The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[DnD 4E Discussion] Psion is out and it is awesome, and I normally hate psionics.

1535456585961

Posts

  • tastydonutstastydonuts Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Yeah I don't like the guest lookouts comics at all. They are too jumbled and confused with the action in the last comic especially just not flowing well for me at all.

    Also, was he just going to stand there and watch the kid get eviscerated or what if they hadn't thrown the rocks? Utterly confusing.

    Edit: I personally would have taken the opportunity to charge as a standard action; using a good old twin strike to start to ruin the cockatrices shit. Then I would have popped my action point and action surge to push the sod off the kid with a bull rush (tiny little legs mean no reach I would bet).

    Or alternatively I would have just fled in the other direction as fast as possible if I truly was evil.


    On the other hand, I wouldn't have been there at all. I'd have ignored the call. ;p

    tastydonuts on
    “I used to draw, hard to admit that I used to draw...”
  • cytorakcytorak Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I had a player drop out of my PbP on here, A Tariff of Relkingham, so I'm recruiting a replacement.

    cytorak on
  • zenpotatozenpotato Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I dig the art style of Lookouts, but I don't think the artist has a good grasp on doing sequentials and clearly depicted action in panels. It's harder than it looks.

    zenpotato on
  • PantheraOncaPantheraOnca Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    im pretty sure its tail has reach. and i agree the layout needs work, i think one of the kids that got turned to stone is flesh again? i dunno.

    PantheraOnca on
  • edited July 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • takyristakyris Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    so hey, got the core three, never got to play.

    what did bards end up as in phb2?

    takyris on
  • edited July 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    im pretty sure its tail has reach. and i agree the layout needs work, i think one of the kids that got turned to stone is flesh again? i dunno.

    Yea, there is definitely 4 kids not stone at the start, then one kid gets turned to stone, and there are 4 kids not stone at the end.

    It really didn't make sense to me either, making your saving throws against a save or die in 3 rounds effect is a pretty big deal, especially if it initially starts to get you and it was just left absent out of the thing.

    Goumindong on
    wbBv3fj.png
  • ProbadProbad Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Fabulous.

    Probad on
  • edited July 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • TerrendosTerrendos Decorative Monocle Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Actually I've got a couple of half-decent stories I could probably turn into adventures, but even the basic functions of Maptools still confound me sometimes, and while I have lots of free time coming up very soon, it'll only last until I start classes again in September.

    Terrendos on
  • ForarForar #432 Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    So, my girlfriend and I watched Freaks & Geeks, and apparently it gave her the slightest interest in playing D&D, or at least giving it a try.

    I'm trying to gently breath life into this ember by setting up a night to play Hero Quest with some friends, which will hopefully be fun, and give them a very, very basic look at what is essentially "D&D Super, Duper, Ultra Lite Edition". If they have enough fun with a dungeon crawl or two through those adventures, perhaps I can form my own game. I'll be destined to DM, but in the name of getting a group rolling, I might just have to bite that bullet. (I exaggerate; I don't dislike DM'ing, and 4th edition looks like it'd be fun to DM, but my natural preference is usually to be a Player as opposed to running the show).

    Forar on
    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
  • zenpotatozenpotato Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Forar wrote: »
    So, my girlfriend and I watched Freaks & Geeks, and apparently it gave her the slightest interest in playing D&D, or at least giving it a try.

    I'm trying to gently breath life into this ember by setting up a night to play Hero Quest with some friends, which will hopefully be fun, and give them a very, very basic look at what is essentially "D&D Super, Duper, Ultra Lite Edition". If they have enough fun with a dungeon crawl or two through those adventures, perhaps I can form my own game. I'll be destined to DM, but in the name of getting a group rolling, I might just have to bite that bullet. (I exaggerate; I don't dislike DM'ing, and 4th edition looks like it'd be fun to DM, but my natural preference is usually to be a Player as opposed to running the show).

    I am Carlos, the dwarf.

    zenpotato on
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Forar wrote: »
    So, my girlfriend and I watched Freaks & Geeks, and apparently it gave her the slightest interest in playing D&D, or at least giving it a try.

