I kind of hope they reverse the 1 and done rule. Seems like it's being talked about. I think college hoops are more exciting when we have juniors and seniors playing in more games.
Sounds like the NBA is, and a 5* who was committed to Syracuse just said fuck it and is going to the G League instead. Should be headed in that direction.
Self-righteousness is incompatible with coalition building.
I kind of hope they reverse the 1 and done rule. Seems like it's being talked about. I think college hoops are more exciting when we have juniors and seniors playing in more games.
How, exactly, would you "reverse" it? One and done exists purely because the NBA doesn't allow for declaration for the draft until the age of 19. Either the NBA drops the rule (and then elite talent decamps to the pros), or they extend the age limit to 21, which is a load of gooseshit for a few reasons (not to mention that the NBA has no reason to do so.)
So it seems in 2011 Donte quoted some offensive lyrics from Meek Mill's song Derrick Rose as well as other offensive terms. He was asked about it and said he didn't do it and then brushed the question off. The tweet was then deleted and Villanova said his account was hacked which makes no sense as you can't hack the account and put on a post from 7 years ago. Villanova then walked that back and the account was deactivated.
Just admit it and apologize for being a stupid kid.
I really do not care.
Please consider the environment before printing this post.
I kind of hope they reverse the 1 and done rule. Seems like it's being talked about. I think college hoops are more exciting when we have juniors and seniors playing in more games.
How, exactly, would you "reverse" it? One and done exists purely because the NBA doesn't allow for declaration for the draft until the age of 19. Either the NBA drops the rule (and then elite talent decamps to the pros), or they extend the age limit to 21, which is a load of gooseshit for a few reasons (not to mention that the NBA has no reason to do so.)
Same way they do in mlb. The cba could say you can come right out of hs, or you can wait 3 years in college and then come out.
I kind of hope they reverse the 1 and done rule. Seems like it's being talked about. I think college hoops are more exciting when we have juniors and seniors playing in more games.
How, exactly, would you "reverse" it? One and done exists purely because the NBA doesn't allow for declaration for the draft until the age of 19. Either the NBA drops the rule (and then elite talent decamps to the pros), or they extend the age limit to 21, which is a load of gooseshit for a few reasons (not to mention that the NBA has no reason to do so.)
Same way they do in mlb. The cba could say you can come right out of hs, or you can wait 3 years in college and then come out.
Or hockey, where you're drafted the year after you turn 18 regardless and retain your eligibility.
Self-righteousness is incompatible with coalition building.
I kind of hope they reverse the 1 and done rule. Seems like it's being talked about. I think college hoops are more exciting when we have juniors and seniors playing in more games.
Sounds like the NBA is, and a 5* who was committed to Syracuse just said fuck it and is going to the G League instead. Should be headed in that direction.
Yeah I heard about that. Sucks they mentioned he'd only get 28K a year, when Mudiay earned 1.2 million playing in China. We'll see how it works out for him, the one thing you do get in the NCAA is exposure.
I kind of hope they reverse the 1 and done rule. Seems like it's being talked about. I think college hoops are more exciting when we have juniors and seniors playing in more games.
Sounds like the NBA is, and a 5* who was committed to Syracuse just said fuck it and is going to the G League instead. Should be headed in that direction.
Yeah I heard about that. Sucks they mentioned he'd only get 28K a year, when Mudiay earned 1.2 million playing in China. We'll see how it works out for him, the one thing you do get in the NCAA is exposure.
Mudiay dodged the scrutiny he would have gotten playing in the us in some fashion, probably made him a ton of extra money because he’s pretty much a bust. Hell, he was injury plagued that entire season and still went 7th. No way he goes that high if he was in the NCAA/g league.
Or they could make it more appealing for a player to stay in college like maybe paying them and allowing them to retain their eligibility if they go undrafted
Or they could make it more appealing for a player to stay in college like maybe paying them and allowing them to retain their eligibility if they go undrafted
But then the house of cards falls down, so that's a no.
