In my mind Fearless defenders in MCU would be Carol Danvers,Black Widow, Sif, Misty Knight and Jessica Jones. So well after the netflix showd and Avengers 2 have aired.
I have a podcast now. It's about video games and anime!Find it here.
0
Options
Brainiac 8Don't call me Shirley...Registered Userregular
I'd miss Moonstar a lot if they ever did a Fearless Defenders movie/show. She is such a fantastic character.
Dark Raven XLaugh hard, run fast,be kindRegistered Userregular
HEY! I can finally talk bout Guardians!
It was the best. My favourite Marvel movie so far, by a wide margin. Hell, it's up there for favourite movie in general. Just perfect, fun space action. Loved it, start to finish.
Yondu was a little weird, bore no resemblance to the one I know from the comics, but he was a fun new character in his own right.
Was slightly disapointed they killed Ronan, because stop killing all the villains off Marvel, but he worked great to hype up Thanos for a future movie. And at least Nebula got away.
Dat face when Quill challenged him to the dance off. Just a perfect "wat" look from Ronan.
Kinda worried the bar is too high for Age of Ultron now. :P
Was slightly disapointed they killed Ronan, because stop killing all the villains off Marvel
In fairness, how many movies is it going to be before they start to run out of villains to be fought? And it's not like it's unheard of to write someone back in after a supposed 'death'.
Red Skull and Ronan could both have been blasted to another dimension/time.
Zola could/should have made backups of himself.
The Abomination's still alive, although I don't think anyone really wants him back.
I think the only 'deader than dead' villains are the guys from the Iron Man movies and the Dark Elf Dude Whose Name I've Forgotten, Started With An M I Think, and I doubt they'd really have much reason to use them again anyway.
Plus, Loki's still alive and scheming.
Was slightly disapointed they killed Ronan, because stop killing all the villains off Marvel
In fairness, how many movies is it going to be before they start to run out of villains to be fought? And it's not like it's unheard of to write someone back in after a supposed 'death'.
Red Skull and Ronan could both have been blasted to another dimension/time.
Zola could/should have made backups of himself.
The Abomination's still alive, although I don't think anyone really wants him back.
I think the only 'deader than dead' villains are the guys from the Iron Man movies and the Dark Elf Dude Whose Name I've Forgotten, Started With An M I Think, and I doubt they'd really have much reason to use them again anyway.
Plus, Loki's still alive and scheming.
Marvel could use a Magneto or Doctor Doom - a top-level human threat that they can't just put down. Maybe that's the direction they're going with Baron Strucker.
Was slightly disapointed they killed Ronan, because stop killing all the villains off Marvel
In fairness, how many movies is it going to be before they start to run out of villains to be fought? And it's not like it's unheard of to write someone back in after a supposed 'death'.
Red Skull and Ronan could both have been blasted to another dimension/time.
Zola could/should have made backups of himself.
The Abomination's still alive, although I don't think anyone really wants him back.
I think the only 'deader than dead' villains are the guys from the Iron Man movies and the Dark Elf Dude Whose Name I've Forgotten, Started With An M I Think, and I doubt they'd really have much reason to use them again anyway.
Plus, Loki's still alive and scheming.
Was slightly disapointed they killed Ronan, because stop killing all the villains off Marvel
In fairness, how many movies is it going to be before they start to run out of villains to be fought? And it's not like it's unheard of to write someone back in after a supposed 'death'.
Red Skull and Ronan could both have been blasted to another dimension/time.
Zola could/should have made backups of himself.
The Abomination's still alive, although I don't think anyone really wants him back.
I think the only 'deader than dead' villains are the guys from the Iron Man movies and the Dark Elf Dude Whose Name I've Forgotten, Started With An M I Think, and I doubt they'd really have much reason to use them again anyway.
Plus, Loki's still alive and scheming.
Marvel's got tonnes of great villains to mine from the comics.
they don't need to bring him back as they can always just introduce some other accuser with a personality closer to that of the comics.
They should bring him back, as a clone or whatever. He's an awesome character - Ronan's got the potential to be Marvel's next Loki.
Recurring villains need to be people who plot and plan, intricate and elaborate plans that can be different from film to film.
Red Skull could come back, Hammer could come back, Hydra and Loki will obviously be back, but you won't see the Abomination again because he's such a one-trick pony. Villains with complex motivations get to show up again and again, villains with simple ones do not.
they don't need to bring him back as they can always just introduce some other accuser with a personality closer to that of the comics.
