The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Mississippi voters deny nullification of Roe v. Wade, drinks all around

1356723

Posts

  • ScooterScooter Registered User regular
    There's also the other side, which is that right now most liberals aren't worked up about it because they feel they have all the birth control they need. If that was taken away, not only would the GOP not have something to rile its base up about, but the Dems would gain it.

  • BigBadWolfBigBadWolf Grandma's HouseRegistered User regular
    So if embryos now count as people from the moment of fertilization - can I use my right as a parent to claim the remaining embryo's from IVF and claim them as dependents on my tax return?

  • ScooterScooter Registered User regular
    I really would love to see an IVF facility take in a cooler full of frozen eggs to the state house and ask what they should do with the thousands of Mississippi citizens they've got locked in this box.

  • ronzoronzo Registered User regular
    edited November 2011
    ronzo wrote:
    Exactly. It's a dog whistle for their base, possibly the most effective one they have. The only problem is that they have been using it long enough now that some of that base has managed to get power and cannot be turned away from the goal. And this is compounded by the fact that over the last few years they have been using tactics like this more and more to cover up their other failings

    See: abortion amendments to the ACA, the whole planned parenthood mess

    I think it's probably a little stronger than just a dog-whistle. If you have congressmen willing to break decorum and scream "Baby killer!" at the sitting president, there's obviously some strong traction within the movement.

    That's basically what I meant too.

    They've been using abortion as a way to herd their base towards certain candidates/goals, but now that same base is stampeding out of control and there really isn't a way to stop them.

    One way or another, abortion protections will be made stronger. If we had a less conservative SCOTUS, this probably would have already happened as people challenged other shitty laws in the bible belt states. This, however, is just too blunt of a circumvention to let go.

    edit:
    Scooter wrote:
    There's also the other side, which is that right now most liberals aren't worked up about it because they feel they have all the birth control they need. If that was taken away, not only would the GOP not have something to rile its base up about, but the Dems would gain it.

    Progressive are worked up about all of the shitty things happening with abortion/birth control. They are just terrified of acting because they don't want the Supreme court to make things worse (by doing something like overturning RvW without having a better abortion protection). Right now, waiting things out until we get a more progressive court is usually regarded as the best move. Though even this is starting to become difficult, as the same prolife base that goes after abortion is now going after anything remotely sexually progressive; see the Wisconsin thread for how they are going back to abstinence only education after just passing a much more progressive sex-ed law last year.

    ronzo on
  • KalTorakKalTorak One way or another, they all end up in the Undercity.Registered User regular
    Scooter wrote:
    I really would love to see an IVF facility take in a cooler full of frozen eggs to the state house and ask what they should do with the thousands of Mississippi citizens they've got locked in this box.

    Just throw some bootstraps into the cooler. You're on your own, kids.

  • taoist drunktaoist drunk Registered User regular
    This whole thing is going to make for some really juicy episodes of Law & Order: SVU.

  • KanaKana Registered User regular
    KalTorak wrote:
    Scooter wrote:
    I really would love to see an IVF facility take in a cooler full of frozen eggs to the state house and ask what they should do with the thousands of Mississippi citizens they've got locked in this box.

    Just throw some bootstraps into the cooler. You're on your own, kids.

    Gerrymandering on an epic scale.

    Plus every sperm counts as 1/2 of a person. Mississippi gains 100 new congressmen in the next census.

    A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    Kana wrote:
    KalTorak wrote:
    Scooter wrote:
    I really would love to see an IVF facility take in a cooler full of frozen eggs to the state house and ask what they should do with the thousands of Mississippi citizens they've got locked in this box.

    Just throw some bootstraps into the cooler. You're on your own, kids.

    Gerrymandering on an epic scale.

    Plus every sperm counts as 1/2 of a person. Mississippi gains 100 new congressmen in the next census.

    I'd like to see the faces of the people behind this whole thing when this gets explained to them. All the implications that legal personhood has, that is. What happens in a miscarriage? Involuntary manslaughter?

    Word of law is a bitch!

  • Magus`Magus` The fun has been DOUBLED! Registered User regular
    If we're counting sperm as people now, I want my own district.

  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    Magus` wrote:
    If we're counting sperm as people now, I want my own district.

    I'm a horrible tyrant that has executed millions of people. On a day to day basis.

  • Magus`Magus` The fun has been DOUBLED! Registered User regular
    Hell, we've all made cannibals of several women (or men!) at this point.

    War criminals, really.

  • JarsJars Registered User regular
    peter north's filmography to be reclassified as snuf films

  • KalTorakKalTorak One way or another, they all end up in the Undercity.Registered User regular
    Pregnant women get two votes!

  • Magus`Magus` The fun has been DOUBLED! Registered User regular
    KalTorak wrote:
    Pregnant women get two votes!

    Whoa now, pregnant women sometimes vote Democrat!

  • KanaKana Registered User regular
    Magus` wrote:
    KalTorak wrote:
    Pregnant women get two votes!

    Whoa now, pregnant women sometimes vote Democrat!

    Crap, this was a HORRIBLE plan!

