are also telling of who you are, and where you are in your life with regards to relationships.
It's obvious to me (and I've long held this opinion myself) that sex and opinions about it are very important to a serious relationship, and that if both people don't feel the same way, it'll cause nothing but trouble. Also, the whole "saving it for marriage" thing often comes with a load of other beliefs which you may or may not share.
Personally, I decided long ago that I'd never enter into a relationship with someone that was waiting until marriage, because I'm not, and it's an important thing to me, and I don't think trying to get either person to compromise their values is a good idea.
Not to put words in this girl's mouth, but as someone who practiced abstinence for a long time myself, the decision to not have sex is not the same as thinking that sex is not important. In fact, sex is very important, just in a different way than it is to the OP. There are any number of associations, related to religion or otherwise, that factor into that choice, and none of them are, "sex is not important to me." I think that's a gross mischaracterization.
Your values do not match up with her values. To tell you the truth, if you dated her, you would probably eventually get her to have sex, but you're going to have a deep seeded feeling of douchebaggery and regret for the rest of your life when you see what it does to her.
Despite what people may tell you, sex is an important part of any relationship. Since you obviously feel you're not in a fulfilling relationship with this girl, dragging it out while your affection for her decreases is not a good thing on either of you. Better to cut it off.
the decision to not have sex is not the same as thinking that sex is not important. In fact, sex is very important, just in a different way than it is to the OP. There are any number of associations, related to religion or otherwise, that factor into that choice, and none of them are, "sex is not important to me." I think that's a gross mischaracterization.
Fair enough. "Important" was probably a poor choice of words on my part. Like Grandaddy said, it's a difference in values between the OP and his girlfriend. The OP seems to value sex and intimacy in his relationships, his girlfriend appears to value abstinence and saving her virginity for a future husband, and the two value sets are fundamentally at odds with each other. For the record, I don't think either of them gets to claim a moral high ground here, as this is a pretty fundamental personal choice. As such, if neither of them is willing to compromise their values to suit the other person, then it's a mismatch over attitudes toward sexual conduct in the relationship. I would think it would be extremely difficult to keep that from eventually becoming a problem in one way or another.
But the question you should be asking yourself is this: is this girl so great that she is worth being in a relationship with even though you know she won't have sex with you?
If she is that great, why don't you marry her?
Because he's 20, and that would be a horrible, horrible mistake.
But the question you should be asking yourself is this: is this girl so great that she is worth being in a relationship with even though you know she won't have sex with you?
If she is that great, why don't you marry her?
Because he's 20, and that would be a horrible, horrible mistake.
As someone who got married shortly after turning 21, I have to disagree; that's not always the case.
That said, marrying someone who obviously has values incompatible with your own is a terrible idea.
To tell you the truth, if you dated her, you would probably eventually get her to have sex, but you're going to have a deep seeded feeling of douchebaggery and regret for the rest of your life when you see what it does to her.
Have a nice day.
:roll:
OP here. Everything besides this has been great so far, guys. Thanks for all the input, I'll take it all into consideration.
The plan right now is to have a talk with her about this and tell her that it does bother me a lot, but not enough for me to want to break up with her (worded more tactfully, of course). I'm not going to see her for a few days so I have that time to think about this some more, so more advice is welcome.
I was about to reply that marrying at 20 is, in and of itself, not stupid... but I was beat to it! :P
I do agree however, that if that is the one and only stickler for you about this person, you should ask yourself if you could see going down that road with her. She may change her mind later and decide to get get down and have sex, but you should not go into it thinking that she will.
So, that said... You wither decide that you absolutely must have sex, and her refusal is unacceptable, which means let her down gently now.
Or, you decide you may in fact see marrying this girl as a possibility, or are uncertain but feel the rest of the relationship is worth enough to stick with it and find out.
Your call, no one here is going to be able to answer which of those is best for you.
And you won't be an ass for dumping her for no sex now, you'd be an ass if you stayed with her either in the hopes of getting in her pants down the line, or leading her on that you could be looking to marry her then dumping her when you feel like it.
- To break up with her, you either have to tell her the truth and come across as a sex-obsessed asshole or lie to her and be a liar.
- You still get manual/oral/etc. You can still get your rocks off this way. I realise this isn't the same, but on a totally practical level, would you rather be jacking yourself off in the meantime?
