The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Samurai [CHAT]ploo

1568101162

Posts

  • gogglesgoggles Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Loomdun wrote: »
    but a stripper could easily handle more children then full grown adults at one time

    Please elaborate here.

    goggles on
  • crawdaddiocrawdaddio Tacoma, WARegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Holy fuck, you grew up in Tacoma? What school did you go to? How old are you?

    EDIT: And, now that the excitement has worn off, Tacoma wasn't that bad, you wuss.

    crawdaddio on
  • LoomdunLoomdun Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    goggles wrote: »
    Loomdun wrote: »
    but a stripper could easily handle more children then full grown adults at one time

    Please elaborate here.

    well a full grown man would require all the attention because there so big, but little children could pick and chose spots, it would be like the stripper is wearing a thong/braw of children

    Loomdun on
    splat
  • MetalbourneMetalbourne Inside a cluster b personalityRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Loomdun wrote: »
    goggles wrote: »
    Loomdun wrote: »
    but a stripper could easily handle more children then full grown adults at one time

    Please elaborate here.

    well a full grown man would require all the attention because there so big, but little children could pick and chose spots, it would be like the stripper is wearing a thong/braw of children

    Do you even know what a stripper is?

    Metalbourne on
  • LoomdunLoomdun Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    oh jeeze I just confused a hooker with a stripper.

    Just get both

    Loomdun on
    splat
  • crawdaddiocrawdaddio Tacoma, WARegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    I seem to have scared goggles away...:(



    [tiny]And I was just about to show him my new tattoo: "Goggles and craw, T-locs4life"[/tiny]

    crawdaddio on
  • gogglesgoggles Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    crawdaddio wrote: »
    Holy fuck, you grew up in Tacoma? What school did you go to? How old are you?

    EDIT: And, now that the excitement has worn off, Tacoma wasn't that bad, you wuss.

    SHHHHHH! Tacoma isn't bad at all, but people BELIEVE it's CRAAAAZY! I just play into that misconception to boost my street cred (i.e. I have none). It is also unfortunate that Tacoma rhymes with aroma. I defend the scent of my fair city of rearing.

    I actually grew up in south Tacoma, but went to elementary schools all over the city due to various programs.

    I could give away my identity now Mr. McLain, but that would spoil the game.

    Yes. I know your identity. It was all too easy.

    goggles on
  • crawdaddiocrawdaddio Tacoma, WARegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    I see you've changed your profile, Conner. I do concede the possibility, to those insistent upon it, that my obliviousness to the aforementioned aroma might possibly be due simply to my being so used to it. Various programs, eh? That might suggest either McCarver, or Wainright.

    EDIT: But do you know my first name?

    crawdaddio on
  • gogglesgoggles Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I see that you're swifter than I imagined.

    Yes Will, we went to Foss together, albeit our interactions were limited at the time.

    goggles on
  • crawdaddiocrawdaddio Tacoma, WARegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Well, Mr. Jeffries, I wonder how long you've been here without my having noticed. I mean, I suppose I could check, but my investigational skills aren't all that great, you see.

    (Though I must say, eighty-five days, sixteen hours, and fifty-five minutes in, you should really post more than the one drawing you had there.)

    crawdaddio on
  • VeritasVeritas Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I don't know if its too late to talk about group projects (or are we on to Tacoma now?) but having just gone through a big one in my last class it wasn't too bad. We had one bad group member but we were luckily a larger group so it didn't affect us too bad - the grade was also partially based on group evaluations so if you didn't do what you were supposed to then you probably didn't get a good review. You were actually accountable to your group and not just the professor.

    Generally speaking though I'm with ND - group projects are usually my projects with their 20% thrown in. This was probably the first group project I've done in a long time a where I didn't have to do the majority of the work.

    Veritas on
  • gogglesgoggles Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Now that I'm just doing research over the summer, I'll try to draw more post-worthy things. In fact, I just need to draw more period.

    goggles on
  • crawdaddiocrawdaddio Tacoma, WARegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Yeah, jeez, Veritas; way to get in the middle of a tearful reunion. You wanna slip into the middle of our awkward, sexually tense hug, too? Cause I warn you, I might have a banana in my pocket...:winky:

    Nah, personally, I'm with Loomy in being one of the kinds of people others probably hate being in projects with. Mostly because of my piss-poor time management skills. That's why I try to avoid situations that put me in groups. You know, like any job ever.

    And, though I'm being horribly hypocritical about it, don't worry too much about post-worthiness, goggles; that's what the doodle thread is for. Just getting a page or two of sketches would probably help people know where to come from in later crits, I would imagine.

    crawdaddio on
  • PROXPROX Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Another man got jailed for lolicon. Pretty scary.

    PROX on
  • Stupid Mr Whoopsie NameStupid Mr Whoopsie Name Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Pretty scary? That seems like clockwork to me...

