That was terrible. When did the Onion start letting people do serious Op-Eds with gastly wordplay as a patina f comedy over them?
Or am I missing something, and the very existence of the column is a meta-comment on whether or not Krugman's argument can possibly be serious?
It's the onion, odds are its a meta riff on Krugman, I doubt he had anything to do with it.
I've always wondered what the sound of a gun that shoots swords would be
"The only way to get rid of a temptation is to give into it." - Oscar Wilde
"We believe in the people and their 'wisdom' as if there was some special secret entrance to knowledge that barred to anyone who had ever learned anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche
I'm going to do a production of a Shakespeare play
and set it in the Elizabethean era
I know that Shakespeare plays are supposed to be set in a hippy commune, or during world war II, or modern times, or a surreal mishmash of different eras, but I think my idea is just crazy enough to work
That was terrible. When did the Onion start letting people do serious Op-Eds with gastly wordplay as a patina f comedy over them?
Or am I missing something, and the very existence of the column is a meta-comment on whether or not Krugman's argument can possibly be serious?
I'm going to do a production of a Shakespeare play
and set it in the Elizabethean era
I know that Shakespeare plays are supposed to be set in a hippy commune, or during world war II, or modern times, or a surreal mishmash of different eras, but I think my idea is just crazy enough to work
Why is Titus Andronicus considered Shakespeare's worst play when it is clearly awesome? Are Shakespeare lovers prissy prudes who can't handle too much ultraviolence? Is the movie just so awesome that it hides the plays terribleness? Am I uncultured swine who doesn't understand shakespeare at all?
I WILL GRIND YOUR BONES TO DUST
AND WITH THE BLOOD AND IT I WILL MAKE A PASTE
AND OF THE PASTE A COFFIN WILL I REAR
AND MAKE TWO PASTRIES OF YOUR SHAMEFUL HEADS
Now I am wondering if longswords or rapiers were the blade of choice when Shakespeare was writing.
England was kind of backwards ass in not adapting the rapier as fast as some other places.
He mentions longswords directly a few times in various plays. Then again, he was not known for being time-correct, what with the clocks in the Roman Empire and shiz. So maybe he was being retro.
Homogeneous distribution of your varieties of amuse-gueule
0
Options
Donkey KongPutting Nintendo out of business with AI nipsRegistered Userregular
Was Hamlet 2 any good/funny? I kinda wanted to see it, but never did.
It was the kind of funny where people who normally don't think things are funny slop praise all over it. It's ok, not great.
Thousands of hot, local singles are waiting to play at bubbulon.com.
0
Options
BobCescaIs a girlBirmingham, UKRegistered Userregular
One of the best Shakespeare adaptations I've ever seen was Ian McKellan and Judy Dench in Macbeth (directed by Trevor Nun). The set was completely minimalist and it was the performances that just really stood out (It was more or less a filmed version of the RSC's 1976 stage production).
Now I am wondering if longswords or rapiers were the blade of choice when Shakespeare was writing.
England was kind of backwards ass in not adapting the rapier as fast as some other places.
He mentions longswords directly a few times in various plays. Then again, he was not known for being time-correct, what with the clocks in the Roman Empire and shiz. So maybe he was being retro.
Well the trick is that during the time like, they didn't call a rapier a rapier, they called it a sword, because it was the type of sword people were wearing at the time. And the rapier is a long sword... so...who knows! I'm sure someone does but that sounds like a lot of googling.
Why is Titus Andronicus considered Shakespeare's worst play when it is clearly awesome? Are Shakespeare lovers prissy prudes who can't handle too much ultraviolence? Is the movie just so awesome that it hides the plays terribleness? Am I uncultured swine who doesn't understand shakespeare at all?
I WILL GRIND YOUR BONES TO DUST
AND WITH THE BLOOD AND IT I WILL MAKE A PASTE
AND OF THE PASTE A COFFIN WILL I REAR
AND MAKE TWO PASTRIES OF YOUR SHAMEFUL HEADS
coffin means pie
To be fair, until today I just thought Titus Andronicus was a band.