- If this girl means so little to you that not having sex would cause you to break up with her, maybe you should break up with her.
Holy value judgements, batman. It's painfully obvious that your opinion is that sex shouldn't be that important to a relationship, but other people can and do hold a different opinion, the OP and myself included.
Untrue. I just don't think it's everything. However, reading through, my advice is poor and unnecessary; at this early stage the OP is absolutely within his rights to dump her and run. If this kind of obstacle - which is quite major as we agree - has come up so early on, what kind of compatability problems will come later?
But the question you should be asking yourself is this: is this girl so great that she is worth being in a relationship with even though you know she won't have sex with you?
If she is that great, why don't you marry her?
Because he's 20, and that would be a horrible, horrible mistake.
As someone who got married shortly after turning 21, I have to disagree; that's not always the case.
That said, marrying someone who obviously has values incompatible with your own is a terrible idea.
Given the way he is speaking of his situation, it would be a horrible, horrible mistake.
I am not willing to marry a girl I've never had sex with. This is something that I would need to bring up in serious conversation if I'm dating a girl who is not willing to have sex before marriage, because it will eventually become a problem if something else doesn't first. That's just me, though. There's a thing about relationship expectations needing to be roughly compatible, and if they're not at all, there's a problem.
AbsoluteZeroThe new film by Quentin KoopantinoRegistered Userregular
edited December 2006
Dude I dated my girlfriend for 4 years before we ever had sex. I have no complaints about it at all. Yeah, waiting wasn't fun, I was a virgin too. This kind of thing just isn't worth breaking up over, and I can only imagine the backlash of dumping a girl because she wouldn't "put out."
Dating isn't about sex. If sex is all you are looking for in a girlfriend, you have looked in completely the wrong place with this girl. Don't break up with her unless this is the case.
Dude I dated my girlfriend for 4 years before we ever had sex. I have no complaints about it at all. Yeah, waiting wasn't fun, I was a virgin too. This kind of thing just isn't worth breaking up over, and I can only imagine the backlash of dumping a girl because she wouldn't "put out."
Dating isn't about sex. If sex is all you are looking for in a girlfriend, you have looked in completely the wrong place with this girl. Don't break up with her unless this is the case.
Dude I dated my girlfriend for 4 years before we ever had sex. I have no complaints about it at all. Yeah, waiting wasn't fun, I was a virgin too. This kind of thing just isn't worth breaking up over, and I can only imagine the backlash of dumping a girl because she wouldn't "put out."
Dating isn't about sex. If sex is all you are looking for in a girlfriend, you have looked in completely the wrong place with this girl. Don't break up with her unless this is the case.
isn't dating about like, I don't know, getting to know each other before making a commitment? and dating in other places, could be about hardcore promiscous sex,
But the question you should be asking yourself is this: is this girl so great that she is worth being in a relationship with even though you know she won't have sex with you?
If she is that great, why don't you marry her?
Because he's 20, and that would be a horrible, horrible mistake.
I agree, but that is his decision to make. And I laid it out in front of him very simply: if she is that great, marry her. If not, break up with her.
The idea is that, like you said, according to the way he describes it, she is not the one. But that is his decision; I'm not giving him the answer, I'm showing him the path.
Yeah, if it turns out you two aren't sexually compatible... well... a healthy sexual relationship is part of a happy marriage.
But what actually constitutes sexual compatibility? She's a girl, he's a guy, they're both heterosexual and presumably attracted to each other. You don't need to validate sexual compatibility by fucking, it becomes pretty obvious if you are sexually compatible if you get a boner when she walks in the room and she gets all flushed when you say hello to her.
There also seems to be a rather naive presumption that for 'the sex to be good' you need to be bedroom gymnasts. This is an unequivocal myth as well. The sex is good when the two people having sex have strong feelings for one another. It can be vanilla missionary and still be incredible sex, so long as you both want each other and submit to it.
I don't think there's anything wrong with wanting sex before marriage but I do think that a lot of people have wildly inaccurate and unrealistic impressions of what sex should be like and how critical it is to a relationship. It's important, yes, but finding a girl that can suck your dick while doing back-flips should be of minor importance when looking for a long-term partner.
I can't advise the OP either way, because it really is his decision, I just hope he makes it based on what he feels is best for him rather than what the media would have him believe is right.
