We have a new update on The Future of the Penny Arcade Forums.

The [GNU/Linux] thread, where 'Windows' is always spelled properly.

SeeksSeeks Registered User regular
You lazy bastards.

OP shamelessly stolen from Visti (and Jasconius, I guess). Modified here and there by yours truly.

Handy commands and shortcuts:
Keep in mind that these are only the most basic forms of each command, and that they all have dozens of switches and caveats that enable you to do awesome things with them.

FILE MANIPULATION:

cd <directory> : change current directory to <directory>
ls : list directory contents
ls -a : list directory contents including hidden files
ls -l : list directory contents in detailed list format
mkdir <dirname> : make subdirectory <dirname> (can also specify full directory e.g. mkdir /home/thesquid/giantAngryBear)
rmdir <dirname> : deletes empty subdirectory <dirname>
cp <file> <dest> : copy <file> to <dest>
cp -r <directory> <dest> : copy <directory> and everything inside it to location <dest>
mv <file> <dest> : moves <file> to <dest>
rm <file> : removes (deletes) <file>
rm -r <directory> : removes (deletes) <directory> and everything inside it
chown <user> <file> : change user ownership of <file> to <user>
chgrp <group> <file> : change group ownership of <file> to <group>
chmod XXX <file> : change permissions of <file> to octal number XXX (probably best to 'man' this one)
touch : change file timestamp (and will create an empty file if it doesn't exist)

HANDY TOOLS:

man : gives the manual page on any command including all of these ones (lol man mount)
man -k <string> : gives a list of all man pages with <string> in the title or short description
less : an extremely simple viewer of plaintext files, has regex searching and up/down movement
more : an even simpler viewer than less (now you get the less is more than more gag in bash)
view : a read-only version of vim, so has all the vim commands, but you can't edit the file
vim / emacs / pico / vi / nano : complex text editors that support enormously complicated yet awesome shortcuts, syntax colouring, the whole shebang

SYSTEM STUFF: (you will probably need to be root to take advantage of these)

top : display Linux tasks (equiv. to Task Manager) htop is a widely preferred and more interactive alternative
ifconfig : for configuring network interfaces (setting ip address, activating and deactivating network cards)
iwconfig : for configuring wireless network interfaces
iwlist : getting more info from a wireless network interface (especially seeing wireless networks in range)
route : show / manipulate the IP routing table
dhclient : DHCP client
lshw : list hardware
lspci : list all PCI devices
lsmod : list modules in Linux kernel
modprobe : add / remove <module> from Linux kernel
mount : mount a file system
umount : unmount a file system

USEFUL THINGOES:

wpa_supplicant : for connecting to WPA networks. Requires several reads of the man page, editing of a configuration file by looking at several example files for clarity, and possibly carving arcane symbols into your face.
tar : for making tarballs of a directory / several files
gzip : for compressing said tarball using *.gz
gunzip : for uncompressing a gzipped file
bzip2 : for compressing said tarball using *.bz2
bunzip : for uncompressing a bzipped file
tar xvfz <file> : for uncompressing a *.tar.gz file
tar xvjf <file> : uncormpressing a *tar.bz2 file
date : printing the date and time
ping : to ping
pwd : print out current directory name
killall <process> : kills all processes of name <process>
ps -aux : prints a snapshot of all current running processes
kill <jobid> : kills process of job id <jobid>. <jobid> can be found with ps -aux or top
which : locates a command


Useful techniques:


* Searching for a file based on file name:

e.g. I want to find all the files in the current directory and any subdirectories that start with Photo and end in jpg, such as Photo322.jpg.

Command: find . -iname "Photo*.jpg"

English translation: find, starting in the the current directory (the "." argument), any files that match the name "Photo*.jpg" in a case insensitive fashion (the "-iname") argument.