    Stupid Mr Whoopsie Name on
  • Angel_of_BaconAngel_of_Bacon Moderator Mod Emeritus
    edited May 2009
    people wrote:
    group projects

    Haven't been a fan of group projects since 8th grade, when I was paired up with a couple of lazy dudes for a science fair project. Their idea was straight out of a "science fair projects" book, and was just about the laziest thing anyone could have chosen to pick. (Line up some marbles on the center groove of an old-school wooden ruler, flick a marble into the line of marbles, marble at the opposite end gets moved out, TA DA INERTIA WHOA.)

    I thought this was lame as shit, so I speared off and did my own project by myself, where I made a couple of scenes in 3d, rendered them out with 2 cameras side by side, printed them out together so when you crossed your eyes, you could make the images overlap and BAM 3D STEREOSCOPIC VISION BIIIIIIIITCCHHHHHHHHH (same thing as Magic Eye except without the 'oooh mystery' bit). Yeah the art on it probably wasn't that great but come on give me a break it was 8th grade. And at the very least I didn't get that shit verbatim out of some book.

    Both my project and the ruler and marbles project got an A.

    Fuck you, 8th grade science class.
    :x



    Luckily though, when it comes to working in groups at actual work, I've not really had to deal with all that much douchebaggery. Even when other people are like "grrr I hate that guy", usually I don't even know what they're talking about. Maybe I'm just oblivious. :D

    Angel_of_Bacon on
  • PROXPROX Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Pretty scary? That seems like clockwork to me...

    “It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exists.”

    http://www.pvponline.com/2009/03/06/ombudsmen-part-5/

    PROX on
  • crawdaddiocrawdaddio Tacoma, WARegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    That's ludicrous!!
    That ought to be subjunctive! "Exist"!!
    Seriously, though, that was the first thing I thought...

    crawdaddio on
  • MetalbourneMetalbourne Inside a cluster b personalityRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    PROX wrote: »
    Pretty scary? That seems like clockwork to me...

    “It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exists.”

    http://www.pvponline.com/2009/03/06/ombudsmen-part-5/

    Even as deplorable as it is, it seems like something like that would fall under first amendment protection.

    ...but what the fuck does that url have to do with it?

    Edit: Well, I assumed the issue was about drawings, here. If it was photos of dead naked kids, the guy deserves to burn.

    Metalbourne on
  • crawdaddiocrawdaddio Tacoma, WARegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    You might construe the comic to be vaguely related, but even that'd be a stretch.

    crawdaddio on
  • Stupid Mr Whoopsie NameStupid Mr Whoopsie Name Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    PROX wrote: »
    Pretty scary? That seems like clockwork to me...

    “It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exists.”

    http://www.pvponline.com/2009/03/06/ombudsmen-part-5/

    What is this? What am I suppose to be taking away from this link?

    Stupid Mr Whoopsie Name on
  • MetalbourneMetalbourne Inside a cluster b personalityRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Oh, thank god. I thought I had gone dense for a second there.

    Metalbourne on
  • PROXPROX Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    PROX wrote: »
    Pretty scary? That seems like clockwork to me...

    “It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exists.”

    http://www.pvponline.com/2009/03/06/ombudsmen-part-5/

    What is this? What am I suppose to be taking away from this link?

    Scott Kurtz drew a kid having sex in the last panel. Therefore under the Protect Act, he could go to jail for up to 15 years.

    "Prohibits drawings, sculptures, and pictures of such drawings and sculptures depicting minors in actions or situations that meet the Miller test of being obscene, OR are engaged in sex acts that are deemed to meet the same obscene condition. The law does not explicitly state that images of fictional beings who appear to be under 18 engaged in sexual acts that are not deemed to be obscene are rendered illegal in and of their own condition (illustration of sex of fictional minors)."

    edit: nevermind. I don't read love is. Apparently those are two full grown adults.

    PROX on
  • VeritasVeritas Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    crawdaddio wrote: »
    You wanna slip into the middle of our awkward, sexually tense hug, too?

    That better be an actual invitation, because I will do it regardless, that's just how I roll.

    (I look for awkward moments and then do my absolute best to make them even more awkward.)

    Veritas on
  • Stupid Mr Whoopsie NameStupid Mr Whoopsie Name Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Prox... so what? Fuck Scott Kurtz.

    Why the fuck are you defending Loli-troublbrewing-Con in the first place?

    Stupid Mr Whoopsie Name on
  • MetalbourneMetalbourne Inside a cluster b personalityRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    PROX wrote: »
    PROX wrote: »
    Pretty scary? That seems like clockwork to me...

    “It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exists.”

    http://www.pvponline.com/2009/03/06/ombudsmen-part-5/

    What is this? What am I suppose to be taking away from this link?

    Scott Kurtz drew a kid having sex in the last panel. Therefore under the Protect Act, he could go to jail for up to 15 years.

    "Prohibits drawings, sculptures, and pictures of such drawings and sculptures depicting minors in actions or situations that meet the Miller test of being obscene, OR are engaged in sex acts that are deemed to meet the same obscene condition. The law does not explicitly state that images of fictional beings who appear to be under 18 engaged in sexual acts that are not deemed to be obscene are rendered illegal in and of their own condition (illustration of sex of fictional minors)."

    edit: nevermind. I don't read love is. Apparently those are two full grown adults.

    So, is there something about him getting busted, or are you just jumping to rabid conclusions?

    Metalbourne on
  • crawdaddiocrawdaddio Tacoma, WARegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    Nope; if you look up the aforementioned Miller test, it fails to meet the first and third criteria (respectively; that the work, as a whole, appeal to prurient interests; and that the work, as a whole again, lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value).

    crawdaddio on
  • MetalbourneMetalbourne Inside a cluster b personalityRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Oh, well way to brew up a bunch of bullshit by not supplying a lot of needed context, prox. Next stop, Fox News!

    Stupid fucker. You are this close to getting raped!

    Metalbourne on
  • PROXPROX Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    Prox... so what? Fuck Scott Kurtz.

    Why the fuck are you defending Loli-troublbrewing-Con in the first place?

    Because a man was sentenced to 15 years for buying comics. COMICS.

    PROX on
  • Stupid Mr Whoopsie NameStupid Mr Whoopsie Name Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    In This Thread: Prox becomes a future case for the FBI to watch over...

    EDIT: Pardon me if at this point I don't just take your word on this one, but usually the kiddie fiddlers at lilicon have a lot of other things going for them that generally lead to arrests.

    Stupid Mr Whoopsie Name on
  • MetalbourneMetalbourne Inside a cluster b personalityRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    PROX wrote: »
    Prox... so what? Fuck Scott Kurtz.

    Why the fuck are you defending Loli-troublbrewing-Con in the first place?

    Because a man was sentenced to 15 years for buying comics. COMICS.

    Well how about linking to THAT story?

    And discussing where he bought it from?

    You fucking attention whore.

    Metalbourne on
  • Stupid Mr Whoopsie NameStupid Mr Whoopsie Name Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    When someone gets arrested for buying a copy of Savage Dragon, despite how much of a crime it might actually be, that's when you can safely freak out.

    Stupid Mr Whoopsie Name on
  • PROXPROX Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    PROX wrote: »
    Prox... so what? Fuck Scott Kurtz.

    Why the fuck are you defending Loli-troublbrewing-Con in the first place?

    Because a man was sentenced to 15 years for buying comics. COMICS.

    Well how about linking to THAT story?

    And discussing where he bought it from?

    You fucking attention whore.

    How am I an attention whore? I'm just bad at providing relevant links pertaining to an interesting art discussion.

    PROX on
  • Stupid Mr Whoopsie NameStupid Mr Whoopsie Name Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    But it's not interesting.

    Stupid Mr Whoopsie Name on
  • crawdaddiocrawdaddio Tacoma, WARegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    [tiny]zing?[/tiny]

    crawdaddio on
  • MetalbourneMetalbourne Inside a cluster b personalityRegistered User regular
    edited May 2009
    PROX wrote: »
    PROX wrote: »
    Prox... so what? Fuck Scott Kurtz.

    Why the fuck are you defending Loli-troublbrewing-Con in the first place?

    Because a man was sentenced to 15 years for buying comics. COMICS.

    Well how about linking to THAT story?

    And discussing where he bought it from?

    You fucking attention whore.

    How am I an attention whore? I'm just bad at providing relevant links pertaining to an interesting art discussion.

    Because you drop into a thread and post MAN ARRESTED FOR LOLICON and wait for the inevitable shitstorm.

    Then when it doesn't happen you try to post a fucking link to a scott kurtz comic and try to imply that he's the one getting busted.

    Finally you change your story to some schmuck who, I can only guess, picked up a copy of uncanny xmen and got his ass arrested as he left the comic book shop.

    So will you finally link to a fucking story to be outraged about or should I just unleash the full might of my internet fury on your worthless ass?

    Metalbourne on
  • PROXPROX Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    When someone gets arrested for buying a copy of Savage Dragon, despite how much of a crime it might actually be, that's when you can safely freak out.

    You can get arrested in Australia if an issue of Savage Dragon implied a scene of underage sex (17 year olds) or rape.

    PROX on
  • Stupid Mr Whoopsie NameStupid Mr Whoopsie Name Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2009
    I have never wanted an application that allows me to slap people through the internet more than I do now. It's maiden voyage would be giving Prox five across the eye...

    Stupid Mr Whoopsie Name on
  • PROXPROX Registered User regular
    edited May 2009
    I have never wanted an application that allows me to slap people through the internet more than I do now. It's maiden voyage would be giving Prox five across the eye...

    Sorry for failing at bringing up stuff. Good grief.

    PROX on
This discussion has been closed.