It's important, yes, but finding a girl that can suck your dick while doing back-flips should be of minor importance when looking for a long-term partner.
Just so you know: trying to figure out the practical logistics of that scenario has pretty much made my brain implode. With sexy results!
It's important, yes, but finding a girl that can suck your dick while doing back-flips should be of minor importance when looking for a long-term partner.
Just so you know: trying to figure out the practical logistics of that scenario has pretty much made my brain implode. With sexy results!
Posts
Still, I wouldn't sweat it. You'll likely eventually break up anyway, so you might as well enjoy what you say is an otherwise good relationship. And hey, if you wind up growing old with her, then it was worth the wait. I don't really see the rush to pop your cherry--it's not like manual and oral are that bad.
In the end, only you know whether she's an awesome girl who you want to be with regardless of sex. Personally I'd probably stick it out. I think ever man should be in a relationship without sex at least once in their life, it teaches you a lot.
It won't.
But the question you should be asking yourself is this: is this girl so great that she is worth being in a relationship with even though you know she won't have sex with you?
If she is that great, why don't you marry her?
If she is not that great, why don't you break up?
It is quite simple.
No, you wouldn't. People have different tastes and preferences; a relationship without sex may not be your preference. I'm sure people will tell you it is shallow and you're an asshole or shit like that because people love passing judgments. Don't let it stand in the way of doing what you want to do, in this case, because those people don't know what is best for you and being in a relationship you don't want to be in will only hurt you in the long run.
It will be a problem only if you perceive it as a problem, because the way you perceive it will affect how you handle it.
If sex is that important to you in the relationship and she doesn't want vaginal intercourse, you could ask her how she feels about anal.
Please be tactful and tasteful.
Your desire to have full intercourse isn't going to go away, it would be unwise to assume that she'll change her mind about premarital sex at any time in the near future, it would be unkind of you to pressure her over it, and marriage isn't in the cards. Given that none of the things causing your feelings are going to change, it seems unlikely that this is going to become easier for you to deal with.
You're looking for something she can't give you. Chances are, given that most people saving themselves for marriage are looking to marry sooner rather than later, she's looking for something you can't give her. Breaking it off now would not be a douchebag move unless you do it in a douchebag manner.
If you act like a gentleman about it, you've done your part. You can't ensure that she won't turn it into a problem, of course, but your chances of nobody deciding to act like a dick are better the less emotional investment either of you have in this relationship. If you're pretty sure you want out, it's better to do it sooner rather than later.
What that also means for many people is that sexual intimacy, such as vaginal intercourse, is too important an element to leave "to chance," and you might as well get it out of the way before marriage is even an issue.
So no, you're not shallow or a jerk if you say "look, this is really important to me. I can't imagine not having sex until I'm married, because that level of intimacy is something I want to share with someone and THEN know that they're the one for me."
As for the awkwardness, if you say that you think she's awesome but you're just not into the intimacy you have if you know it's a dead end, say you'll be friends but then STOP the intimacy.
Of course, it all depends just how fixated on sex you actually are. I could tell you that there's more to life and relationships than constant fucking, that strong friendships and an ability to relate to a partner are more vital for a relationship to last than your penis/vagina compatibility but that might not necessarily be true for everybody. Neither argument is more sound - you aren't a jerk for wanting sex and she isn't a bitch for holding out.
I guess what you really need to do is sit down and have a long hard think about your future. Are you going to hate yourself for breaking up with her? Imagine losing her and how you'll feel without her around. If the concept of that doesn't hurt then you should probably break up. On the other hand, if the mere thought of life without her tears your heart apart and makes you want to kill yourself for even considering it, you might want to stick it out. If you really like her that much, then you'll get the sex eventually plus all the other great things that she already gives you and you won't regret breaking up with her for the rest of your life either.
If the answer is no, then i believe you should end it/start looking for someone new. However, being a virgin, you are probably not too sure how important sex is in a relationship for you.
Put it in da....
Okay seriously, this isn't all together a bad suggestion. I've known of multiple women who didn't want to have vaginal sex, but were completely okay with having anal sex. Weird but true.
This is a very true statement. I can't see myself getting married anytime soon (at the earliest would be 29 or so). It's hard to imagine marrying someone and then finding out you're not sexually compatible with somebody. Because trust me, there will be women you absolutely have fantastic sex with, and there will be women who just aren't going to do it for you. That's quite a chance to be making, especially if you're talking post-marriage.
