EUR PS3's backwards compatibility supports less games

elkataselkatas Registered User regular
edited March 2007 in Games and Technology
http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSL2267625820070223

So... in the nutshell. Sony has started to remove PS2 dedicated chips from PS3 to save in manufacturing costs. As a result of this European PS3's will be less backwards compatible than their US and JPN counterparts. However, this shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone, as Sony has many times stated that PS2 backwards compatibility will be completely hardware based on only first models. It is also fairly reasonable to except that new US and JPN PS3 models will feature same kind of hardware revision.

Hypnotically inclined.
elkatas on
«134567

Posts

  • El VientoEl Viento Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    hahaha, arse. I'll delete my dupe thread. This (the story) sucks, gg Sony, carry on killing your fanbase!

    Edit: can't kill my own thread on this new-fangled board? Can I get a mod lock up in it?

    El Viento on
    vf5bannerok6.jpg
  • ShujaaShujaa Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Does this mean there will be software emulation at some point, or that they're just giving up on it?

    By the way, this means we're paying about $200 more than everyone else, for the privilege of waiting 4 months and getting less features.

    Shujaa on
  • elkataselkatas Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Shujaa wrote: »
    Does this mean there will be software emulation at some point, or that they're just giving up on it?

    Current plan is that PS2 backwards compatibility will be emulation based. Originally even first models should have featured PS2 emulator, but Sony ran on technical problems.

    elkatas on
    Hypnotically inclined.
  • CripTonicCripTonic Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Careful, they might throw in a PSP with your waste of Euros.

    CripTonic on
    0liDg.png
  • corcorigancorcorigan Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    I'm not exactly seeing Sony making an effort to be popular in Europe.

    Wouldn't surprise me entirely if Wiis suddenly become very available and 360s drop in price the day they come out too...

    corcorigan on
    Ad Astra Per Aspera
  • Spectral SwallowSpectral Swallow Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    I made a thread a while back about how Europe gets all the good stuff. This is another PERFECT example.

    I want the high prices for less features. I may just have to move.

    Spectral Swallow on
  • Mr_GrinchMr_Grinch Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    "Kwiatowski said gamers with a PS2 would have to hold onto their device to play their current collection"

    Ok, so now people can't safely sell their old PS2 to make a bit of a dent in the massive price of the PS3? This is utter bullshit, what about those that have pre-ordered under the impression it'll be 98% backwards compatible?

    Rather than do this, why don't Sony just employ people to stand outside gaming stores in Europe and kick customers in the balls?

    Mr_Grinch on
    Steam: Sir_Grinch
    PSN: SirGrinchX
    Oculus Rift: Sir_Grinch
  • BeckBeck Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    I don't know guys, I'm always hearing stuff about Europeans and wierd, closet fetishes...Maybe sadomasochism is a big one.

    Beck on
    Lucas's Franklin Badge reflected the lightning back!
  • saikocatsaikocat London, UKRegistered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Typical. They do something that'll reduce the price, but we don't get a pricedrop, no we get the same rip-off price, but now with less features! Sometimes I think Sony enjoy it when people hate them, they thrive on that shit.

    saikocat on
    Square Enix Europe Community Manager
    Nosgoth Community : Facebook | Twitter | YouTube | Forums
  • MarlorMarlor Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Shujaa wrote: »
    By the way, this means we're paying about $200 more than everyone else, for the privilege of waiting 4 months and getting less features.

    Sony are really giving European customers more and more reasons to import a PS3 from the US. Or to buy an XBox 360 instead.

    Marlor on
    Mario Kart Wii: 1332-8060-5236 (Aaron)
  • RamiRami Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    They still haven't sold out of pre-orders yet, perhaps people are hoping they will slash the price soon after release?

    Rami on
  • Rhesus PositiveRhesus Positive GNU Terry Pratchett Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    I don't see this making much of a difference to the "Sony = only good console" crowd, who buy on the name alone. Hell, how many of them will even realise? I'm casting no aspersions on Sony lovers, but if you're already resigned to buying the next console because it's Sony, how much are you going to bother reading up on it? If I were a Sony fanboy, I'd have been put off the Web articles already, due to the amount of flack Sony have (rightly) been getting.