They should bring him back, as a clone or whatever. He's an awesome character - Ronan's got the potential to be Marvel's next Loki.
Recurring villains need to be people who plot and plan, intricate and elaborate plans that can be different from film to film.
Red Skull could come back, Hammer could come back, Hydra and Loki will obviously be back, but you won't see the Abomination again because he's such a one-trick pony. Villains with complex motivations get to show up again and again, villains with simple ones do not.
Ronan is like that in the comics, GOTG didn't give a good example for who he is.
Not anymore. He used to be. While I prefer later era anti-hero Ronan myself, it was a totally valid move on the part of the movie to use an older interpretation of Ronan, seeing as this is his first appearance.
they don't need to bring him back as they can always just introduce some other accuser with a personality closer to that of the comics.
They should bring him back, as a clone or whatever. He's an awesome character - Ronan's got the potential to be Marvel's next Loki.
Recurring villains need to be people who plot and plan, intricate and elaborate plans that can be different from film to film.
Red Skull could come back, Hammer could come back, Hydra and Loki will obviously be back, but you won't see the Abomination again because he's such a one-trick pony. Villains with complex motivations get to show up again and again, villains with simple ones do not.
Abomination is probably better developed than those other villains except for Loki. They gave him quite a bit of screen time and set up his motivation pretty well. There's also more psychological elements to his character development than the other villains. The whole idea of Blonsky being an aging soldier who still wanted to remain useful and was willing to subject himself to dangerous experiments to do it was pretty interesting.
they don't need to bring him back as they can always just introduce some other accuser with a personality closer to that of the comics.
They should bring him back, as a clone or whatever. He's an awesome character - Ronan's got the potential to be Marvel's next Loki.
Recurring villains need to be people who plot and plan, intricate and elaborate plans that can be different from film to film.
Red Skull could come back, Hammer could come back, Hydra and Loki will obviously be back, but you won't see the Abomination again because he's such a one-trick pony. Villains with complex motivations get to show up again and again, villains with simple ones do not.
Abomination is probably better developed than those other villains except for Loki. They gave him quite a bit of screen time and set up his motivation pretty well. There's also more psychological elements to his character development than the other villains. The whole idea of Blonsky being an aging soldier who still wanted to remain useful and was willing to subject himself to dangerous experiments to do it was pretty interesting.
They could easily bring him in as the pawn of another villain/organization, as well. Hell, he could show up in Agents of SHIELD if they had the budget for it. They're technically responsible for containing the Gamma folk. Or they were.
There's no plan, there's no race to be run
The harder the rain, honey, the sweeter the sun.
they don't need to bring him back as they can always just introduce some other accuser with a personality closer to that of the comics.
They should bring him back, as a clone or whatever. He's an awesome character - Ronan's got the potential to be Marvel's next Loki.
Recurring villains need to be people who plot and plan, intricate and elaborate plans that can be different from film to film.
Red Skull could come back, Hammer could come back, Hydra and Loki will obviously be back, but you won't see the Abomination again because he's such a one-trick pony. Villains with complex motivations get to show up again and again, villains with simple ones do not.
Abomination is probably better developed than those other villains except for Loki. They gave him quite a bit of screen time and set up his motivation pretty well. There's also more psychological elements to his character development than the other villains. The whole idea of Blonsky being an aging soldier who still wanted to remain useful and was willing to subject himself to dangerous experiments to do it was pretty interesting.
They could easily bring him in as the pawn of another villain/organization, as well. Hell, he could show up in Agents of SHIELD if they had the budget for it. They're technically responsible for containing the Gamma folk. Or they were.
They could also (temporarily) de-power him and just have Tim Roth play him, maybe with some make up and prosthetics.
they don't need to bring him back as they can always just introduce some other accuser with a personality closer to that of the comics.
They should bring him back, as a clone or whatever. He's an awesome character - Ronan's got the potential to be Marvel's next Loki.
Recurring villains need to be people who plot and plan, intricate and elaborate plans that can be different from film to film.
Red Skull could come back, Hammer could come back, Hydra and Loki will obviously be back, but you won't see the Abomination again because he's such a one-trick pony. Villains with complex motivations get to show up again and again, villains with simple ones do not.
Abomination is probably better developed than those other villains except for Loki. They gave him quite a bit of screen time and set up his motivation pretty well. There's also more psychological elements to his character development than the other villains. The whole idea of Blonsky being an aging soldier who still wanted to remain useful and was willing to subject himself to dangerous experiments to do it was pretty interesting.
it is but I dont know he just didn't have the charisma that loki did. hell he wasn't even that imposing I'm sure that could be solved though
Posts
He...would be a pretty great Doctor Strange. Yeah, I said it.