    I'm trying to gently breath life into this ember by setting up a night to play Hero Quest with some friends, which will hopefully be fun, and give them a very, very basic look at what is essentially "D&D Super, Duper, Ultra Lite Edition". If they have enough fun with a dungeon crawl or two through those adventures, perhaps I can form my own game. I'll be destined to DM, but in the name of getting a group rolling, I might just have to bite that bullet. (I exaggerate; I don't dislike DM'ing, and 4th edition looks like it'd be fun to DM, but my natural preference is usually to be a Player as opposed to running the show).

    Not to poke at stereotypes (seriously, Shelly Mazzanoble?) but don't forget to include roleplaying and not just orc-killing.

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • ForarForar #432 Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Arivia wrote: »
    Not to poke at stereotypes (seriously, Shelly Mazzanoble?) but don't forget to include roleplaying and not just orc-killing.

    The game itself does include some 'flavour text' here and there, and I'll likely try to spice up the combat descriptions based on what happens and how the dice roll, but I don't think I'll push too much 'roleplay' this early on. It's mostly just an attempt to whet their appetite for adventure, and see who sticks around for more.

    Forar on
    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Forar wrote: »
    Arivia wrote: »
    Not to poke at stereotypes (seriously, Shelly Mazzanoble?) but don't forget to include roleplaying and not just orc-killing.

    The game itself does include some 'flavour text' here and there, and I'll likely try to spice up the combat descriptions based on what happens and how the dice roll, but I don't think I'll push too much 'roleplay' this early on. It's mostly just an attempt to whet their appetite for adventure, and see who sticks around for more.

    I wouldn't push it, but just allow for it (ie: interacting with an innkeeper or the local wizard). Actor-y types are put off by only dice hitting the table.

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • Super NamicchiSuper Namicchi Orange County, CARegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I hear Dragon Strike's VHS is a great way to really spark someone's interest in the hobby
    it's not

    Super Namicchi on
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    personally

    you can't really play D&D without an 80 in WoW and a 60 in FFXI. Those are the basic skills Gary Gygax required, so will it be forever.

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • SkyCaptainSkyCaptain IndianaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Actually I think one kid makes his disguise check as a radish and manages to fool everyone (including the players) that he's actually still alive.
    One kid hid behind a statue.

    SkyCaptain on
    The RPG Bestiary - Dangerous foes and legendary monsters for D&D 4th Edition
  • edited July 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • SkyCaptainSkyCaptain IndianaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Statue doesn't count as ally anymore hah.

    SkyCaptain on
    The RPG Bestiary - Dangerous foes and legendary monsters for D&D 4th Edition
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Candlekeep keeps trying to convince me to play Pathfinder or whatever Paizo's calling their 3.75. I'm like, "Why would I want to fix a game all over that Wizards already fixed for me?"

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • edited July 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • TerrendosTerrendos Decorative Monocle Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    It does when it's one of your allies that's been petrified.

    Though to be fair, under the circumstances I'd cut the group some slack and give the kid at least partial concealment, maybe full if the statue was a fat kid.

    Terrendos on
  • tastydonutstastydonuts Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Terrendos wrote: »
    Actually I've got a couple of half-decent stories I could probably turn into adventures, but even the basic functions of Maptools still confound me sometimes, and while I have lots of free time coming up very soon, it'll only last until I start classes again in September.

    basic maptools works just fine. you don't need to code up an entire suite for it.

    and I'm sure goum or aegeri could supply you with a starting point for all that too~ ;p

    RIGHT YOU TWO?

    edit: yea, I'd say a petrified player is an object. mere scenery. until they get fixed. just like their corpse, but not when they're dying.

    tastydonuts on
    “I used to draw, hard to admit that I used to draw...”
  • Mostlyjoe13Mostlyjoe13 Evil, Evil, Jump for joy! Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I almost got sucked in to the 2010 fight over what the setting is going to be. For a minute there I could see the old setting wars of old take hold...and then it all slipped away. I don't care if it's Dark Sun or Dragonlance. I just want new powers, paragon paths, and classes.