I don't think you're a jerk for wanting to break up with her because of this. It boils down to you two just not being compatible, and that should be one of the foundations of a strong relationship, correct? If sex is important to you, don't lead her on. There's plenty of women out there who aren't worried about having sex until marriage. Plenty.
I personally think it's rather foolish to wait that long because it would be really rather unfortunate to find out that the person you married and yourself aren't as good as you'd like in the sack.
Yes, you can practice but sometimes people just don't share the same tastes (rough vs gentle, on top vs on bottom, etc) and to find that stuff out after you're married is really problematic.
If she won't concede (and nothing against her if she doesn't) I highly suggest going out and finding someone who is more on your wavelength.
That being said, don't go with a girl just for sex, you still need all that emotional stuff, too.
Steam Profile | Signature art by Alexandra 'Lexxy' Douglass
Hey, that was noobert that wrote that, not me. Also, it's utter bollocks, you can start considering marriage whenever the hell you want. Plus, sex isn't the be-all and end-all of a relationship. You can have mediocre sex but a fantastic relationship and utterly amazing sex but an absolutely lousy relationship. In fact, if you judge a relationship squarely on the quality of the sex, you're likely to end up pretty miserable, because sex only lasts a couple of hours a day and that leaves another 22 hours of not-sex.
Sex, as has been said, is not the be-all/end-all of a successful relationship, but it is a major component thereof, and worrying about it doesn't make you shallow or a jerk.
- To break up with her, you either have to tell her the truth and come across as a sex-obsessed asshole or lie to her and be a liar.
- You still get manual/oral/etc. You can still get your rocks off this way. I realise this isn't the same, but on a totally practical level, would you rather be jacking yourself off in the meantime?
- If this girl means so little to you that not having sex would cause you to break up with her, maybe you should break up with her.
www.rockmidgets.com
The answer is NO... it's quite the opposite
My girlfriend and I are both Sophomores in college. We've been going out for 4 years, having met in high school. Both of us have had 2 previous relationships, nothing serious. We're both virgins. I'm 20, she's 19. She actually made a "promise to God" that she wouldn't have sex (or go to third base, even, but that one's been forgotten occasionally) before marriage. Basically, we get each other off through our underwear.
We're both in the school chorale, and share a lot of the same friends as well.
It's really not a fun situation to be in. You're in college, sex all over the place, and you just... can't. My little brother is having sex now. You can't pressure her, that would pretty much be evil, but you can't not feel like you want more.
She, of course, wants to get married, and would be overjoyed if I proposed to her tomorrow. I just honestly know almost nothing about what I'll be doing in the future, so I don't feel like I can plan anything that permanent. I didn't even decide I wanted to major in physics until this semester, and I still haven't declared it. It wouldn't work monetarily, or with regard to living space, but she feels that getting engaged would make us more important as a couple in our family's eyes.
My problem is that I don't even think I can trust how I feel. Most of the time I'm happy- I'm a content guy in general- but when she's been too tired to do anything for a few nights in a row, or when we're fighting over something, I can't help but think that if I ended it, I would finally have a chance to have sex. It's tough to think that about someone you've been professing to love for so long- it makes you wonder how much was really what you felt, and what was just gut reaction and reflex.
Most of the time, when we fight, it's because she feel like she loves me more than I love her, because she wants to get married and I don't feel ready yet. If either of us really wanted to break up with the other one, we would have about a week ago.
I'm not sure I'm really qualified to give advice here, but what I'm thinking is that if this is what you want out of a relationship that doesn't end in marriage, it's fine to stay in it. If you like the girl enough to find out if you love her, I'd say it's worth it to give it more time at least. If not, it's probably best to break it off, and remain friends if possible.
I'm a bit weird in that my current girlfriend, myself, and both of my ex-girlfriends can all hang out together, and we do when we're back home. It probably helps that they broke up with me, and I'm an easy going guy. Still, it's possible you could end up the say way.
My advice to the OP would go along with the majority of those who've posted so far. You need to decide how important it is to you. If you can't make the sacrifice she's asking you to make, then you're just not compatible people, and I don't think there's any shame in breaking it off as long as you do it in a respectful manner.