    I predict that come March there will still be a lot of second-hand PS2s available, and therefore a lot (relatively speaking) of pissed-off PS3 owners wondering why Fifa and Pro Evo aren't working.

    Rhesus Positive on
    [Muffled sounds of gorilla violence]
  • MarlorMarlor Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    I don't see this making much of a difference to the "Sony = only good console" crowd, who buy on the name alone. Hell, how many of them will even realise?

    One big issue is: how many people will end up returning their PS3s because they are "broken"?

    Backwards compatibility on the 360 was pretty decent by the time it was widely available, but even then, people were getting royally pissed off at not being able to play certain games. At least retailers could say "stick with it, and Microsoft will improve the emulation" when people complained.

    Sony is only promising that "a limited range of PlayStation®2 (PS2) titles" will be playable on PAL consoles. This will be a huge issue if they keep this stance and don't rapidly improve the emulation.

    Marlor on
    Mario Kart Wii: 1332-8060-5236 (Aaron)
  • ben0207ben0207 Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    No wonder they can't sell any preorders.

    Nice one Sony.

    ben0207 on
  • Unco-ordinatedUnco-ordinated NZRegistered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Marlor wrote: »
    I don't see this making much of a difference to the "Sony = only good console" crowd, who buy on the name alone. Hell, how many of them will even realise?

    One big issue is: how many people will end up returning their PS3s because they are "broken"?

    Backwards compatibility on the 360 was pretty decent by the time it was widely available, but even then, people were getting royally pissed off at not being able to play certain games. At least retailers could say "stick with it, and Microsoft will improve the emulation" when people complained.

    Sony is only promising that "a limited range of PlayStation®2 (PS2) titles" will be playable on PAL consoles. This will be a huge issue if they keep this stance and don't rapidly improve the emulation.
    1) I'd call them retards for buying a PS3 to play PS2 games in the first place. I mean, to me backwards compatibility is an asset but it's not exactly a reason to buy the bloody console.

    2) "At least"? You make it seem like Sony isn't doing the same thing. You do realise they'll be updating it as well, right? And if the PSP (and the previous 2 months of the PS3) is anything to go by, they'll be a lot more regular than the 360's ones.

    Anyway, I'll wait and see. It really seemed like the PAL launch was going to be OMFG awesome, with it's launch lineup and this isn't really a huge hit to that. I'll be getting a PS3 at the end of 2007/start of 2008 anyway, so most of the problems will probably be fixed by then.

    Unco-ordinated on
    Steam ID - LiquidSolid170 | PSN ID - LiquidSolid
  • ben0207ben0207 Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    1) I'd call them retards for buying a PS3 to play PS2 games in the first place. I mean, to me backwards compatibility is an asset but it's not exactly a reason to buy the bloody console.

    That would include me. You saying I'm retarded for wanting play some great games I missed out on by not owning a PS2, and not wanting to invest in outdated tech?

    ben0207 on
  • ZekZek Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Rami wrote: »
    They still haven't sold out of pre-orders yet, perhaps people are hoping they will slash the price soon after release?
    Or maybe nobody wants the damn things.

    Zek on
  • Katchem_ashKatchem_ash __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2007
    ben0207 wrote: »
    1) I'd call them retards for buying a PS3 to play PS2 games in the first place. I mean, to me backwards compatibility is an asset but it's not exactly a reason to buy the bloody console.

    That would include me. You saying I'm retarded for wanting play some great games I missed out on by not owning a PS2, and not wanting to invest in outdated tech?


    If you just buying a PS3 to buy PS2 games, yes I would see that as stupid because its much cheaper to get a PS2.

    If you want to play PS3 and PS2 games, no I wouldn't see that as being stupid.

    This information however is not very good for the system. But still its the PS3 and still doesn't deter me.

    Katchem_ash on
  • chaossoldierchaossoldier Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Marlor wrote: »
    Shujaa wrote: »
    By the way, this means we're paying about $200 more than everyone else, for the privilege of waiting 4 months and getting less features.

    Sony are really giving European customers more and more reasons to import a PS3 from the US. Or to buy an XBox 360 instead.

    Or at least they would import...

    if sony didn't have importing video game consoles declared illegal over there.

    chaossoldier on
    stopit.gifsophia.gifrotj.png
  • Unco-ordinatedUnco-ordinated NZRegistered User regular
    edited February 2007
    ben0207 wrote: »
    1) I'd call them retards for buying a PS3 to play PS2 games in the first place. I mean, to me backwards compatibility is an asset but it's not exactly a reason to buy the bloody console.

    That would include me. You saying I'm retarded for wanting play some great games I missed out on by not owning a PS2, and not wanting to invest in outdated tech?
    It depends. Would you really take back your PS3 because it couldn't play some PS2 games?

    I mean, to me buying a PS3 would be for PS3 games, with the backwards compatibility being an asset. Would I be disappointed? Yeah, but returning it because of that? Bugger off. If PS2 games are the main reason why you buy a PS3, then yeah you are pretty retarded.

    Unco-ordinated on
    Steam ID - LiquidSolid170 | PSN ID - LiquidSolid
  • XagarathXagarath Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    It deters me even further.
    Given the famous fragility of the PS2, if I were to get a PS3, I'd want it to run my fair-sized PS2 collection.
    It not doing so is another black mark against the thing.

    Xagarath on
  • Katchem_ashKatchem_ash __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2007
    Xagarath wrote: »
    It deters me even further.
    Given the famous fragility of the PS2, if I were to get a PS3, I'd want it to run my fair-sized PS2 collection.
    It not doing so is another black mark against the thing.

    What Fragility? My brother still has those big hunky PS2 and its working like new. I am the slim, $129 CDN one and it still works.

    Katchem_ash on
  • ToadTheMushroomToadTheMushroom Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Can you change the thread title to

    '...backwards compatibility supports fewer games' please. Its bugging me.


    Also, it wouldnt surprise me if half the PS3s preordered are again for stupid ebay reselling. They wont make any money at all but people will still try it.

    As for backwards compatibility. Again, until Sony release an exact list of what is compatible, stop complaining. Sure there might be fewer games that work, but if those ones that dont work are Barbie Horse adventures 1 through 10 then why bother whining about it?

    ToadTheMushroom on
  • chaossoldierchaossoldier Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Xagarath wrote: »
    It deters me even further.
    Given the famous fragility of the PS2, if I were to get a PS3, I'd want it to run my fair-sized PS2 collection.
    It not doing so is another black mark against the thing.

    What Fragility? My brother still has those big hunky PS2 and its working like new. I am the slim, $129 CDN one and it still works.

    There was a good 70% (estimated) chance of PS2s failing depending on what serial number it was and how you played it (flat or standing).

    chaossoldier on
    stopit.gifsophia.gifrotj.png
  • ToadTheMushroomToadTheMushroom Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    When calculating the amount of PS2s sold do Sony take into account replacements?

    I mean 100 million shipped is one thing. But if there are only 30 million owners then thats not as impressive.

    ToadTheMushroom on
  • XagarathXagarath Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Xagarath wrote: »
    It deters me even further.
    Given the famous fragility of the PS2, if I were to get a PS3, I'd want it to run my fair-sized PS2 collection.
    It not doing so is another black mark against the thing.

    What Fragility? My brother still has those big hunky PS2 and its working like new. I am the slim, $129 CDN one and it still works.

    A lot of people say the PS2 breaks easily.
    Mine came close to it once (giving Disc Read Errors) but thankfully stopped again.

    Xagarath on
  • RaggieRaggie Schattenjäger Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    That´s just great. Especially considering that some of the best PS2 games are being released in Europe only just now. We only just got Okami, and FFXII isn´t even here yet.

    Raggie on
    ypvha57nnenm.jpg
  • Katchem_ashKatchem_ash __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2007
    Xagarath wrote: »
    It deters me even further.
    Given the famous fragility of the PS2, if I were to get a PS3, I'd want it to run my fair-sized PS2 collection.
    It not doing so is another black mark against the thing.

    What Fragility? My brother still has those big hunky PS2 and its working like new. I am the slim, $129 CDN one and it still works.

    There was a good 70% (estimated) chance of PS2s failing depending on what serial number it was and how you played it (flat or standing).


    I have played it both ways, flat and standing, my PS2 Slim is flat, my brother fat one is standing. None have developed problems (knock on wood). I assume I am in the 30% then.

    Katchem_ash on
  • XagarathXagarath Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Raggie wrote: »
    That´s just great. Especially considering that some of the best PS2 games are being released in Europe only just now. We only just got Okami, and FFXII isn´t even here yet.

    Um, yes it is. Today, in fact.
    Unless you're non-UK, in which case I am unsure.

    Xagarath on
  • LewiePLewieP Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Get it here for £25.99, next day delivered.

    LewieP on
  • ShimShamShimSham Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    On the subject of PS2 fragility, the most recent slimline models have no outstanding problems. It's the first few years of production on the original PS2 that had so many problems. Amazingly enough my brother's launch PS2 just stopped working for the most part. It stil plays some games, but for the most part, nah.

    ShimSham on
  • SyphonBlueSyphonBlue The studying beaver That beaver sure loves studying!Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    When calculating the amount of PS2s sold do Sony take into account replacements?

    I mean 100 million shipped is one thing. But if there are only 30 million owners then thats not as impressive.
    Nope. Sony only counts units shipped.

    SyphonBlue on
    LxX6eco.jpg
    PSN/Steam/NNID: SyphonBlue | BNet: SyphonBlue#1126
  • LunkerLunker Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Can you change the thread title to

    '...backwards compatibility supports fewer games' please. It's bugging me.
    Thank you. My temples were throbbing as I read the title. :razz:
    I also fixed the "its / it's" in your quote.
    I mean, to me buying a PS3 would be for PS3 games, with the backwards compatibility being an asset. Would I be disappointed? Yeah, but returning it because of that? Bugger off. If PS2 games are the main reason why you buy a PS3, then yeah you are pretty retarded.
    I agree with your first sentence, but you have to admit that having the leverage of a great PS2 catalog is a fantastically huge asset. Why gimp that?

    Besides, there are plenty of people saying, "Hey, my PS2 busted. Maybe I'll just save up for a PS3 instead of buying a new PS2." And there are a shitload of people with aging PS2s. Just saying.

    Lunker on
    Tweet my Face: @heyitslunker | Save money at CheapAssGamer (not an affiliate link)
  • LewiePLewieP Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Lunker wrote: »
    Can you change the thread title to

    '...backwards compatibility supports fewer games' please. It's bugging me.
    Thank you. My temples were throbbing as I read the title. :razz:
    I also fixed the "its / it's" in your quote.
    I mean, to me buying a PS3 would be for PS3 games, with the backwards compatibility being an asset. Would I be disappointed? Yeah, but returning it because of that? Bugger off. If PS2 games are the main reason why you buy a PS3, then yeah you are pretty retarded.
    I agree with your first sentence, but you have to admit that having the leverage of a great PS2 catalog is a fantastically huge asset. Why gimp that?

    Besides, there are plenty of people saying, "Hey, my PS2 busted. Maybe I'll just save up for a PS3 instead of buying a new PS2." And there are a shitload of people with aging PS2s. Just saying.

    Exactly, A new PS2 costs, at best, £50.

    Xbox 360 + PS2 costs less that PS3. Much less than PS3 + PS2.

    LewieP on
  • LunkerLunker Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    LewieP wrote: »
    Lunker wrote: »
    Can you change the thread title to

    '...backwards compatibility supports fewer games' please. It's bugging me.
    Thank you. My temples were throbbing as I read the title. :razz:
    I also fixed the "its / it's" in your quote.
    I mean, to me buying a PS3 would be for PS3 games, with the backwards compatibility being an asset. Would I be disappointed? Yeah, but returning it because of that? Bugger off. If PS2 games are the main reason why you buy a PS3, then yeah you are pretty retarded.
    I agree with your first sentence, but you have to admit that having the leverage of a great PS2 catalog is a fantastically huge asset. Why gimp that?

    Besides, there are plenty of people saying, "Hey, my PS2 busted. Maybe I'll just save up for a PS3 instead of buying a new PS2." And there are a shitload of people with aging PS2s. Just saying.

    Exactly, A new PS2 costs, at best, £50.