    I'm actually giddy about the new classes. What setting specific classes would you love to see?

    Dark Sun could give us the Templars a new type of Divine class. I could see a new Primal from Dragonlance tied to the Mystics that SAGA gave us. Thoughts?

    Mostlyjoe13 on
    PSN ID - Mostlyjoe Steam ID -TheNotoriusRNG
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Candlekeep keeps trying to convince me to play Pathfinder or whatever Paizo's calling their 3.75. I'm like, "Why would I want to fix a game all over that Wizards already fixed for me?"

    Candlekeep and even the wizards FR boards are grognardia central.

    Oh very true. But as Candlekeep's 12th most prolific poster (just started posting there again after like 3-4 years off), I have to point out that it is the best place to nerd out about Realms stuff. On the other hand, the edition wonkery...ugh. "This isn't my REALMS/D&D/CHICKEN, I'm playing 2e/3e/Pathfinder" gets really, really old.

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • edited July 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Arivia wrote: »
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Candlekeep keeps trying to convince me to play Pathfinder or whatever Paizo's calling their 3.75. I'm like, "Why would I want to fix a game all over that Wizards already fixed for me?"

    Candlekeep and even the wizards FR boards are grognardia central.

    Oh very true. But as Candlekeep's 12th most prolific poster (just started posting there again after like 3-4 years off), I have to point out that it is the best place to nerd out about Realms stuff. On the other hand, the edition wonkery...ugh. "This isn't my REALMS/D&D/CHICKEN, I'm playing 2e/3e/Pathfinder" gets really, really old.

    The lot over at the wizards boards, who basically made it impossible to have any constructive discussion about the 4E realms are ultimately what killed it. There's a good reason that despite all the stuff that I like about Cormyr that has been published Sorrow of Heaven is basically becoming planescape after paragon tier.

    As opposed to Candlekeep, where the general response is "LALALALALALA SELLPLAGUE NEVERHAPPENED"

    Did things really break down that fast on the 4e Realms boards? All I remember from about 2006 were people going angsty at the Chosen and fanboying about Drizzt, nothing that terrible.

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • Mostlyjoe13Mostlyjoe13 Evil, Evil, Jump for joy! Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    As a rule I'm trying to stay away from Wizard's boards these days. I got into far too many semantics fights there than is good for my sanity.

    Mostlyjoe13 on
    PSN ID - Mostlyjoe Steam ID -TheNotoriusRNG
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    My favorite thing about the 3e wizards boards was trolling people's pet hopes on the Future Releases board with simple economics.

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • edited July 2009
    This content has been removed.

  • TerrendosTerrendos Decorative Monocle Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    I've found that the boards on the different 4e roles, the character optimization and development boards, and the What's a DM/Player to do to be pretty civil. Perhaps because, in order to have a reason to post in those, you need to already be part of a 4e game.

    Terrendos on
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Arivia wrote: »
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Arivia wrote: »
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Candlekeep keeps trying to convince me to play Pathfinder or whatever Paizo's calling their 3.75. I'm like, "Why would I want to fix a game all over that Wizards already fixed for me?"

    Candlekeep and even the wizards FR boards are grognardia central.

    Oh very true. But as Candlekeep's 12th most prolific poster (just started posting there again after like 3-4 years off), I have to point out that it is the best place to nerd out about Realms stuff. On the other hand, the edition wonkery...ugh. "This isn't my REALMS/D&D/CHICKEN, I'm playing 2e/3e/Pathfinder" gets really, really old.

    The lot over at the wizards boards, who basically made it impossible to have any constructive discussion about the 4E realms are ultimately what killed it. There's a good reason that despite all the stuff that I like about Cormyr that has been published Sorrow of Heaven is basically becoming planescape after paragon tier.

    As opposed to Candlekeep, where the general response is "LALALALALALA SELLPLAGUE NEVERHAPPENED"

    Did things really break down that fast on the 4e Realms boards? All I remember from about 2006 were people going angsty at the Chosen and fanboying about Drizzt, nothing that terrible.

    Yeah.

    Now kill off the Gods and Chosen these people are fanboys of. The result was purely hilarious over-dramatics and in fact still is. Most of the more common trolls have simply got bored and left. But now it's pretty much the same 4 people who talk to each other in every thread.

    I'm not going to say too much (because I know my players read this thread), but I asked them some very pointed questions about Mystra's Chosen recently. While they definitely screwed up some stuff in the 4e transition (having Sehanine in the PHB but not in the Realms is hilarious), that's no need to get all pissy about it.

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • HorseshoeHorseshoe Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Clearly they didn't get the errata that you cannot use your own allies for cover to make stealth checks anymore.

    argh. another one from the highlight reel of our "stupidest d&d arguments ever"
    Arivia wrote: »
    Candlekeep keeps trying to convince me to play Pathfinder or whatever Paizo's calling their 3.75. I'm like, "Why would I want to fix a game all over that Wizards already fixed for me?"

    whatever you do

    don't ask this question into the mirror five times

    Horseshoe on
    dmsigsmallek3.jpg
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Horseshoe wrote: »
    whatever you do

    don't ask this question into the mirror five times

    what, do I grow Elminster's stat block

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • Hexmage-PAHexmage-PA Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Arivia wrote: »
    Candlekeep keeps trying to convince me to play Pathfinder or whatever Paizo's calling their 3.75. I'm like, "Why would I want to fix a game all over that Wizards already fixed for me?"

    From what I gather Pathfinder is really only a modest improvement over 3.5 with a ton of new options for the base classes and really high production values. Also, they added a Fly skill!

    I love this thread on RPG.net: Pathfinder Preview Thread After reading so many threads that claim that Pathfinder is going to be the greatest thing ever it's nice to actually see a thread where people point out the game's flaws based on the new preview material.

    Hexmage-PA on
  • AriviaArivia I Like A Challenge Earth-1Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    Arivia wrote: »
    Candlekeep keeps trying to convince me to play Pathfinder or whatever Paizo's calling their 3.75. I'm like, "Why would I want to fix a game all over that Wizards already fixed for me?"

    From what I gather Pathfinder is really only a modest improvement over 3.5 with a ton of new options for the base classes and really high production values. Also, they added a Fly skill!

    I love this thread on RPG.net: Pathfinder Preview Thread After reading so many threads that claim that Pathfinder is going to be the greatest thing ever it's nice to actually see a thread where people point out the game's flaws based on the new preview material.

    so basically they're aggravating instead of fixing the 3e option problem, yay! And I'm guessing fighters still boil down to stab, pierce, or blunt, repeat.

    Arivia on
    huntresssig.jpg
  • PMAversPMAvers Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    After reading so many threads that claim that Pathfinder is going to be the greatest thing ever it's nice to actually see a thread where people point out the game's flaws based on the new preview material.

    Well, any previous statement where something's considered to be "the greatest thing ever" has already been proven wrong, since the product that deserves said title has already been released.

    *points down*

    Boosh.

    PMAvers on
    persona4celestia.jpg
    COME FORTH, AMATERASU! - Switch Friend Code SW-5465-2458-5696 - Twitch
  • tastydonutstastydonuts Registered User regular
    edited July 2009
    PMAvers wrote: »
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    After reading so many threads that claim that Pathfinder is going to be the greatest thing ever it's nice to actually see a thread where people point out the game's flaws based on the new preview material.

    Well, any previous statement where something's considered to be "the greatest thing ever" has already been proven wrong, since the product that deserves said title has already been released.

    *points down*

    Boosh.

    you know, I had "boosh" stuck in my head all day, and I was trying to find a way to post or fit it in some conversation. but no longer. thanks!

    tastydonuts on
    “I used to draw, hard to admit that I used to draw...”
This discussion has been closed.