Notes: It is very important if you are passing wildcards to find that you escape the wildcards by using \ or ". If you do not, then the shell will expand the wildcards on the command line and your command will then be the equivalent of:
find . -iname
    * Doing the same operation on a bunch of files e.g. I want to gzip up each text file in the current directory into their own separate archive Command: for eachFile in *.txt; do gzip "$eachFile"; done English translation: Take the list of files that are returned by *.txt. Go through each of those filenames in the list one by and one, and each time 1.) Assign the current filename to the variable called "eachFile". This can be accessed by $eachFile. 2.) Execute the command between "do" and "done". In this example, it is gzip "$eachFile". Notes: "$eachFile" is enclosed in quotation marks so that any filenames with spaces get passed correctly to gzip. The semi-colons tell the shell that a command is done and to treat anything after the semi-colon as a new command. If you wanted to, you could have the loop do more than one command on a single line, like so: for eachFile in *.txt; do gzip "$eachFile"; mv "$eachFile".gz .. ; done Any more complexity, and you're probably at the stage where you should be writing a script instead of trying to fit it into one line. * Displaying the contents of files/simple manipulation of standard input head [filename] tail [filename] cat [filename] Head will show, by default, the first 10 lines of a file, or if no filename is provided, then standard input. Tail will show, by default, the last 10 lines of a file, or if no filename is provided, then standard input. Useful for looking at log files. cat will dump the entire contents of a file to standard output (typically the screen, but often not). If no filename is provided, then it will basically echo standard input to standard output. This is useful in creating simple files. e.g. I want to create a file called "hello.txt" containing the line "This is a test" cat > hello.txt This is a test Ctrl-D (Ctrl-D signals end-of-file). To *append* something to an existing file: cat >> hello.txt This will be the second line of the file Ctrl-D Note the >>! If you just use >, you will overwrite the file, instead of appending. * Displaying something to screen echo Hello world! The echo command will echo whatever arguments is passed to it back to the standard output. Typically used in scripts to show status reports. Chaining it all together! Let's list the first ten lines of every text file in the current directory and pretty it up with a header. for eachFile in *.txt; do echo "*** Ten lines of $eachFile ***"; head "$eachFile"; done Oh crud, it went by too fast to see it! Hang on - we know that we can use 'less' to view text files for eachFile in *.txt; do echo "*** Ten lines of $eachFile ***"; head "$eachFile"; done | less Tada! (push 'q' to quit from less, by the way). Replace with appropriate options for those times you want to sort mp3 files, or photos, or whatever.


So you want to run linux?

Well, the easiest way to do that is to download a linux distro, burn it, and boot it. Some have "live" cds, others don't. Where can you find a distro? Here are a few to get you started:



Ubuntu is the leader in the field right now and is often suggested to newcomers. It's the easiest to set up, can be run from within windows without too much hassle (if necessary), as makes for the easiest transition from the two big proprietary operating systems.


Fedora is another of the major distros - Also a fine beginner's choice. They're a little more strict with the "open-source only" philosophy, and thus, a little less simple to jump to, straight from Windows. It also has a bit of a reputation for being kinda "bleeding edge" at times, sometimes to its detriment. That being said, it's still very easy and waaayyy more than capable of being an internet/email/pictures box.


Debian is an old dog, but stable as hell. Ubuntu is built on a Debian foundation. Debian is known for its strong views on only including free packages with the distribution.


Opensuse is another rather popular distro, though it's scoffed at by a few purists who dislike Novell's dealings with Microsoft. Many others, like myself, aren't bothered by that at all. I haven't tried it in a long time, but people who do use it seem to be quite loyal to the brand. This is good beginner's distro.


Mandriva is sort of an old hand in the linux world, somewhat like Fedora and Slackware. Back in the day, you would typically use one of three distros... Red Hat, Mandrake or Slackware, and Mandriva is what became of Mandrake. I haven't used it since 2003 or so, but it was plenty good back then and I've heard nothing bad about it since. Perfectly fine for newcomers or oldbies alike.


Arch Linux is an increasingly popular distro, but is often not recommended unless you know what you're doing as it requires a good deal of setup. Their wiki is awesome, though. If you want an advanced, minimalist (out of the box) distro, you could do a lot worse than Arch. Definitely not for beginners.


Slackware is one of the oldest linux distributions; in fact, it's almost as old as linux itself. There's a saying that "Slackware is linux." This is similar to Arch linux (or rather, Arch is similar to this), only Slackware is easier to install and setup. This isn't a distro for beginners, but that being said, if you're patient it's not impossible. It was my first real distro, and I'm no genius.


Gentoo linux is for nerds. If you enjoy compiling everything from source before you've got any OS going at all, including the kernel, then give it a shot. It's kinda like Arch, except more difficult. If you want to learn about your computer and the deeper workings of linux (and maybe Unix), it's worth trying at least once or twice.


Those are the big dogs. For some smaller, but still perfectly serviceable dogs, check these out:


Distrolettes:

What is a distrolette? It's a distribution that is a spin-off of another, or built on top of another. Often, distrolettes are more specialized than their parents, or more "dumbed down" for the masses.


ubuntu-logo.png

Ubuntu


That's right, we've got Ubuntu twice in this OP. Ubuntu is built on top of Debian, and always has been. Great distro for beginners.


mint-logo-200.png

Linux Mint


Linux Mint (everyone calls it Mint linux) is an Ubuntu spinoff. Long story short, it comes with all the good, proprietary stuff installed by default that Ubuntu doesn't for legal or philosophical reasons.


chakra_logo.png

Chakra


Chakra is Arch linux for people who are lazy and like KDE. It's really quite impressive, though the last time I checked, also buggy. That was a while ago, so that might be fixed by now.


CrunchBang-logo.png

Crunchbang Linux


Crunchbang is a somewhat minimalist but full-featured distro currently based off of Debian. It used to be based off of Ubuntu, but they've changed that very recently. Currently my favorite distro, for no good reason in particular.


PuppyLogo2.jpg

Puppy Linux


Puppy Linux is small and quite lightweight, meant to be installed on systems that haven't had a spring in their step for quite some time now. The latest release is named 'Lupu', since it's evidently a mashup of the old Puppy Linux + Ubuntu's Lucid Lynx.


trisquel_logo.png

Trisquel


Trisquel is the only distro listed in this OP that meets Richard's Stallman's rigid definition of what makes a Free OS 'Free'. What it boils down to is, basically, it's harder to install flash in Trisquel than it is in Ubuntu. Nonetheless, I've got it installed on my laptop and haven't yet found a reason to replace it, as it's actually quite good. It too is based off of Ubuntu.


But what does it look like?

See, that's an interesting question because Linux can look in a lot of different ways. More so than just referring to themes and colour schemes and such, the entire user interface can change depending on which desktop environment you choose to use. Here are a couple of screenshots of the main ones:


Gnome - one of the two most popular linux desktop environments, there has been a bit of a schism in the Gnome community as of late. Specifically, the release of Gnome 3 has been met with some controversy for a number of reasons that won't be enumerated here; suffice to say, Gnome itself now has two distinct flavors: 2.3.x and 3.x.


Gnome 2.3, under Ubuntu 10.10:


ambiance-maverick-preview_update.png




Gnome 3, from Gnome.org's website:


gnome3_overview.png


KDE - a bit more tweakable than Gnome, I'm led to believe. Recently in it's fourth incarnation - Looks like this:

kde_snapshot2.png


Openbox - a popular lighter DE. Can look like this, but is extremely flexible, so it's hard to have only one screenshot:


dt-openbox.png


There are several others if you don't like those. Here's a little sampler:

Awesome:
dt-awesome.png


Unity (Ubuntu's new shell):

ubuntu_1104-screenshot-1.png


Elive:
dt-elive.png


XFCE:
dt-xfce.jpg


LXDE:
dt-lxde.png


IceWM:
dt-icewm.png


Programs:

Here is a list of programs that some of the forumers have found useful for one thing or another.

Internet stuff:

Browsers: Firefox, Chrome/Chromium, Opera.
Command-line browsers (lololol): Links, Elinks, Lynx.
Email: Thunderbird, Evolution, Claws Mail.
Command-line email: Mutt, Alpine.
Twitter: Pino, Twittux.
FTP: FileZilla, gFTP.
BitTorrent: Transmission.

Video:

VLC - VideoLan client. Plays everything. I install this on every machine I use, no joke.
MPlayer - A quintessential linux video player. Very good, and what I fall back on when - god forbid - VLC doesn't work for some reason.
SMPlayer - Mplayer is great, but can be a little tough to work with sometimes... especially if it's not working properly. SMPlayer is a frontend that makes MPlayer more convenient to use.
Kdenlive - A damn fine multi-track video editor. It's not quite Final Cut Pro or Sony Vegas, but it's a hell of a lot better than Windows Movie Maker.
OpenShot - Another video editor. I prefer Kdenlive to this, though others disagree. This is a bit simpler, and therefore, may be quicker for fast Youtube vids.

Audio:

VLC or Mplayer will also work for audio. There's also:

Rhythmbox - A run-of-the-mill yet entirely functional iTunes-esque (from what I hear) music player. It comes pre-packaged with a lot of distros, and if it doesn't, is almost certainly available in your repos. The version packaged with the newest Ubuntu also has a music store plugin.
Banshee - Similar to Rhythmbox or any other database-music-player-thing, but more lightweight.
Audacious - A fork of BMP, which is a fork of XMMS. Essentially, Winamp for linux.
Audacity - Audacity needs no introduction, since if you've ever done any basic audio editing, you've probably done it with Audacity regardless of OS.

Editing texts:

Vim - Command-line text editor, very powerful, fast, etc. But don't listen to me, let this guy sell it to you. Gvim is the popular GUI front-end for Vim, and it is quite good.
Emacs - Also command-line (has front-ends available), also powerful, flexible, etc. Emacs has been a top hacker's tool de jour for more than 25 years, and a GUI front-end exists for this as well if you're scared of the command-line. Emacs/Vim flame wars are purportedly legendary, so don't get people started.
Nano - A very simple command-line based text editor. It's great for very simple edits.
Gedit - Gnome text editor. It's typically what I use even when I'm not running Gnome, and is a popular go-to GUI text editor for basic (and slightly less basic) tasks.
Kate/KWrite - Similar to Gedit, except for KDE. More advanced, I think.
Leafpad - A very simple, lightweight GTK+ text editor. Essentially, Notepad for linux. This is what I use when I'm stuck on an old, shitty machine.

Office

LibreOffice - A fork of OpenOffice, this is supposedly where all the talent fled to (or rather, what they founded) after Oracle refused to be a part of the Document Foundation. This is also a full office suite.
OpenOffice.Org - Cross-platform MS Office clone/replacement. Full office suite, and all that you'll ever likely need for processing texts unless your job forces you to buy Microsoft.
AbiWord - AbiWord is a word processing program, similar to MS Word. It's not a full office suite, so if you'd prefer something different from Libre/OpenOffice or only want a word processor, this is a decent way to go.


Image:

The GIMP - The GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program) is a F/LOSS Photoshop clone. Not as feature-packed, and perhaps less than perfect for professionals, it's still more than enough for damn near everyone that uses Photoshop.
Shotwell - A decent, lightweight photo management system.
Phatch - A photo batch processor. Need 5,000 images scaled down, desaturated and converted from .png to .jpg? Phatch can do that, and quite a lot more.


Misc:


Dia - Flowcharts and diagrams.
Speedcrunch - A calculator.
TuxGuitar - Tablature editor and player. Good for guitarists.
Gummi - Editing Latex files.
Awk - Programming language. I think.
Screen - "There is no need for any apps beyond awk and screen. What els eciuld you possibly want :p "
MySQL GUI - MySQL Administrator.
Gnome Do - A QuickSilver/Launchy/etc. clone (launcher).
Kupfer - Another launcher, preferred by some over Gnome-Do.



Linux games?

Sadly, the number of options the linux gamer has available to him or her (mostly him, let's not kid ourselves) is limited. That is not to say, however, that no options exist. Some companies are surprisingly linux-friendly, and actually do release linux executables and/or open-source their engines (in the case of Id).

But you're interested in games you can get right now, aren't you? Fair enough.

Excellent resource: The Linux Game Tome (http://www.happypenguin.org/).

For many people though, the sheer number of games on that site - along with the amount that are completely shit... sorry, but it's true - can be overwhelming, so we've decided to list a few games that suck noticeably less right here. These aren't strictly linux-only so much as just games that are available on linux.

Commercial:

Penny Arcade Adventures: On the Rain-Slick Precipice of Darkness - Pretty good action adventure games developed by HotHead and designed by the PA guys themselves (Mike and Jerry). There were supposed to be four episodes in total, but as of March 2010 the other episodes were postponed indefinitely.

Neverwinter Nights - Not exactly brand new, but a classic. It's a bit of a hassle to get working though... worth it in my opinion.

World of Goo - You know this game already. Get it, it's pretty good.

The Penumbra series - Suspenseful, Lovecraftian (I guess?) horror FPS'. I hear good things.

Gish - Platformer starring a ball of... tar, or.. trash, or something. It's decent from what I've played.

Eschalon, Books I & II - Very old-school, stat-heavy clickfest RPGs. Not up everyone's alley, but I'm digging Book I so far.

Aquaria - An indie, underwater metroidvania. Pretty good from what I've played so far, though I had a bitch of a time installing it and getting it to run, personally. If you encounter a bug when trying to launch that whines about an inconsistency, check out this bug page.

Unreal Tournament 2004 - A quite good arena-style FPS. If you're a gamer, you probably already know all about the UT series.

Quake Wars - This is also a pretty well-thought-of property. A Battlefield clone.