    Xbox 360 + PS2 costs less that PS3. Much less than PS3 + PS2.
    It was the exact reasoning that led to me first owning a PS2; my PS1 had given up the ghost, and I had a choice between spending $70 (US) for a PSone or putting that toward a $250 preowned PS2. With my huge devotion to FF in that era, if the PS2 didn't have BC I probably would have just stuck with a PSone.

    Lunker on
    Tweet my Face: @heyitslunker | Save money at CheapAssGamer (not an affiliate link)
  • cloudeaglecloudeagle Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Let's not kid ourselves... BC for these machines is going to take a HEFTY hit. Otherwise Sony wouldn't have bothered to announce it.

    Actually, I have to give some kudos for the way Sony handled this... they owned up to what they're doing, they didn't spew bullshit like "we did this because it's what the gamers want," etc. It was honest. I like honesty.

    And, let's face it, Sony HAS TO cut the cost of the PS3 somewhere (again, losing upwards of $300 per console sold), and according to Sony execs, the cost of components isn't dropping as fast as they'd like. They can't keep up a $300 loss forever. So this move makes some business sense.

    ...but maybe not entirely. The PS2 handled BC near-flawlessly, which has given Sony a lot to live up to. Joe Average WILL expect the PS3 to be fully BC... after all, the PS2 was! And when that expensive machine isn't BC, some people (who either don't comprehend next-gen DVD playback or don't give a crap about it, which is a sizeable crowd) are going to feel ripped off.

    Really, this is just another way that, financially speaking, their Blu-ray gambit has painted Sony into a corner.

    cloudeagle on
    Switch: 3947-4890-9293
  • LunkerLunker Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    cloudeagle wrote: »
    And, let's face it, Sony HAS TO cut the cost of the PS3 somewhere (again, losing upwards of $300 per console sold), and according to Sony execs, the cost of components isn't dropping as fast as they'd like. They can't keep up a $300 loss forever. So this move makes some business sense.
    Kind of. It would have been great business sense had they done this from the start -- but to piss in European gamers' faces (and let's face it, European gamers already take plenty of shots to the eye) is rather bold. It's admitting that they need to cut costs by reducing features, but they're not passing that cost-savings to the customers.

    EDIT: On the plus side, this is one sure-fire way to ignite sales of first-gen PS3s!

    Lunker on
    Tweet my Face: @heyitslunker | Save money at CheapAssGamer (not an affiliate link)
  • LewiePLewieP Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    They should really make the 20gig one available in the UK, and give that one software emulation or even no BC compatibility whatsoever, then make the 60gig one have hardware emulation.

    That way consumers have a choice 1. save money by not getting BC they don't need, or 2. An additional bonus to the extra price premium they are paying.

    LewieP on
  • ArtoriaArtoria Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Sony is banking on the PS3 doing for Blu Ray what the PS2 did for DVD and I just don't see that happening this time around.

    you know I still regret buying the PS3 at launch due to the post launch slump (VF5 not withstaning) we are in now, but I don't think I regret it as much after reading that BC is going to be messed up in later models.

    Artoria on
  • cloudeaglecloudeagle Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    Lunker wrote: »
    cloudeagle wrote: »
    And, let's face it, Sony HAS TO cut the cost of the PS3 somewhere (again, losing upwards of $300 per console sold), and according to Sony execs, the cost of components isn't dropping as fast as they'd like. They can't keep up a $300 loss forever. So this move makes some business sense.
    Kind of. It would have been great business sense had they done this from the start -- but to piss in European gamers' faces (and let's face it, European gamers already take plenty of shots to the eye) is rather bold. It's admitting that they need to cut costs by reducing features, but they're not passing that cost-savings to the customers.

    EDIT: On the plus side, this is one sure-fire way to ignite sales of first-gen PS3s!

    Yeah, you're right, having the feature in for other countries and swiped away for Europe is a huge slap in the face, and could be interpreted as a dickish move. If Sony had known about all this, they should have just kept BC out from the beginning... then again, I'm guessing the execs/developers at Sony honestly didn't realize just how expensive the components would be (and, apparently, remain) when they created the PS3.

    cloudeagle on
    Switch: 3947-4890-9293
Sign In or Register to comment.