The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I love that PA made that photo specifically to go out in press releases to make fun of the retarded caricatures the media had been putting out about people who play video games.
Do you think that geeks today are more accepted than before?
Jerry: Even if it were true, I would resist it. I don’t want to be accepted. I want to retain my street credentials. There are lots of geeks, and certainly geeks can communicate with one another, but ... do we have an openly geek Senator? Is there a Senator that can speak fluently about Daleks? Maybe not.
I would say that Michael and I are being beat up less. It hasn’t completely abated. It still happens on occasion. But I would say that… the beatings are less severe.
What do you think is the difference between a nerd and a geek?
Jerry: I think being a geek is cool… A geek has an ownership of their geek nature.
And nerds?
Jerry: They don't. It’s my hope that my nerds become geeks via a natural process, that they learn that their inherent nature isn’t something they need to feel ashamed of. I feel like 'nerd' is the epithet, and 'geek' is the inside term.
Mike: Is that like what's written on a tombstone?
Jerry: Mhm. Here lies, you know, Nerd.
How do you geek out?
Jerry: We geek out constantly. I'm geeking out right now. I'm talking to CNN.
They are taking terrible questions and giving hilarious answers. I enjoyed that.
I also love that "youtube comments" are the new litmus of terrible internet postings.
I'd like to be witty and come up some kind of scale for how many "youtube comments" an awful post is worth but its a mathematically unsound proposition.
Infinity, multiplied by any number, is still infinity.
Volucrisus Aedrius on
0
Tossrocktoo weird to livetoo rare to dieRegistered Userregular
Was on the front page earlier today, thought for sure there'd be a thread on this already but a search for 'CNN' turned up squat.
Nothing very groundbreaking discussed, good to see the guys get some big press though.
Editor's note: Geek Out! posts feature the latest and most interesting in nerd-culture news. From scifi and fantasy to gadgets and science, if you can geek out over it you can find it on Geek Out! Look for Geek Out! posts on CNN's SciTech blog.
I read you're guys column via a friend, and man...a bit too much geek for my taste. The Writing is also out there, like someone simple trying to sound important. I give you guys prop for your success and your game tastes...BUT, you're still too geeky for most gamers. I enjoy games, for over 30 years now...but I still have a life outside games.
You guys don't give off that impression and I'm not so sure that's truly a cool thing, even for a Geek.
I also love that "youtube comments" are the new litmus of terrible internet postings.
I'd like to be witty and come up some kind of scale for how many "youtube comments" an awful post is worth but its a mathematically unsound proposition.
Infinity, multiplied by any number, is still infinity.
Wait, wait, how does this work? Are "youtube comments" measure of terribleness? I'm thinking there's two ways you can go with this.
One: a youtube comment scale, where a post's quality is rated on a scale from 0 to 1 youtube comments, with 0.0 being an acceptable, quality post, and 1.0 being the worst possible post. A bad post might be 0.3 youtube comments, a terrible post might be 0.7 youtube comments.
Or two: one youtube comment is the indivisible quantum of post quality, i.e., the only way to have less than one youtube comment of quality in a post is to have 0 youtube comments, which would just be no post at all. So maybe a good post is like a billion youtube comments. A gigayoutubecomment.
Framling on
you're = you are
your = belonging to you
their = belonging to them
there = not here
they're = they are
0
BroloBroseidonLord of the BroceanRegistered Userregular
I also love that "youtube comments" are the new litmus of terrible internet postings.
I'd like to be witty and come up some kind of scale for how many "youtube comments" an awful post is worth but its a mathematically unsound proposition.
Infinity, multiplied by any number, is still infinity.
Can anyone explain why youtube now orders comments not by the order they were posted in but apparently according to who you may be responding to? Not are the conversations retarded to begin with, they're also impossible to follow.
yeah they recently changed the reply system, not sure why. My guesses are:
1) Decrease server load
2) Make conversations impossible to follow in order to deter commenting
I didn't bother checking the CNN link but I am gathering the picture of them is the "Tycho holding 360 controller backwards and Gabe with a PSP" picture that they use for articles like this.
I didn't bother checking the CNN link but I am gathering the picture of them is the "Tycho holding 360 controller backwards and Gabe with a PSP" picture that they use for articles like this.
oh yes
if you do read it dont bother checking the comments
I didn't bother checking the CNN link but I am gathering the picture of them is the "Tycho holding 360 controller backwards and Gabe with a PSP" picture that they use for articles like this.
oh yes
if you do read it dont bother checking the comments
The only things I ever read the comments for are my own YouTube videos, and I get maybe one new comment a week.
Actually one of my oldest videos apparently qualifies for ad revenue or something, anyone know how that works?
I didn't bother checking the CNN link but I am gathering the picture of them is the "Tycho holding 360 controller backwards and Gabe with a PSP" picture that they use for articles like this.
oh yes
if you do read it dont bother checking the comments
The only things I ever read the comments for are my own YouTube videos, and I get maybe one new comment a week.