Everything in the Humble Indie Bundles - Seriously, click the link, and check out the games. The Humble Frostbyte Bundle as well.

Minecraft - Needs no introduction. This game is worse than heroin for the first week you play it. Pay your bills early because you probably won't leave the house for a while.


Free:

Cave Story (Doukutsu) - Needs no introduction.

Battle for Wesnoth - Strategy game, oh my! It's free, open-source (I think), and you can even install it from your repo most likely.

UFO: Alien Invasion - XCOM homage (knockoff). I've played about 10 seconds of it, but it's easy to install, easy to run, and looks quite promising.

Chromium B.S.U. - A pretty cool Shmup. It's probably in your repos.

OpenArena - Imagine Quake 3. Now imagine Quake 3 with way shittier character models and audio that's not quite as good. That's basically OpenArena. It's worth checking out if you're into Q3.

Alien Arena - I think it's also based off of Id's Quake 3 engine (might be Quake 2, not sure), although they've taken the style for this game in a more original direction. My personal favorite of the Quake 3 knockoffs.

Frets on Fire - Guitar Hero clone.

Lincity-NG - A SimCity clone. I wasn't a huge fan of it when I tried it, but I couldn't tell you why exactly... probably because I've spent some time playing SimCity 3000 Unlimited, which is what this is aping.

Frozen Bubble - Puzzle Bobble clone. Pretty fun actually, worth adding to your collection.

Neverball/Neverputt - If you've played Super Monkey Ball, you'll know what to expect from Neverball... which, in my mind, equals "Monkeyball minus the annoying wannabe-mascot-bullshit." Monkeys piss me right off. The file also includes Neverputt, which is basically mini-golf. Both games are great time wasters.

Secret Maryo Chronicles - Though better than SuperTux by quite a margin, this would still be a pretty middle of the road platformer (below average even, by today's standards) if not for the fact that it's such a shameless Mario World ripoff.

StepMania - DDR clone.

Wormux - Worms clone. Worms is great, so this is worth looking at.

FreeCiv - An empire-building strategy game inspired largely by Civ 2, thus the name.

Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup - I'm not a big fan of Roguelikes myself, so I'll let Frem sell it: "a great roguelike. It has a really nice graphical tiled version, too. Getting it compiled can be a pain, though. You may want to reference the Arch Linux PKGBUILD."


More to come.


Not a fan of penguins?

That's alright, not everybody is. Me, I don't mind as long as they're not dancing. Either way, Linux is not the only Unix-like in town.
freebsd_logo.png

FreeBSD





[url="http://www.openbsd.org/]openbsd.gif

OpenBSD[/url]




[url="http://www.opensolaris.org/]OpenSolarisLogo2.png

OpenSolaris[/url]

userbar.jpg
desura_Userbar.png
Seeks on
«13456735

Posts

  • ImpersonatorImpersonator Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    We were all busy shell-scripting, that's why.

    Also, LXDE! <3

    Impersonator on
  • krushkrush Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    no love for Mandriva?

    krush on
  • ImpersonatorImpersonator Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    There's a Portuguese distro based on it so it's cool. 8-)

    Impersonator on
  • krushkrush Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    I always considered Mandrake/Mandriva the easy-to-use distro before there was Ubuntu.

    krush on
  • FodderFodder Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Slackware easier to install than arch? I am somewhat skeptical of that, if only because the "package manager"'s solution to dependencies is "do it yourself, you lazy bastard. Also, get off my lawn!"

    I'd finally had enough of my year or two old ubuntu install with incremental updates being slow as hell and firefox crashing every 30 seconds and did a full, fresh install of 10.04. Aside from some wonkiness with xmonad* it's been quite excellent. Ubuntu One and the social integration isn't really doing anything for me, and to be honest I'm not sure the twitter or fb integration is even working, but I'm not overly concerned about it for the time being.

    *admittedly, half of which was my fault since the .8 -> .9 version change was big enough to require redoing a part of my config and I redid the whole thing instead, then did a terrible job of paying attention. However, xmonad --recompile doesn't appear to actually change the /usr/bin/xmonad binary like I sort of think it ought to, which led to a lot of confusion.

    Fodder on
    steam_sig.png
  • krushkrush Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    also, Mandriva is still the only (to my knowledge) distro that includes MP3 support natively. For me, that's a bit plus as it means one less thing I have to do after I install.

    krush on
  • ImpersonatorImpersonator Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Also, what do you guys think of Slax? Because last time I checked pretty much every module was 'untested' (or unsafe, basically not verified for viruses and shit like that) and that scared the hell out of me. I don't want no dirty packages in my Linux distribution, thank you!

