It’s super common in middle-class neighborhoods around Dallas. Or the slightly more pricey, “irregular stone façade with ordinary brick sides.”
The bricks are totally a facade as well, almost 0 actual brickwork is used to build anymore
RedTide#1907 on Battle.net
Come Overwatch with meeeee
+2
Options
ShivahnUnaware of her barrel shifter privilegeWestern coastal temptressRegistered User, Moderatormod
Riemann, I'm doing some neural network stuff and have just come across a gram matrix calculation using einstein summation notation. Do you know anything about the notation? If I were to say "this is what I think it means," would you be able to tell me whether I was correct or not? Most of the descriptions I've found have been very hard to grok for some reason.
I am so old that I remember Burger Chef. They had these kids meals that had these little pots with seeds in them that you could grow a plant out of. https://youtu.be/iSfMPo6KWps
Riemann, I'm doing some neural network stuff and have just come across a gram matrix calculation using einstein summation notation. Do you know anything about the notation? If I were to say "this is what I think it means," would you be able to tell me whether I was correct or not? Most of the descriptions I've found have been very hard to grok for some reason.
it's been a super long time and it was never something I learned more than the most basics on but I can take a look
I remember reading a passage somewhere that a translator described something as 'lost' in english. But a second translator said it wasn't lost as in 'I lost my phone' it was lost as in befouled, obliterated, irretrievably gone, as in paradise lost. Big difference!
The people who make youtube gardening videos have the best accents
+1
Options
VanguardBut now the dream is over. And the insect is awake.Registered User, __BANNED USERSregular
speaking of art, i think my brain has accepted the world before was no more and a book, which has been brewing for years, has finally reached the surface of thoughts so as to begin writing it down
i learned a lot from last go so i'm taking my time getting to starting out but i guess i still want to do it
0
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
I remember reading a passage somewhere that a translator described something as 'lost' in english. But a second translator said it wasn't lost as in 'I lost my phone' it was lost as in befouled, obliterated, irretrievably gone, as in paradise lost. Big difference!
I remember reading a passage somewhere that a translator described something as 'lost' in english. But a second translator said it wasn't lost as in 'I lost my phone' it was lost as in befouled, obliterated, irretrievably gone, as in paradise lost. Big difference!
also I wish I could remember where I read that.
was it a translation of milton
hmm I don't think so. I don't think it used paradise lost as an example but that's what it made me think of
0
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
paradise unsuccessful
Allegedly a voice of reason.
0
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
I remember reading a passage somewhere that a translator described something as 'lost' in english. But a second translator said it wasn't lost as in 'I lost my phone' it was lost as in befouled, obliterated, irretrievably gone, as in paradise lost. Big difference!
also I wish I could remember where I read that.
was it a translation of milton
hmm I don't think so. I don't think it used paradise lost as an example but that's what it made me think of
The key subplot is the drab uniformity of Brezhnev-era public architecture. This setting is explained in a humorous animated prologue, in which architects are overruled by politicians and red tape (director and animator - Vitaliy Peskov). As a result, the identical, functional but unimaginative multistory apartment buildings found their way into every city, town, and suburb across the former Soviet Union. These buildings are completely uniform in every detail including the door key of each apartment.[1]
Following their annual tradition, a group of friends meet at a banya (a traditional public "sauna" bath) in Moscow to celebrate New Year's Eve. The friends all get very drunk toasting the upcoming marriage of the central male character, Zhenya Lukashin (Andrei Myagkov) to Galya (Olga Naumenko). After the bath, one of the friends, Pavlik (Aleksandr Shirvindt), has to catch a plane to Leningrad. Zhenya, on the other hand, is supposed to go home to celebrate New Year's Eve with his fiancée. Both Zhenya and Pavlik pass out. The remaining friends cannot remember which person from their group is supposed to catch the plane -thus they mistakenly send Zhenya on the plane instead of Pavlik.
Zhenya spends the entire flight sleeping on the shoulder of his annoyed seatmate, played by the director himself (Ryazanov) in a brief comedic cameo appearance. The seatmate helps Zhenya get off the plane in Leningrad. Zhenya wakes up in the Leningrad airport, believing he is still in Moscow. He stumbles into a taxi and, still quite drunk, gives the driver his address. It turns out that in Leningrad there is a street with the same name (3rd Builders' street), with a building at his address which looks exactly like Zhenya's. The key fits in the door of the apartment with the same number (as alluded to in the introductory narration, "...building standard apartments with standard locks"). Inside, even the furniture is nearly identical to that of Zhenya's apartment. Zhenya is too drunk to notice any minor differences, and goes to sleep.
Later, the real tenant, Nadya Shevelyova (Barbara Brylska), arrives home to find a strange man sleeping in her bed. To make matters worse, Nadya’s fiancé, Ippolit (Yuri Yakovlev), arrives before Nadya can convince Zhenya to get up and leave. Ippolit becomes furious, refuses to believe Zhenya and Nadya's explanations, and storms out. Zhenya leaves to get back to Moscow but circumstances make him return repeatedly. Nadya wants to get rid of him as soon as possible, but there are no flights to Moscow until the next morning. Additionally, Zhenya tries repeatedly to call Moscow and explain to Galya what has happened. Eventually, he does contact her, but she is furious and hangs up on his call. Ippolit also calls Nadya's apartment and hears Zhenya answer. Although Zhenya is trying to be available to receive potential calls from Galya, Ippolit also refuses to accept the truth of the situation. It seems more and more clear that Zhenya and Nadya are the only two people who understand the night's circumstances.
