going with enlightenedbum . extremely low profile. avoided bandwagons until Void who was red. Would be strategic placing after Auralynx+ GG essentially sealed his fate...
Hey, I forget I made that point yesterday (2days ago?) with my line vote. That is far better reasoning for a vote than my previous vote. enlightenedbum
"The psychedelic mind is a higher dimensional mind, it is not fit for three dimensional space time."
- Terence McKenna
0
WACriminalDying Is Easy, Young ManLiving Is HarderRegistered Userregular
Phone scuttling.
I might not be around tonight, so I'm calling this a bit early.
I'm Raphael. I'm the blue kill. Need Sam and Dean dead, don't care about anyone else. Do with that what you will, village.
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
Well, since he's almost definitely Dean... no. Just told him my name that I'm an angel and that I'm blue.
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
Indeed it is! But killing me is not part of your win condition. If I don't win the vote I won't target him tonight!
(Nothing stops him from targeting me, but I am also not part of his win condition, probably)
Interesting!
enlightenedbum on
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
in the series, there is only one "good" archangel- and it's not Raphael. Also I'm a bit surprised Raphael would be the killer and not Michael or even Lucifer (he is technically an angel)
Yeah I'm a survival neutral with a bonus "village specials have to be dead" win condition. Which is tough.
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
Yeah I'm a survival neutral with a bonus "village specials have to be dead" win condition. Which is tough.
If you need to kill "village specials", I'm not sure if you are technically neutral. It's like mafia-proxy
Eh, I win if y'all kill the mafia and they're dead. I win if the mafia controls the vote and they're dead. It's more like I'm 60/40 anti-village.
However, killing me is a kill you control that is 100% not aimed at the mafia so you shouldn't kill me.
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
Well, if we're not going with ebum - and it sounds like we shouldn't - let's go with CJ
In what world does it sound like we shouldn't kill the guy who needs me dead.
We're both interested parties here.
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
in the series, there is only one "good" archangel- and it's not Raphael. Also I'm a bit surprised Raphael would be the killer and not Michael or even Lucifer (he is technically an angel)
There's totally two.
Ish.
I mean the second one is pretty hostile to the Winchesters themselves, but harmless to the world at large
0
AuralynxDarkness is a perspectiveWatching the ego workRegistered Userregular
Well, if we're not going with ebum - and it sounds like we shouldn't - let's go with CJ
In what world does it sound like we shouldn't kill the guy who needs me dead.
... the one where he just revealed as (where everyone but you is concerned) a second vig who doesn't have any more idea who the guard is than the mafia?
in the series, there is only one "good" archangel- and it's not Raphael. Also I'm a bit surprised Raphael would be the killer and not Michael or even Lucifer (he is technically an angel)
There's totally two.
Ish.
I mean the second one is pretty hostile to the Winchesters themselves, but harmless to the world at large
Who is the other?
are you counting Michael as a "good guy"? Though I don't know if he gets better later on..
Yeah I'm a survival neutral with a bonus "village specials have to be dead" win condition. Which is tough.
If you need to kill "village specials", I'm not sure if you are technically neutral. It's like mafia-proxy
Eh, I win if y'all kill the mafia and they're dead. I win if the mafia controls the vote and they're dead. It's more like I'm 60/40 anti-village.
However, killing me is a kill you control that is 100% not aimed at the mafia so you shouldn't kill me.
Not aimed "by" the mafia?
Important distinction I think.
I mean the vote, kime.
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
so people think letting an outed SK of Village Specials....is a good idea. I see....
I'm saying that we should let WACriminal deal with him as everyone voting Ebum just kills voting records, not that we should let him live.
Well WAcriminal said he's working with another angel who is his guard - and not knowing what that ones wincon is he might need his buddy to live and guard ebum. Though there was clarification that guards can guard against the vote - so I'm not sure how this is going to play out.
Switch Animal Crossing Friend Code: SW-5107-9276-1030
Island Name: Felinefine
so people think letting an outed SK of Village Specials....is a good idea. I see....
Is two really "serial?"
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
so people think letting an outed SK of Village Specials....is a good idea. I see....
Is two really "serial?"
If that is your actual goal, no. But you are still anti-village even if you just need to get rid of village specials. And effectively so far, your kills have been Serial Killer-ish. So I'd be reluctant to trust claims
Now if you were a neutral who couldn't kill people..but select individuals..it would be slightly different. But you are a neutral with a kill.
Posts
Confusion will be my epitaph
Bandwagon!
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
Day 4
Void Slayer [8]- Gizzy (5), AustinP0027(7), Grunts Ghosts (8), Auralynx (9), enlightenedbum (10), WACriminal(11), Moridin889 (14), MagicPrime (15)
Grunt’s Ghosts[5]- Cythraul(2), Retaba(3), Kime (13), VoidSlayer (16), 38thdoe(17)
Gizzy[1]- Grunts Ghosts (4), Jpants(6)
enlightenedbum[1]- Kilnaga (12)
Retaba[0]- AustinP0027 (1)
Did not Vote: JusticeforPluto, Trust, Egos
- think that is correct.
edit: added Austin's + coloring to his.
- Terence McKenna
I might not be around tonight, so I'm calling this a bit early.
I need to see ebum bleed.
Island Name: Felinefine
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
.... this is awkward
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
(Nothing stops him from targeting me, but I am also not part of his win condition, probably)
Interesting!
in the series, there is only one "good" archangel- and it's not Raphael. Also I'm a bit surprised Raphael would be the killer and not Michael or even Lucifer (he is technically an angel)
If you need to kill "village specials", I'm not sure if you are technically neutral. It's like mafia-proxy
edit: I guess "technically" you could still be neutral. It would be more "effectively"
Eh, I win if y'all kill the mafia and they're dead. I win if the mafia controls the vote and they're dead. It's more like I'm 60/40 anti-village.
However, killing me is a kill you control that is 100% not aimed at the mafia so you shouldn't kill me.
edit: though there would have to be some odd mechanics in place for this to be..the case.
In what world does it sound like we shouldn't kill the guy who needs me dead.
We're both interested parties here.
There's totally two.
Ish.
I mean the second one is pretty hostile to the Winchesters themselves, but harmless to the world at large
... the one where he just revealed as (where everyone but you is concerned) a second vig who doesn't have any more idea who the guard is than the mafia?
I'll go with CJ, cause I'm my experience a quite CJ is a mafia CJ.
Who is the other?
Gabriel is the only one I would count
Not aimed "by" the mafia?
Important distinction I think.
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
Island Name: Felinefine
I mean the vote, kime.
Because of one "miss"?
Gotcha
3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
Steam profile
Island Name: Felinefine
I'm saying that we should let WACriminal deal with him as everyone voting Ebum just kills voting records, not that we should let him live.
Well WAcriminal said he's working with another angel who is his guard - and not knowing what that ones wincon is he might need his buddy to live and guard ebum. Though there was clarification that guards can guard against the vote - so I'm not sure how this is going to play out.
Island Name: Felinefine
Is two really "serial?"
And he's been reticent before now to give direction or communicate with others, except now when it's his life on the line.
Not saying its a bad call either way, just we've got two vigs and I don't see why we need to lose either.
If that is your actual goal, no. But you are still anti-village even if you just need to get rid of village specials. And effectively so far, your kills have been Serial Killer-ish. So I'd be reluctant to trust claims
Now if you were a neutral who couldn't kill people..but select individuals..it would be slightly different. But you are a neutral with a kill.
he is effectively a serial killer. there is a difference. you dont give the village two kills and the mafia one.
We have a seer. Ebum is Lucifer.