    Impersonator on
  • MalkorMalkor Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    I wish my laptop didn't die. I had Arch set up just the way I wanted.

    Now I don't feel motivated to combine the old HD with my new computer.

    Malkor on
    14271f3c-c765-4e74-92b1-49d7612675f2.jpg
  • darkphoenix22darkphoenix22 Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    krush wrote: »
    also, Mandriva is still the only (to my knowledge) distro that includes MP3 support natively. For me, that's a bit plus as it means one less thing I have to do after I install.

    A lot of Ubuntu derivatives include it and the other codecs as well.

    darkphoenix22 on
  • SeeksSeeks Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Isn't Mandriva going away, anyhow?
    Slackware easier to install than arch? I am somewhat skeptical of that, if only because the "package manager"'s solution to dependencies is "do it yourself, you lazy bastard. Also, get off my lawn!"

    Eh, it's easy enough to install. Initially. After that, yeah you're pretty much on your own, haha. Slackware will teach you the value of a good package manager, that's for sure.

    Seeks on
    userbar.jpg
    desura_Userbar.png
  • FremFrem Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    I had no idea what to make of Mandriva. It sort of had a niche of being a really easy to use, yet really fast and actually kinda like Slackware with a package manager thing going on.

    SuSE should probably be on the list, though. If for no other reasons than because they do neat things with Mono, they've got SuSE Studio for making/running customizable livedisks through your web browser, and because they've got Jimmac hanging around making Gnome look really slick.

    Frem on
  • Apothe0sisApothe0sis Have you ever questioned the nature of your reality? Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    I have always maintained the best way to evaluate distros is on the basis of the aesthetic appeal of the logo.

    Unfortunately, this puts my beloved Debian and SUSE lower down the list.

    Apothe0sis on
  • SeeksSeeks Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Updated the OP, adding Mandriva and Suse. Photobucket seems to be sorta shitting out on me though, so I can't tell if it looks right or not.

    Seeks on
    userbar.jpg
    desura_Userbar.png
  • theSquidtheSquid Sydney, AustraliaRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    So my brother in law gave me this old Mac to use. This ill begotten powerpc abomination with some flavour of MacOSX installed.

    I mock it, as I use it to lovingly download and burn Debian, the distribution I will use to erase its existence. Soon, it will be dead by my hand.

    theSquid on
  • Apothe0sisApothe0sis Have you ever questioned the nature of your reality? Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    I think it should be pointed out that Red Hat, the progenitor of Fedora and RHEL is named for Fred Durst's trademark red cap. Before he was in a sub-par nu-metal band he was involved in the project.

    Apothe0sis on
  • VistiVisti Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Woo, those new distro icons are neat. Arch one is still broken, I see. Here's one:

    arch-linux-logo.png

    Visti on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ImpersonatorImpersonator Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    I actually love OpenSUSE even though I'm riding with Lucid Lynx at the moment. I just love their KDE implementation.

    Impersonator on
  • Apothe0sisApothe0sis Have you ever questioned the nature of your reality? Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    I don't really like Ubuntu or Fedora, but I have to use Fedora at work. At least it IS linux.

    I really want to redo some SUSE but I'm currently out of machines upon which to do it.

    I'd also like to try Arch - I'm thinking that might be an idea for my Netbook if I can find a different solution for the Windows work stuff I do.

    Apothe0sis on
  • Mr_RoseMr_Rose 83 Blue Ridge Protects the Holy Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    OK, a few weeks ago, I figured out how to get a list of everything in the filesystem sorted by filesize into a text file.
    I have since forgotten the details.
    I do know that it involved piping the output of one command into sort then the output of that to a file which then opened in nano.
    Any ideas what my mystery command might have looked like?

    Mr_Rose on
    ...because dragons are AWESOME! That's why.
    Nintendo Network ID: AzraelRose
    DropBox invite link - get 500MB extra free.
  • MKRMKR Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Probably ls with the recursive switch and one of the sorting switches. Try ls --help.

    MKR on
  • Mr_RoseMr_Rose 83 Blue Ridge Protects the Holy Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Aha! Found a nice list of commands here; turns out it was "du" or disk usage.

    Actually, it might be an idea to put a link to that list of commands in the OP somewhere, because there's a lot and maybe four people know all of them.