I still believe the easiest solution is to treat scholarships like vouchers. Drop the full time student requirement to part time. This would help the student athletes focus on the core classes while they participate in their sport (see articles on juggling being a full time student, a part-time job, and practice hours at the same time). Keeping part time would help with complaints that removing all class work would give an unfair advantage to prestigious universities and allow the NCAA to keep using the term 'student athlete'.
The voucher would just be that. If a football player plays 3 years then leaves for the draft, but doesn't get drafted, they can come back and finish up the other 80 credit hours for free. If a basketball player plays 1 year then leaves for the draft, doesn't get drafted, spends 4 years playing in Europe, then wants to get their education, they can come back and take 32 credit hours for free. You get the high level jist, the longer you stay and play the more free credit hours you get on your voucher.
With a system like this in place, you get around how to pay players (since it's pretty complicated from a competition standpoint) and when the NCAA touts that athletes are getting paid in their education, they really will be.
Also if a system like that was in place, you could then make more compelling arguments for the one and done rule (or a 2 and done). If a high school kid doesn't get drafted, they'd have to pay their own way into college. But with 1 and done's, that one year of playing would be worth some free education.
Keeping part time would help with complaints that removing all class work would give an unfair advantage to prestigious universities and allow the NCAA to keep using the term 'student athlete'.
Given that the term was created as a cynical ploy by the colleges and the NCAA in order to evade workman's compensation, why would we want to let them keep using it?
The reality is that the NCAA is engaged in a longform exercise in justifying plunder. The fair answer is simple - let the players keep what they create valuewise. There is no other fair solution.
I'm a realist and if any change happens it's going to do so as a comprise with the powers that be.
The solution Patrick Hruby posted will never happen. Maybe this is the engineer or project manager in me, but posting a solution without a plan on how to get to said solution is no solution at all. What in the world does he propose is going to happen to the NCAA? That they will see how amazing that plan is and everyone will quit? Give me a break. You don't get massive changes in power structure without a higher power intervening or revolution. In this case, the Government could step in and mandate it, but that is very unlikely. Or all collage athlete's could go on strike? I don't see that happening either. Especially since his plan screws over the majority of college athletes.
The voucher system allows the power structure to continue to use the same rhetoric they've been using, they don't lose any power or very much money. At the same time they get a monkey off their back around treatment of players. Is it the best system? no, probably not. But you'd at least solve 3 major issues with the current system, 1) not enough time for their sport, school, and a job; 2) the ability to study the field they want and not the easiest; 3) the ability to devote themselves to their education if a pro career doesn't work out.
I'm a realist and if any change happens it's going to do so as a comprise with the powers that be.
The solution Patrick Hruby posted will never happen. Maybe this is the engineer or project manager in me, but posting a solution without a plan on how to get to said solution is no solution at all. What in the world does he propose is going to happen to the NCAA? That they will see how amazing that plan is and everyone will quit? Give me a break. You don't get massive changes in power structure without a higher power intervening or revolution. In this case, the Government could step in and mandate it, but that is very unlikely. Or all collage athlete's could go on strike? I don't see that happening either. Especially since his plan screws over the majority of college athletes.
The voucher system allows the power structure to continue to use the same rhetoric they've been using, they don't lose any power or very much money. At the same time they get a monkey off their back around treatment of players. Is it the best system? no, probably not. But you'd at least solve 3 major issues with the current system, 1) not enough time for their sport, school, and a job; 2) the ability to study the field they want and not the easiest; 3) the ability to devote themselves to their education if a pro career doesn't work out.
Of course, you're ignoring the major issue, which is that players are being cut off from the wealth their labor genetates,instead just giving all that money to the NCAA and the schools. So your "solution" doesn't actually solve anything, but it lets you feel better by rounding off some of the more abusive aspects of the system.
The problem is that the NCAA and the schools are taking the wealth that the players are creating and not returning any to them (and no, the scholarship doesn't count.) If you're not going to fix that part, then you're not actually fixing the problem.
John Beilein flirted with the Pistons but has decided to come back. Rumor has it he's getting a new contract with basically a rolling extension. He gets to stay in Ann Arbor til he feels like retiring, sounds like. He's 65, so I would imagine that's reasonably soon.