Thus, Zhenya and Nadya are compelled to spend New Year's Eve together. At first, they continue to treat each other with animosity, but gradually their behaviour softens and the two fall in love. In the morning, they feel that everything that has happened to them was a delusion, and they make the difficult decision to part. With a heavy heart, Zhenya returns to Moscow. Meanwhile, Nadya reconsiders everything and, deciding that she might have let her chance at happiness slip away, takes a plane to Moscow to find Zhenya. She has no difficulty finding him as their addresses are the same.
omg it's Ironiya Sudbui
everyone watches that on New Year's; it's cute
Steam, LoL: credeiki
+1
Options
AtomikaLive fast and get fucked or whateverRegistered Userregular
Paradise left on the nightstand
Paradise in my other pants
Fuck, I forgot my Paradise
+2
Options
VanguardBut now the dream is over. And the insect is awake.Registered User, __BANNED USERSregular
I remember reading a passage somewhere that a translator described something as 'lost' in english. But a second translator said it wasn't lost as in 'I lost my phone' it was lost as in befouled, obliterated, irretrievably gone, as in paradise lost. Big difference!
also I wish I could remember where I read that.
nothing was more useful in college, i think, than a super loose class i took on translation where we read a bunch of different texts on how different poets have translated
the final project was to translate a book
i did lorca's "poet in new york"
i would write out several translations of every line
the google translation, literal dictionary translations, more colloquial and kind of smash them together until i got something that felt close to the original but also like a new translation
I remember reading a passage somewhere that a translator described something as 'lost' in english. But a second translator said it wasn't lost as in 'I lost my phone' it was lost as in befouled, obliterated, irretrievably gone, as in paradise lost. Big difference!
also I wish I could remember where I read that.
that usage is common when I read about archeology. IE: part of this ruin is lost because it was destroyed by deep plowing in the Victorian era etc...
Attacked by tweeeeeeees!
+2
Options
ChanusHarbinger of the Spicy Rooster ApocalypseThe Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered Userregular
Riemann, I'm doing some neural network stuff and have just come across a gram matrix calculation using einstein summation notation. Do you know anything about the notation? If I were to say "this is what I think it means," would you be able to tell me whether I was correct or not? Most of the descriptions I've found have been very hard to grok for some reason.
oh! you use einstein summation notation all the time in physics undergrad
10 years ago me writes it natively/is confused when people don't use it and current me maybe knows it
The level of ignorance and misinformation necessary to promote this kind of thinking is so profound on so many levels and in so many different fields that you could teach a course on how stupid this tweet is
...also I love apartment buildings that look like that
when I visited berlin the architecture felt very comforting in all the soviet legacy bits, like just cozy to be around
Steam, LoL: credeiki
0
Options
ShivahnUnaware of her barrel shifter privilegeWestern coastal temptressRegistered User, Moderatormod
Riemann, I'm doing some neural network stuff and have just come across a gram matrix calculation using einstein summation notation. Do you know anything about the notation? If I were to say "this is what I think it means," would you be able to tell me whether I was correct or not? Most of the descriptions I've found have been very hard to grok for some reason.
it's been a super long time and it was never something I learned more than the most basics on but I can take a look
That's ok! I think this is pretty basic, though if you don't know then I will soldier on :P
The initial summation, as used in this tutorial is
bijc, bijd -> bcd
I think that what this boils down to is: take two four dimensional tensors, and produce a three dimensional tensor where the element at index (b, c, d) is equal to the sum of the elementwise products (that is, each (i, j)) for each combination of b, c, and d.
Or specifically, in this case, the tensors are flat on the first dimension (b), and I'm thinking of them as three dimensional tensors where each "slice" containing all the i and j is one matrix. Then what the summation is doing is taking the sum of the elementwise products, for every combination of c and d, and outputting those sums at location (c, d) in what is essentially a two dimensional matrix
Shivahn on
0
Options
ShivahnUnaware of her barrel shifter privilegeWestern coastal temptressRegistered User, Moderatormod
Ugh, that was not nearly as clear as it is in my head.
Riemann, I'm doing some neural network stuff and have just come across a gram matrix calculation using einstein summation notation. Do you know anything about the notation? If I were to say "this is what I think it means," would you be able to tell me whether I was correct or not? Most of the descriptions I've found have been very hard to grok for some reason.
it's been a super long time and it was never something I learned more than the most basics on but I can take a look
That's ok! I think this is pretty basic, though if you don't know then I will soldier on :P
The initial summation, as used in this tutorial is
bijc, bijd -> bcd
I think that what this boils down to is: take two four dimensional tensors, and produce a three dimensional tensor where the element at index (b, c, d) is equal to the sum of the elementwise products (that is, each (i, j)) for each combination of b, c, and d.