    Mr_Rose on
    ...because dragons are AWESOME! That's why.
    Nintendo Network ID: AzraelRose
    DropBox invite link - get 500MB extra free.
  • BarrakkethBarrakketh Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Well, using sort you can do is like this:
    ls -lR /path/ | sort -n -k 5
    

    And we had some handy commands in the previous OP. And I posted some that are specific to Arch's package manager hidden away in that thread, along with other bits I've posted.

    Barrakketh on
    Rollers are red, chargers are blue....omae wa mou shindeiru
  • Mr_RoseMr_Rose 83 Blue Ridge Protects the Holy Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Also
    du -aS /path/ | sort -nr > sorted.txt && nano sorted.txt
    
    seems to work, and might even be what I originally came up with.

    On a slightly related topic, what's the difference between > and < exactly?

    Mr_Rose on
    ...because dragons are AWESOME! That's why.
    Nintendo Network ID: AzraelRose
    DropBox invite link - get 500MB extra free.
  • theSquidtheSquid Sydney, AustraliaRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Okay guys recommend me a modern distro for a Pentium 2.

    This is important to my plans for world domination.

    theSquid on
  • darkphoenix22darkphoenix22 Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    theSquid wrote: »
    Okay guys recommend me a modern distro for a Pentium 2.

    This is important to my plans for world domination.

    Puppy Linux is probably your best bet. It was made to run on everything.
    http://puppylinux.org/

    darkphoenix22 on
  • elliotw2elliotw2 Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    I vote a BSD, I like FreeBSD

    elliotw2 on
    camo_sig2.pngXBL:Elliotw3|PSN:elliotw2
  • theSquidtheSquid Sydney, AustraliaRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    theSquid wrote: »
    Okay guys recommend me a modern distro for a Pentium 2.

    This is important to my plans for world domination.

    Puppy Linux is probably your best bet. It was made to run on everything.
    http://puppylinux.org/

    Hm see Puppy makes me a little nervous, it doesn't quite operate the same way a normal Linux distro does due to the fact that it doesn't really sit on the hard drive, it just creates a save file. That doesn't fill me with confidence.

    theSquid on
  • SeeksSeeks Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Maybe Arch? I don't know what specs you're running here, but the barebones shouldn't demand too much. After that, just install a lightweight WM on that sucker.

    Seeks on
    userbar.jpg
    desura_Userbar.png
  • darkphoenix22darkphoenix22 Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    You can do a HD install of Puppy Linux.
    http://puppylinux.org/wikka/InstallationFullHDD
    http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=29653


    You could also try Debian Stable. Use the netinstall cd or Xfce Live CD to install it though.

    darkphoenix22 on
  • ImpersonatorImpersonator Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    theSquid wrote: »
    Okay guys recommend me a modern distro for a Pentium 2.

    This is important to my plans for world domination.

    Puppy Linux is probably your best bet. It was made to run on everything.
    http://puppylinux.org/

    Lubuntu.

    Impersonator on
  • darkphoenix22darkphoenix22 Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    theSquid wrote: »
    Okay guys recommend me a modern distro for a Pentium 2.

    This is important to my plans for world domination.

    Puppy Linux is probably your best bet. It was made to run on everything.
    http://puppylinux.org/

    Lubuntu.

    I'd be skeptical of Lubuntu just because 10.04 LTS is its first release. Ubuntu already doesn't have a good track record in terms of bugs.

    darkphoenix22 on
  • ImpersonatorImpersonator Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    I tried it and it's good.

    Impersonator on
  • darkphoenix22darkphoenix22 Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    I'm kinda iffy about the fact that they used Chromium as the main browser. Chromium is still a bit beta.

    darkphoenix22 on
  • ImpersonatorImpersonator Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    No it isn't. What are you talking about? There are stable and unstable versions if that's what you're referring to. Even the Netbook version of the next Ubuntu release is going to come with Chromium. :)

    edit: And really, you can just install a different browser, software shouldn't be an issue with Linux distributions. What matters the most is that Lubuntu is a solid distro, I really liked it.

    Impersonator on
  • darkphoenix22darkphoenix22 Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    No it isn't. What are you talking about? There are stable and unstable versions if that's what you're referring to. Even the Netbook version of the next Ubuntu release is going to come with Chromium. :)

    edit: And really, you can just install a different browser, software shouldn't be an issue with Linux distributions. What matters the most is that Lubuntu is a solid distro, I really liked it.

    Chrome/Chromium for Linux is still in Beta as far as I can tell. A distribution, especially one aimed at new users like the Ubuntus, shouldn't be making beta software default.

    It also seems like you have to add a PPA to get some bug fixes for Lubuntu from what I read on the front page, as they haven't pushed stuff to the main Ubuntu repo.

    I would wait a release just for them to get everything worked out.

    darkphoenix22 on
  • ImpersonatorImpersonator Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    No it isn't. What are you talking about? There are stable and unstable versions if that's what you're referring to. Even the Netbook version of the next Ubuntu release is going to come with Chromium. :)

    edit: And really, you can just install a different browser, software shouldn't be an issue with Linux distributions. What matters the most is that Lubuntu is a solid distro, I really liked it.

    Chrome/Chromium for Linux is still in Beta as far as I can tell. A distribution, especially one aimed at new users like the Ubuntus, shouldn't be making beta software default.

    It also seems like you have to add a PPA to get some bug fixes for Lubuntu from what I read on the front page, as they haven't pushed stuff to the main Ubuntu repo.

    I would wait a release just for them to get everything worked out.

    Where did you read that?

    http://lubuntu.net/blog/lubuntu-1004-now-available-download

    Don't spread misinformation just because you're not into a certain distro.

    Impersonator on
  • darkphoenix22darkphoenix22 Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Where did you read that?

    http://lubuntu.net/blog/lubuntu-1004-now-available-download

    Don't spread misinformation just because you're not into a certain distro.

    It's on the front page (though looking it over again I may have misread it).
    == Specific Lubuntu changes ==

    Lubuntu still contains modifications not available in the official repository, you can see them in the Lubuntu PPA [1] :
    - New pcmanfm2 and libfm (LP: #523433)
    - lubuntu-default-settings with pcmanfm2 support
    - Fix for blurry shutdown-icon from elementary-icons (LP: #527345)
    - Autologin support in ubiquity (LP: #546445)

    == Thanks of Julien ==

    Mind you I honestly may be being a lil hard on them. I, and a few other people I know, have had quite a few problems with Chromium on Linux in terms of crashing.

    It's a fine browser, just not ready to be default just yet. ;)

    Edit: I guess making your own distro can make you a bit harder on other contemporaries. I do look forward to when Lubuntu matures though. Puppy Linux does have some drawbacks and Lubuntu looks like a good eventual alternative. :P

    Mind you, infinityOS isn't perfect either and its current release has a few drawbacks and bugs as well (which I hope to take care of in the next release). This is also why it hasn't reached 1.0 yet (well, apart from branding).

    darkphoenix22 on
  • ImpersonatorImpersonator Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Where did you read that?

    http://lubuntu.net/blog/lubuntu-1004-now-available-download

    Don't spread misinformation just because you're not into a certain distro.

    It's on the front page (though looking it over again I may have misread it).
    == Specific Lubuntu changes ==

    Lubuntu still contains modifications not available in the official repository, you can see them in the Lubuntu PPA [1] :
    - New pcmanfm2 and libfm (LP: #523433)
    - lubuntu-default-settings with pcmanfm2 support
    - Fix for blurry shutdown-icon from elementary-icons (LP: #527345)
    - Autologin support in ubiquity (LP: #546445)

    == Thanks of Julien ==

    Mind you I honestly may be being a lil hard on them. I, and a few other people I know, have had quite a few problems with Chromium on Linux in terms of crashing.

    It's a fine browser, just not ready to be default just yet. ;)

    I believe you're reading it wrong.

    What the changelog says is that Lubuntu already has those changes thanks to the PPA. What that means is that they're not available on the official repositories and that if you do want them you'd need to add it to your sources list. Of course that the Lubuntu distro already comes with the Lubuntu PPA added to the software sources, it wouldn't make sense otherwise.

    Impersonator on
  • darkphoenix22darkphoenix22 Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Ya, I guess that means that you have to add the Lubuntu PPA in order to install it from another install CD or Ubuntu installation, which is a bit wierd for a official Ubuntu derivative.

    darkphoenix22 on
  • BarrakkethBarrakketh Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Ya, I guess that means that you have to add the Lubuntu PPA in order to install it from another install CD or Ubuntu installation, which is a bit wierd for a official Ubuntu derivative.

    ?
    lubuntu is a faster, more lightweight and energy saving variant of Ubuntu using LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. The lubuntu team aims to earn official endorsement from Canonical

    I think we have different definitions of "official" :P

    Barrakketh on
    Rollers are red, chargers are blue....omae wa mou shindeiru
Sign In or Register to comment.