    A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    Kana wrote:
    Magus` wrote:
    KalTorak wrote:
    Pregnant women get two votes!

    Whoa now, pregnant women sometimes vote Democrat!

    Crap, this was a HORRIBLE plan!

    No no, you have to be 18 years old to vote. It's all good.

  • Magus`Magus` The fun has been DOUBLED! Registered User regular
    Technically speaking isn't it the girls in the south who get pregnant prior to 18? ;p

  • KanaKana Registered User regular
    Magus` wrote:
    Technically speaking isn't it the girls in the south who get pregnant prior to 18? ;p

    Good point.

    Plan's back on boys!

    A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
  • Magus`Magus` The fun has been DOUBLED! Registered User regular
    Well, I think you've got it backwards. The teenage mom's can't vote, while the the 'adult' ones can, and those adult ones might be more likely to vote Democrat!

    IT'S ALL COLLAPSING.

  • BagginsesBagginses __BANNED USERS regular
    The best result would be a ruling of "personhood doesn't matter, still her body."

  • Mom2KatMom2Kat Registered User regular
    As someone who just recently had to make the decision on when to say goodbye to our son this is absolutley abbhorent. While my life was not in danger, our son had no chance for a meaningful life. We had to make the descision at 23 weeks pregnant. I just wonder what the hell these lawmakers think they are doing? Are they going to up funding to healthcare for the children who will be born who will need massive care and probably not make it like my son? Or are they just going to say fuck you should have keep your legs shut.

    I am so glad that in this country at least it is still my decision on what I do with my body.

    So bloody pissed right now.

  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    Mom2Kat wrote:
    As someone who just recently had to make the decision on when to say goodbye to our son this is absolutley abbhorent. While my life was not in danger, our son had no chance for a meaningful life. We had to make the descision at 23 weeks pregnant. I just wonder what the hell these lawmakers think they are doing? Are they going to up funding to healthcare for the children who will be born who will need massive care and probably not make it like my son? Or are they just going to say fuck you should have keep your legs shut.

    I am so glad that in this country at least it is still my decision on what I do with my body.

    So bloody pissed right now.

    They don't give two shits about mothers or children, or abortion for that matter. They care about riling their base up and increasing favorable voter turnout - that is all.

  • enlightenedbumenlightenedbum Registered User regular
    Mom2Kat wrote:
    As someone who just recently had to make the decision on when to say goodbye to our son this is absolutley abbhorent. While my life was not in danger, our son had no chance for a meaningful life. We had to make the descision at 23 weeks pregnant. I just wonder what the hell these lawmakers think they are doing? Are they going to up funding to healthcare for the children who will be born who will need massive care and probably not make it like my son? Or are they just going to say fuck you should have keep your legs shut.

    I am so glad that in this country at least it is still my decision on what I do with my body.

    So bloody pissed right now.

    They don't give two shits about mothers or children, or abortion for that matter. They care about riling their base up and increasing favorable voter turnout - that is all.

    They care quite a lot about shaming women from having sex.

    The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
  • DarkPrimusDarkPrimus Registered User regular
    Every Embryo Is A Life

    (But After They're Born Fuck 'Em)

  • Magus`Magus` The fun has been DOUBLED! Registered User regular
    Mom2Kat wrote:
    As someone who just recently had to make the decision on when to say goodbye to our son this is absolutley abbhorent. While my life was not in danger, our son had no chance for a meaningful life. We had to make the descision at 23 weeks pregnant. I just wonder what the hell these lawmakers think they are doing? Are they going to up funding to healthcare for the children who will be born who will need massive care and probably not make it like my son? Or are they just going to say fuck you should have keep your legs shut.

    I am so glad that in this country at least it is still my decision on what I do with my body.

    So bloody pissed right now.

    I'm sorry for your loss. It's best not to give too much thought into the GOP's thoughts on abortion as nothing positive can come of it. As people have said, the GOP's current platform is abortion is murder and welfare for children of poor parents (and especially single moms) is the lesser known 8th Deadly Sin.

    On the plus side America is slowly moving towards a more secular and liberal society. It will be awhile, sadly, but progress is good.

  • Gigazombie CybermageGigazombie Cybermage Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    I actually don't think so Magus. I think we're moving backwards. Our politics are getting more and more conservative, and just look at what's happened to the states. It'll take YEARS to undo the mess conservatives have made there, if we ever do. At the very least we're stagnating. It'll get worse when the conservatives take back the Senate, and if Obama gets voted out they'll be no checks to their power whatsovever. They'll control the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, and I think they'll control enough of the country to pass consitutional amendments at will.

  • KistraKistra Registered User regular
    The best part is the name of the movement that is supporting these amendments across the country:
    http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/2589017101.html

    Yup, "conceived in rape" - classy.

    One thing that hasn't been mentioned in the discussion so far is that every woman with a 28ish day cycle will spend about half of the time not being able to prove that she isn't carrying a new mississippi citizen. And personhood for the fertilized egg will start about 5 days before the pregnancy starts. As pregnancy tests and ultrasounds have gotten more sensitive, scientists have found that there are a large number of fertilized eggs that never implant and just come out with a woman's period. How will the new law take these deaths into account if noone ever knew that the person existed? Will they provide pregnancy tests to every woman in the state to take every week? Collect all used pads and tampons to test for the presence of eggs?

    Animal Crossing: City Folk Lissa in Filmore 3179-9580-0076
  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    edited November 2011
    That's unbearably awful.

    "Hey guys, if it wasn't for religious guilt and shame, my mother would have never carried me to term. And look how great I turned out! So remember: get raped, get pregnant, deal with it."


    Forgetting the 10 other ways that this is just unfathomably stupid and selfish, it wholly misses the point. No one has ever argued that a child born from rape isn't still a child. That's pretty much NEVER been an argument. I wonder how her mother feels about the issue, knowing that not only is her daughter the product of a brutal violation of her person and liberty, and that in her daughter's face she sees her attacker every day for the rest of her life, but also the irreparable damage to whatever life she was planning on having before her unplanned pregnancy. What if she was engaged or married when she was raped? Is it now also her husband's responsibility to raise that child? If there's a divorce, does he have to pay child support?


    To hell with these goddamn awful people. Arguing that rape pregnancies are cool because all babies are awesome is like telling someone that getting terminal cancer is cool because now they get to be part of a test group for treatments.

    Atomika on
  • Skoal CatSkoal Cat Registered User regular
    They also get to go to heaven sooner!

  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    Really, this whole argument shows that Evangelicals really need purgatory.

    If fertilized eggs are people, with souls, then aren't we doing them a favor by killing them before they can sin?

    Oh shit, I don't know if they have original sin or not. Hmm......alright, abortions are right out but if we "Baptize" them in the womb what are the chances they survive?

    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • EmegaMart20EmegaMart20 Registered User new member
    So It Goes wrote:
    They're doing it on purpose to try to force the SCOTUS to hear an abortion case and then magically overturn Roe v Wade.
    I agree with you and its not good.

  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    Skoal Cat wrote:
    They also get to go to heaven sooner!

    "It just reminds me of the horrible day that Maude was called up to her glorious reward." - Ned Flanders

  • This content has been removed.

  • DerrickDerrick Registered User regular
    So It Goes wrote:
    They're doing it on purpose to try to force the SCOTUS to hear an abortion case and then magically overturn Roe v Wade.
    I agree with you and its not good.

    With the current SCOTUS, that's not a bad plan. It's really all about who's throwing the conservative 5 money this month.

    Steam and CFN: Enexemander
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    Eh. The conservatives on the court are all pretty much True Believers. I don't think you have to buy them despite Thomas's stupidity.

    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • chrisnlchrisnl Registered User regular
    This will be interesting. Assuming they do amend their state Constitution, will SCOTUS side with Federal Primacy or Social Conservatism? The only upside to them actually overturning Roe v. Wade would be reading the dissent, probably written by Ginsburg I would guess?

    steam_sig.png
  • Kipling217Kipling217 Registered User regular
    This personhood amendment goes far beyond what most Pro-lifers are willing to go. No abortion for rape victims? No abortion exception for the mothers health? No BC apart from condoms?

    That is going to make a lot of pro-lifers choke if it comes down to it. I think a lot of them are only backing this in order to get a more moderate pro-life law enacted in the end. Lose the personhood part, but keep the anti-abortion part.

    The sky was full of stars, every star an exploding ship. One of ours.
  • enlightenedbumenlightenedbum Registered User regular
    edited November 2011
    Kipling217 wrote:
    This personhood amendment goes far beyond what most Pro-lifers are willing to go. No abortion for rape victims? No abortion exception for the mothers health? No BC apart from condoms?

    That is going to make a lot of pro-lifers choke if it comes down to it. I think a lot of them are only backing this in order to get a more moderate pro-life law enacted in the end. Lose the personhood part, but keep the anti-abortion part.

    Nope, that's pretty much the end goal of the fundies.

    Always remember, abortion is NOT about abortion. It's about women having sex.

    enlightenedbum on
    The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
  • DerrickDerrick Registered User regular
    Eh. The conservatives on the court are all pretty much True Believers. I don't think you have to buy them despite Thomas's stupidity.

    Scalia is not a true believer, and neither is Thomas. They are both bought men, 100%. You can make a case for other three (I suppose).

    Steam and CFN: Enexemander
  • Kipling217Kipling217 Registered User regular
    Kipling217 wrote:
    This personhood amendment goes far beyond what most Pro-lifers are willing to go. No abortion for rape victims? No abortion exception for the mothers health? No BC apart from condoms?

    That is going to make a lot of pro-lifers choke if it comes down to it. I think a lot of them are only backing this in order to get a more moderate pro-life law enacted in the end. Lose the personhood part, but keep the anti-abortion part.

    Nope, that's pretty much the end goal of the fundies.

    Always remember, abortion is NOT about abortion. It's about women having sex.

    The Leaders and people who stand in front of clinics yeah. The average pro-lifer in the street? Not so fanatical.

    True Believers are always more fanatical then the fairweather crowd.

    The sky was full of stars, every star an exploding ship. One of ours.
Sign In or Register to comment.