Or specifically, in this case, the tensors are flat on the first dimension (b), and I'm thinking of them as three dimensional tensors where each "slice" containing all the i and j is one matrix. Then what the summation is doing is taking the sum of the elementwise products, for every combination of c and d, and outputting those sums at location (c, d) in what is essentially a two dimensional matrix
ok yeah that's over my head. Sorry can't help out
Attacked by tweeeeeeees!
0
Options
AtomikaLive fast and get fucked or whateverRegistered Userregular
Goddamn it, the app says Paradise fell out of my purse back at the airport women’s room
+2
Options
ShivahnUnaware of her barrel shifter privilegeWestern coastal temptressRegistered User, Moderatormod
Riemann, I'm doing some neural network stuff and have just come across a gram matrix calculation using einstein summation notation. Do you know anything about the notation? If I were to say "this is what I think it means," would you be able to tell me whether I was correct or not? Most of the descriptions I've found have been very hard to grok for some reason.
it's been a super long time and it was never something I learned more than the most basics on but I can take a look
That's ok! I think this is pretty basic, though if you don't know then I will soldier on :P
The initial summation, as used in this tutorial is
bijc, bijd -> bcd
I think that what this boils down to is: take two four dimensional tensors, and produce a three dimensional tensor where the element at index (b, c, d) is equal to the sum of the elementwise products (that is, each (i, j)) for each combination of b, c, and d.
Or specifically, in this case, the tensors are flat on the first dimension (b), and I'm thinking of them as three dimensional tensors where each "slice" containing all the i and j is one matrix. Then what the summation is doing is taking the sum of the elementwise products, for every combination of c and d, and outputting those sums at location (c, d) in what is essentially a two dimensional matrix
ok yeah that's over my head. Sorry can't help out
That is ok, thanks for taking a look. I thiiiink I'm getting it right. But maybe not.
I could also just calculate the matrix in another way, not using a function that requires me to learn this notation, but where's the fun in that.
They changed the coating on M&Ms at some point. You use to be able to just kind of hold them in your mouth, and the coating would dissolve until there was only the thinnest layer around it holding in the now-liquid chocolate melted by your body heat, then you could mash it against the roof of your mouth with your tongue. Now they just kind of turn to goo.
Remember the tagline “M&Ms melt in your mouth, not in your hand”
Posts
sounds like a breezeperkele
Those were the standard design in the 80s and 90s.
Norwegian is drunk Norwegian
The bricks are totally a facade as well, almost 0 actual brickwork is used to build anymore
Come Overwatch with meeeee
Remember Babbage's?
it's been a super long time and it was never something I learned more than the most basics on but I can take a look
I remember reading a passage somewhere that a translator described something as 'lost' in english. But a second translator said it wasn't lost as in 'I lost my phone' it was lost as in befouled, obliterated, irretrievably gone, as in paradise lost. Big difference!
also I wish I could remember where I read that.
i learned a lot from last go so i'm taking my time getting to starting out but i guess i still want to do it
was it a translation of milton
hmm I don't think so. I don't think it used paradise lost as an example but that's what it made me think of
well dang it that was the joke
omg it's Ironiya Sudbui
everyone watches that on New Year's; it's cute
Paradise in my other pants
Fuck, I forgot my Paradise
nothing was more useful in college, i think, than a super loose class i took on translation where we read a bunch of different texts on how different poets have translated
the final project was to translate a book
i did lorca's "poet in new york"
i would write out several translations of every line
the google translation, literal dictionary translations, more colloquial and kind of smash them together until i got something that felt close to the original but also like a new translation
sadly i lost most of the notebooks in a move
that usage is common when I read about archeology. IE: part of this ruin is lost because it was destroyed by deep plowing in the Victorian era etc...
dude where's my paradise
That is a major difference modifier.
oh! you use einstein summation notation all the time in physics undergrad
10 years ago me writes it natively/is confused when people don't use it and current me maybe knows it
I ask this every day
...also I love apartment buildings that look like that
when I visited berlin the architecture felt very comforting in all the soviet legacy bits, like just cozy to be around
That's ok! I think this is pretty basic, though if you don't know then I will soldier on :P
The initial summation, as used in this tutorial is
bijc, bijd -> bcd
I think that what this boils down to is: take two four dimensional tensors, and produce a three dimensional tensor where the element at index (b, c, d) is equal to the sum of the elementwise products (that is, each (i, j)) for each combination of b, c, and d.
Or specifically, in this case, the tensors are flat on the first dimension (b), and I'm thinking of them as three dimensional tensors where each "slice" containing all the i and j is one matrix. Then what the summation is doing is taking the sum of the elementwise products, for every combination of c and d, and outputting those sums at location (c, d) in what is essentially a two dimensional matrix
Have you checked the dashboard?
this is obviously fake but
ok yeah that's over my head. Sorry can't help out
That is ok, thanks for taking a look. I thiiiink I'm getting it right. But maybe not.
I could also just calculate the matrix in another way, not using a function that requires me to learn this notation, but where's the fun in that.
Remember the tagline “M&Ms melt in your mouth, not in your hand”
Of course he does. He’s a cop.
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades