So my school is giving out free installs of Windows Vista Ultimate to make better use of the new online infrastructure. Problem is, I'm pretty attached to XP, and I'm having trouble finding any unbiased opinions of the updated Microsoft OS.
So for reasons I'm not entirely sure of myself, I'm turning to you. Who has Vista and is happy with it? Who thinks it isn't worth the disc it's written on? The main issues I'm battling with are comparing and contrasting the Vista GUI with XP, and compatibility with other software and programs.
I'm dual booting xp and vista on my desktop, but I haven't used xp in more than 2 months. I haven't found anything completely broken with it, and it seems to have nearly perfect backwards compatibility with what I've tried to install. Also, you can use dx10 with it so thats another bonus.
The only reason i wouldn't turn vista is that not all popular games right now are supported by it. But, there are games coming out that are only for vista. To be honest, anything outside of that I would get it as long as my computer supports its graphic capabilities. (which it does ) Make sure every single one of your drivers is compatible. Since its release there should be a good number of patches out there now.
I've been running Vista for a few months now, and I have not had a single problem with it. Not one program I have attempted to install has not worked correctly, I have experienced a performance increase over XP, and I have yet to have it crash on me.
I say go for it.
TDL on
Meet me on my vast veranda
My sweet, untouched Miranda
And while the seagulls are crying
We fall but our souls are flying
I'm generally anti-Vista, but free? Shit, set up a new partition on your HD and install it on that so you can dual boot XP/Vista. See which one you like more and/or use them each for different things.
I've been running Vista for a few months now, and I have not had a single problem with it. Not one program I have attempted to install has not worked correctly, I have experienced a performance increase over XP, and I have yet to have it crash on me.
I say go for it.
How "different" is the GUI from XP? Would you say it's navigation and customization is a noticeable improvement from the previous Windows generation?
EDIT: And dual booting is actually a good idea I hadn't thought of. I think I'll pick up a second internal hard drive tomorrow and try out Vista for a while. And if I don't like it, I can just go back until the kinks are worked out.
It is certainly an improvement, but I wouldn't say it's very noticeable, no. I got used to it fairly quickly, and I do prefer it, but it's not greatly changed.
If I still had something running XP I would compare the differences, but I got rid of my XP partition almost immediately after using Vista.
TDL on
Meet me on my vast veranda
My sweet, untouched Miranda
And while the seagulls are crying
We fall but our souls are flying
0
Options
Zxerolfor the smaller pieces, my shovel wouldn't doso i took off my boot and used my shoeRegistered Userregular
edited September 2007
I'm in the camp that thinks that Vista takes far too much heat than it deserves. Was it overhyped? Yeah. Did it fall short of the lofty expectations that Microsoft put on it? Probably. Is it a bad OS? Not at all. It's actually quite good, and brings about some actual improvements over XP. Plus, if they're giving it away free anyway, you honestly have nothing to lose. I've been running a pure Vista install on my machine for the past few months and have extremely few problems with it.
That said, if the question is buying to upgrade over XP, I would hesitate to say yes. I like Vista, but I don't think it's worth spending that extra couple hundred if you have XP unless a) it came with a new computer, b) you're getting it mad cheap, or c) you want to be able to take advantage of DX10. I fell into group c.
Vista has pretty good driver support now. I would certainly recommend upgrading. Windows explorer is a lot better (and faster and more stable), apps in general are faster to load if you have enough ram, thanks to superfetch. And reformatting goes so much more smoothly with Vista than it does with XP. Integrated search everywhere is also really nice. I wouldn't want to go back to XP.
RandomEngy on
Profile -> Signature Settings -> Hide signatures always. Then you don't have to read this worthless text anymore.
I've been running Vista for a few months now, and I have not had a single problem with it. Not one program I have attempted to install has not worked correctly, I have experienced a performance increase over XP, and I have yet to have it crash on me.
I say go for it.
How "different" is the GUI from XP? Would you say it's navigation and customization is a noticeable improvement from the previous Windows generation?
The GUI is almost exactly the same for all day-to-day stuff. Some of the Control Panel items are different, but it's easy to find your way around after a few minutes. Heck, I still use the old NT4 conventions for folder viewing and navigation and I can get around it just fine.
The effects actually don't get in the way like you'd expect. Everything still moves along snappily.
I got by on 1GB for the beta and it still worked pretty well. I've been told that 2GB is the minimum, but I noticed no significant speed loss compared to XP except for HD video playback. Everything else was the same as far as I could tell.