Actually one of my oldest videos apparently qualifies for ad revenue or something, anyone know how that works?
youtube makes it a "featured video" and gives it ad space at the top of the list and every time someone views it you get cash (like a fraction of a penny or something)
I think
Chi City describes it waaay better in one of his vids that I cant be arsed to find right now
VALVEjunkie on
0
HenroidMexican kicked from Immigration ThreadCentrism is Racism :3Registered Userregular
edited March 2010
That photo is NEVER going to get old.
Kudos to Mike & Jerry for at least giving worthwhile responses to stupid questions (they exist). And I agree on the whole lack of Child's Play questioning. It's like CNN doesn't know anything!
I didn't bother checking the CNN link but I am gathering the picture of them is the "Tycho holding 360 controller backwards and Gabe with a PSP" picture that they use for articles like this.
oh yes
if you do read it dont bother checking the comments
The only things I ever read the comments for are my own YouTube videos, and I get maybe one new comment a week.
Actually one of my oldest videos apparently qualifies for ad revenue or something, anyone know how that works?
youtube makes it a "featured video" and gives it ad space at the top of the list and every time someone views it you get cash (like a fraction of a penny or something)
I think
Chi City describes it waaay better in one of his vids that I cant be arsed to find right now
Is it a featured video that he gets paid for when people see it?
Ivar on
0
HenroidMexican kicked from Immigration ThreadCentrism is Racism :3Registered Userregular
I saw the word "charity" in there somewhere, but the interviewer completely ignored it
Likely because he didn't give a shit and was just going through the motions.
"Bob, we've got an interview lined up with these two guys."
"Who are they?"
"Some nerds or geeks, whatever, running a website. Here's the questions."
"Ugh, fine."
I didn't bother checking the CNN link but I am gathering the picture of them is the "Tycho holding 360 controller backwards and Gabe with a PSP" picture that they use for articles like this.
oh yes
if you do read it dont bother checking the comments
The only things I ever read the comments for are my own YouTube videos, and I get maybe one new comment a week.
Actually one of my oldest videos apparently qualifies for ad revenue or something, anyone know how that works?
youtube makes it a "featured video" and gives it ad space at the top of the list and every time someone views it you get cash (like a fraction of a penny or something)
I think
Chi City describes it waaay better in one of his vids that I cant be arsed to find right now
Is it a featured video that he gets paid for when people see it?
I saw the word "charity" in there somewhere, but the interviewer completely ignored it
Likely because he didn't give a shit and was just going through the motions.
"Bob, we've got an interview lined up with these two guys."
"Who are they?"
"Some nerds or geeks, whatever, running a website. Here's the questions."
"Ugh, fine."
Posts
No but honestly the interview is a bit shit
Ted Turner is doing interviews at CNN again?
PA: Video games.
this is blowing my mind
PSN: Robo_Wizard1
Edit: At least the first half or so is.
They are taking terrible questions and giving hilarious answers. I enjoyed that.
was just about to post this
I'd like to be witty and come up some kind of scale for how many "youtube comments" an awful post is worth but its a mathematically unsound proposition.
Infinity, multiplied by any number, is still infinity.
Wait, wait, how does this work? Are "youtube comments" measure of terribleness? I'm thinking there's two ways you can go with this.
One: a youtube comment scale, where a post's quality is rated on a scale from 0 to 1 youtube comments, with 0.0 being an acceptable, quality post, and 1.0 being the worst possible post. A bad post might be 0.3 youtube comments, a terrible post might be 0.7 youtube comments.
Or two: one youtube comment is the indivisible quantum of post quality, i.e., the only way to have less than one youtube comment of quality in a post is to have 0 youtube comments, which would just be no post at all. So maybe a good post is like a billion youtube comments. A gigayoutubecomment.
your = belonging to you
their = belonging to them
there = not here
they're = they are
Can anyone explain why youtube now orders comments not by the order they were posted in but apparently according to who you may be responding to? Not are the conversations retarded to begin with, they're also impossible to follow.
1) Decrease server load
2) Make conversations impossible to follow in order to deter commenting
My money's on 2.
kpop appreciation station i also like to tweet some
gabe isn't that into it, but tycho really sells it
Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
oh yes
if you do read it dont bother checking the comments
The only things I ever read the comments for are my own YouTube videos, and I get maybe one new comment a week.
Actually one of my oldest videos apparently qualifies for ad revenue or something, anyone know how that works?
Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
Yo.
youtube makes it a "featured video" and gives it ad space at the top of the list and every time someone views it you get cash (like a fraction of a penny or something)
I think
Chi City describes it waaay better in one of his vids that I cant be arsed to find right now
Kudos to Mike & Jerry for at least giving worthwhile responses to stupid questions (they exist). And I agree on the whole lack of Child's Play questioning. It's like CNN doesn't know anything!
Is it a featured video that he gets paid for when people see it?
Likely because he didn't give a shit and was just going through the motions.
"Bob, we've got an interview lined up with these two guys."
"Who are they?"
"Some nerds or geeks, whatever, running a website. Here's the questions."
"Ugh, fine."
maybe? fuck I dunno
here lemme check
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0bGs-hhenI
and no, it isn't a featured vid
apparently none of his videos are