They could be hiding anything in there. Even a fursuit
Pulling off a fur fox head to reveal a fur rabbit underneath is the stuff of nightmares.
Seriously though, like I just don't get it. And that's fine, because I'm not lobbying congress to not allow furries healthcare rights or preventing them from getting married. Hell I don't even know a Furry. I'm all for them doing what they do if it makes them happy, but I'll die not understanding it any more than my grandfather never understood Rock and Roll or video games.
i can understand insofar as people often are able to tap into different parts of themselves or qualities that they don't think they possess when in costume
Yesterday I tried to feed the kitties and Swarley refused to eat and just wandered around the apartment crying for Beasto until I had to throw his food out
he's also a huge fan of a) sitting in front of the mirror yelling at his reflection and b) hiding in the bathroom yelling until the other cat comes to investigate to see if he's dying and NOPE GONNA ATTACK YOU FROM THE DARK BITCH
your cats are deranged
0
Options
zepherinRussian warship, go fuck yourselfRegistered Userregular
They could be hiding anything in there. Even a fursuit
Pulling off a fur fox head to reveal a fur rabbit underneath is the stuff of nightmares.
Seriously though, like I just don't get it. And that's fine, because I'm not lobbying congress to not allow furries healthcare rights or preventing them from getting married. Hell I don't even know a Furry. I'm all for them doing what they do if it makes them happy, but I'll die not understanding it any more than my grandfather never understood Rock and Roll or video games.
i can understand insofar as people often are able to tap into different parts of themselves or qualities that they don't think they possess when in costume
Right, I bet for a lot of people it's more about accessing a different identity/creating a social world entirely disconnected to one's daily experience as it is about finding furriness or tails attractive.
Yesterday I tried to feed the kitties and Swarley refused to eat and just wandered around the apartment crying for Beasto until I had to throw his food out
he's also a huge fan of a) sitting in front of the mirror yelling at his reflection and b) hiding in the bathroom yelling until the other cat comes to investigate to see if he's dying and NOPE GONNA ATTACK YOU FROM THE DARK BITCH
your cats are deranged
harley does this thing where she'll fluff out her tail so it's like a fucking raccoon and then run around growling and bouncing off the walls
0
Options
HakkekageSpace Whore Academysumma cum laudeRegistered Userregular
Well I guess I feel a bit better now about not forcing my mom to change all her passwords when she lost her iphone. Even though it's very likely that iphone would have just been wiped and sold.
my cousin just posted a link to an article about how a bunch of idiot beachgoers killed a tiny Franciscana dolphin that had beached, because they kept passing it around in a giant crowd for selfies
and dolphins, shockingly, need to be in the water to survive
I am kind of shocked that the Fbi can't crack an iPhone themselves.
Were all those movies about hacking... wrong?!
Mostly what they're worried about is that too many attempts to brute force it will reset the phone.
The 5C has a hypothetical security vulnerability where it's possible to replace the phone's firmware with another, signed, firmware even though it's locked (not possible on newer models).
The restriction on how many attempts you get to unlock it, and the restriction on how fast you can enter those attempts, are built into the firmware (in newer phones this is built into the hardware and can't be circumvented in this way).
So what the FBI want apple to do is replace the firmware on that phone only with another which, while not unlocking it, makes it practical to brute force it into unlocking without the risk of the phone deleting all its data. It has to be apple that does it because only they can sign the firmware such that there phone will accept it.
So I guess I need to see a trauma therapist or something. Third time I've had macabre nightmares about what happened and so got no sleep. Working full time and taking two hard courses, I can't manage my life without sleep.
So I guess I need to see a trauma therapist or something. Third time I've had macabre nightmares about what happened and so got no sleep. Working full time and taking two hard courses, I can't manage my life without sleep.
Sucks.
Sorry to hear that bruh. You should definitely consider a therapist if you think this is affecting your life.
Load a copy up in a VM and when it locks, load a new copy.
life's a game that you're bound to lose / like using a hammer to pound in screws
fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
+1
Options
LudiousI just wanted a sandwich A temporally dislocated QuiznosRegistered Userregular
They could be hiding anything in there. Even a fursuit
Pulling off a fur fox head to reveal a fur rabbit underneath is the stuff of nightmares.
Seriously though, like I just don't get it. And that's fine, because I'm not lobbying congress to not allow furries healthcare rights or preventing them from getting married. Hell I don't even know a Furry. I'm all for them doing what they do if it makes them happy, but I'll die not understanding it any more than my grandfather never understood Rock and Roll or video games.
"I don't have anything against furries, I just don't want my daughter marrying one."
I didn't say that. My hypothetical kid can do whatever the hell they want (aside from Murder or heavy unstable drug use) and I'd stand behind them.
are YOU on the beer list?
0
Options
amateurhourOne day I'll be professionalhourThe woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered Userregular
They could be hiding anything in there. Even a fursuit
Pulling off a fur fox head to reveal a fur rabbit underneath is the stuff of nightmares.
Seriously though, like I just don't get it. And that's fine, because I'm not lobbying congress to not allow furries healthcare rights or preventing them from getting married. Hell I don't even know a Furry. I'm all for them doing what they do if it makes them happy, but I'll die not understanding it any more than my grandfather never understood Rock and Roll or video games.
i can understand insofar as people often are able to tap into different parts of themselves or qualities that they don't think they possess when in costume
Right, I bet for a lot of people it's more about accessing a different identity/creating a social world entirely disconnected to one's daily experience as it is about finding furriness or tails attractive.
That actually makes a lot of sense. I can get behind that.
are YOU on the beer list?
0
Options
VanguardBut now the dream is over. And the insect is awake.Registered User, __BANNED USERSregular
I am kind of shocked that the Fbi can't crack an iPhone themselves.
Were all those movies about hacking... wrong?!
Mostly what they're worried about is that too many attempts to brute force it will reset the phone.
The 5C has a hypothetical security vulnerability where it's possible to replace the phone's firmware with another, signed, firmware even though it's locked (not possible on newer models).
The restriction on how many attempts you get to unlock it, and the restriction on how fast you can enter those attempts, are built into the firmware (in newer phones this is built into the hardware and can't be circumvented in this way).
So what the FBI want apple to do is replace the firmware on that phone only with another which, while not unlocking it, makes it practical to brute force it into unlocking without the risk of the phone deleting all its data. It has to be apple that does it because only they can sign the firmware such that there phone will accept it.
right
but i still can't see how they can be compelled to essentially develop firmware through a court order
is well established you can't compel people to work against their will
Load a copy up in a VM and when it locks, load a new copy.
The encryption keys are tied to the hardware. Brute forcing the encryption is considerably less practical than brute forcing the firmware into yielding access to the encrypted data.
I am kind of shocked that the Fbi can't crack an iPhone themselves.
Were all those movies about hacking... wrong?!
So, as a frogrammer myself, here's the thing about hacking.
The more disheveled your clothes are and the cooler looking your tower, the better a hacker you are. Ideally you have some kind of graphic tee, a backwards baseball hat, baggy jean shorts, and flip flops (with or without socks). Your computer is sleek and black with bright highlights, covered in blue LEDs, with its dozen fans roaring like a jet engine and liquid cooling pipes running in and out of the machine.
FBI guys all wear suits or at least business casual, shower daily, and have a boring monochrome Dell box. Therefore they can't be good hackers.
I am kind of shocked that the Fbi can't crack an iPhone themselves.
Were all those movies about hacking... wrong?!
Mostly what they're worried about is that too many attempts to brute force it will reset the phone.
The 5C has a hypothetical security vulnerability where it's possible to replace the phone's firmware with another, signed, firmware even though it's locked (not possible on newer models).
The restriction on how many attempts you get to unlock it, and the restriction on how fast you can enter those attempts, are built into the firmware (in newer phones this is built into the hardware and can't be circumvented in this way).
So what the FBI want apple to do is replace the firmware on that phone only with another which, while not unlocking it, makes it practical to brute force it into unlocking without the risk of the phone deleting all its data. It has to be apple that does it because only they can sign the firmware such that there phone will accept it.
right
but i still can't see how they can be compelled to essentially develop firmware through a court order
is well established you can't compel people to work against their will
So I guess I need to see a trauma therapist or something. Third time I've had macabre nightmares about what happened and so got no sleep. Working full time and taking two hard courses, I can't manage my life without sleep.
I am kind of shocked that the Fbi can't crack an iPhone themselves.
Were all those movies about hacking... wrong?!
Mostly what they're worried about is that too many attempts to brute force it will reset the phone.
The 5C has a hypothetical security vulnerability where it's possible to replace the phone's firmware with another, signed, firmware even though it's locked (not possible on newer models).
The restriction on how many attempts you get to unlock it, and the restriction on how fast you can enter those attempts, are built into the firmware (in newer phones this is built into the hardware and can't be circumvented in this way).
So what the FBI want apple to do is replace the firmware on that phone only with another which, while not unlocking it, makes it practical to brute force it into unlocking without the risk of the phone deleting all its data. It has to be apple that does it because only they can sign the firmware such that there phone will accept it.
right
but i still can't see how they can be compelled to essentially develop firmware through a court order
is well established you can't compel people to work against their will
*shouts terrorism over and over again*
yes that's about all that they can do
0
Options
amateurhourOne day I'll be professionalhourThe woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered Userregular
What's funny is that the CIA could probably (and has probably) busted an iPhone before.
BUT if the CIA got that data and handed it to the FBI, the FBI would have to show in court how they got said data.
Which in the end wouldn't matter because for all of snowden's leaked documents nothing will ever be done to change the CIA.
So yeah, the Feds should just get the CIA to crack it. They probably already have.
anyone see anything concerning about when i go to get insurance quotes it autopopulates possible cars for me
one is my current one
and one is a random ass 2011 nissan sentra
think it is the one other person in the country with my first and last name?
my credit report has no weird accounts or anything sinister
I can't recall if car registrations are public info like home ownership is, but if so it's prob just someone else with your name
500 deductible or $1000, the eternal question
surprisingly geico has the lowest insurance so far. only about $200 more per 6 months (i have basic liability only on my shitbox) if i go with 500 deductible
Posts
i can understand insofar as people often are able to tap into different parts of themselves or qualities that they don't think they possess when in costume
Yes
but all those shiny command centres
have they tried hacking the mainframe?
your cats are deranged
Don't they have some hip savant 20 something for that?
what's hilarious is that this has
1) solidified apple's security
2) called into question the extent of the fbi's capabilities
Right, I bet for a lot of people it's more about accessing a different identity/creating a social world entirely disconnected to one's daily experience as it is about finding furriness or tails attractive.
Sure
get a court order to force you to put in the code
harley does this thing where she'll fluff out her tail so it's like a fucking raccoon and then run around growling and bouncing off the walls
NNID: Hakkekage
the fbi doesn't have a gibson is why
and dolphins, shockingly, need to be in the water to survive
this makes me really angry
Mostly what they're worried about is that too many attempts to brute force it will reset the phone.
The 5C has a hypothetical security vulnerability where it's possible to replace the phone's firmware with another, signed, firmware even though it's locked (not possible on newer models).
The restriction on how many attempts you get to unlock it, and the restriction on how fast you can enter those attempts, are built into the firmware (in newer phones this is built into the hardware and can't be circumvented in this way).
So what the FBI want apple to do is replace the firmware on that phone only with another which, while not unlocking it, makes it practical to brute force it into unlocking without the risk of the phone deleting all its data. It has to be apple that does it because only they can sign the firmware such that there phone will accept it.
Sucks.
Sorry to hear that bruh. You should definitely consider a therapist if you think this is affecting your life.
Crack phone open.
Extract hard drive.
Copy the raw data.
Load a copy up in a VM and when it locks, load a new copy.
fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
I didn't say that. My hypothetical kid can do whatever the hell they want (aside from Murder or heavy unstable drug use) and I'd stand behind them.
That actually makes a lot of sense. I can get behind that.
right
but i still can't see how they can be compelled to essentially develop firmware through a court order
is well established you can't compel people to work against their will
It's those pentalobe screws man, even the FBI is like "Fuck this, we're not paying $20 for a screwdriver."
the ending was perfect and it really cemented the rise of both Oscar Issac and Bill Weasley.
Arch,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_goGR39m2k
The encryption keys are tied to the hardware. Brute forcing the encryption is considerably less practical than brute forcing the firmware into yielding access to the encrypted data.
So, as a frogrammer myself, here's the thing about hacking.
The more disheveled your clothes are and the cooler looking your tower, the better a hacker you are. Ideally you have some kind of graphic tee, a backwards baseball hat, baggy jean shorts, and flip flops (with or without socks). Your computer is sleek and black with bright highlights, covered in blue LEDs, with its dozen fans roaring like a jet engine and liquid cooling pipes running in and out of the machine.
FBI guys all wear suits or at least business casual, shower daily, and have a boring monochrome Dell box. Therefore they can't be good hackers.
:bro:
Not the new Apple encryption.
Hue hue hue fuck off FBI.
yes that's about all that they can do
BUT if the CIA got that data and handed it to the FBI, the FBI would have to show in court how they got said data.
Which in the end wouldn't matter because for all of snowden's leaked documents nothing will ever be done to change the CIA.
So yeah, the Feds should just get the CIA to crack it. They probably already have.
*dies*
500 deductible or $1000, the eternal question
surprisingly geico has the lowest insurance so far. only about $200 more per 6 months (i have basic liability only on my shitbox) if i go with 500 deductible