The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.
FandyienBut Otto, what about us? Registered Userregular
edited May 2009
I spent two weeks looking forward to mammoth after spotting an advertisement for it and then I was just really toasted and I caught the last five minutes
Someone link that article that mentioned that girls who give you blowjobs are more likely to get pregnant because their bodies learn to recognise your sperm or something like that.
Someone link that article that mentioned that girls who give you blowjobs are more likely to get pregnant because their bodies learn to recognise your sperm or something like that.
Someone link that article that mentioned that girls who give you blowjobs are more likely to get pregnant because their bodies learn to recognise your sperm or something like that.
what?
Yeah no joke, it was science!
that doesn't sound very likely!
I can't for the life of me remember where I saw the article, and what the exact premise behind it was, but I don't really feel like googling for it.
I can't help but feel slightly disappointed with that new Dawkins book. Not that Dawkins is bringing out a new book, but that such a book is even necessary. Who is the target audience for that book? Is it simply people who are on the fence about evolution, or is it for those bible thumping creationist nuts?
I can't help but feel slightly disappointed with that new Dawkins book. Not that Dawkins is bringing out a new book, but that such a book is even necessary. Who is the target audience for that book? Is it simply people who are on the fence about evolution, or is it for those bible thumping creationist nuts?
The target audience is hopefully broad. But unfortunately I have a feeling only people who already accept and understand evolution will buy it. After The God Delusion he's probably seen as too extreme for the hardcore religious to even consider taking him seriously.
Hopefully it will be a good read like his other books and some of those on the fence will come to understand evolution better.
Someone link that article that mentioned that girls who give you blowjobs are more likely to get pregnant because their bodies learn to recognise your sperm or something like that.
what?
Yeah no joke, it was science!
that doesn't sound very likely!
I can't for the life of me remember where I saw the article, and what the exact premise behind it was, but I don't really feel like googling for it.
Surely it would work the other way around and they'd develop anti-bodies to fight off your sperm more efficiently in the future?
Now if you were to drop a load right into their bone marrow...
I can't help but feel slightly disappointed with that new Dawkins book. Not that Dawkins is bringing out a new book, but that such a book is even necessary. Who is the target audience for that book? Is it simply people who are on the fence about evolution, or is it for those bible thumping creationist nuts?
The target audience is hopefully broad. But unfortunately I have a feeling only people who already accept and understand evolution will buy it. After The God Delusion he's probably seen as too extreme for the hardcore religious to even consider taking him seriously.
Hopefully it will be a good read like his other books and some of those on the fence will come to understand evolution better.
Maybe. I really hope this book causes a fucking earthquake on the side of the religious right, though. If it's covered by lots of news outlets as an item of controversy, that can only increase the amount of people that are going to read it.
But yeah, I'm still disappointed that such a book is still necessary in the 21st fucking century.
I can't help but feel slightly disappointed with that new Dawkins book. Not that Dawkins is bringing out a new book, but that such a book is even necessary. Who is the target audience for that book? Is it simply people who are on the fence about evolution, or is it for those bible thumping creationist nuts?
The target audience is hopefully broad. But unfortunately I have a feeling only people who already accept and understand evolution will buy it. After The God Delusion he's probably seen as too extreme for the hardcore religious to even consider taking him seriously.
Hopefully it will be a good read like his other books and some of those on the fence will come to understand evolution better.
Maybe. I really hope this book causes a fucking earthquake on the side of the religious right, though. If it's covered by lots of news outlets as an item of controversy, that can only increase the amount of people that are going to read it.
But yeah, I'm still disappointed that such a book is still necessary in the 21st fucking century.
I can't help but feel slightly disappointed with that new Dawkins book. Not that Dawkins is bringing out a new book, but that such a book is even necessary. Who is the target audience for that book? Is it simply people who are on the fence about evolution, or is it for those bible thumping creationist nuts?
The target audience is hopefully broad. But unfortunately I have a feeling only people who already accept and understand evolution will buy it. After The God Delusion he's probably seen as too extreme for the hardcore religious to even consider taking him seriously.
Hopefully it will be a good read like his other books and some of those on the fence will come to understand evolution better.
Maybe. I really hope this book causes a fucking earthquake on the side of the religious right, though. If it's covered by lots of news outlets as an item of controversy, that can only increase the amount of people that are going to read it.
But yeah, I'm still disappointed that such a book is still necessary in the 21st fucking century.
This strikes me as staggeringly naive.
How so? Do you mean I'm underestimating how few people accept evolution? I'm not quite following you.
I can't help but feel slightly disappointed with that new Dawkins book. Not that Dawkins is bringing out a new book, but that such a book is even necessary. Who is the target audience for that book? Is it simply people who are on the fence about evolution, or is it for those bible thumping creationist nuts?
The target audience is hopefully broad. But unfortunately I have a feeling only people who already accept and understand evolution will buy it. After The God Delusion he's probably seen as too extreme for the hardcore religious to even consider taking him seriously.
Hopefully it will be a good read like his other books and some of those on the fence will come to understand evolution better.
Maybe. I really hope this book causes a fucking earthquake on the side of the religious right, though. If it's covered by lots of news outlets as an item of controversy, that can only increase the amount of people that are going to read it.
But yeah, I'm still disappointed that such a book is still necessary in the 21st fucking century.
This strikes me as staggeringly naive.
How so? Do you mean I'm underestimating how few people accept evolution? I'm not quite following you.
The world is a big place with many cultures and many styles and levels of education.
In what could prove to be a landmark discovery, a leading paleontologist said scientists have dug up the 47 million-year-old fossil of an ancient primate whose features suggest it could be the common ancestor of all later monkeys, apes and humans.
Anthropologists have long believed that humans evolved from ancient ape-like ancestors. Some 50 million years ago, two ape-like groups walked the Earth. One is known as the tarsidae, a precursor of the tarsier, a tiny, large-eyed creature that lives in Asia. Another group is known as the adapidae, a precursor of today's lemurs in Madagascar.
In what could prove to be a landmark discovery, a leading paleontologist said scientists have dug up the 47 million-year-old fossil of an ancient primate whose features suggest it could be the common ancestor of all later monkeys, apes and humans.
Anthropologists have long believed that humans evolved from ancient ape-like ancestors. Some 50 million years ago, two ape-like groups walked the Earth. One is known as the tarsidae, a precursor of the tarsier, a tiny, large-eyed creature that lives in Asia. Another group is known as the adapidae, a precursor of today's lemurs in Madagascar.
I can't help but feel slightly disappointed with that new Dawkins book. Not that Dawkins is bringing out a new book, but that such a book is even necessary. Who is the target audience for that book? Is it simply people who are on the fence about evolution, or is it for those bible thumping creationist nuts?
The target audience is hopefully broad. But unfortunately I have a feeling only people who already accept and understand evolution will buy it. After The God Delusion he's probably seen as too extreme for the hardcore religious to even consider taking him seriously.
Hopefully it will be a good read like his other books and some of those on the fence will come to understand evolution better.
Maybe. I really hope this book causes a fucking earthquake on the side of the religious right, though. If it's covered by lots of news outlets as an item of controversy, that can only increase the amount of people that are going to read it.
But yeah, I'm still disappointed that such a book is still necessary in the 21st fucking century.
This strikes me as staggeringly naive.
How so? Do you mean I'm underestimating how few people accept evolution? I'm not quite following you.
The world is a big place with many cultures and many styles and levels of education.
I can't help but feel slightly disappointed with that new Dawkins book. Not that Dawkins is bringing out a new book, but that such a book is even necessary. Who is the target audience for that book? Is it simply people who are on the fence about evolution, or is it for those bible thumping creationist nuts?
The target audience is hopefully broad. But unfortunately I have a feeling only people who already accept and understand evolution will buy it. After The God Delusion he's probably seen as too extreme for the hardcore religious to even consider taking him seriously.
Hopefully it will be a good read like his other books and some of those on the fence will come to understand evolution better.
Maybe. I really hope this book causes a fucking earthquake on the side of the religious right, though. If it's covered by lots of news outlets as an item of controversy, that can only increase the amount of people that are going to read it.
But yeah, I'm still disappointed that such a book is still necessary in the 21st fucking century.
This strikes me as staggeringly naive.
How so? Do you mean I'm underestimating how few people accept evolution? I'm not quite following you.
The world is a big place with many cultures and many styles and levels of education.
In what could prove to be a landmark discovery, a leading paleontologist said scientists have dug up the 47 million-year-old fossil of an ancient primate whose features suggest it could be the common ancestor of all later monkeys, apes and humans.
Anthropologists have long believed that humans evolved from ancient ape-like ancestors. Some 50 million years ago, two ape-like groups walked the Earth. One is known as the tarsidae, a precursor of the tarsier, a tiny, large-eyed creature that lives in Asia. Another group is known as the adapidae, a precursor of today's lemurs in Madagascar.
In what could prove to be a landmark discovery, a leading paleontologist said scientists have dug up the 47 million-year-old fossil of an ancient primate whose features suggest it could be the common ancestor of all later monkeys, apes and humans.