This is why I disagree with the whole policy, personally. It creates a source of tension in the relationship, causing doubt, creating drama, all for the sake of a notion of courtship that I feel is now completely outdated and was never conducive to healthy relationships in the first place. But that's my opinion, and each individual needs to decide for themselves how important it is to them. If your feelings on the matter aren't compatible with your partner's feeling on the matter, then you're in for a rough ride if you choose to stay in the relationship.
Her opinion that it's *not* important, and that she can have a full relationship without it until she gets married is a significant opinion.
Your thoughts that it *is* important are also telling of who you are, and where you are in your life with regards to relationships.
It's obvious to me (and I've long held this opinion myself) that sex and opinions about it are very important to a serious relationship, and that if both people don't feel the same way, it'll cause nothing but trouble. Also, the whole "saving it for marriage" thing often comes with a load of other beliefs which you may or may not share.
Personally, I decided long ago that I'd never enter into a relationship with someone that was waiting until marriage, because I'm not, and it's an important thing to me, and I don't think trying to get either person to compromise their values is a good idea.
Luckily, I never got put into that situation.
Have a nice day.
2 months is a piece of shit amount of time. Every second that you extend this relationship is just making it harder for you to break up.
As someone who got married shortly after turning 21, I have to disagree; that's not always the case.
That said, marrying someone who obviously has values incompatible with your own is a terrible idea.
:roll:
OP here. Everything besides this has been great so far, guys. Thanks for all the input, I'll take it all into consideration.
The plan right now is to have a talk with her about this and tell her that it does bother me a lot, but not enough for me to want to break up with her (worded more tactfully, of course). I'm not going to see her for a few days so I have that time to think about this some more, so more advice is welcome.
I do agree however, that if that is the one and only stickler for you about this person, you should ask yourself if you could see going down that road with her. She may change her mind later and decide to get get down and have sex, but you should not go into it thinking that she will.
So, that said... You wither decide that you absolutely must have sex, and her refusal is unacceptable, which means let her down gently now.
Or, you decide you may in fact see marrying this girl as a possibility, or are uncertain but feel the rest of the relationship is worth enough to stick with it and find out.
Your call, no one here is going to be able to answer which of those is best for you.
And you won't be an ass for dumping her for no sex now, you'd be an ass if you stayed with her either in the hopes of getting in her pants down the line, or leading her on that you could be looking to marry her then dumping her when you feel like it.
Untrue. I just don't think it's everything. However, reading through, my advice is poor and unnecessary; at this early stage the OP is absolutely within his rights to dump her and run. If this kind of obstacle - which is quite major as we agree - has come up so early on, what kind of compatability problems will come later?
www.rockmidgets.com
Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
Dating isn't about sex. If sex is all you are looking for in a girlfriend, you have looked in completely the wrong place with this girl. Don't break up with her unless this is the case.
so what then IS about sex, if not dating?
What?
ask david deangelo. he knows bout that.
I agree, but that is his decision to make. And I laid it out in front of him very simply: if she is that great, marry her. If not, break up with her.
The idea is that, like you said, according to the way he describes it, she is not the one. But that is his decision; I'm not giving him the answer, I'm showing him the path.
But what actually constitutes sexual compatibility? She's a girl, he's a guy, they're both heterosexual and presumably attracted to each other. You don't need to validate sexual compatibility by fucking, it becomes pretty obvious if you are sexually compatible if you get a boner when she walks in the room and she gets all flushed when you say hello to her.
There also seems to be a rather naive presumption that for 'the sex to be good' you need to be bedroom gymnasts. This is an unequivocal myth as well. The sex is good when the two people having sex have strong feelings for one another. It can be vanilla missionary and still be incredible sex, so long as you both want each other and submit to it.
I don't think there's anything wrong with wanting sex before marriage but I do think that a lot of people have wildly inaccurate and unrealistic impressions of what sex should be like and how critical it is to a relationship. It's important, yes, but finding a girl that can suck your dick while doing back-flips should be of minor importance when looking for a long-term partner.
I can't advise the OP either way, because it really is his decision, I just hope he makes it based on what he feels is best for him rather than what the media would have him believe is right.
Just so you know: trying to figure out the practical logistics of that scenario has pretty much made my brain implode. With sexy results!
I have got to convince my wife to try this.
And if not, then I'll dump her.