Self-righteousness is incompatible with coalition building.
NCAA basketball rules changes in the wake of the FBI investigation:
15 official visits (up from 5)
Elite high school prospects as determined by USA Basketball and college players can be represented by agents (to be certified as legit by the NCAA), college players may hire them after any season. These relationships must be terminated during the school year (...why?)
College players may submit for the draft and stay in the process through the draft. Undrafted players may opt to return to school. Currently they must withdraw at least 10 days prior to the draft.
D1 schools must honor scholarships to men's and women's basketball players who left school and came back to the same institution.
Self-righteousness is incompatible with coalition building.
I feel like coaches are gonna be pissed about the 'test the waters' change with the draft, but it's absolutely the right change and I doubt they'll whine because it'd be a terrible face to show recruits.
I feel like coaches are gonna be pissed about the 'test the waters' change with the draft, but it's absolutely the right change and I doubt they'll whine because it'd be a terrible face to show recruits.
One and done is the reality today, so these changes aren't a big deal. The agent changes are unacceptable - remember, the NCAA's restrictions on agent representation are illegal (as in a court of law found them to be a restraint on the right to counsel.)
Just in case you thought the NCAA did something correct for once, apparently they did not actually talk with USAB before releasing these changes, which means that USAB did not know they were going to be in charge of figuring out which players can be represented.
Just in case you thought the NCAA did something correct for once, apparently they did not actually talk with USAB before releasing these changes, which means that USAB did not know they were going to be in charge of figuring out which players can be represented.
Michigan opens against some MEAC tomato can tonight. Gonna raise some banners, play real good defense, maybe score sometimes? This is basically a Bo Ryan roster with a couple NBA talented guys.
enlightenedbum on
Self-righteousness is incompatible with coalition building.
0
Options
RingoHe/Hima distinct lack of substanceRegistered Userregular
I'm happy to watch UNC vs Wofford if I can find it. The grudge match no one knew would ever be a grudge. I won't even be mad if Wofford wins again.
ESPN2 at 7pm Eastern
No TV/TV package so the deal for me is more finding the right bar, or friend with streaming details. Thanks though! Let's go heels! Or Terriers! Just anything to ignore ongoing election coverage! (I voted, I care deeply, I just don't want the stress till it's hopefully over tomorrow)
100 points with 7:30 left. 59 in both halves. Previous Duke freshman debut scoring record was Bagley last year with 25. Barrett had 33, Zion 28, Reddish 22.
Last night is a perfect example of why the NBA needs to get rid of the, wait 1 year to be drafted rule. Zion should be playing for Suns right now. Instead, Duke is going to steamroll everyone.
Last night is a perfect example of why the NBA needs to get rid of the, wait 1 year to be drafted rule. Zion should be playing for Suns right now. Instead, Duke is going to steamroll everyone.
They'd have Barrett. For all the hype that Zion gets, he's not the best player on this team.
Posts
Sounds like the NBA is, and a 5* who was committed to Syracuse just said fuck it and is going to the G League instead. Should be headed in that direction.
How, exactly, would you "reverse" it? One and done exists purely because the NBA doesn't allow for declaration for the draft until the age of 19. Either the NBA drops the rule (and then elite talent decamps to the pros), or they extend the age limit to 21, which is a load of gooseshit for a few reasons (not to mention that the NBA has no reason to do so.)
I really do not care.
Same way they do in mlb. The cba could say you can come right out of hs, or you can wait 3 years in college and then come out.
Or hockey, where you're drafted the year after you turn 18 regardless and retain your eligibility.
Yeah I heard about that. Sucks they mentioned he'd only get 28K a year, when Mudiay earned 1.2 million playing in China. We'll see how it works out for him, the one thing you do get in the NCAA is exposure.
Mudiay dodged the scrutiny he would have gotten playing in the us in some fashion, probably made him a ton of extra money because he’s pretty much a bust. Hell, he was injury plagued that entire season and still went 7th. No way he goes that high if he was in the NCAA/g league.
But then the house of cards falls down, so that's a no.