Anthropologists have long believed that humans evolved from ancient ape-like ancestors. Some 50 million years ago, two ape-like groups walked the Earth. One is known as the tarsidae, a precursor of the tarsier, a tiny, large-eyed creature that lives in Asia. Another group is known as the adapidae, a precursor of today's lemurs in Madagascar.
Fucking sweet.
Yeah, but where are the fossils that link those 3 together? Evilution is full of these types of holes!
In what could prove to be a landmark discovery, a leading paleontologist said scientists have dug up the 47 million-year-old fossil of an ancient primate whose features suggest it could be the common ancestor of all later monkeys, apes and humans.
Anthropologists have long believed that humans evolved from ancient ape-like ancestors. Some 50 million years ago, two ape-like groups walked the Earth. One is known as the tarsidae, a precursor of the tarsier, a tiny, large-eyed creature that lives in Asia. Another group is known as the adapidae, a precursor of today's lemurs in Madagascar.
Fucking sweet.
Yeah, but where are the fossils that link those 3 together? Evilution is full of these types of holes!
In what could prove to be a landmark discovery, a leading paleontologist said scientists have dug up the 47 million-year-old fossil of an ancient primate whose features suggest it could be the common ancestor of all later monkeys, apes and humans.
Anthropologists have long believed that humans evolved from ancient ape-like ancestors. Some 50 million years ago, two ape-like groups walked the Earth. One is known as the tarsidae, a precursor of the tarsier, a tiny, large-eyed creature that lives in Asia. Another group is known as the adapidae, a precursor of today's lemurs in Madagascar.
Fucking sweet.
Yeah, but where are the fossils that link those 3 together? Evilution is full of these types of holes!
But my absolute favouritest stuff is when we find really really ancient humans because it confuses the fuck out of the morons which insist that the world is like <7,000 years old
I mean I can love all the world like a brother or a hot step-sister and I don't care about faith and religion but it's beyond me how anyone can think that while maintaining the brain power necessary to breathe
Scientists have unveiled a 47-million-year-old fossilised skeleton of a monkey hailed as the missing link in human evolution.
The search for a direct connection between humans and the rest of the animal kingdom has taken 200 years - but it was presented to the world today at a special news conference in New York.
The discovery of the 95%-complete 'lemur monkey' - dubbed Ida - is described by experts as the "eighth wonder of the world".
They say its impact on the world of palaeontology will be "somewhat like an asteroid falling down to Earth".
Posts
It was just
what
Nice. I'll have to pick it up when it comes out.
A thousand nano-peen uses, that is.
I think I've seen Pterodactyl, too. And the one with the conquistadors versus the T-Rex. I should have a marathon someday.
"Sandra has a good solid anti-murderer vibe. My skin felt very secure and sufficiently attached to my body when I met her. Also my organs." HAIL SATAN
Awesome, going back to his roots I see
Yeah no joke, it was science!
His youtube channel is also awesome.
http://www.youtube.com/user/richarddawkinsdotnet?blend=1&ob=4
that doesn't sound very likely!
I can't for the life of me remember where I saw the article, and what the exact premise behind it was, but I don't really feel like googling for it.
Unlike Honda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwRCBHhyrAA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjyWP2LfbyQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fB_1gPRCLCo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2VCfOC69jc
The target audience is hopefully broad. But unfortunately I have a feeling only people who already accept and understand evolution will buy it. After The God Delusion he's probably seen as too extreme for the hardcore religious to even consider taking him seriously.
Hopefully it will be a good read like his other books and some of those on the fence will come to understand evolution better.
Don't worry
it's still true with crocodiles.
Surely it would work the other way around and they'd develop anti-bodies to fight off your sperm more efficiently in the future?
Now if you were to drop a load right into their bone marrow...
But yeah, I'm still disappointed that such a book is still necessary in the 21st fucking century.
This strikes me as staggeringly naive.
The world is a big place with many cultures and many styles and levels of education.
Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
Fucking sweet.
Point taken.
Quite so old bean.
Another glass of sherry?
Yeah, but where are the fossils that link those 3 together? Evilution is full of these types of holes!
I'll fill your hole with my dick.
Am I doing this right?
One gap filled means another two gaps are made!
Bacteria mouthed dragons was one of the last threads I held on to.
moar like venomfang-x
oh god, no
But my absolute favouritest stuff is when we find really really ancient humans because it confuses the fuck out of the morons which insist that the world is like <7,000 years old
I mean I can love all the world like a brother or a hot step-sister and I don't care about faith and religion but it's beyond me how anyone can think that while maintaining the brain power necessary to breathe
post avatar or gtfo