There aren't a ton of advantages to upgrading to Vista, aside from "omg shiny" and DirectX10 support (which is a biggie if you game). I think it basically comes down to personal choice; some people are comfortable with XP the way it is and don't need to change a thing. Change would only make them unhappy. Other people enjoy the UI changes and the shiny that Vista introduces. Since it's free just grab it and dual boot.
Well unfortunately I was double checking my hardware specs and found out my video card doesn't support DX10, but I think I'm going to get Vista anyway since the main vibe I'm getting is "it's better than XP." Even if it's not worlds better, it's better, and it's free.
The UI is really pretty useless, as far as advantages go. It's pretty, woo.
The real advantages for me are;
- One button press hotkey for search. I rarely use actual folder directories any more.
- Increased stability, especially with video drivers. It only crashed with the first few Nvidia drivers, and updates them without having to restart. It alt-tabs to certain programs that used to have issues (Acrobat) faster too. This is *huge* and why I would never consider going back to XP.
- After a few months and minor tweaks, it boots and loads programs faster than XP did, with 2gb of RAM.
- The only useful graphical thing is actually quite great; thumbnails on mouseover and alt-tab. 3d Flip is generally useless, except when synced to a mouse button for one handed sorting of open windows (great for sorting through a dozen word documents while jotting notes and/or porn).
There's a ton of minor stuff too, like the games explorer, performance monitor, easier user account management, and probably things I don't even think about any more.
On the other hand, my printer was a brick for months, and goddamn Xfire still triggers UAC whenever it starts (the only time I really see it anymore).
As long as you don't have to run games that uses loads of hi-res textures, you should be fine. I recently added XP on my system (dual-boot), seeing how Vista completely fails to handle things like the Cinematic mod for HL2...and Oblivion if you just push it far enough (though Oblivion doesn't break completely like HL2 does, and this is improved with the latest Nvidia driver + MS Hotfix KB940105). Other than that, I haven't really had that many bad experiences lately due to more mature drivers etc. since I first started using it.
I have to agree with a lot of the above posts. IT"S FREE!!!! I myself don't like it, but that's also because the only time i have used it is on my girlfriend's labtop, which has shit for RAM. It makes me want to kill myself with the labtop in hopes of destroying it in the process. But, like everyone keeps saying, take it.
Does anyone here have Vista Ultimate 64 bit? Last time I tried it, I kept getting BSOD out the arse - iv boughten an 8800 GTX recently and a new Nforce 680I SLI mobo (both are 'certified for Vista') so im wondering if I would be having problems with it still if I tried running it again.
As to whether you should install it - as for me, I believe that the moment that you install windows vista is when you're going to buy the next big new pc game, the one that you absolutely can't live without, that everyone else is playing - and it requires vista.
I just haven't seen any real compelling reason to switch otherwise.
Your going to have to upgrade at some point and its to your advantage to get it for free while you can. There isn't any reason you can't just take the discs and the key and store it for later use.
Oh yeah, the xfire UAC thing is kind of a pain, but I restart less often than I did with xp so it's not too bad overall.
Oddly, on my laptop it doesn't do it. I don't really understand why though; I thought there'd been an update, but the install on my desktop still triggers it.
If you were paying for it I'd say no wait 6 months or more. But since its free go for it.
I dual boot xp/vista. Vista is pretty much only used for vista only/dx10 stuff atm. Its just not worth the hassle otherwise. (Though more and more stuff offering up dx10 like bioshock and world in conflict) Sure its pretty and probably safer but damn is it a hassle with UAC on not to mention software conflicts (I've off and on had a hell of a time more so with games that use punkbuster not to mention Rise and Fall wouldn't even install).
Oh yeah speaking of xfire some games have problems while in vista using in game chat. For example I haven't been able to get Company of Heroes or Sup Com to work with xfire in game chat (still tracks time though).
Have I got some bizzaro universe version of Vista? The only time I see the UAC prompt crop up is when I'm installing something or when I'm altering some sensitive part of the system. I rarely see it.
Anyway, I'd definitely say go with Vista. Personally I'm finding it a lot more stable than XP. No matter what I've thrown at it and what crazy program has crashed, Vista has always managed to maintain control an allow me to exit the offending software. I've only had 1 crash in the past few months that I've been using Vista, and that's when I tried to run a Russian game on my PC (Tarr Chronicles demo in case you're wondering. It worked afterwards anyway).
I've been running Vista for a few months now, and I have not had a single problem with it. Not one program I have attempted to install has not worked correctly, I have experienced a performance increase over XP, and I have yet to have it crash on me.
I say go for it.
Vista runs so much better than XP did on my machine.
I utterly loathe Vista... The installation was weird, giving at some spots no indication of installing at all, so you just had to wait and see.