The voucher would just be that. If a football player plays 3 years then leaves for the draft, but doesn't get drafted, they can come back and finish up the other 80 credit hours for free. If a basketball player plays 1 year then leaves for the draft, doesn't get drafted, spends 4 years playing in Europe, then wants to get their education, they can come back and take 32 credit hours for free. You get the high level jist, the longer you stay and play the more free credit hours you get on your voucher.
With a system like this in place, you get around how to pay players (since it's pretty complicated from a competition standpoint) and when the NCAA touts that athletes are getting paid in their education, they really will be.
Also if a system like that was in place, you could then make more compelling arguments for the one and done rule (or a 2 and done). If a high school kid doesn't get drafted, they'd have to pay their own way into college. But with 1 and done's, that one year of playing would be worth some free education.
Given that the term was created as a cynical ploy by the colleges and the NCAA in order to evade workman's compensation, why would we want to let them keep using it?
The reality is that the NCAA is engaged in a longform exercise in justifying plunder. The fair answer is simple - let the players keep what they create valuewise. There is no other fair solution.
We need to reject the NCAA's corrupt framing that just so happens to give them and the schools all the power.
The solution Patrick Hruby posted will never happen. Maybe this is the engineer or project manager in me, but posting a solution without a plan on how to get to said solution is no solution at all. What in the world does he propose is going to happen to the NCAA? That they will see how amazing that plan is and everyone will quit? Give me a break. You don't get massive changes in power structure without a higher power intervening or revolution. In this case, the Government could step in and mandate it, but that is very unlikely. Or all collage athlete's could go on strike? I don't see that happening either. Especially since his plan screws over the majority of college athletes.
The voucher system allows the power structure to continue to use the same rhetoric they've been using, they don't lose any power or very much money. At the same time they get a monkey off their back around treatment of players. Is it the best system? no, probably not. But you'd at least solve 3 major issues with the current system, 1) not enough time for their sport, school, and a job; 2) the ability to study the field they want and not the easiest; 3) the ability to devote themselves to their education if a pro career doesn't work out.
Of course, you're ignoring the major issue, which is that players are being cut off from the wealth their labor genetates,instead just giving all that money to the NCAA and the schools. So your "solution" doesn't actually solve anything, but it lets you feel better by rounding off some of the more abusive aspects of the system.
The problem is that the NCAA and the schools are taking the wealth that the players are creating and not returning any to them (and no, the scholarship doesn't count.) If you're not going to fix that part, then you're not actually fixing the problem.
That sucks, butI dont blame him.
{Twitter, Everybody's doing it. }{Writing and Story Blog}
15 official visits (up from 5)
Elite high school prospects as determined by USA Basketball and college players can be represented by agents (to be certified as legit by the NCAA), college players may hire them after any season. These relationships must be terminated during the school year (...why?)
College players may submit for the draft and stay in the process through the draft. Undrafted players may opt to return to school. Currently they must withdraw at least 10 days prior to the draft.
D1 schools must honor scholarships to men's and women's basketball players who left school and came back to the same institution.
One and done is the reality today, so these changes aren't a big deal. The agent changes are unacceptable - remember, the NCAA's restrictions on agent representation are illegal (as in a court of law found them to be a restraint on the right to counsel.)
Edit: Relevant tweet
Again, the NCAA should not be dictating anything about agents, because to do so is an illegal restraint to the right to counsel.
Nintendo ID: Incindium
PSN: IncindiumX
ESPN2 at 7pm Eastern
No TV/TV package so the deal for me is more finding the right bar, or friend with streaming details. Thanks though! Let's go heels! Or Terriers! Just anything to ignore ongoing election coverage! (I voted, I care deeply, I just don't want the stress till it's hopefully over tomorrow)
100 points with 7:30 left. 59 in both halves. Previous Duke freshman debut scoring record was Bagley last year with 25. Barrett had 33, Zion 28, Reddish 22.
They'd have Barrett. For all the hype that Zion gets, he's not the best player on this team.
http://sagarin.com/sports/cbsend.htm
Kenpom has them 27 with some pretty significant preseason expectations involved in the rankings.