As long as you admit your mistakes its cool
I got this one which made me smile because it really was the best armor :
that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
Appendages?
There as a bit in the Incredible Hercules (?) where
She loved it, and the movie held up with my second. It was just as fantastic.
She wasn't sure how much she could get into a movie that featured a main character that was a raccoon and a tree.
Nintendo Network ID - Brainiac_8
PSN - Brainiac_8
Steam - http://steamcommunity.com/id/BRAINIAC8/
Add me!
He has had to at some point. Everybody fights each other in the comics.
That sounds hilarious.
the whole Incredible Hercules run is pretty goddamn funny
Ares is just a dick when he "joins" the Avengers to get at Hercules
"HALT! SUSPECT IS THREATENING THE LIFE OF MY TEAMMATE! DEADLY FORCE AUTHORIZED!"
"What? No he isn't."
"I AM SORRY WONDER MAN, I CANNOT HEAR YOU OVER THE SOUND OF RETURN FIRE."
Fearless Defenders probably less so as they can't use Dani.
There is also a bit in the previous Hercules mini-series (the one with Texeira art), where Hercules has to do his 12 labours again, but modernized.
Nintendo Network ID - Brainiac_8
PSN - Brainiac_8
Steam - http://steamcommunity.com/id/BRAINIAC8/
Add me!
It was the best. My favourite Marvel movie so far, by a wide margin. Hell, it's up there for favourite movie in general. Just perfect, fun space action. Loved it, start to finish.
Was slightly disapointed they killed Ronan, because stop killing all the villains off Marvel, but he worked great to hype up Thanos for a future movie. And at least Nebula got away.
Dat face when Quill challenged him to the dance off. Just a perfect "wat" look from Ronan.
Kinda worried the bar is too high for Age of Ultron now. :P
Red Skull and Ronan could both have been blasted to another dimension/time.
Zola could/should have made backups of himself.
The Abomination's still alive, although I don't think anyone really wants him back.
I think the only 'deader than dead' villains are the guys from the Iron Man movies and the Dark Elf Dude Whose Name I've Forgotten, Started With An M I Think, and I doubt they'd really have much reason to use them again anyway.
Plus, Loki's still alive and scheming.
Loki's more popular than Thor right now.
That's already the case, though. They were in The Air I Breathe together.
I know, you'll note that the comment you quoted is in response to someone saying they wanted him to play a character in Marvel Cosmic.
Nintendo ID: Pastalonius
Smite\LoL:Gremlidin \ WoW & Overwatch & Hots: Gremlidin#1734
3ds: 3282-2248-0453
Recurring villains need to be people who plot and plan, intricate and elaborate plans that can be different from film to film.
Red Skull could come back, Hammer could come back, Hydra and Loki will obviously be back, but you won't see the Abomination again because he's such a one-trick pony. Villains with complex motivations get to show up again and again, villains with simple ones do not.
twitch.tv/Taramoor
@TaramoorPlays
Taramoor on Youtube
Ronan is like that in the comics, GOTG didn't give a good example for who he is.
Also tries to commit genocide against his people, but he had a good reason for that.
One of the best Ronan panels:
Nintendo Network ID - Brainiac_8
PSN - Brainiac_8
Steam - http://steamcommunity.com/id/BRAINIAC8/
Add me!
Not anymore. He used to be. While I prefer later era anti-hero Ronan myself, it was a totally valid move on the part of the movie to use an older interpretation of Ronan, seeing as this is his first appearance.
Abomination is probably better developed than those other villains except for Loki. They gave him quite a bit of screen time and set up his motivation pretty well. There's also more psychological elements to his character development than the other villains. The whole idea of Blonsky being an aging soldier who still wanted to remain useful and was willing to subject himself to dangerous experiments to do it was pretty interesting.
They could easily bring him in as the pawn of another villain/organization, as well. Hell, he could show up in Agents of SHIELD if they had the budget for it. They're technically responsible for containing the Gamma folk. Or they were.
The harder the rain, honey, the sweeter the sun.
They could also (temporarily) de-power him and just have Tim Roth play him, maybe with some make up and prosthetics.
it is but I dont know he just didn't have the charisma that loki did. hell he wasn't even that imposing I'm sure that could be solved though