Then, when you have updated all your drivers, it turns all that... Shit UI stuff on that doesn't add to anything anyway, and to keep the thing smooth you need to turn them off anyway. I can't find the Run command, and it crashes when running WMP, complaining about my 2 gigs of memory not being enough in a short BSOD...
And I still cannot see a difference between DX9 and 10, except a difference in 15 FPS (15 FPS and 30 FPS... Guess which one I'm going to choose.)
So far, it's been pissing me off, but I'm slowly adapting to it... The weirdest thing is that my main drive is under safely remove hardware.
What the fuck?
Overall, Ubuntu was easier, quicker and cleaner to install... I haven't installed either before I installed them on this computer.
But since it's free, I'd get it and maybe wait for Service Pack 1....
Oh mother of God, when I try to play games on Vista (nVidia 6600GT) the graphics card will randomly crash. This is followed by Vista eventually going "Vista has recovered from a graphics driver crash!" as though I should congratulate Vista from recovering when this shit shouldn't be happening in the first place.
Some games recover well along with the driver crash. GalCiv 2 does not, you have to Ctrl+Alt+Delete it. Which means lost progress.
Or better yet... Windows Key. That's it. The search box works as a run dialog.
Oh mother of God, when I try to play games on Vista (nVidia 6600GT) the graphics card will randomly crash. This is followed by Vista eventually going "Vista has recovered from a graphics driver crash!" as though I should congratulate Vista from recovering when this shit shouldn't be happening in the first place.
...the graphics driver crashed. Why are you blaming Vista? It recovered instead of giving you a BSOD like XP would.
And to Urgel: when you do get BSODs on 2k/XP/Vista, it's usually a driver or hardware problem, not an OS problem. And if Aero's running slowly... yeah, your hardware or your drivers are fucked up. Even integrated GPUs (the more recent ones anyway) can handle the fancy GUI stuff.
...the graphics driver crashed. Why are you blaming Vista? It recovered instead of giving you a BSOD like XP would.
No, that's just the thing... He's not the only one with this problem (check out sites like NVNews.net etc). Yes, it's Nvidia's fault (though some of the driver problems is caused by Microsoft messing up completely on Vista 32bit memory management) but XP would absolutely not BSOD on you as this particular problem never appears in the first place.
Posts
I know jack shit about computers, but I hear the words "Dual Boot" thrown around alot these days.
3DS Friend Code: 2165-6448-8348 www.Twitch.TV/cooljammer00
Battle.Net: JohnDarc#1203 Origin/UPlay: CoolJammer00
The only reason i wouldn't turn vista is that not all popular games right now are supported by it. But, there are games coming out that are only for vista. To be honest, anything outside of that I would get it as long as my computer supports its graphic capabilities. (which it does ) Make sure every single one of your drivers is compatible. Since its release there should be a good number of patches out there now.
I say go for it.
My sweet, untouched Miranda
And while the seagulls are crying
We fall but our souls are flying
How "different" is the GUI from XP? Would you say it's navigation and customization is a noticeable improvement from the previous Windows generation?
EDIT: And dual booting is actually a good idea I hadn't thought of. I think I'll pick up a second internal hard drive tomorrow and try out Vista for a while. And if I don't like it, I can just go back until the kinks are worked out.
If I still had something running XP I would compare the differences, but I got rid of my XP partition almost immediately after using Vista.
My sweet, untouched Miranda
And while the seagulls are crying
We fall but our souls are flying
That said, if the question is buying to upgrade over XP, I would hesitate to say yes. I like Vista, but I don't think it's worth spending that extra couple hundred if you have XP unless a) it came with a new computer, b) you're getting it mad cheap, or c) you want to be able to take advantage of DX10. I fell into group c.
Long answer: Hell yes.
The GUI is almost exactly the same for all day-to-day stuff. Some of the Control Panel items are different, but it's easy to find your way around after a few minutes. Heck, I still use the old NT4 conventions for folder viewing and navigation and I can get around it just fine.
The effects actually don't get in the way like you'd expect. Everything still moves along snappily.
I got by on 1GB for the beta and it still worked pretty well. I've been told that 2GB is the minimum, but I noticed no significant speed loss compared to XP except for HD video playback. Everything else was the same as far as I could tell.
There aren't a ton of advantages to upgrading to Vista, aside from "omg shiny" and DirectX10 support (which is a biggie if you game). I think it basically comes down to personal choice; some people are comfortable with XP the way it is and don't need to change a thing. Change would only make them unhappy. Other people enjoy the UI changes and the shiny that Vista introduces. Since it's free just grab it and dual boot.