Now I am wondering if longswords or rapiers were the blade of choice when Shakespeare was writing.
England was kind of backwards ass in not adapting the rapier as fast as some other places.
He mentions longswords directly a few times in various plays. Then again, he was not known for being time-correct, what with the clocks in the Roman Empire and shiz. So maybe he was being retro.
Well the trick is that during the time like, they didn't call a rapier a rapier, they called it a sword, because it was the type of sword people were wearing at the time. And the rapier is a long sword... so...who knows! I'm sure someone does but that sounds like a lot of googling.
Edit: Abd: Yes.
Look, all I know is that when Capulet is in his helicopter, he calls for his longsword. He also calls his wife a ho' though, so perhaps we shouldn't listen too closely to what he says.
Homogeneous distribution of your varieties of amuse-gueule
Now I am wondering if longswords or rapiers were the blade of choice when Shakespeare was writing.
England was kind of backwards ass in not adapting the rapier as fast as some other places.
He mentions longswords directly a few times in various plays. Then again, he was not known for being time-correct, what with the clocks in the Roman Empire and shiz. So maybe he was being retro.
Well the trick is that during the time like, they didn't call a rapier a rapier, they called it a sword, because it was the type of sword people were wearing at the time. And the rapier is a long sword... so...who knows! I'm sure someone does but that sounds like a lot of googling.
Edit: Abd: Yes.
Look, all I know is that when Capulet is in his helicopter, he calls for his longsword. He also calls his wife a ho' though, so perhaps we shouldn't listen too closely to what he says.
Posts
I can't tell if this is a serious question. When would I go to the Stratford festival I'm poor and surround myself with the uncultured.
It's the onion, odds are its a meta riff on Krugman, I doubt he had anything to do with it.
you kiddin me
"We believe in the people and their 'wisdom' as if there was some special secret entrance to knowledge that barred to anyone who had ever learned anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche
I'm going to do a production of a Shakespeare play
and set it in the Elizabethean era
I know that Shakespeare plays are supposed to be set in a hippy commune, or during world war II, or modern times, or a surreal mishmash of different eras, but I think my idea is just crazy enough to work
"In the long run we are undead" is an acceptable economics joke.
it's from a recent episode so uh... i guess don't watch it if you want to see it unsullied?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZnLu43kztU
The Merchant of Venice in prehistoric Italy.
yes. deal with it.
boomsnikt!
My thumb, sir? No, sir. Your very mother did happen to bite her thumb at my behest just last night, though.
Phantom has Affliction, I just haven't used it yet.
dennis being classic dennis
England was kind of backwards ass in not adapting the rapier as fast as some other places.
twitch.tv/tehsloth
this is the way, step inside
this is the way, step inside
this is the way, step iiinsiiiiiide
more plays than the plays where people dress up in costumes
I WILL GRIND YOUR BONES TO DUST
AND WITH THE BLOOD AND IT I WILL MAKE A PASTE
AND OF THE PASTE A COFFIN WILL I REAR
AND MAKE TWO PASTRIES OF YOUR SHAMEFUL HEADS
coffin means pie
He mentions longswords directly a few times in various plays. Then again, he was not known for being time-correct, what with the clocks in the Roman Empire and shiz. So maybe he was being retro.
It was the kind of funny where people who normally don't think things are funny slop praise all over it. It's ok, not great.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUOoDUUlA34
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVs7XrTv1YM&
Well the trick is that during the time like, they didn't call a rapier a rapier, they called it a sword, because it was the type of sword people were wearing at the time. And the rapier is a long sword... so...who knows! I'm sure someone does but that sounds like a lot of googling.
Edit: Abd: Yes.
Wasn't the names of swords pretty different when they were used by people and not just historians
To be fair, until today I just thought Titus Andronicus was a band.
twitch.tv/tehsloth
Reach and speed. While the longswords tended to be the same length, lunging doesn't work nearly as well.
ahem, whoops
My first thought was, "Wow, he is old."
I did not stop to consider whether or not they had filming equipment in the 16th century.
I don't know. There is precedent. I mean, look at Sean Connery.