The real advantages for me are;
- One button press hotkey for search. I rarely use actual folder directories any more.
- Increased stability, especially with video drivers. It only crashed with the first few Nvidia drivers, and updates them without having to restart. It alt-tabs to certain programs that used to have issues (Acrobat) faster too. This is *huge* and why I would never consider going back to XP.
- After a few months and minor tweaks, it boots and loads programs faster than XP did, with 2gb of RAM.
- The only useful graphical thing is actually quite great; thumbnails on mouseover and alt-tab. 3d Flip is generally useless, except when synced to a mouse button for one handed sorting of open windows (great for sorting through a dozen word documents while jotting notes and/or porn).
There's a ton of minor stuff too, like the games explorer, performance monitor, easier user account management, and probably things I don't even think about any more.
On the other hand, my printer was a brick for months, and goddamn Xfire still triggers UAC whenever it starts (the only time I really see it anymore).
UAC can be turned off.
As to whether you should install it - as for me, I believe that the moment that you install windows vista is when you're going to buy the next big new pc game, the one that you absolutely can't live without, that everyone else is playing - and it requires vista.
I just haven't seen any real compelling reason to switch otherwise.
Welcome to an Apple ad from six months ago.
Turn it off when setting up, back on when you're done, and you'll see it once every few days, at most. Barring shitty programs that need updates.
Switch: US 1651-2551-4335 JP 6310-4664-2624
MH3U Monster Cheat Sheet / MH3U Veggie Elder Ticket Guide
Most Software developers are on the ball now, and you only encounter UAC when doing an install.
Also, that UAC thing is GREAT for when you set up a PC where you want a truly locked guest account.
Let's play Mario Kart or something...
Oddly, on my laptop it doesn't do it. I don't really understand why though; I thought there'd been an update, but the install on my desktop still triggers it.
I dual boot xp/vista. Vista is pretty much only used for vista only/dx10 stuff atm. Its just not worth the hassle otherwise. (Though more and more stuff offering up dx10 like bioshock and world in conflict) Sure its pretty and probably safer but damn is it a hassle with UAC on not to mention software conflicts (I've off and on had a hell of a time more so with games that use punkbuster not to mention Rise and Fall wouldn't even install).
Oh yeah speaking of xfire some games have problems while in vista using in game chat. For example I haven't been able to get Company of Heroes or Sup Com to work with xfire in game chat (still tracks time though).
Edit: To the guy who keeps being asked for a password on his MacBook: What on Earth are you doing? I seeit almsot never. Maybe once a day at worst.
Anyway, I'd definitely say go with Vista. Personally I'm finding it a lot more stable than XP. No matter what I've thrown at it and what crazy program has crashed, Vista has always managed to maintain control an allow me to exit the offending software. I've only had 1 crash in the past few months that I've been using Vista, and that's when I tried to run a Russian game on my PC (Tarr Chronicles demo in case you're wondering. It worked afterwards anyway).
Vista runs so much better than XP did on my machine.
Then, when you have updated all your drivers, it turns all that... Shit UI stuff on that doesn't add to anything anyway, and to keep the thing smooth you need to turn them off anyway. I can't find the Run command, and it crashes when running WMP, complaining about my 2 gigs of memory not being enough in a short BSOD...
And I still cannot see a difference between DX9 and 10, except a difference in 15 FPS (15 FPS and 30 FPS... Guess which one I'm going to choose.)
So far, it's been pissing me off, but I'm slowly adapting to it... The weirdest thing is that my main drive is under safely remove hardware.
What the fuck?
Overall, Ubuntu was easier, quicker and cleaner to install... I haven't installed either before I installed them on this computer.
But since it's free, I'd get it and maybe wait for Service Pack 1....
Some games recover well along with the driver crash. GalCiv 2 does not, you have to Ctrl+Alt+Delete it. Which means lost progress.
Windows Key + R.
Learn your Windows Key shortcuts
Yes, this.
Yay easy to use Linux!
...the graphics driver crashed. Why are you blaming Vista? It recovered instead of giving you a BSOD like XP would.
And to Urgel: when you do get BSODs on 2k/XP/Vista, it's usually a driver or hardware problem, not an OS problem. And if Aero's running slowly... yeah, your hardware or your drivers are fucked up. Even integrated GPUs (the more recent ones anyway) can handle the fancy GUI stuff.
No, that's just the thing... He's not the only one with this problem (check out sites like NVNews.net etc). Yes, it's Nvidia's fault (though some of the driver problems is caused by Microsoft messing up completely on Vista 32bit memory management) but XP would absolutely not BSOD on you as this particular problem never appears in the first place.